Just been listening to DBS's interview with John Kaminski. I ground to a halt after about 30 mins and no part 2 was available!!!! :evil: GRRRR
That should read: IT ground to a halt :oops:
i was thinking, maybe another interview gone bad!
Quote from: "thirdeyewise"i was thinking, maybe another interview gone bad!
I don't know. But, I was enjoying that talk and was disappointed. I keep going back hoping it will eventually appear.
It became very apparent that Kaminski was spreading severe dis-information when he began saying outrightly that there were no planes that hit the towers; I really think that Kaminski's credibility will be completely destroyed if he goes down this road, because he certainly does not believe that planes hit the towers.
It was extremely odd how the second part was never posted, but it really sounded to me like Daryl could sense the bullshit and may not have felt comfortable about letting the rest be heard. Daryl, why don't you either post it or tell us what happened?
LINDSEY
Quote from: "Father Brown"I don't know. But, I was enjoying that talk and was disappointed. I keep going back hoping it will eventually appear.
Me too... It was going great.
As for those that claim no plane(s), do they say that just the second hit was missing an aircraft?
Another falling out? LOL. I mention the shows content here: http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=7644&p=29316#p29316
I want transperancy, post part 2!
Quote from: "thirdeyewise"I want transperancy, post part 2!
Me, too!
What say thee, Melvin?
I just wish to point out that having an opinion about particular elements of various crimes that have been covered up does not necessarily make one a disinfo agent. I've watched the "no planes" videos too and I have to admit that the television coverage does appear to be highly suspicious. Having said that however, one always needs to be cautious about what anyone attempts to "prove" using a computer. There are great "artists" out there who can do anything with a computer and make it look very convincing. The "no planes" videos do seem to leave out the many instances of the second plane which was captured on tape from the west side of the north tower. In any event, I wouldn't call Kaminski a disinfo agent because he takes the position he does vis a vis the planes. He still says it was done by the jews. If he said it was done by Usama ( :lol: ) then we'd know he was a disinfo agent. He doesn't. As always, we keep our eyes and ears wide open and we use our own best judgment about things. For the moment (i.e. provisionally) Kaminski's writing, which is among the best by the way, makes me believe he's fighting on the side of the good guys. He doesn't have to agree with me on every particular in order to be placed in that camp.
Quote from: "kolnidre"Quote from: "thirdeyewise"I want transperancy, post part 2!
Me, too!
What say thee, Melvin?
Melvin........................too funny!!!!
kudos to father brown for the melvin capture, LOL!
seriously though, what happened in part 2 of the audio.
Tomas O; I agree. If kaminski had said that Osama or Cheney were the masteminds of 9/11, I might have had severe problems, however, he expressed an opinion that there might have been no plains (which I don't agree with) but he did agree that Israel was behind 9/11.Perhaps he is trying to link "no plainers" with Zionist "conspiracy theorists", maybe Daryl is right, who knows.
Sorry, the last sentence was an afterthought,tho' well worth thinking about though I say so myself.
However, I do think DBS should either explain what happened, or else post part II.