"UK infrastructure faces cyber threat" / Vince Cable

[Helphand]

1) "Iain Lobban" - is he a Jew? If so why is he in charge of GCHQ?  Even a Hof Jude's primary national allegiance is to Israel and the tribe, not to the countries he infiltrates. If he isn't Jewish, the remainder applies nonetheless.

2) He's exaggerating to maintain funding and extract more from the beleagured UK taxpayer: "he did not want to go into detail about the threat". WTF. Bullshitter.

3) He's a fear mongering apparatchik.

4) Now we're getting warmer: "Intellectual property theft". Must be a bum chum of Mandy Mandelson, who hangs out with Rothschild and the rest of the Judeo-Bolshevik criminal network. Film moguls, media queers, BBC employees, record producers... lots of nodes on the international criminal network there.

5) "20,000 "malicious" e-mails on government networks" -  probably just a small sample of the torrent of communications from rightfully enraged UK citizens complaining about UK secret "Government" anti-white, anti-indigenous and naturalised foreigners and the constant push by the Government Jews and their bought and paid for puppet MPs  for unending "migration". The UK may have been invaded a few times 1,000+ years ago but that was then and this is now: we are supposed to be living in a democracy, Government Jews, where the majority determine what their culture is and they have every right to defend that culture against the one-worldism of the Government Jew.

6) Another marker: "It needs to maintain the integrity of its financial and commercial services" - this tells you that Lobban is interested in  protecting the money industry of the UK beyond all else even though Channel 4 TV's program showed banks paid far less tax than even the attenuated UK manufacturing sector and yet are bailed out under compulsion of law by the UK taxpayer. This is a modern day realisation of H.S. Spencer's Shylocracy or Democracy (1919).

You cannot believe a word that comes out of the mouths of UK Government officials, MPs, House of Lords peers or officials like Lobban in the uncountable quangos that litter the political and administrative landscape.

And while I'm here, let me mention Vince Cable of the Lib-Dem side of the Hegelian Dialectic that is the present coalition Government.
Despite there being an acknowledged 2.5million out of work and some 10million economically inactive he resisted the introduction of even a nominal limit on immigration numbers and made some hyperbolic noises about how even those limitations would do the UK material economic harm, result in major business leaving the country, blah blah. While the UK is in the EU/EEC any chance of limiting numbers, particularly unskilled from third world countries arriving via their former colonial masters like Portugal, is impossible. But even in the present weighted environment where the locals subsidise big business and are sidelined economically he rails against cosmetic limits. Pushing the case to that degree is not politics, it's the compulsion of a tribal mission.

Vince Cable is not ostensibly a Jew, but spiritually he is a globalist and one-worlder. And I will go further: I think he is a crypto or nuevo Crisitano. He's married to a woman of Indian origins (Goa) he met while working on some government "work" beano in Africa. Marriage in a Roman Catholic ceremony. Her maiden name: Rebello. Rebello/Rivero and variants = Portuguese and Spanish marrano Jew names. And his surname, Cable, whilst not determinative, is plausibly Jewish; from a  pamphlet of the 1930s: "Sir L.C.W. Alexander, Bart., married the daughter of the Jewish Baron Cable".  Facially and in body proportion terms he is more than potential.
 
What does this matter? Well very plainly, it signifies that Cable and other of his ilk owe their allegiances to some third party, some power other than that to which they are ostensibly responsible and by which these wreckers are paid.

Last word: the coalition is pushing the policy of austerity (for us, not for them and their money masters); reduced government spending, but unlimited bailouts (and bonuses) for the banks. Not a sniff of any reform of the money system and the elimination of sterling debt money. They bailed out the banks in 2008 by printing money at our expense; they'd done the same in August 1914 when the Treasury issued Bradbury Notes; but print money and spend it into circulation for infrastructure projects, manufacturing and industry to meet our domestic needs with surplus for export without the ludicrous fraud-farce of borrowing it at interest? Not likely!


By their fruits ye shall know them.

These whores have sold their souls and betrayed a sacred trust. Universe WILL re-establish equilibrium. Compensation in Universe's balance will be merciless; the slow sucking of the last breath from their twisted dancing corpses as they dangle in the breeze from the lampposts lining Whitehall.

In the seventeenth century England suffered a revolution - in reality, an attack from without by bribed actors within the State - now, perhaps, arriving sooner than contemplated, is the true Restoration.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11528371


UK infrastructure faces cyber threat, says GCHQ chief

GCHQ is mostly associated with electronic intelligence-gathering The UK's critical infrastructure - such as power grids and emergency services - faces a "real and credible" threat of cyber attack, the head of GCHQ says.

The intelligence agency's director Iain Lobban said the country's future economic prosperity rested on ensuring a defence against such assaults.

The internet created opportunities for hostile states and criminals, he said.

For example, 1,000 malicious e-mails a month are already being targeted at government computer networks, he said.

Speaking to the International Institute for Strategic Studies, Mr Lobban said he did not want to go into detail about the threat to the UK's "critical national infrastructure".

But he said the threat posed by terrorists, organised criminals and hostile foreign governments was "real and credible" and he demanded a swifter response to match the speed with which "cyber events" happened.

Quote
Cyberspace is contested every day, every hour, every minute, every second"
Unquote
Iain Lobban
 
GCHQ
 Critical national infrastructure also includes sectors such as financial services, government, mass communication, health, transport, and food and water - all of which are deemed necessary for delivering services upon which daily life in the UK depends.


With both the Strategic Defence and Security Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review due to be published next week, Mr Lobban said ministers would be looking at what capabilities the UK needs to develop further.

"Clearly they will also be deciding how they trade off against other spending priorities."

He added: "Just because I, as a national security official, am giving a speech about cyber, I don't want you to take away the impression that it is solely a national security or defence issue. It goes to the heart of our economic well-being and national interest."

Intellectual property theft
 
While GCHQ is more usually associated with electronic intelligence-gathering, Mr Lobban stressed that it also had a security role, referred to as "information assurance".

He said that they had already seen "significant disruption" to government computer systems caused by internet "worms" - both those that had been deliberately targeted and others picked up accidentally.

Each month there were more than 20,000 "malicious" e-mails on government networks, of which 1,000 were deliberately targeted at them, while intellectual property theft was taking place on a "massive scale" - some relating to national security.

And there was a "big challenge" with the government wanting to get more and more services online, he said.

"Cyberspace lowers the bar for entry to the espionage game, both for states and for criminal actors," he said.

"Cyberspace is contested every day, every hour, every minute, every second. I can vouch for that from the displays in our own operations centre of minute-by-minute cyber attempts to penetrate systems around the world."

While 80% of the threat to government systems could be dealt with through good information assurance practice - such as keeping security "patches" up to date - the remaining 20% was more complex and could not simply be solved by building "higher and higher" security walls.

Export expertise?
 
Although cyberspace presented a potential security threat to the UK, Mr Lobban said that it also offered an opportunity if the UK could get its defences right.

"Fundamentally, getting cyber right enables the UK's continuing economic prosperity.

"There's a clear defensive angle. In order to flourish, a knowledge economy needs to protect from exploitation the intellectual property at the heart of the creative and high-tech industry sectors. It needs to maintain the integrity of its financial and commercial services."

But he added that the implications were wider than that.

"There is an opportunity which we can seize if government and the telecommunications sector, hardware and software vendors, and managed service providers can come together.

"It's an opportunity to develop a holistic approach to cyber security that makes UK networks intrinsically resilient in the face of cyber threats.

"That will lead to a competitive advantage for the UK. We can give enterprises the confidence that by basing themselves here they gain the advantages of access to a modern internet infrastructure while reducing their risks."

He said developing such expertise would also open up potential export opportunities, with the global market for cyber security products "growing faster than much of the rest of the global economy".

[Anonymous]

For example, 1,000 malicious e-mails a month are already being targeted at government computer networks, he said.

my old gmail account probably gets about that.

[Helphand]

LOL!

I see the BeeBeeCee are pumping the same spew again today:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11562969