Scum of the universe

[Anonymous]

Gun + aim + pull trigger = Better world

Sorry, but this story pissed me right the fuck off the charts!

- - - - - -

Ninth Circuit Jew Judge Alex Kozinski Posts Porno Pics Portraying Cow Women and Farm Animals On His Website

Zionist Wikipedia describes the Jew judge Alex Kozinski as someone born in "Bucharest, Romania, but his parents, both Holocaust survivors, brought him to America in 1962 when he was 12. They settled in Los Feliz, Los Angeles and his father, Moses, ran a small grocery store there." And you wondered why the 9th Circuit court was so radical and so Talmudically inclined in its opinions on homosexuality, sodomy, abortion, traditional values, etc. This fat Jew bastard is one big disgusting reason. And now Kozinski, apparently an aficionado of hard-core porn and beastialty himself, now sits in judgment as one of his own Self-Chosen brethren, Jewish scat pornographer Ira Isaacs is brought before the court. Isn't it nice to know that we live in a Jew, Jew world? Weimar, anyone?

-the West

Alex Kozinski, who is presiding over an obscenity trial (of Jewish pornographer who created scatological and beastialty porn) in L.A., admits he posted sexually explicit photos and videos. He says he didn't think the public could see the site, which is now blocked.

By Scott Glover, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
3:54 PM PDT, June 11, 2008

One of the highest-ranking federal judges in the United States, who is currently presiding over an obscenity trial in Los Angeles, has maintained his own publicly accessible website featuring sexually explicit photos and videos.

Alex Kozinski, chief judge of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, acknowledged in an interview with The Times that he had posted the materials, which included a photo of naked women on all fours painted to look like cows and a video of a half-dressed man cavorting with a sexually aroused farm animal. Some of the material was inappropriate, he conceded, although he defended other sexually explicit content as "funny."

Kozinski, 57, said that he thought the site was for his private storage and that he was not aware the images could be seen by the public, although he also said he had shared some material on the site with friends. After the interview Tuesday evening, he blocked public access to the site.

After details about the website were published on latimes.com this morning, the judge offered to entertain motions to recuse himself from the obscenity trial of Hollywood filmmaker Ira Isaacs, who is accused of distributing criminally obscene sexual fetish videos depicting bestiality and defecation.

Prosecutors said they were conferring with supervisors within the Department of Justice about how to proceed. In the meantime, they wanted jurors to be admonished to disregard publicity in the case. Defense attorney Roger Diamond made no objection to Kozinski continuing to hear the case, which began with opening statements this morning.

This afternoon jurors were taken to the appeals court's offices in Pasadena to view three videos at issue in Issacs' trial.

Stephen Gillers, a New York University law professor who specializes in legal ethics, told The Times that Kozinski should recuse himself from the Isaacs case because "the public can reasonably question his objectivity" concerning the issues at hand.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me ... 0192.story

LA obscenity case nauseates some potential jurors


Pictured above: Ira Isaacs

What can one say to this AP article except what Curt Maynard would intone? Yes, "It's the Jews, stupid!" Read this article and then the one below it called "Jews and Scatology" and start figuring out the grotesque and wretched nature of the Jewish character. It's a mix of mammon (money) and depravity/sickness/disease. Wake up! The international Jew is literally the cancer of all humankind.

-the West


By LINDA DEUTSCH
The Associated Press
Tuesday, June 10, 2008; 9:46 PM

LOS ANGELES -- What violates community obscenity standards in the nation's reputed pornography capital? Federal prosecutors think they have a case.

Ira Isaacs readily admits he produced and sold movies depicting bestiality and sexual activity involving feces and urine. The judge warned potential jurors that the hours of fetish videos included violence against women, and many of them said they don't want to serve because watching would make them sick to their stomachs.

"It's the most extreme material that's ever been put on trial. I don't know of anything more disgusting," said Roger Jon Diamond _ Isaacs' own defense attorney.

The case is the most visible effort of a new federal task force designed to crack down on smut in America. Isaacs, however, says his work is an extreme but constitutionally protected form of art.

"There's no question the stuff is disgusting," said Diamond, who has spent much of his career representing pornographers. "The question is should we throw people in jail for it?"

Isaacs, 57, a Los Angeles advertising agency owner who says he used to market fine art in commercial projects, calls himself a "shock artist" and says he went into distributing and producing films about fetishes because "I wanted to do something extreme."

"I'm fighting for art," he said in an interview before his federal trial got under way. "Art is on trial."

He plans to testify as his own expert witness and said he will cite the historic battles over obscenity involving authors James Joyce and D.H. Lawrence.

One of his exhibits, he said, will be a picture of famed artist Marcel Duchamp's "Fountain," a porcelain urinal signed by the artist in 1917.

Diamond said Isaacs also will tell jurors the works have therapeutic value for people with the same fetishes depicted on screen.

"They don't feel so isolated," Diamond said. "They have fetishes that other people have."

Isaacs makes a brief appearance in one of the videos he produced; others that he distributed were imported from other countries.

The business has been lucrative. At one point, he has said, he was selling 1,000 videos a month at $30 apiece. Then his office was raided by FBI agents who bought his videos online with undercover credit cards.

The government obtained an indictment against Isaacs on a variety of obscenity charges, including importation or transportation of obscene material for sale. Prosecutors have declined to comment about the case.

Jean Rosenbluth, a former federal prosecutor and law professor at University of Southern California, said such prosecutions were rare until the creation of the U.S. Department of Justice Obscenity Prosecution Task Force. Child pornography cases are handled by a separate unit.

"The problem with obscenity is no one really knows what it is," she said. "It's relatively simple to paint something as an artistic effort even if it's offensive."

The test of obscenity still hinges on a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court ruling which held that a work is not legally obscene if it has "literary, artistic, political or scientific value."

Jurors also are asked to determine whether the material in question violates standards of what is acceptable to the community at large.

"This task force was quite controversial and many in the Department of Justice felt that it was a waste of resources," Rosenbluth said. "Because of the pressure, they seem to have chosen the worst cases they can find to prosecute."

Each of the four counts against Isaacs carries a five-year maximum prison sentence. Prosecutors also are seeking forfeiture of assets obtained through his video sales. Two of the original six counts were dropped.

"A lot of this is about sending a message _ `Don't make this stuff. Don't put it on the Internet. We don't want it here,'" Rosenbluth said.

Rosenbluth said prosecutors would be emboldened to pursue similar cases if Isaacs is convicted, though there would be lengthy challenges on appeal.

In an unusual twist, the trial is being presided over by the chief judge of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Alex Kozinski, under a program that allows appellate judges to occasionally handle criminal trials at the District Court level. Kozinski is known as a strong defender of free speech and First Amendment rights.

Eight men and six women were chosen for the jury Tuesday. Two will be designated alternates later. The panel was to hear opening statements Wednesday before viewing the movies.

When jury selection began Monday, he urged prospects to be open about their opinions and incurred an onslaught of negative statements. Within the first hour, he dismissed 26 men and women who said they could not be fair to the defendant because they were repulsed by the subject matter. By day's end, half the panel of 100 had been excused.

"I think watching something like that would make me physically ill, nauseous," said one woman. "It's affecting me physically now just thinking about it."

One man fired angry comments at the ponytailed Isaacs.

"Hearing stuff about feces made me sick and the defendant looks like my ex-business partner who did some of these things. He looks guilty as sin to me," said the man. "It turns my stomach thinking about it."

Several prospects marched up to the judge's bench for private conferences when he told them that the films also involved violence against women. They, too, were excused, as were several who cited their religious beliefs.

Asked how long they would have to watch the movies, Kozinski told them it would be about five hours and "I will be there watching with you. This is part of the job we're doing."

(This version CORRECTS description of Duchamp artwork.)

Jews and Scatology

 The Jewish infatuation with 'Bodily functions'

Quotes from Dr Pierce

In the case of the Jews I used the often-remarked Jewish tendency toward scatological humor, which is a much greater tendency than appears in Aryans. I cited as an example of this tendency a new MTV program, Dude, This Sucks

Catch this

I mentioned that in the filming of a recent episode of this program two men -- the "Shower Rangers" -- who previously had been dosed with a powerful laxative, came onto the stage dressed as Boy Scouts. On cue they turned their backs to the audience, dropped their trousers, bent over, and sprayed a group of unsuspecting teenaged girls on the stage with feces.


Two teenagers the Jews defecated on


They are suing MTV and the Jew Redstone


The Jews who scripted the Shower Rangers' act apparently thought this feces shower was hilariously funny. This is the sort of thing that Jews usually consider funny. I pointed out that the Jew ultimately responsible for the Shower Rangers is the owner of MTV, billionaire media mogul Sumner Redstone, who also owns CBS and many other mass media. He is one of the most influential Jews in the world, a Jew who, whenever he visits the White House, always gets a big hug from whichever shabbos goy is President at the moment.

I also could have blamed the feces-spraying incident on MTV's homosexual Jewish program manager, Brian Graden, who, of course, takes his orders from Redstone.

Some listeners just couldn't believe that an ultra-rich, ultra-influential Jew such as Redstone could be involved in such a low-class act as the Shower Rangers: Howard Stern, maybe, but not Sumner Redstone. One thing I didn't point out in my broadcast three weeks ago is that the Jew Howard Stern also works for Sumner Redstone.

Redstone undoubtedly is a very sophisticated and very clever Jew, but the Shower Rangers is indeed the sort of filth he regularly produces for the consumption of Aryan teenagers, whether their parents are paying attention or not. It is indeed the sort of filth he and his fellow Jews who control our media, our advertising, and the conditioning of our children think is very funny.

Talk to a swimming pool maintenance man in Hollywood or someone who is responsible for security at one of the New York condos where these rich Jews live and play. You'll get an earful.


Bill Murray from Caddy Shack


  Who can forget the scene at a elite jewish country club - where someone mistakes a baby ruth bar for a turd. That ever so zany Bill Murray - drains the pool - finds the turd and eats it. You just got to love jews !!

Dr Pierce

Whether Sumner Redstone and Brian Graden believed that the Shower Rangers would be a bold new step toward conditioning Aryan teenagers to laugh at the same things Jews laugh at or whether they naively believed that Aryans and Jews already laugh at the same things, there can be no real dispute about the fact that the Shower Rangers were part of an MTV program and that they performed as I said.
The performance I described is the subject of a lawsuit filed against MTV in Los Angeles Superior Court at the beginning of last month by two of the girls who were sprayed.

The people who told me that Sumner Redstone never would condone something like the Shower Rangers, that he is too smart and sophisticated for that, were confirmed in their belief by the fact that they couldn't find any news of the spraying incident in Los Angeles newspapers. Are you surprised that the media bosses cover for each other?

But actually, Jews do talk about these things with one another. If it's too much trouble for you to get a copy of the court documents, then scan some of the Hollywood "insider" newsletters, which are chock full of news reports on things such as which media mogul's son was so drunk at his bar mitzvah last Saturday that he barfed all over the Torah scroll, or which queer ad-agency executive has just been diagnosed as having AIDS, or who is rumored to have made an out-of-court settlement with a shikse starlet to avoid a paternity suit.

One of my favorites - In this jewish film they show a girl squatting - defacating and then - Ohh YUK.

Several of the Hollywood newsletters carried all the details of the Shower Ranger episode last month. Believe me; it happened. And believe me, it is typical of the people who control Hollywood and the television entertainment industry and the conditioning of America's children -- and, incidentally, all three branches of our government.

[kolnidre]

Very revealing post. Thanks.

There is definitely some kind of degeneracy agenda keeping people at an infantile animal level, trapped in the carnal realm.

I just tried to find a quote of the prayer Talmudists are supposed to say as they "drop the kids off at the pool" (take a dump). I think I saw it in Michael A. Hoffman's superb book, Judaism's Strange Gods, but didn't find it.

Interestingly, Hitler, the most evil man who ever lived(TM), was a coprophiliac, i.e. he was literally obsessed with shit.

[Anonymous]

Interestingly, Hitler, the most evil man who ever lived(TM), was a coprophiliac, i.e. he was literally obsessed with shit.

Can you provide me with a source of this info?  Its the first time I hear of it..  Thanks.

[clark-kent]

SANTA MONICA (AP) --

MTV apologized Thursday to two 14-year-old girls who said they were splattered with feces when an act defecated on stage during a taping of the music channel's "Dude, This Sucks" show.

"This is a terrible incident. It was unintended and we regret that it happened," Brian Graden, the cable channel's president for programming, said in a statement.

He added that the episode would never be aired and that he had taken steps to see that such an event never happens again.

"We are sorry if these women were hurt. It is certainly never our intention to hurt anyone," he said.

Graden said the network had just learned that the girls are suing MTV, adding that the company "will respond accordingly through the legal process."

The teen-agers said they were standing next to a stage on Jan. 21 at the Snow Summit Ski Resort in the San Bernardino Mountains east of Los Angeles, watching a two-man act called Shower Rangers during videotaping of a "Snowed In" segment of the MTV show.

"Without warning or explanation the two Shower Rangers turned their backsides to the audience, both opened a flap on the back of their shorts, exposing their naked buttocks," the girls' attorney Gloria Allred said.

"Before they could say or do anything, the Shower Ranger whose buttocks faced them bent over, spread the cheeks of his buttocks and emitted a spray of fecal matter," the lawyer said.

Monique Garcia and Kelli Sloat of Big Bear Lake are seeking unspecified general, compensatory and punitive damages, claiming intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence and battery.

"All of a sudden I was smelling something disgusting and I started to gag. I looked around at my friends. They were covered in something. As I looked down at myself, I realized I was, too," Garcia said during a news conference at Allred's office.

"We believe that subjecting children without their knowledge and consent and without notice to their parents to such an outrageous and indecent act is completely unacceptable and intolerable," Allred said.

The teen-agers "want to send a message that this type of act goes far beyond the bounds of decency and that neither MTV nor any television network should ever allow any similar disgusting incident to take place in the future," Allred said.

Non WN source

This is just awful I agree, the girls didn't know what they had coming. but I think you can hardly say that jews have a monopoly on bathroom humor.
If you never laughed at flatulance let at an importune time I don't think I want to know you.
I AM NOT DEFENDING THESE ACTIONS.

[kolnidre]

If you never laughed at flatulance let at an importune time I don't think I want to know you.

Flatulence and premeditated shitting on unsuspecting people are two pretty different things, n'est-ce pas?

[Anonymous]

This is not "bathroom humor" as you so mildly put it, neither is it mere flatulence.

Peace.

[clark-kent]

Totally and completely agree. But I thought Caddyshack was fucking funny. Does that make me brainwashed by jews?

[Anonymous]

Nope, and I think it was a chocolate bar in the movie, not sure if my memory is correct.  I don't always agree with every single thing mentioned when I post content that is not my own, and I won't be putting a disclaimer all the time when I do post, although I sometimes do, when I feel it is necessary

[clark-kent]

Yea it was a Baby Ruth bar. No you shouldn't have to put a disclaimer you can tell by their language where it came from. Its just like I don't agree with everything I upload or even most. I just like to have other sources for news if I hear it from anywhere.

But I was thinking doesn't the second article get into censorship. If two consenting adults decide to shit on each other and film it and another adult wants to buy the video, should that be illegal? Didn't Larry Flint already fight this battle. Then I thought what if these people were coerced into these acts, and how would we know, then the sexual violence towards women aspect would have been very hard to prove they weren't coerced and just acting with the presumed no-budget of these movies.

[high_treason]

Does anybody see the People vs Iraa Issacs in the making, I can image one of the kosher producers is gathering up the boys to do a movie about the heroic Jew who stood up to the system.

[Ognir]

A bit early in the morning to be talking SHIT  

[mastermg]

Does anybody see the People vs Iraa Issacs in the making, I can image one of the kosher producers is gathering up the boys to do a movie about the heroic Jew who stood up to the system.

Lol I can imagine that.
"One hero stands up to defend art. His name is Iraa Issacs..."
I can defenitely see that hit the big screens.