Hufschmid analysis (Summer-Fall 2007, noob Zionism wakeup)

[Anonymous]

In the thread on TIU show for the 8th of June 2008 here. I made mention of a .doc I wrote up that I was going to send to Hufschmid in an email about his irrational logic.  Canard commented that I should post it, so I am doing that here.

A little explanation.  The first part is the initial email I was going to send, written in summer-fall 2007 (I believe) when I was getting into the Zionist thing.  I continued to read all the material on his site and added my comments of things I disagreed on and things I agree on afterwards as I went along reading his site.  My views of certain things mentioned have changed since then, and they continue to change as I learn more.  Before you make a statement against something I said, just remember that.  I did not send this email to him as I saw it pointless the more I read...

So that's about it... enjoy my view on Hufschmid when I first was learning about Zionism, almost one year later I have learned a lot more  And remember, my views on many things have surely changed.  If ya want some clarifications on then vs now, ask me before making a straw man to take down, please

Peace.

- - - - - -

Hello Mr. Hufschmid,

I have been reading several of the pages on your web site, and I just had to comment on some things posted.

You (I assume you are the one writing the material, I could be mistaken as sometimes the author refers to "Hufschmid's article") state that people who are "Useful idiots" or who have been deceived by Zionists such as Dan Wallace, and are then killed, then "good riddance to another idiot".  I think people are allowed to make mistakes.  Part of life is to be ignorant.  They aren't making mistakes like signing in the Fed or other crimes.  I was not always aware of most truths, in fact I only "woke up" in August 2006, which started with 9/11 and Alex Jones (I'm 23yrs old).  I am ignorant, everyone is ignorant, as we all don't know everything about everything.  We all have a lack of knowledge in some aspect of knowledge as a whole.  We all have to start somewhere, and it depends on each person how fast they move from one topic to another.  I stopped listening to AJ in March 2007 as I saw patterns of statements and logic which led me to distrust him as an honest person.

"When you buy tables from a carpenter who lies or cheats, you are denying money to a carpenter who is honest. Eventually the honest carpenters will be driven to bankruptcy, and all that will remain are the dishonest and incompetent carpenters.
Likewise, when you support deceptive investigators, you give them money, and you promote their ideas. This spreads the deception throughout the population, and it provides the liars with money to operate with.
Don't be grateful to a criminal
As I mentioned earlier, we develop an attachment to the first person who exposes 9/11 to us, just as we develop a loyalty to the first product that appears on the market."


One may know more about something than another, as in one has more information/knowledge about a subject, and the other may have more knowledge than the first person about something.  Maybe one or both is lacking knowledge or they do not believe in it because it is not believable to them at their current level of understanding the world, or the evidence is insufficient.  There will always be more to a subject than we currently know, so ignorance will never end, it can only be lessened.

We can all be misled.  Although it is "tough luck" to trust in the wrong people and make a mistake which results in being killed by those who we trusted, I don't see it being "good riddance" and they "deserve" it, they deserved better in my differing opinion.

If people who are involved with Zionists unknowingly are "helping them to destroy us" it makes them "one of our enemies"?  Maybe if people would stop making other people enemies because of their ignorance and instead try to help free the ignorant of their ignorance, and help them realize the greater truth, that they are being played, there would be greater support and more people who are on the battle against Zionism.  Before I acknowledged Zionist existence, would I have been helping them?  Was I an enemy?  LOL. 

They may not be going after the right people who commit the crimes (Zionists, Mossad, Al, Sayanim), but they do some degree of good in at least confronting some lies like the official story of 9/11, etc.  Isn't it better to have people see that one lie than no lies at all?  I would not know about Zionism or any of the other groups like Jesuits, CFR, etc, if I had not watched Terrorstorm or Loose Change in 2006 and started from there.  The learning process needs to have some degree of gradualism, or else the greater truths which are hard to believe or understand will be flat out rejected to a programmed mind.  Even if a person doesn't progress beyond 9/11 dissinfo, isn't that better than that person remaining completely ignorant of 9/11?  If all there was, was a "Hufschmid, Bollyn, Smith" based truth tellers out there... I don't think many people would be awake to the basic lies, like 9/11.  I agree the dissinfo people should be taken out, but if they weren't there providing some basic info, I would still be part of the ignorant masses, along with many others.  The information battle against Zionism would be much harder with less people even capable of opening their eyes/mind.

I just wanted to let you know what I thought, you can think of me as a criminal, liar, agent, Zionist, it doesn't matter.  But I would recommend changing what seem to me like harsh conclusions/opinions about people who have suffered under deception.  Is being "dumber" than others reason enough for these idiots to "deserve whatever the Zionists do to them"?  I think it's better that they know some things and can eventually know more and join a full awakening of the deception, rather than just be glad they are gone.  

Since my awakening, I remained inactive from groups and learned things on my own, I didn't get played by Zionists and kept from discovering things directly, it just took time, and like you say if we were to get rid of the garbage rehashing of information, people would learn quicker.  Some things are too hard to believe at first given the institution of anti-Semitism being so prevalent.  Although these deceived peoples may be naïve in thinking they can change things by joining these infiltrated activist groups, at least they are brave enough to try.  Later on they may eventually wake up and realize more things like Zionism.  The real idiots who deserve your criticism are the ones who willingly ignore things like 9/11 (the basics without the perceived anti-Semtic brainwashing association) because it conflicts with their world view reality and perpetuate the lie because they truly are stupid (as I once was) and will never accept the truth.  For the willing participants (agents) I agree with your statements, but not the unwilling dupes, they deserved more than a death of this kind.

I look at as much info as I can and make up my own mind.

Thanks for your work and your site.  If I misconstrued your view on this, sorry, this is the way it looked to me when I read http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Dan-Wa ... ption.html and other parts.  I'll keep looking at your evidence.

Peace,

**MY NAME REMOVED** (I'm in Canada)










Hufscmid draws conclusions that people are agents, are deceptive, are working with Zionists, are Zionist deniers, are useful idiots because they don't talk about Zionism.  Ever heard of ignorance... not knowing about there involvement in things?  That would be my first educated reasonable conclusion.  If someone has a site that links to other sites that he considers infilatrated, part of the crime network, Zionist denier, then they are by proxy part of the network.  Again, ignorance, not an agent.  If you have proof that they know about the information on Zionism, and they are ignoring it willingly, are intentionally deceiving others, then they can be deceptive.  Some people believe things, doesn't make them agents of deception, they are just ignorant.

Steven Jones, who Hufschmid seems to have respect for, was associated with 911 truth scholars, but left after Fetzer promoted no planes or that other crap.  But before that, he was a member, and according to Hufscmid, the links on their sites to sites he considers part of the deception, misinformation, would have made Jones a deceiver or usefull idiot by proxy.  IGNORANCE.  If you don't know, you don't know.  He liks Steven Jones work on thermite, but still doesn't trust the guy.

His reasoning faculties are very flawed, far too paranoid to make rational judgments on individual or group bases.

John Tiffany
He writes articles and book reviews for the AFP. In a review of a "fascinating new book, Suppressed Science" by Jack Phillips, he writes:
 
In another chapter, Phillips explores the art of dowsing—using divining rods to locate sources of underground water.
www.americanfreepress.net/FAB/html/supp ... ience.html
As is typical with liars, he follows that sentence with a remark that allows himself to get out of trouble for promoting such nonsense:
Most mainstream scientists reject it.
Tiffany then continues promoting the possibility that dowsing is real:
However, some progress has been made toward giving dowsing a scientific foundation, says Phillips. Dr. Elizabeth Jurka has found that the brains of dowsers, when dowsing, show four different types of brainwaves, as if the individuals were asleep and awake at the same time. And another scientist, Dr. Zaboj V. Harvalik,....
The American Free Press is selling that deceptive book, but they will not sell my book. How do you explain this?

LOL.  Retard Hufschmid.  Because he doesn't know or believe rods can locate water, he declares John Tiffany a deceiver?  Are you kidding?  Ridiculous.  I have used this technique, and the rods do move, and I dug in that location for a well, and guess what, there were underground springs in that location!  I believe in UFOs, cause I have videos or them, but Hufschmid won't, because maybe he never has seen them, or has but doesn't believe it, so I WOULD BE A DECEIVER TOO for spreading the truth about things.  That's classic.

This guy is way delusional.  He is the deceiver!!!  Everything is Zionist, if you say something is not Zionist when he says it is, well you're an agent or a tool, or whatever!

Mike Blair
He has been writing articles for AFP for years. In this article he implies that America and Russia have the ability to control weather all around the world:
www.americanfreepress.net/html/harnessing_weather.html
He discusses the possibility that we have the ability to create and destroy hurricanes, and that we could have stopped the Katrina hurricane.
There is no evidence that there are any machines in America or Russia that can control the weather. Unfortunately, trying to show that this theory is a hoax as futile as trying to show that the aliens in New Mexico are a hoax, or that the image of Jesus on a cheese sandwich is a hoax.
I don't want to waste my time trying to talk people out of believing that America and Russia are having "Weather Wars". However, I will make the accusation that Mike Blair and other people who promote Weather Wars, crop circles, and aliens are fully aware that they are lying. I will accuse Mike Blair and the others of being con artists; criminals; Deception Delivery Devices.
I don't know why Blair and others are trying to deceive us, or who they work for. Maybe Blair works for America, and maybe he thinks that he is going to help us by running a psy-op that will counteract the Mossad psy-ops. Or maybe he works for the Mossad.  

LOL.  I believe there are such technologies.  So If I were to promote aliens, crop circles and such, I am a deceiver too?  RIDICULOUS!!!  Hufschmid is very narrow minded.  He will only deal with things that have so called evidence for it, like paper documents or what?  Where does he get all his Zionist information from?  Very close minded.  Anything beyond his realm of understanding is not real.  Even though it can be and most likely is.  Sad close mindeed fool.  Stuck in anti-Zionism, and wont ever learn about spirits or anything outside his box.

If you are a regular visitor to the EricHufschmid.net website, you know that Zionist agents can be identified by their attempt to shift blame away from Israel and Zionism and onto people that they are willing to sacrifice, such as the Bush family, the Nazis, the Muslims, the Vatican, and Tony Blair.

So even though he may be correct, he makes assumptions.  He doesn't know they are Zionist deniers or agents, he simply believes that because they don't talk about Zionist involvement or put Zionists at the top of the ladder.  If you aren't saying the Zionists are doing it, then you are working for them!!!  LOL

Another way to identify Zionist agents is that they promote other Zionist agents, and they try to ignore Hufschmid and Bollyn.
Professor Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin did not travel to Japan, but they provided a video to present to the audience.
They never asked Hufschmid or Bollyn if they were interested in speaking or providing a video, even though David Ray Griffin, Steven Jones, Andreas von Bulow, and many other people reference the research of Hufschmid and Bollyn

You guys ever think that maybe they don't talk about you is because your crazy?  That you think everyone is an agent, even them, because they don't talk about you or refer to your work?  Maybe that's why.  How would you like it if you go where your investigation goes, and you don't find good evidence for Zionism or don't know about it at all, and then these guys are calling you an agent because you don't talk about, even though all you are is ignorant.  DO you really think many people are going to want to be associated with such a delusional paranoid bunch?  NO.  Hey these guys may be right, but it looks to me like they just accuse people with circumstantial evidence, which is not proper evidence, it can be good evidence to help you believe something, but isn't hard evidence.  Now they claim others are agents when they use soft evidence, like UFO, alien, weather mod, anything that isn't hard evidence.  HYPOCRITES.

Incidentally, if the Catholic Church is involved in wars and corruption, it may be coming from the Crypto Jews within the organization, not the true Catholics. Greg Szymanski may also be a Crypto Jew.

So he tends to believe that Crypto Jews are doing all the bad things in the church and not true catholics?  Well I guess we can trust them now.  Lets all ignore Jon Phelps and Zsamanski because they are Zionist denier agent.  Well I can rest safely now. Thakns for that bit of info!

•  Jeff Rense
Rense is another host on Genesis. Rense will condemn Zionism, and even complain that the Holocaust is a hoax, but most of what he has on his web site and on his radio show is nonsense about UFOs.
Some people will try to pick through his articles in the hope of finding something intelligent, but I suspect that most intelligent people will think to themselves,
"Holy Mother of Bush. Since his articles about UFOs don't have any supporting evidence, how can I trust his articles about Zionism or the Holocaust?"
Furthermore, when somebody criticizes Zionism or the Holocaust, the Zionists can counter their arguments with remarks such as,  
"Oh, you don't believe the official story of the Holocaust? You should go to Rense.com where all the UFO believers, remote viewers, time travelers, and Holocaust deniers gather to discuss their hallucinations, you dumb ass."

OK.  So because some ignorant dumb person doesn't believe in UFOs, time travel, etc, LIKE YOU IDIOT HUFSCMID, then they are crypto Zionists? WTF.  These things can be true, but they're too abnormal for you to believe, so anyone who promotes it is a fruit loop?  AGAIN, shallow mind.

Some of these people may eventually learn enough about Zionism to realize their mistake, but until they do, add their name to the list.
Furthermore, some people cover up the 9-11 attack or support Zionism because of bribery or blackmail. We need to get a list of these people, also.
We can't make the world a better place when immoral people are sabotaging our efforts.
The Useful Idiots must make a choice between continuing to help the Zionists, or turning against them. As President Bush might say,  
"You are either with us, or you are with the Axis of Zionism."

Need I say anything?  You are either with us against the fight in Zionism, or you are against us, as in you go on the list because you are with the Zionist because of your statement.  Well I am not a Zionist, and I am not with you guys.  So I guess I don't exist right?  If there are only 2 sides, anyone who isn't in either, doesn't exist?  What a stupid remark.  And putting the ignorant people on the list too, wow, your going to convict people who don't even know they are supporting bad people?  That sounds right... NOT

We cannot blame a person who innocently spreads false information, but we should stand up to the people who are knowingly providing this disinformation.

Isnt that a contradiction of the useful idiots deserve everything they get?  WTF?

As far as I know, I am the first person to complain that the phrase "inside job" is deception, and that we should refer to it as an "outside job" or, as an "inside job by Zionists".

If that isn't a contradiction, what is?  Inside job is deception?  It  may be deceptive, as it doesn not elaborate on who is responsible for the inside job, but he only states inside job is deception.  Deceptive does not mean deception.  Yet after he states its ok to use the term inside job if it is followed by who he thinks is responsible.

I refuse to feel sorry for underdogs
The Zionists behind 9/11, the world wars, the attack on the USS liberty, and the Oklahoma City bombing are not fooling around, so why should I?
They have already slaughtered hundreds of millions of people, and are contaminating the planet with uranium. I am not going to back down from such a group. I am not going to let them intimidate me.
Furthermore, I am not going to feel sorry for people who get caught up in this mess simply because they are stupid or ignorant. It is not my fault if any of you are stupid or ignorant. Don't try using that excuse on me. If you are stupid or ignorant, go back into your house and sit in front of your television set.

Wow sure sounds like a nice guy.  I'll sure promote his stuff....

As I write this article (19 August 2006), many of the people who had praised WingTV or who provided links to their articles are now removing their links and backing away from them. WingTV is sinking, and the other Zionist rats don't want to sink with them. However, we should not let any of the Zionist rats get away. All of the rats need to be thrown into the water to drown with WingTV.
So, start spreading the news! WingTV, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, Fred Burks, Jim Marrs, Jeff Rense, and virtually everybody else in this 9/11 movement is a Zionist Denier. They are the criminal network, along with people who control our media and our banking system.

OK... so someone finds out eventually that wingTV cant be trusted, since no one is as good as you eh Eric?  We are all just too stupid, and you must criticize us.  Then they decide they wont support wingtv by linking to them.  But nono, its too late for you, you were stupid and ignorant before, so you must pay for supporting them, you are part of the crime network.  You evil person who supports people by thinking they are good, then doesn't when you finally realise they aren't.  But, whats this you said:
We cannot blame a person who innocently spreads false information, but we should stand up to the people who are knowingly providing this disinformation.
So even though I was unknowingly linking to a site that I didn't know was using others peoples work, since that's what everyone does, rehash the dug up facts, I am part of the network?

A lie, as I define it, is making a false statement in order to deceive people.
If any of my statements were false, I did not realize it at the time, and I had no intention to deceive people, so any false statement I made would qualify as something other than a lie, such as:
 • blunder
 • confusion
 • error
 • goof
 • inaccuracy
 • miscalculation
 • misjudgment
 • mistake

So its ok for you to be ignorant or stupid, but not for others?





Some people defend Alex Jones and others, who do not talk about Jesuit/Vatican links and/or don't talk about Zionist/Israel/Jew links with the conspiracies of the world, by saying they have an audience who is large, and to talk about Jesuit/Vatican would make them seem anti-Catholic or anti-Christian to the brainwashed ignorant folk, or talk about Zionist/Israel/Jew connections would make them seem anti-Semite, etc.  So to do so would turn people away from them, and lessen the effect of waking people up to 9/11 and other things.  This reasoning is non-valid for the Hufschmid Smith Bollyn anti-Zionist people.  These people say that if you don't talk about Zionism or play down its significance, you are a useful idiot, a Zionist agent, or Zionist denier, etc.  It could very well be that these people don't believe the Zionist control.  Some of the evidence of Zionist absolute control is pretty weak.  People repeat it over and over, but where did this information come from?  Stating it as fact can be fact, but it can also not be true.

At the same time, they "attack" and attempt to discredit those who talk about things these anti-Zionists don't believe is real.  Just like people who don't know or believe in Zionist absolute control, they may prefer Jesuit, or Globalist control, etc, the anti-Zionists don't believe in Jesuit control or Globalists.  The anti-Zionists claim that the people who talk about Mars colonies, other dimensions, Moon city, spiritual maters, are con artists, liars, and that these people are making "us" look bad, these people are giving a bad name to the conspiracy theory group.  So there position is that of discrediting people who have a different view than there view.  UFO are nonsense, aliens are nonsense, secret collies, advanced technology are nonsense to these followers of Hufschmid Smith Bollyn ideology of Zionist/Israel/Jew mass control.

So stating something as being true, may or may not be true.  But I prefer too look at all the evidence, everything together.  I don't act like these anti-Zionist people and claim something is false, and therefore the person talking about what I perceive to be false is a liar, a con.  How could they possibly know these things are false?  Maybe they are maybe they aren't.  They just have a narrow mind, close mind.  They like many other people, have a certain world view established, and for them anything that appears to be non sense is simply that, non sense lying.  For them it gives a bad name to "us" true truth tellers.  Anything that doesn't point to Zionist control is a lie, and is deceiving us and others from knowing the truth about Zionism.  LOL.  To me such thinking is going against the search for truth by only accepting acceptable things.  Like those who are completely brainwashed, and see the exposure of 9/11 lie is not acceptable and is a lie, and anyone who talks about this perceived lie is a liar, a con, dishonouring the vitoms of 911, etc, etc.  All the excuses they can come up with that attempt to discredit the truth and keep it bogged down.  This is what the anti-Zionist people are doing, when they can't see past their pre-conceptions and be open to other possibilities that don't fit with their current frame of reality.  Just like the 9/11 truth deniers.  Its all the same type of thinking.  Only the anti-Zionist are able to look at people on the news, in the world, and draw conlusions.  But they can't accept anything beyond what there eyes can see.  The Jews are people, they exist in there eyes, the Zionist exist in there eyes, the corruption exists in there eyes.  So anything that is not a person, with events in the news, is not real.  The moon city cant be real, because for them the mon landings are a hoax, and they may be.  But does that exclude cities from being established later using secret advanced technologies far beyond the current perceived disclosed level of technology made public?  No.  It is just harder to believe.  So for the anti-Zionists, these thigns are nonsense lies to discredit he rest of them.

I submit that the ones who are doing the discrediting are the anti-Zionists themselves, who have such an abrupt stance against anything they don't perceive as being possible.  Just like there attacks on Jones and others for not talking about Zionism, making them deceivers for keeping the truth.  I call these anti-Zionists deceivers for not discussing higher dimensions, cities in space, advanced tech, hollow earth, etc.  They are deniers of all these things.  They are covering up the truth.

What do you think about that?  If something is unbelievable, then that makes it untrue?  Isn't that what the brainwashed sheeple think?  Your account of 9/11 is unbelievable, therefore it isn't true, and it is nonsense.  Wake up, open your eyes you anti-Zionist close minded fools.  There are many things you are being willingly ignorant about, as those 9/11 sheeple, by choosing to ignore it.  Not simply out of lack of knowledge, but rather this lack of knowledge is a result of choosing to ignore things which your fragile mind can't accept.

The guilt by association these anti-Zionists use is also flawed.  Anyone who has a site that has links to other sites that the anti-Zionists know/claim/suspect/assume to be Zionist related by control, infiltration, etc, is also related to Zionism by such a link.  This may be true that they know of the connection to Zionism there links have.  But it may also be they don't know.  And it may also be that the sites the anti-Zionists suspect/know/assume are related to Zionism actually are not related to Zionism.

They use a lot of deductive reasoning through logical deduction which can be true.  But it is also known to be flawed if used as the only source to come to a conclusion about something.  Some trees grow fruit, apples are red, therefore all trees with red fruit are apples.  False.  So can this: site A is Zionist influenced, site B links to site A, therefore site B is Zionist influenced.  This assumption can be true, but is not necessarily.

Making all these accusations about people with very little explainable evidence isn't good research work.  You claim to have evidence to back all of your claims, but in these cases, you make insinuations, and that is not evidence, or is it?

The reason this type of fight can go on forever is that Piper cannot prove that I read his manuscript, and I cannot prove that I didn't.

Just like you cant prove people who link to sites you consider Zionist makes them Zionists by proxy,  yet you do like Piper did, and continue the accusation anyways.

Many people complain that I accuse almost everybody of being in the Zionist crime network. As I've mentioned before, almost everybody in this truth movement is acting like they are part of the network, so why shouldn't I accuse them of being part of it?
All throughout my life it seems that America has been deteriorating. Why should I respect the people in leadership positions when the chaos, crime, and deterioration gets worse and worse?
Why shouldn't I wonder if our leaders are responsible for this deterioration? Why shouldn't I wonder if this deterioration is deliberate?

And I would agree that it would be fine to accuse them, if there was evidence.  You use very lax and weak methods to declare someone associated with Zionism.  The people you claim are part of the network aren't leaders elected, they are people trying to expose things.  And yes some may have an agenda, but not all.  Some were bad from the start, some got turned, but some are still good.  Look at you, you claim to not be part of the crime network, so logically there are more people in the spotlight that aren't either.

Why is 9/11 taking so long to be exposed? I think it is because most of the 9/11 truth seekers are actually Zionists.
There are hundreds, or thousands, of JFK assassination investigators, so why is there so little progress in exposing this crime? I say it is because most of the investigators in this field are also infiltrators.

Well that's because the actual people in control of doing things are not likely to be part of the movement.  There are some politicians who support 911 truth (probably agents for something to get more power), but its not like the top people in the movement are working for the government in a capacity to change things.  If they don't need to be in the government to make changes, then why can't we?  Why can't you?  You do need to be inside to make changes to it, we can only elect them in our current system.  We can't vote on bills to be passed or new laws.  These people expose some truth, but because it isn't the truth as you see it involving Zionists, this means they are infiltrators/agents, and this is the reason the members of government are not doing anything about it? That has to be one of the weakest most delusional arguments I have ever heard.

Jeff Rense promotes idiotic theories, such as aliens, reverse speech, and clairvoyance

LOL.  Great argument.  Hufschmid is declaring research/investigation through promotion and allowing articles to be on his site for all purposes like aliens, ufo, reverse speech, clairvoyance, is idiotic.  Forget about going after all evidence and fact, and looking at everything and learning about more than Just Zionism when it comes to conspiracies and hidden information/knowledge  We can't learn about these things because Mr Hufschmid declares them to be idiotic.  Or because his mind is incapable of accepting the possibility of these things being legitimate enough to talk about, for they would tarnish the real investigations into Zionism exposure, and nothing else, for if you don't expose Zionism, you are one of the Axis of Zionism.

If the American Free Press had been publishing articles from me, and if they had been promoting my book and video, a lot more people would know about this information. Instead, most of the material published by the AFP has been nearly worthless.

I agree wit that.

How is it possible that Daryl Smith, who has only been involved in this Zionist issue for about a year, has already done more to expose it than Piper and all of his friends have done over the past 30 years?

Good point.

Obviously Murdoch is not interested in promoting me or my material. Instead, a Fox television station in New York promoted the Loose Change video, and they interviewed the producers of Loose Change. Why doesn't Fox television interview me? Why don't they show my video?

SO lets have everyone who is asking why are they promoting Loose Change and not there movies in regards to 9/11 movies.  Why not me, why not me?

Some mysterious people are helping to make Loose Change into a Hollywood movie, and they are going to put it into theaters. Why doesn't Murdoch help me make a movie and put it into theaters?

Duh as teenagers would say... that would expose you as a Zionist agent by your own methods.

Mike Piper points out that Murdoch, the Bronfmans, and the Openheimers work for the Rothschilds. Therefore, if I work with Murdoch, that means I am working with the Rothschilds, also! However, if all of us are a big team, what are we working for? And what is my role in this team?
Since the summer of 2002 I have been occasionally helping Bollyn expose Rupert Murdoch's Zionist connections, as well as other Zionists. Is Bollyn also working with the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, and others?

Isnt that a straw man?  Setting up a claim against you, then destroying with another claim that is not related?

By comparison, Mike Piper only discusses superficial issues in regards to Murdoch and other Zionists, or he discusses information after Bollyn or somebody else exposes it.

So we can't use information that someone else discovered?  You expect everyone to be better or smarter than you at finding things to expose?  I wouldn't know where to begin on getting new information to expose Zionism.  Anything I find will have to be from someone who is writing it or speaking it.  So if I read it from somewhere, well Im not exposing it, its already there, I am discussing it.  SO how do I com eup with new things if its all stuff that has been discussed?  What else would I talk about if I cant find new thigns and cant talk about things others have already talked about?  I wouldn't be talking very much thats for sure.  SO don't let Piper and others talk about others work, and you cant either.  You're supposed to talk about original stuff that you exposed, because discussing previously exposed information isn't considered proper.  LOL.  Is there only one level of exposure?  So if someone wants to get information out to more people, isn't it good that they discuss it thereby exposing it to more people?  Why do you use such a lame comparison to seemingly incriminate Piper or defend you?

Piper's book Final Judgment contains some valuable information about the Israeli connection to the assassination of President Kennedy, but that may have been the bait that was used to give him credibility in the first place.

This is the kind of lax evidence I don't like to see, its weak lose association with Zionism.  Why would it do that?  Because that can be applied to everyone that doesn't come up with new information, and even those who have that it "may" have been used to gain credibility.  Always the may, or the possible.  How would you like it if someone started accusing you of things because you weren't as good as them at investigating and didnt come up with new things often?  I don't think you would like that person.  So even though his actions look like hes an agent, he most probably is working with the Zionists given his lame attacks as I read them here, using weak evidence like guilt by association, related to what could be actual involvement or simply ignorance.  When you make a claim as a possibility, even if its not true, the person your accusing isn't going to like be praising you.  You have targeted them, and your followers will believe they may or possibly are what you claim.  That person is not trustable anymore.  That is the implication.

Piper and many other people are upset with me for questioning the honesty of the 9/11 "truth seekers" and the American Free Press, but I have serious evidence to back up my accusations. By comparison, Piper and others make insinuations without any evidence.

Ya some of your evidence does back up the accusations.  If it was serious evidence, then you shouldn't use other weaker evidence that is more or a supposition than actual evidence.  It lessens the effect of truth by having good arguments mixed in with weak ones, that aren't conclusive other than they may or possible are as you claim they are.

The White Supremacist sites link almost exclusively to one another.
This may appear to be a silly complaint because everybody links only to the sites that they approve of. However, once you realize that these white supremacist sites are deceptive, it should be obvious that their decision to link to one another is to create a maze of deceptive sites.

So even here you state its silly to use the this site links to the other complaint, but you use it to proclaim said truth site may or possibly or is part of the crime network.  Like they link to sites they consider to be like themselves, trying to educate others about something?

It is possible that some Zionists have infiltrated the Catholic Church and the Mormon Church. However, there is no evidence that Catholic Church officials are controlling  the white supremacists, communism, the banking system, or the FBI. All the evidence points to Zionists as the world's primary criminal group.
Therefore, the people who promote the theory that the Vatican is behind the corruption in the world -- such as Eric Jon Phelps, Phil Jayhan, and Greg Szymanski -- should be considered as part of the Zionist criminal network.
The people who blame the world's problems on President Bush, the Vatican, or the oil company executives are not naive. Don't make excuses for stupid or naive people. Their theories have no supporting evidence. They should be arrested, not defended. Warn your friends and relatives to avoid these criminals

Stating its possible that Zionism infiltrated the church, possible, not giving evidence.  Then all the evidence points towards Zionism and not church controlling the other groups.  But hes not giving us examples of this evidence.  So a firs time reader to this would think wtf, your telling me something but not telling me why, your just stating a reason without explaining how you got to reason this.

The truth can be placed in the open; exposed naked to the entire world. The truth does not need any laws to protect it, and it does not need secrecy to protect it. The truth does not need evidence destroyed, nor does it need videotapes to be confiscated.
Only lies need secrecy; only lies need protection from laws. Only lies benefit from fear, secrecy, blackmail, gossip, and confiscation of evidence.

This applies to everything, including aliens, ufo, etc- secrets, confiscation of evidence.

Occasionally somebody will advise me to stop talking about one or both of these issues:
•  The Apollo moon landing
•  The Holocaust
Why should I ignore those two subjects? How does the truth on those subjects benefit by suppressing discussions of them?

But this is nonsense, you make the rest of us look bad... Oh right, sorry, this is the logic you use to discredit people who talk about aliens, ufo, etc, etc.  You aren't very good at catching yourself in hypocrisy or double think.  But you're not even as kind as those who ask you to stop talking about it.  You declare these other people to be liars, cons, etc.

I don't see how we are helping the human race by remaining silent on any issue.

Follow your own moto dude, let people talk about UFO and aliens, etc.

You should find it peculiar that the people who promote UFOs, such as Richard Hoagland and Art Bell, also promote the official story on 9/11 and other crimes. Do you really think this is a coincidence?

Good point.

Steven Greer, who has The Disclosure Project, creates the impression that he is exposing the truth about the UFOs, but I bet that if you look at him and his associates, you will find that most of them are working for some government agency or some group of criminals, and they are trying to make us look like idiots.

You bet eh?  I'm convinced now! LMAO

It is more likely because they are trying to fool people into thinking that they are the truth seekers, when in reality they are diverting everybody's attention away from Israel and onto Bush, Cheney, the CIA, and a few military leaders.

Yes I agree that is more likely if like you assume they are the truth movement.

10) Most people pushing UFOs are Zionists
Zionists promote a lot of idiotic theories, such as the idea that the airplanes that hit the World Trade Center towers were either holograms or illusions created by blue screen technology.
This is evidence that they are trying to send people down the wrong path, and create the impression that conspiracy theories are stupid.

So here you are trying to discredit UFO promoters by relating it with hologram/illusion airplanes hitting WTC.  Nice try at the sneaky move.  I could argue that everyone knows there was 6million Jews killed by the Nazis in WW2.  Anyone one who is trying to deny this is crazy wacko retarded, the theories they come up with are "idiotic theories".  Everyone knows we landed on the moon, anyone who says different is stupid.  Do you not understand how programmed people are?  Included Mr. Hufscmid.  He uses logic that is so flaud it can be used on his own positions against him, i.e. Holocoast and Apollo.  People don't believe the holocaust is like Hufscmid says, just like Hufschmid doesn't believe there are UFO or Aliens, or other Dimensions like other people say.  9/11 is something concrete with video evidence and more.  You want people who talk about anything that isn't tangible to shut up because they make conspiracy theories look stupid.  Regular people see Apollo hoax, Holocasut hoax, 9/11 hoax, etc as idiotic.  Even those who learn of 9/11, still wont believe the Apollo hoax,  Holocaust, or Zionism supremacy.

I see the Zionists as being analogous to an organization of cats who work together to catch thousands of stupid, unorganized mice. Why should I feel sorry for the mice? Why should I hate the cats?

Bad anaology, we are all humans, mice and cats are different species.  Would you hate aliens for killing and outsmarting the human race?  That would be comparable to the cat mouse thing.  Cat type A outsmarting and killing cat type B is comparable to Zionsts and Goy.  Tisk tisk.  Apologetic rhetoric you twisted fellow!

Sweep the USA in the trash and start over

YUP.

•  dislike intensely; feel antipathy or aversion towards; "I hate Mexican food"; "She detests politicians"
•  the emotion of hate; a feeling of dislike so strong that it demands action

Many times Hufschmid states that he does not "hate" Zionists, or the media, etc.. He goes on to explain we are the ones enabling them by bweing ingnorant, or stupid, or buying the magazines, etc.  How can h e not have an aversion towards Zionism?  Or a strong dislike that demands action?  Is he saying he likes them?  Isn't he demanding action by exposing these evil ones?  Yet he says he doesn't hate them.  Well I do.  They are evil.  Evil should be hated.  What you gonna love evil and let it do anything to you?  Wake up!

Obviously the US military was involved in developing and producing the flying saucers, but whose idea was it? Since most of the people who promote the concept that aliens actually exist are Zionist Jews, and since the Zionists have a history of deceiving people and trying to take over the world, we should consider that they are the ones who have been secretly trying to develop alien spacecraft.

Really?  Most of the UFO ptomoters are ZIonsists?  Where did you come up with this crazy idea?  LOL.  Please give me your proof, your evidence of this.  The evidence I seem to see from you is that they are not all about exposing 911 Zionists crimes, so that makes them part of the Zionist crime network, since they tarnish the image of the other honest 911 researchers by being involved in UFO research.  One thing dependant on the other.  Someone could be just about UFO disclosure, like Steven Greer, and hes a Zionist now because Hufschmid seems to think so.

It would actually be better if you don't let the suspicious people realize that you suspect them of being Zionists. It would be better if you observe them quietly, and observe their associates, and behind their back, spread information about them.
!?!?!

Does Hufscmid think he has a momoploy on truth?  Only cerrtaint hings can be said?  Even if you know what your saying is inside information, or eye witness, personal experience, but its nonsense because someone doesn't believe it's a serious topic.

Fundamentalism: a movement or point of view characterized by rigid adherence to fundamental or basic principles (may apply to scientific or religious viewpoints).

Coudnt that be applied to Hufschmid?  His point of view on things only related to Apollo Hoax, Holocoast Hoax, 9/11, or Zionism related, anything, the UFOs aliens, dimensions, crop circles, all that is nonsense idiotic theories.

Every day it gets worse for them; it's only a matter of time before they are thoroughly exposed to virtually everybody who can think. Only the hopeless losers will remain oblivious to Zionism.

Im glad im no longer a "hopeless loser" then  LOL

When somebody provides amazing details about a crime, you should ask yourself, "Where did he get that information?"

Yes.  And I ask that everytime I read something on your site that about anything that incriminates people as Zionists.  Theres no bibliography of srouce information, which would help in convincing people.

When somebody uncovers important information about a crime, that does not prove that he is an honest investigator. we must consider the possibility that he is a member of the crime network, and his job was to release a few details of their crime in order to fool you into believing that he is an honest investigator.
Ted Gunderson, a former FBI agent, is now an independent investigator, and he works with the American Free Press. He is on the left in the photo below with his friend Anthony Hilder, who is also working with the American Free Press.

So now Gunderson and Hilder are Zionist related some how?

Gunderson and Hilder have been investigating many crimes for decades, but what have they accomplished? Their silence on the issue of Zionism suggests that they are soldiers in the gigantic Zionist army.

See here you suggest something because of your fundamental view that you have to be exposing Zionism when it comes to just about anything, and if you aren't, its not ignorance, its not that theey cou ldnt find evidence of Zionist involvement, its not that they don't know about Zionism being a big influcne in our world.  NO.  He can only suggest the one thing he always does, that is your not exposing Zionism in any aspect of the badness in our world, then you in some way a soldier, and agent, and cryto, etc helping the Zionists.  Is that really the best way of gaining peoples trust and validating your work, when you make weak accusations like that?

We don't expect everybody to like us or agree with us, but a very suspicious aspect of this "truth movement" is that virtually every "truth seeker" is ignoring us. This cannot be due to personal preferences. This has to be a coordinated attempt to push us aside and promote their own people as "truth seekers".

True, most likely agendas.

Some people have suggested to us that Dylan Avery, Jim Condit Jr, Chris Bjerknes, Reverend Ted Pike, and other "truth seekers" simply have a different approach to exposing corruption, or they are trying to please everybody, or they are naive, overly trusting, or victims of Zionist deception. However, people who promote deception are dangerous, regardless of whether they do it as result of naivety or because they are working with the Zionist crime network.
Our philosophy is that you would not let an incompetent pilot fly your airplane, and you would not let an incompetent dentist work on your teeth, so why allow incompetent "truth seekers" to tell you how to fix the world?

Right.

Without the Zionist bias, the real purpose of the Spanish Inquisition was to remove the Jews and Muslims who were pretending to be Catholics. Some of the Jews had become priests and bishops. These Jews were referred to as "Maranos" or "Marranos", which has a similar meaning as "pigs".
Here are some alternatives to the official story:
   •  www.ewtn.com/library/HOMELIBR/SPANINQ.TXT
   •  www.trosch.org/for/inquisition.html

So your using Catholic sites, whos messages is that the inquisitions aren't as bad as people say.  So Cathloics commit atrocities, and you use Cathlics to refute the evilness.  What if a Jew were to downplay the evil of a certain part of Jewisgh history.  You would accuse them of being Zionist.

Why would Szymanski, Phelps, Vyzygoth, and other "truth seekers" promote such obviously stupid theories? Why are they willing to spend so much of their lives and money to deceive us? Why are they willing to make fools of themselves? Why are they willing to expose themselves as criminals?
Why did they select the Vatican for their deception instead of the Mormon church, the atheists, the Veterans, the National Football League, or some other group?  

LOL.  Se how he states it as being obviously stupid, but wont tell us why it is so.  Give us some of your evidence that you say you always provide to back up what you say.  He undermines there credibility but calling the theories obviously stupid,  meaning that if you cant already see that this is obviously stupid, then you are also stupid.  LOL.  Emperors new clothes!  He says its stupid, Ill agree, or else they might think im stupid too!  Simple why Vatican, because look at history and there you have it.  Why would you pick Mormon, of the NFL when those are obviously stupid theories to base corruption on.  Whereas a great historical power is valid.  LAME!

However, the tremendous amount of time and effort these liars put into promoting their deception about the Vatican makes the most sense if we consider the possibility that the Vatican has indeed been taken over by Crypto Jews.
In such a case, the job of people such as Phelps and Szymanski is to divert Catholics away from the evidence of that Jewish infiltration.

Ok, agreed its possible.  But when you use the deception above, its discredits you.  Only you to blame for that.

Hufschmid links to Texe Marrrs article at least once about Jews Lenin, Satlin, Marx, Bush.  But never have aI seen on any page him making Texe Marrs a Zionist cooperator.  The reason I say this, is because Texe Marrs associated with Alex Jones, appeared on his show.  Usually having associates that Hufschmid doesn't trust makes you someone he doesn't trust.  So why Texe Marrs left alone?  He covers enough Zionist stuff that permits him to not be discredited by Hufschmid?  Yet, like others who Hufschmid discredits by associating/promoting people whom Hufschmid conciders untrustworthy, Marrs promotes Alex Jones.  Yet nothing to be said?  Why is this?

The camera crew that interviewed Jimmy Walter and I were independent contractors, and they filmed us for several hours. Both of us provided a lot of serious information about 9-11 to support the theory that September 11 was a government operation.

So here you refer to 911 as a government operation, the government being part of the country, would indicate that 911 was an inside job as many state.  But you allow with others who you have convinced to state that sayng 911 was an inside job is stupid and blah blah, they say it's a Zionist job, some go saying it's a jew job.  This points more directly at the perpetrators, but inside is still a valid statement as you yourself indicate by saying government operation.

In other words, they deceived her into thinking that she was talking about stupid conspiracies, such as Big Foot, or alien abductions. To be more blunt, Jodie Dean may have become what they refer to as a useful idiot.

OK.  Again with limited mind making things that are possible impossible.  For one aliens I cant prove, I never was contacted or visited or seen one.  So that I have to rely on other accounts and information. Bigfoot,t here is a tape, and it has been thouroughly analyzed lately, and you can see the way it walks, the muscle detail, the breast of the woman kind hanging low.  The suit would have to of been skin tight and the hair real to see the muscle in the leg.  I know Bigfoot is real, because there ia one video.  Not many videos like 911.  But there is one.  And it has plenty to say.  They live away from people, in wilderness.  Why you think its wilderness?  Because people go there all the time?  No, because only a few people in a lifetime will go to certain areas, and there are many more places that people never go to.  You can claim they would have been seen, found, shot, etc, but that's just a feeble mind making up excuses to reject things that don't fit with there frame of reality.  And it is sad, because you limit yourself from knowing many more things that are out there because you cant believe it to be possible or so.

Unfortunately, most people don't care about history, so they don't care whether history books are accurate. Most people are interested only in football games, Star Trek fantasies, and alcohol.
Millions of people would complain if television announcers got the football scores mixed up, but they would not care if history books are distorted in order to cover up government scams, or to allow people to extort money.

Yup its sad.

Most Americans treat the killing of Native Americans as family entertainment. For example, when I was a child, a common game was called "Cowboys And Indians", in which the kids pretended to Cowboys or Indians, and then they had fun killing the Indians. Toy companies provided props for these games, such as uniforms, guns, and bows and arrows.
If a German toy company provided props for a game called Nazis and Jews, in which the German children pretend to be Nazis who put Jews into prision camps, people around the world would probably condemn the Germans. So why is it acceptable for Americans to treat the killing of Indians as family entertainment?

Indeed hypocracy.

[/quote]
The truth does not need a government to protect it, nor does the truth need the assistance of the Jewish Defense League. Only lies need assistance. The truth can be exposed to the world. In fact, the only way we will know what is true and what is false is to expose all the information. Secrecy protects lies, not the truth.
[/quote]
Right on!

A lot of people are angry that the Zionists are causing so much suffering, but how are the Zionists any worse than the American pioneers?
The American pioneers deceived the Native Americans, lied to them, and slaughtered them. The Zionists are doing the same thing, except that they are doing it to the Europeans, the Americans, and the Russians.
If the American pioneers are great people for creating a new nation, why not describe the Zionists as great people who are building a great nation for themselves?
MORE ON THAT PAGE

YUP!  We are founded on death and deceit.

So why is the world so full of fighting, crime, and misery? Why are so many people trying to avoid work rather than helping to make a better world? Because of the defective, unhappy, miserable people, that's why.

DUH!  Most of the jobs are pretty useless.  How is it the job makes the world a beter place?  The jobn is there to make the business money, not to make the world a better place.  SO why want to work in any job that is crap?

Archaeologists tell us that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, but how can anybody know what was going on millions of years ago? Professors and scientists cannot agree about the events that are happening during their own lifetime!

HAHAHA yup

Some of the people who claim to have been abducted by Martians may be working for the CIA, and some may be experiments in mind control who where fooled into believing they were abducted. Other people may be deliberately lying about UFOs simply because they want to profit from the sales the UFO related items.
People who insist that aliens are here on earth are insisting on something they have no evidence of. Some people claim they saw strange things in the sky, but I once saw a strange shadow moving across the night sky, also. However, that doesn't prove that aliens from other planets are here on the earth.
Million of people are fascinated by the thought that aliens from other planets are living among us. Those people will cling to any evidence they can find to believe in aliens. The UFO conspiracy belongs in the Entertainment Category.

Yup I agree, that is a possibility.

Our history books and encyclopedias tell us that Oswald killed Kennedy by himself, that lots of men walked on the moon, and that 19 Arabs attacked us on September 11.
After investigating such events, my conclusion is:
•  American schools do not "teach history" to their students. Rather, they "deceive" students with "government propaganda".  
•  An American with a Ph.D. in history does not have an "advanced degree in history". Rather, he has "extensive exposure to propaganda".
•  Americans with PhDs in history are often given the title of Doctor. A more appropriate title would be Victim or Fool.

Yup.

The people who reprimand me for asking about the 9-11 movement should take the hypocrisy to such an extreme that it becomes amusing. For example, why not tell me,
"you are either with us or against us."
Thanks for mentioning that, cause you are hypocritical yourself:  you say
The Useful Idiots must make a choice between continuing to help the Zionists, or turning against them. As President Bush might say,  
"You are either with us, or you are with the Axis of Zionism."

How many times do we have to suffer through a crummy government before it occurs to us that maybe the imbecile who gets elected President is not the problem; that maybe we need to experiment with changes in our election system, our legal system, and other government systems? How much corruption, inefficiency, chaos, and traffic jams do we have to suffer through before it occurs to us that maybe Bush is not our problem; that maybe we need to take our nation to the repair shop and give it an overhaul?

HELL YEAH!  You are fucking right on there!

There is nothing wrong with investigating the Kennedy assassination even further, but the rest of us should not wait for all details to be discovered. There is more than enough information in the Warren report to prove the US Government was involved in the killing. Further investigations only provide additional details on who was involved and what their motives were.  
By the way, I think our government has learned from that mistake because if you look at the reports about the Oklahoma City and 9-11 attack, the reports do not have much information about the attack. I think our government has realized that the more they say, the more they hurt themselves. The best policy for a corrupt government is to ignore the issues, and to fake ignorance and stupidity.

Awsome comment.  The information is there, and they omit it purposely to lesser incriminate themselves.

The information about the 9-11 attack will not by itself make the world a better place. Information is an intangible entity. But an intangible entity cannot build better cities for us, nor can it give us better governments. Information is of value only if we do something with it.

Good point.

A week later you drop by the shop and ask if your car is ready, but they tell you they're still investigating. This goes on week after week. A year later you ask for your car, but they tell you they still have not finished the investigation. You point out that they've got so many books and videos already, but they respond that none of them are conclusive; that they need a better book, and they need more details.
Imagine this goes on for decades. At what point would you tell them that they've got enough information and that they should take what they've got and do something with it.
Wouldn't it occur to you that the car is never going to get fixed if all they do is investigate? Wouldn't it occur to you that they must take the information they've got, propose repairs for the car, and then let you decide which of those proposals to implement?

Good example.  We must take action and do something with the information, show that the current leaders are incompetent and can't uncover the truth, prevent us from going into a lie of a war.  

Investigating the 9-11 attack is a merely the first step in making a better world. The second step is to spread the information that the investigation uncovers. The third step would be to use this information to propose possible repairs to our nation. And the fourth step is to start experimenting with the nation by implementing some of those proposals.



How absurd does this situation have to get before you complain that employees are not tools for businesses to use to manipulate us? When will we consider the possibility that there is something wrong with America's attitudes towards money, life, and people? When do we stop complaining about George Bush and start realizing that this nation is seriously messed up?

Yup its retarded.  Grocery store and all the public businesses making employees are all nice, pretend to be things.

What do we do to stop this abuse in the future elections? The first time a voter falls for this deception we could say it is because he is naive, but what happens when he believes the same lies over and over and over? Do we set up a committee to watch over the elections and make decisions on when the voters are being manipulated? If so, who watches that committee to ensure they are honest?
It's possible that this problem would be reduced dramatically if our schools would teach children about voting, deception, and what to look for in a candidate. However, the attitude in America, and I suppose in other nations also, is that people inherently know how to vote. Supposedly, voting is as natural as breathing. Supposedly, there is no way to help people become better voters.

LOL.

This problem affects of all nations, not just America. The primary enemy of every nation is its own people. The people create and support crummy governments, allow those crummy governments to exploit and manipulate them, and ridicule people who try to help them understand that their government is manipulating them. Rather than face the possibility that their nation's problems are their own fault, most people prefer to blame foreign nations or some minority of people within their nation.

Yup!

The majority of people want to play like children, while somebody else grows the food, learns the technical skills, fixes the plumbing, and cleans up the garbage. Only a small number of people will learn useful skills and do useful work without being forced into it.

Yup.

Imagine a hospital in which the doctors are selected by the voters of the city. Also, imagine that their are no standards for either the voters or the candidates to meet. People such as Ronald Reagan, George Bush, and Bill Clinton are allowed to run for the position of "doctor".

Yeah voting is bad.

If you had died in the 9-11 attack, who should be blamed for your death? Would you blame President Bush? Or would you blame the voters for electing incompetent government officials and for ridiculing the "conspiracy nuts" who expose the corruption? How many of the 3000 Americans who died during the 9-11 attack were "innocent victims"? And how many should instead be classified as "irresponsible jerks who became victims of their own inability to create a respectable government, and who deserve what they got"?
YOU ARE AN ASSHOLE.  YOU HAVE BEEN SAYING THE PEOPLE WHO VOTE ARE MORE RESPONSIBLE THAN THE ACTUAL PEOPLE COMMITTING CRIMES.  You are a retard to think the people who died on 911 deserve what they got.  That is pathetic logic you arrogant fool.

America has never had a "work ethic"; rather, this nation has always had a "slave and servant ethic".

[Z.O.G.]

Hufshit is a complete idiot.  I exchanged several e-mails with him a few months ago to ask him if he could get me some proof that Alex Jones' wife is a damn Jew.  But he didn't have any.  So we started talking about the Jews and related things.

He knew next to nothing(or pretended not to know) about the Jews and their involvement in destructive and dangerous radical social and political movements in the Western world in the 20th century, i.e. Communism/Marxism, racial egalitarianism, feminism, the "Civil Rights" Movement and Civil Rights Act of 1964, open borders, the flood of non-white immigration into White countries, the Immigration Reform Act of 1965, etc...

He is a complete ignoramus.  For someone who pretends to be an expert on the Jews, he is truly pathetic.  I have learned more about the Jews and the destructive ideas that they create and promote in the past 9 months than he has learned about in the past 9 years.

But I later found out that Hufshit is a part Jew himself.  This probably means that he was NOT actually ignorant of the Jewish involvement in all of these destructive movements and ideologies, but that he was just PRETENDING to be ignorant of it.  In other words, Hufshit is just a typical lying, scheming Jew P.O.S.

[high_treason]

I might not agree with all your views but I do agree with you that Hufschmid is a strange person. I just think he was hit really hard by a lot of information that may have caused him to become paranoid. But some in the alternative movement are cowards and opportunists and not ignorent especially Alex Jones while I don't think of him as an agent I do think he wants to hit the big leagues (i.e. Hollywood) thats why he avoids the issue like the plague. While people who promoting the black pope and the Vatican theories are clearly dillusional about who funds it and the fact that there aren't enough people to be recruited by the Vatican for missionary work. The Vatican clearly has no power its strength ended with the 30 years war and the French revolution. But I don't believe everyone who doesn't mention zionism is an agent, but they are probably not ignorent either, they are just scared from the anti-semite label and the ADL we have seen it with CC recently.

[Ognir]

I did 2 audios with him last year,  and I called him an agent after the 2nd one

[Anonymous]

Well as a former student of the trio EH, DBS, & Bollyn I still appreciate the work that Hufschmid puts out. He is one of the original people who have exposed 9/11 and he is also one of the first and very few people who have called out others with in the truth movement for being frauds while other spineless people were being too "PC" to do so when they saw some BS. I could make a good argument myself for EH being a shill or agent but at this point that is not my belief. He also doesn't promote people to just wear funny t shirts and wave signs but insinuates for people to take more of some real actions that with have to be taken regardless. Although I don't agree with everything he says or his stances on topics you cant deny that he is intelligent and gives a much different point of view of issues that most would not look at.  As an INDEPENDENT investigator myself though I only stand for myself in complete trust so I wouldn't put the "prothink" seal of approval on anyone out there except for a very small handful and Khanverse is one of those people. Again I look at people's message and not the messenger because as long as the correct information gets out there than thats all that counts whether you prefer TIU, Prothink, Judicial, etc etc.

As far as Alex's wife, I do have a tiny bit of information. Alex and his wife were married by Tex Marrs and one time on Tex's show someone called him and asked if Alex's wife was Jewish and he just simply said she is now Christian... That should say it all. If you really want to know though the best thing to do is not ask someone else and base that they are a shill for not knowing and CALL ALEX"S SHOW YOURSELF AND ASK HIM. I don't understand why more of us aren't spending a little time calling ALL types of radio shows out there and injecting some REAL shit.

[joeblow]

Well Mr. ProThink, you're obviously not a rabid AJ listener like myself (I can hear all you people laughing at me!). I specifically heard him talking about his son and he called him "Einstein" as a first name.

P.S.

Check out my new pseudo-tracker at http://nwo.umunu.com I put all of WW3's stuff on it. Please do NOT change or create .torrents with umunu as an announcer. The torrent will FAIL because I turned off the built-in tracker.

Yours in Judaism,

Joe Blow

[Ralph Furely]

just a question and a little off topic, but after you hear the man talking about arabs owning hollywood and the stock markets, among other outrageous and obviously bullshit claims, how can you waste your time with this guy?  why even bother listening to him anymore?  when it is so obvious he will not research or talk about in lengths the most important part in all of this, why still support him?
not to mention all his fishy connections and affiliations, among a list of other things i could put here as well.

i guess im just still dumbfounded at the fact that ppl who are in the know, still support and listen to this fucking criminal piece of shit.  he sticks up for the bad guys and would rather all of us turn our cheeks to all this Zionism shit.

fuck him he should be hung by the balls in a public arena.

as for Eric, i pretty much hold the same stance as Mike.  he has done a lot of suspicious shit and that little episode with him recording Daryl n shit really made me think the other way about him, but still, he has a lot of info most others wont put out, and he was the pioneer in the 9/11 investigation, among other things.  like showing us some shills in this movement, etc.  for that ill always appreciate him.

[Papillon]

Eric goes way beyond the 'they & them' talking and urges us to have a deeper look into ourselves, for we, 'the stupid, gullible Goy suckers' ALLOW this all to happen to us. Most people are not able to think properly and like Eric says, most people are just plain stupid. I'm on the very same page with him but I see a tendency of 'wrapping up ALL Jews' in his talks but as long as you take the bait & don't bite the hook, you can learn from almost everybody, even AJ!! The different truthtellers more or less complement each other.

Papillon.