CIRCUMCISION and armoring: Jewish psychosis

[Helphand]

Oldish post but a good one, the live url has gone but maybe wayback can deliver it, haven't tried...


From: Anarchore <e@t.me>
Newsgroups: can.politics,soc.culture.israel,aus.politics,alt.politics.british
Subject: A Possible Explanation of Jewish Psychosis
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 14:50:18
Message-ID: <mn.7b7a7d7c12c449c0.75909@t.me>


Circumcision is one of those bizzare things that is so horrifying that it is hard to believe that humans would do something like this, and to their infants yet!

It gives rise to mental illness, which explains why Jews are so apt to be and follow psychopaths that lead them down the unwavering support for a vile terrorstate.  They have been controlled by the Elders of Zion, and are ruining the world with their warmongering, antispeech madness, and terrorist "antiterror" legislation.  They dominate the Liberal and Conservative parties and the media, and three of the last four Supreme Court judges are Jews.

From early on, the Elders of Zion, have mandated circumcision as social control.  We know the way to brainwash is to use trauma, to create a hole in the psyche that can be exploited later.

No wonder diseased hacks like Irwin Cotler can run around spewing non-sequitors day and night without feeling any guilt.

The guy is obviously suffering severe castration anxiety.

We need to get the Jews into therapy(Muslims too, since they have their share of psychopaths as well!)

If we heal the Jews, maybe they won't feel the need to dominate and bleat endlessly about the hohocaust.

"Thus, it is the emotional plague in man that rationalizes genital mutilation with pseudo-hygienic pretexts; drives him to strap down helpless newborns and cut away a third of the skin of the penis, with its concentration of sensitive nerves; and allows him to say and believe that the screaming infant feels no pain or just a little discomfort. Circumcision, more than any other invention of armoring man, demonstrates our deep seated hatred of sexuality and our need to destroy what we fear most."


http://www.orgonomy.org/article_025.html

Journal of Orgonomy Volume 31 no. 1

Circumcision From An Orgonomic Perspective

Richard Schwartzman, D. 0.Rebecca Schwartzman, B.A.

All of nature's processes are governed by a single energy; orgone energy. This energy permeates the cosmos and courses through all living things. The emotional and physical health of human beings depends upon whether this energy flows freely in the body or whether it is blocked.

When the energy is unimpeded, individuals feel alive, are able to relate well with others, and function well in their work. When it is blocked, they feel dissatisfied and every aspect of functioning suffers. From birth, and quite possibly before, humans respond to traumatic events by physically contracting, especially in their musculature. When muscular tension becomes chronic, it is known as "armoring," and its presence prevents the natural flow of orgone energy through the body. Armoring forms as a consequence of early, painful experiences of infancy and childhood. Feelings and memories are held in the armor and, as such, the unconscious resides not in the "mind" but rather in the whole human being. Thus, mind and body are united with orgone energy functioning as the common principle.

From Reich's discovery of armoring we know that even the earliest emotional experiences are biophysically held in the body as chronic muscular contractions. Adults cannot remember back to their earliest days of life, but initial feelings and experiences remain locked within them, laying the foundation for neurosis with all its untoward consequences. Medical orgone therapy seeks to reestablish the free flow of orgone energy by relieving armoring, and in so doing it brings about the expression of long-buried feelings and emotions.

Prevailing opinion holds that the human condition is almost entirely the result of either heredity or social factors. However, life's first experiences shape character most, and lay the foundation for either healthy functioning or chronic discontent. Birth and the first few days of life are the most important and decisive period of development, and the earliest traumas produce the most severe damage. This is because the newborn has not developed any means to defend against shock and injury. The trauma of circumcision produces a severe biophysical contraction, concentrated at the site of the injury. With no mechanism yet developed to defend against the excruciating pain, the infant can only scream and then withdraw into himself.

Adults, during the course of medical orgone therapy, regularly recall past traumas as armoring is released. As impossible as this may seem, sometimes a patient will relive his circumcision. It is a horrendous experience for the patient and very disturbing for the physician. If individuals could see a circumcision being relived, with all its pain and terror, there would be no question that even the earliest infantile experiences remain alive in the adult and are not at all "forgotten."

The location of armoring, the site where the flow of energy is predominantly blocked, determines the type and degree of neurosis that will develop. Thus, armoring that occurs as a result of circumcision has its own particular lasting aftereffects. The severe trauma of circumcision increases pelvic armoring and serves to block the flow of feeling into the genital; therefore the full energetic discharge that should normally accompany orgasm becomes inhibited. Dr. Elsworth Baker tells us that castration anxiety is produced originally "through the threat of castration, either with words and implications, or by circumcision."(1) In the adult, castration anxiety manifests itself as a fear of natural sexual relations, and such individuals are always orgastically impotent-they lack the capacity for complete surrender to the involuntary contractions that occur with orgasm and complete discharge of sexual excitation. Because of pelvic armoring and castration anxiety, which increases the holding in this area, one would expect circumcised men to be more likely to engage in pregenital forms of sex. Indeed, a recent study of the effects of circumcision found a relationship between circumcision and sexual activity(2). Specifically, circumcised men were shown to engage in a more elaborate set of sexual practices, particularly masturbation and oral and anal sex. The authors of the study hypothesized that this behavior may be due to reduced sensitivity of the penis. 1 While reduced sensitivity exists, from what we know of the effects of armoring, and specifically castration anxiety, it can be speculated that those who have been genitally traumatized prefer less threatening outlets for their sexual drive.

The American Academy of Pediatrics determined in 1971 that there was no valid medical need for routine circumcision (4). However, physicians ignored this report and continued to advocate the procedure for health reasons. 2 What are the real roots of this barbaric practice? What is at work in man's structure that permits this brutalization of helpless infants? Reich has provided us with answers by elucidating what he called the "emotional plague."

Most people are rigidly armored and as such are incapable of achieving a state of natural, healthy functioning. However, at their core, they long for freedom and release from this straitjacket of armoring (5). People fear and hate what they long for most but cannot have. Reich tells us that there is "[a] terror that strikes the armored human being when he faces any kind of living expression [and this] is responsible for the systematic armoring of newborn generations."(6) Reich called this reaction "plague behavior" and it has become organized in many of our social institutions.

One can recognize the emotional plague individual by the following characteristics:

    * He is always genitally frustrated and his impulses, in particular, are sadistic.

    * He imposes his way of thinking and living on others.

    * His behavior is exceedingly well rationalized.

    * The real motive for the behavior is never the stated motive.

    * He seriously and honestly believes in the stated goal.

    * Touching upon his hidden motives always produces anxiety and anger and he strongly defends his thinking and actions.

Circumcision is a classic example of a practice rooted in the emotional plague. It fulfills every requirement of plague behavior. The very act of cutting the newborn's penis speaks to the genital frustration and sadistic impulses at work. Ideas about circumcision are imposed on others by our culture, and those who defy the practice are reproached. (You who are not circumcised are "dirty," you who are not circumcised look "ugly," you who are not circumcised shall not enter into a covenant with God.) The reasons for circumcision (health, hygiene, and religious devotion) are very well-rationalized. The real motive for advocating circumcision, the desire to kill life in newborns, is never stated. Those who advocate the practice seriously and honestly believe in their stated objectives, but if their hidden motives are touched upon anxiety and anger always appear.

Thus, it is the emotional plague in man that rationalizes genital mutilation with pseudo-hygienic pretexts; drives him to strap down helpless newborns and cut away a third of the skin of the penis, with its concentration of sensitive nerves; and allows him to say and believe that the screaming infant feels no pain or just a little discomfort. Circumcision, more than any other invention of armoring man, demonstrates our deep seated hatred of sexuality and our need to destroy what we fear most.

The emotional plague will continue to influence human behavior and therefore circumcisions will continue to be performed. Circumcision will remain a practice of cultures so long as there are love-starved individuals. Parents will continue to demand that their sons be circumcised and rationalize their conduct. Physicians will continue to scare parents with threats that their boy will develop cancer of the penis and suffer from urinary tract infections. 3All this will be done with good intention. Reich tells us that the emotional plague "... [has] to give way when confronted, clearly and uncompromisingly, with rational thinking and with the natural feeling for life." For this reason, education and appeals to spare defenseless infants from a brutal assault will slowly bring about change.

Some parents may recognize that circumcision is damaging, and that the remote possibility of health consequences of an intact foreskin does not warrant its amputation. Yet despite this understanding, these parents may still be reluctant to leave their child intact. They fear that later in life their boy will suffer social disapproval because he was not circumcised. Parents are also concerned for themselves; what will friends and family think and say when they discover the new baby is not circumcised? These are legitimate concerns, but they need to be put into perspective. Reich tells us:

    If the rigid armoring of the human animal is the basic common principle of all his emotional misery; if it is this armoring which puts him, alone among biological species, beyond the pale of natural functioning, then it follows logically that prevention of rigid armoring is the main and central goal of preventive mental hygiene. (7)

In light of this, it should be the goal of parents, above all other considerations, to prevent armoring in their children wherever possible. Children should not be adapted to a neurotic world by fostering the development of a rigid character. A child who grows up relatively free from armor will understand that it is society that has the problem, not he. Because of this he will be able to confront society's neurotic reactions. Reich tells us that we must learn from children instead of "forcing upon them our own cockeyed ideas and malicious practices, which have been shown in every new generation to be damaging and ridiculous."(

There is a simple solution for parents who have doubts about whether to circumcise: Let the child decide for himself. If he feels at some point that social or religious pressures warrant the operation, he can elect to undergo the procedure fully informed and with a developed ego. No lasting armoring will result. "LET THE CHILDREN THEMSELVES DECIDE THEIR OWN FUTURE. Our task is to protect their natural powers to do so."(9)



Footnotes

1. Moses Maimonides, the foremost intellectual figure of medieval Judaim, wrote that one purpose of the commandment to circumcise was to diminish sexual passion. Rabbi Elie Munk, in his commentary on Maimonides, states: "Thus scarcely having entered the world the Jew is put onto the road of self control. It is the first of a long series of steps, religious and moral, all permeated with a moral purity which envelops him in an atmosphere of chastity and human dignity and prevents him from falling to the level of an animal."(3) back to text

2. It is interesting to note here that female genital mutilation (FGM), which is practiced in Africa, the Persian Gulf, and the southern Arabian Peninsula, is also defended with rationalizations of better health, improved aesthetics, and appeals to religion and tradition. When we hear of FGM practiced in another culture we are appalled. But when circumcision which has so much in common with FGM is performed in our hospitals, with the rationalizations we give to it, the practice is accepted with hardly a second thought.  back to text

3. Although cancer of the penis only occurs in the uncircumcised, we know that it is extremely rare and occurs most often in the severely mentally ill and those who practice poor hygiene and health care. Some studies show that urinary tract infections are slightly more frequent in the uncircumcised, but they often resolve spontaneously, without adverse long-term effects or can be readily treated with antibiotics. A possible explanation as to why the uncircumcised child has a slightly increased incidence of urinary tract infection may be found in the over-attention paid to cleanliness. Retraction of the foreskin to clean the penis (which should not be done in boys under two years of age) causes or contributes to urinary tract infection. Regardless of what might account for the slight potential risk of infection, the danger does not warrant amputation of the foreskin as a preventative measure.  

REFERENCES

1.   Baker, E. Man In The Trap. New York: Macmillan, 1967, p. 73.

2.   Laumann, E., Masi, C., Zuckerman, E. et al. "Circumcision in the United States. Prevalence, Prophylactic Effects, and Sexual Practices," JAMA, 277(13):1052-7, April 2, 1997.

3.   Munk, E. Call to the Torah. New York: Feldheim Publishers, 1969.

4.   American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, "Standards and Recommendations for Hospital Care of Newborn Infants," 5th ed. Evanston, IL: kAP, 71, 1971.

5.   Reich, W Children of the Future. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1983, P. 18.

6.  Reich, W p. 18.

7.   Reich, W p. 16.

8.   Reich, W p. 20.

9.   Reich, W p. 20.

[Bela]

Muslims also get circumcised, and also at a later age than Jews - seems like in Turkey and Malaysia, it happens about age 10-13.  In Turkey, you get circumcised, and then you get a party thrown for you.  

[youtube:kmxavzfw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAOq5mgoVPs[/youtube]kmxavzfw]

You get to wear a cute little outfit.



In spite of circumcision being widely practiced in Muslim cultures, there is seemingly less neurosis than with Jews.  In Argentina, there's an entire section of Buenos Aires called "Shrink Hill" which has nothing but psychiatrists for the Jewish community there.  You don't see this in Muslim areas.  

Maybe it's because with the Jews it happens so early, and also the Mohel sort of molests them afterward, by sucking the blood out, they get a complex (just kidding) - I think the neurosis with Jews comes from the separatist, "chosen" nonsense, the victimization complex, and possibly a few other things, like an overemphasis on sex as some sort of redemption or therapy.

[maz]

Muslims also get circumcised, and also at a later age than Jews - seems like in Turkey and Malaysia, it happens about age 10-13.  In Turkey, you get circumcised, and then you get a party thrown for you.  

You get to wear a cute little outfit.

 And they get to have a trophy too :lol:

[kolnidre]

That's a whopper of an article and I don't have sufficient time to take it in or offer my own thoughts and observations on this inhuman ritual at the moment.

But speaking of tropies...

One time when I was playing in the basement of one of my best friends growing up the ball we were playing with knocked some things off a shelf. Among the articles that scattered on the floor was his "Certificate of Circumcision," complete with the mohel's signature.

Even then I remember thinking, isn't the dark scar and dried up head proof enough?

[MikeWB]

[Bela]

And they get to have a trophy too :lol:

That's a scepter.  Jews don't get scepters.

[anarchore]

Well Helphand, was I ever tickled to see this back from when I posted more in newsgroups, thanks for finding it!

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

LargeSarge posted this one awhile back... an interesting thread.  MikeWB that's about the most accurate Cartoon I've seen in a long time   :lol:  :lol: :

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=5594&start=0

[Bela]

I don't think anyone's getting the point.  

If half a billion Muslims are subject to circumcision, then the theoretical neurosis that supposedly comes from circumcision would be among them too. It just isn't.  

Jewish women are just as neurotic or worse - and do not get circumcised.  My conclusion is this is either due to the effects of inbreeding and/or indoctrination.  

Need I mention Sarah "I'd kill Jesus again" Silverman as an example?

The nonsense (from the above posted article) that women prefer circumcised over non is just that.  Some sleazy Turk was telling me that foreign women like Turkish guys on account of the circumcision, not in spite of it.  I have never heard any woman complain one way or the other.  

A lot of German and N. European women go to Turkey to fool around.  I spent about 3 months there and heard enough stories, and saw enough.

Below a couple of articles on circumcision in Malaysia:

http://www.circlist.com/rites/malaysia.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSKLR170131

[Helphand]

Good points though there could of course be different reasons for the multifarious cases of psychosis in these subject poulations, so the effect of infant circumcision at least is not demonstrably shown to be illusory...

As I spotted them here are some other comments on this topic.

Quoted in "Judaism and the Vatican by Vicomte Leon de Poncins" (1967):

"...Tertullian said that the Jews only practised
circumcision to check the tendency to idolatry and to remind them
of their true God...." (Dr. A. Roudinesco. Le Malheur d'Israel., pp. 126-27)

In his "New History of the Jews" (1968) Eustace Mullins says at pages 36-7:

"This identification, one on which the Jews have always insisted for this very reason, was that of circumcision. Not only did it identify those who were active Jews, but it also identified those Gentiles whom the Jews had enslaved; it was the badge of Jewry. Consequently, as the Jews rose to power in the Roman Empire, and began to possess many slaves, the first thing they did was to circumcise their Gentile slaves as the badge of possession. This circumcision of the Gentiles roused the Romans against them. In the year 315 AD, Emperor Constantine issued the first edict against the Jews, whom he described as "that disgaraceful sect". This edict forbade the Jews to circumcise their Gentile slaves..."

[page 53:]

"Among the Jews themselves, the blood rite is an integral part of the ceremony of circumcising Jewish males. According to the Jewish Encyclopaedia, Vol. VI, page 99, when performing the circumcision, the mohel, or circumciser, "takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle provided."
What the Jewish Encyclopaedia does not tell us is that this mixture of wine and blood is then drunk by the rabbi, as a great delicacy. No other people in the world today enacts such a weird blood rite, save, perhaps, some Stone-Age natives in the deepest jungles of the Congo or New Guinea."

What happens to all the off-cuts? Are they the equivalent of "misshapes" in the world of the chocolatier/retailer? Mullins is not 100% clear on this. Spit or swallow?

[anarchore]

I don't think anyone's getting the point.  

If half a billion Muslims are subject to circumcision, then the theoretical neurosis that supposedly comes from circumcision would be among them too. It just isn't.  

Yes it is... the Muslims are fukked... who but a fukked society does this to their kids?  Also, the more % circ, the higher % of violence in the country.  

However, they may be spared the brunt of the negative brain effects because Muslims don't torture their kids with this filthy rite until they are 10 yrs old or so, J-ws do it to infants whose brains are developing.

And pardon my sexism, but women aren't exactly the intellectual powerhouses of the nations, J-w and Muslim women go along with what their  husbands wantt.

 Israhell has high domestic abuse rates.


http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/20 ... srael%2020

The Advancement of the Status of Women - Israel 2001

by R. Werczberger, Research and Information Center, The Knesset


Background

Since its establishment in 1948, the state of Israel has had the image of a country in which women enjoy full equality. This image, due to the liberal and socialist ethos of the Zionist movement, is, however, somewhat misleading. There are many areas, in which traditions, social institutions, religious rules, and even laws have kept women at a disadvantage: in the workplace, in divorce proceedings and as victims of violence. Changes in the political and economic climate, such as the Middle East conflict onflict in the Middle East and the influx of thousands of guest workers, have created new problems. The widening economic gap in Israeli society, along ethnic and geographical lines, points to the entrenchment of poverty and disadvantage in particular groups. Old women, single mothers, Arab women, immigrants from Ethiopia and the former Soviet Union and foreign workers (with or without work permits) are most vulnerable to poverty, health problems and abuse of basic rights. Women as a group are disadvantaged in the labor market, the health system, education, the courts and religious institutions and are subject to harassment and violence.

The status of women in Israel has been influenced by several social and historical factors related to the conflict between state and religion, which characterize the political scene. Though the founding fathers of the State were mostly oriented towards a secular and liberal, or socialist ideology, they assigned to the religious institutions all matters concerning personal status, i.e. marriage, conversion, divorce, burial, etc. Thus, the Orthodox stream of Judaism, acting according to Halacha - Jewish religious law - known for its patriarchalism, virtually obtained a monopoly over official Jewish religious life and personal status. Another factor influencing the status of women is the centrality of the IDF (Israel Defense Forces). Though women have always served in the IDF, the army offers a predominantly male environment

that spills over into civilian society by means of the "old boy's network". Finally, even though the Proclamation of the Establishment of the State of Israel declares equality between the sexes, so far none of the Basic Laws, which in the absence of a constitution form the country's normative rules, incorporates this principle, due mainly to the unresolved relationship between religion and the State.

Legislative Developments

    * Legislation: The Committee for the Advancement of Women in the Knesset, Israel's Parliament, and individual female Members of Knesset, have been active in the field of advancing women's status through legislation. Their initiatives involve a variety of issues: in particular issues of gender, equality at work, violence against women, welfare, health and fertility, and more.

    * The Authority for the Advancement of Women was established by law in 1998. This body is authorized to encourage, coordinate, promote and monitor the government's and the local authorities' activities regarding women's status, to promote legislation and to advise the government on the enforcement of laws promoting the status of women. It is also expected to initiate research and to enhance public awareness through the media and education.


Changes in the Political Arena

The growing awareness of the status of women has been manifested in the increasing presence of women in managerial and decision-making positions. The last few years have seen record numbers of women in these positions: the current Knesset has the largest number of women Knesset Members -16 out of 120 members; Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's government also includes a record number of women ministers - the minister of Education, the Minister of Industry and Trade and the Minister responsible for Regional Development. In addition, two women are deputy ministers: in the Ministry of National Infrastructure and in the Ministry of Defense. Since the establishment of the State, one woman (Golda Meir) has served as Prime-Minster. In the 1998 local elections, two women were elected as mayors (of the cities of Netanya and Herzliya), and the number of female council members rose from 153 in 1993, to 240. Three women now serve as justices of the Supreme Court and 36 are judges of District Courts; women constitute 34% percent of the total number of judges. The State Attorney is also a woman.

Facts concerning the status of women in Israel

Women in the Labor Force: In 2000, 45.44% of the labor force were women, of whom only 15.8% worked full time, compared to 34.1% of the men. The average monthly salary for women was 60.18% of men's wages. The average wage-per-hour was 80.5% of that of men. In the Arab sector, the participation of women in the labor force is significantly lower - only 22%, and the rate of unemployment is higher than in the Jewish population -11.7%. The average salary of Arab women is only 71% of that of Jewish women.

In general, women work mostly in lower-paying jobs, in services, education, health, welfare and clerical positions, and are significantly less represented in prestigious and lucrative occupations such as hi-tech, management and engineering,

Poverty: The economic gap between rich and poor has deepened during recent years. 16% of the women in Israel today live in poverty, compared to 14% of the men. The difference may lie in the fact that most single famlies are those of single women.

Violence against women continues to be a serious problem, ranging from domestic violence, sexual violence, sexual harassment, incest, trafficking in women for prostitution and honor-killing or femicide (mostly in the Muslim sector). It is estimated that about 200,000 women are suffering from domestic violence. At present there are 13 shelters for abused women and their families which during 2000, sheltered some 715 women and 882 children. There is also one hostel for battering and violent husbands.

[SolusInAeternum2]

However, they may be spared the brunt of the negative brain effects because Muslims don't torture their kids with this filthy rite until they are 10 yrs old or so, J-ws do it to infants whose brains are developing.

I suspect that infant circumcision is a key factor in the formation of the jewish psychosis. A trauma as extreme as circumcision only a few days out of the womb must profoundly influence the child's relationship to reality and to humanity - especially when this is later compounded with horrorcaust fables and paranoid fantasies about anti-Semites.

At root, I think the jewish psychosis is an acute form of what Celia Green has termed the human evasion response: hatred of reality, caused by traumatic experiences of objective impotence, displaced on to other humans ("gentiles").

[anarchore]

Funny how Freud postulated that anti-semitism was due to revulsion against circumcision, but absent is any mention of how it affects the mind of the subject of the procedure!  How telling, and how twisted Freud is.  This is another illustration of societies continuing with pathocracy-strengthening atavistic rituals that are harmful to themselves and others.  Twisted systems twist the people.

[Bela]

Yes it is... the Muslims are fukked... who but a fukked society does this to their kids?  Also, the more % circ, the higher % of violence in the country.

And you are getting these stats from where?

However, they may be spared the brunt of the negative brain effects because Muslims don't torture their kids with this filthy rite until they are 10 yrs old or so, J-ws do it to infants whose brains are developing.

You have no data on these "negative brain effects", or do you?

And pardon my sexism, but women aren't exactly the intellectual powerhouses of the nations, J-w and Muslim women go along with what their  husbands wantt.

Since I've been on this planet, I have noticed that MOST people (male and female) are NOT intellectual.  "Intellectuals" come in both male and female packages, and are a genuine minority, as are most intelligent people.  Any bell curve will show you that.  

Most of the men I've known, almost without exception, have not been "intellectual powerhouses" either.   My mother was probably one of the smartest people I've ever known, even though we didn't get along that well.   So your sexism is well noted.  

PS - I'm not married, and I do whatever I want.  If I was married, my husband wouldn't get away with telling me how to think, unless he wanted to see some divorce papers and a list of soon to be split assets.  Some insecure men will marry compliant women who won't question them.  That's not everyone, as you seem to indicate.

[Bela]

Focusing on circumcision as an explanation for Jewish mental issues is barking up the wrong tree.  Herve Ryssen wrote a book called Psychopathology of Judaism -  at present only available in French.  He seems to have a grip on what is at issue. What I've been able to find is absent of any discussion of circumcision as an event that creates a mental disorder.  It is hard to find quotes from the book, but here is one (from http://forum.thiazi.net/showthread.php?t=152612)



Psychopathology of Judaism


http://www.herveryssen.net


Judaism is not only a religion, as many Jews are atheists or agnostics, and do not consider themselves less Jews. This is not a race, even if it is true that a "trained eye" most of times, can recognize "the Jewish type" that is to say a characteristic pattern which is the result of their strict observance of the endogamy over the centuries. Jews are indeed the "chosen ones" by God, and marriage outside the community is strongly frowned upon. However, mixed marriages exist and have also helped to renew the blood of Israel after all these centuries spent in the ghettos, where the Jews vonluntarily, preferred to live apart from the rest of the population. The essential condition of such mixed marriages, is that the mother is to be Jewish, since Orthodox Rabbis recognize a Jew only if born of a Jewish mother. However, even only a Jewish father or only a Jewish grandparent is enough to identify oneself completely with the Judaism. Jewish is therefore a mental race which has been shaped over the centuries by the Hebrew religion and the universal project of Judaism.

The Judaism is a political project

Judaism is essentially a political project. It is, important for the Jewish to work toward the emergence of a world in "peace", a peace that should be universal and permanent. It is therefore not a coincidence that this word "peace" (shalom in Hebrew) is found frequently in the speech of the worldwide Jew. In this perfect world that they are building, all conflicts will have disappeared first and foremost, naturally, between the nations. It is the reason why the Jewish have been militating, tirelessly for many years, for the abolition of the borders, the dissolution of the national identities and the establishment of the global empire. The nations are considered as responsible for the triggering of wars and turmoil so that they have to be weakened and eventually replaced by a world government, the sole authority that can allow happiness and prosperity to reign on earth.
.
We find this idea more or less developed both in the writings of some intellectual marxists such as -Karl Marx to Jacques Derrida-, than in the speech of the liberal thinkers such as Karl Popper, Milton Friedman, Hayek and Alain Minc. The idea is to unify the world by all means and to generate the cultural conflicts. It is in this perspective that the intellectuals Jewish from all over the world who are working tirelessly. Wether there are left or right wing, liberal or marxist, believers or atheists, they are the most ardent propagandists of the plural society and of the universal misgeneration.

Thus, the Jews- all the Jews- encourage with all their strength the immigration in all the countries in which they are installed, not only because the multicultural society corresponds to their political project, but also because the dislocation of the national identity, and the massive installation of the immigrants preserve them from an eventual nationalist burst, against the control of the power that they have acquired, especially in finance, the politic, and the media. All the intellectual Jewish, without any exeption, are focused on this question of the "plural society" and exercise an "anti rascist vigilance" constantly : In France, some influents writers and journalists such as Bernard Henry-Levy, Jacques Attali, Jean Daniel, Guy Sorman, Guy Konopniki agree on this point despite their political differences. This obsession which is very characteristic of the Judaism is also naturally treated in the movies, where the producers and directors are many Jewish and influents : As soon as a film does the apology of the interbreeding, of the "tolerance", and of the plural society, we can make sure that it is the case of a Jewish producer.

We understand better now why the former communists of the 70's did not have so much difficulties to join the liberal right wing.The fact is that after the Palestinian intifada in october 2000, the Jewish from France and of the Western World have realised that nowadays, the danger comes from Islam and from the young African immigrants. Their aim is to consolidate the multiracial society that they have contributed so much to establish in our country, that already threatens to break up. The former Marxists such as Alexandre Adler, André Glucksmann, or Pascal Bruckner, support therefore nowadays, with Finkielkraut, the right american zionist party. And yet, they have not become French patriots, they only react for the exclusive interest of Judaism.

Tolerance as weapon of war.

The members of the Jewish sect are the most proselytes of the world, but unlike Christianity or Islam which intend to convert people of all races,The Jews have no such plan to convert the world to the Judaism but simply to encourage the other nations to give up their national and religious identities in order to favour the spirit of "tolerance". The ceaseless campaigns to blame the White concerning slavery, colonization, plunder of the Third World or Auschwitz, have no other purpose than the one of putting the opponent on their knees by a sweet method. When only the Jewish will remain on Earth in order to keep their faith and their traditions, they will finally be recognized by everyone as the God's "chosen" people. Their "mission" (this term is frequently used) is to disarm the other peoples, to dissolve anything which is not Jew in order to favour this universal"peace". As established by the prophet Isaiah: "The wolf shall dwell with the lamb, the tiger will rest with the kid, cal, lion, ram shall live together and a young child will lead them" (isaiah, XI, 6 to 9). The Messiah from Israel who has been so much waited for during three thousands years will therefore establish the kingdom of David and will give to the Jews an empire everywhere in the universe. A few explicit texts exist on this subject.

Jews are therefore continuously encouraged to campaign in order to promote the unification of the world and to hasten the arrival of the Messiah. The propaganda is their field, and it is no coincidence they are so many and influent in all the medias. In their hands, the "tolerance" and the "human rights" become incredibly efficient weapons which work very well. In fact, as you will have understood, it is not through their names or physical appearances that we can recognize the Jews, but rather from what they write and what they say wherever they are installed.

Selective amnesia and fabulation

Many jews, as we know, have played an absolute overwhelming role in the Soviet tragedy and the thirty million deaths that accompanied it . We remind you that Karl Marx was born in a Jewish family and that Lénine himself had some Jewish blood in his veins, Trotsky, the leader of the red army was a Jew named Bronstein, while Kamenev (Rosenfield) and Zinoviev (Apfelbaum) were running the two capitals. But the list of Jews who have distinguished themselves in the crimes of Communism is endless. It must be said and repeated : The doctrinal Jews, the Jewish officers and the Jewish torturers had a very heavy reponsability in this story. The "perfect" world they have concocted and which was supposedly "ineluctable" has turned out to be from the very beginning, a real nightmare for the population and not until 1948, the intellectual Jewish took their distance from the Stalinist government, when Staline finally launched the "anti zionist" campaign to ost the senior Jewish leadership positions.

The undisputable fact is systematically passed under silence. In his book called "Two Centuries Together" Alexander Solzhenitsyn was outraged that the intellectual Jewish were still refusing to recognise their responsibilities in the slaughter of thousand of Christians. It also notes that some of them show themselves as victims of the Bolschevik government.

This selective amnesia is necessary to people who don't cease to proclaim their "innocence" as we can regularly notice in their writings, and as we can read it , for example, in the editorial issue of the Israel magazine on April 2003, "the first Israeli monthly magazine in French language" under the username of a certain André Darmon "To kill a Jew or a child makes God crying as he is the bearer of the universal ethics and of innocence that we are exterminating". Not less!"

It is therefore quite inconceivable that the Jews may have been responsible for any atrocities. Jews are only victims "scapergoats" of an evil and hostile world. But very soon, the Messiah will punish the "bad" and will restore the sons of Israel in their own rights.

Nevertheless, in this same editorial, a certain Frederick Sroussi recognised that the Nazi governement was worst than the Stalinian government. He quoted the cruelties perpetrated by some SS: for example, we learn that SS Latvian Cukurs' hobby was to lauch Jewish babies in the air to shoot them in their head as in ball-trap, he writes. He also points out, among other episodes, the rape of children which would have been committed by the SS before killing them". In this chapter, the examples are not lacking, and the Second World War has contributed to feed the fertile imagination of the children of Israel.

Unless, of course, it is once again a case of "projection" syndrome. We know, in fact- even if the media never speak about it-, that many Jews and Rabbis are involved in paedophile cases (see "Psychanalyse du Judaisme", 2007). And murdering a child would be perharps more a Jewish speciality than the characteristic of a SS mind. The revelations of professor Ariel Toaff, the son of the former great Rabbi of Rome, also confirmed in February 2007, in his 400 pages book "Pasqua di Sangue" the practice of some ritual murderers among the Ashkenazi Jews.

EMOTIONAL FRAGILITY

It should be well understood, therefore, that the suffering of the Jewish cannot be compared to any others. As a consequence thereof, we can only get indignant at what the historian Stephane Courtois states in the preface of his Communism Black Book : "The death of a an Ukranian child from Koulak who is deliberately forced to starvation by the Stalinist government is worth the death of a Jewish child in a Warsaw ghetto". These simple words are enough to provoke the ire of Frederic Stroussi who says himself being stunned by such affront.This speech according to him is no more and no less only "despicable" and represents a vulgar attack against Israel : "What this comparison has to do in here?" he writes. Why do we have to use the slaughter of a Jewish child to deliver an undelying false and hateful rumour with the idea that the Jews would shadow the other victims of the totalitarianism by monopolizing all the attention on them?

The author of the article, as we can notice, reacts in a outrageous way and totally disproportioned with respect to the intentions, yet insignificant and certainly justified by the level-headed Stephane Courtois. He demonstrates here, the "great intolerance and frustration" which is so characteristic with the intellectual Jewish. These reactions are obviously not "normal".

Please note Israel Magazine is a monthly magazine destined to the Jewish community and that, consequently, one can hardly accuse Frederick Sroussi to lie to the Goyist reader as well as to hide to them the true nature of the Bolschevism and the so called malefic cruelty of the SS. His speech does not correspond to a false dialectic as the anti-Semite could claim, but in fact, it reflects the very essence of the Jewish soul. The agressive anti-Semitism stems from the of the failure of understanding of the Jewish identity and only remarks perfidy where there is essentially an existential anxiety which is generated by the psychological dysfunction.

Hysterical people

No jews have ever dared to approach the "transparent mirror" - if we can say - introduced to the Jewish by the Freudian psychanalysis, in which the Jews have claimed to see humanity, but which, at a closer analysis, reflects on the ground of different orientations all the neurosis of the Judaism. The Psychoanalysis is , indeed, like the Marxism, i.e. a "Jewish science" which comes out of the brain of a Jewish intellect. It was therefore logical to wonder how the Freudian "discovery" corresponded to the Jewish specificity. The answer was not obvious and it took hunded of books of all kinds to realise that the question of incest was literary throbbing of the Judaism production and that the issue was far from being only theorical. The Jewish mothers love their sons, it is well known, and incest, real or false, is the origin of a well known mental illness which is called hysteria. It has attracted the attention of Freud in the development of his theories. From there, the parallels between Judaism and the hysterical pathology were quite natural . Judaism is well known for these diseases: Hysteria, depression, introspection, amnesia, manipulation, mythomania, ambivalence of identity, prophetic deceivements (see Jacques Attali!) sexual ambiguity and so on. : "Everything is in there. Freud as a good Jew, has just thrown out a very specific community about the rest of humanity. In reality, this is not the "oedipus complex" but rather the complex of Israel. Indeed, Jews do not seem to really wish to discuss the topic. On the other hand, all the psychiatrists mention : "The hysterical woman wants so much a child from her father or her doctor that she can persuade herself to be pregnant by one of them so as to develop a "nervous pregnancy". However, they found that all the Jewish writers always use the same term to refer to the coming of their Messiah, "The delivery of the Messiah", they say. The Jewish community, as you have understood, "the wife of God" (the Shekhina of the Kabbalist) which is supposed to give birth to the Messiah, is indeed subject to this characteristic nervous pregnancy for nervous hysterical women. Karl Kraus, the Austrian Jewish journalist who did not agree with Freud, states : "Psychoanalysis is the mental illness of which it claims to be the cure". But the right formula can be said in ten words : "Judaism is the disease that claimed to cure the psychoanalysis".

The sexual revolution

After Freud, other Jewish thinkers produced a symbiosis between the Marxism and the Freudian doctrine. Wilhem Reich, Herbert Marcuse said that there should be a sexual revolution in order to break the patriarchal family and the "free sex". These are the theories that have largely inspired the student riots of May 68 . Once again, it played a crucial role. The 70's saw the wave and the Jewish women were again in the foreground (Gisele Halimi, Elisabeth Batinder, etc...). As time passed, a series of legislations appeared to dissolve the family : A Neuirth law legalized the contraceptive pill (1967), succeeded by the challenge of the authority of the father as the head of the household (1970), the divorce by the mutual consent (1974), the right of abortion at the Simon Veil's initiative (1975). The great wave of the porn movie accompanied this "liberation". Here we are compelled to note that the Jewish producers and film directors play a very important role in the sex industry (see The Jewish Mafia, 400 pages, 2008). In parallel, the Freudian concept of bisexuality favored the emergence of homosexuality.

A war machine against Humanity

In fact, the only tangible results of this moral "liberation" is combined with the systematic criminalization of the white man, who is denounced tirelessly by the movies, literature and history as the reason of all the illnesses of our planet, and the collapse of the European societies. The appealing of the egalitarian Judaism which tends to level all the differencies, all the identities, is trying to manage the destruction of the world, this is the truth. Yitzhak Attia, the director of the seminar at the French Institute writes himself in this Israel issue magazine : "Even if our reasons were to shout out with all our strentgh the absurdity of this confrontation between a small insignificant people and the rest of humanity, he writes it is as absurd as incoherent as it may seem and we are engaged in a close battle between Israel and the nations who can only be genocidal. The "peaceful" Israel is no more nor less than the death of all Humanity".

The neutralization of the devil

The question is whether the agressiveness of the Judaism can be neutralized in order to save humanity from the evils that could be more serious than Marxism,with their Psychoanalysis and their ideology of globalization together. First of all, he must face the facts : "After all these centuries of mutual misunderstanding, the anti Christians, the Muslims and Hitler have failed to resolve the Jewish question. The fact is that the Jews feed themselves with the hatred they have generated among all the people worldwide. This hatred, it must be said, is vital for their survival ans for their spiritual genetics because it allows them to close the ranks in their community and across the centuries, where other civilizations have disappeared.

For their part, the Rabbis are sparing no efforts to ensure the Jewishness to be recorded in their genes, even a renegade Jew remains a Jew, and therefore, it is perfectly useless to attempt to leave the prison community. Because the Judaism is a prison. Claiming that a Jew can only be a Jewish, means to work in favor of the Judaism. Therefore, everything is possible, to accomodate the sick among us, because the Jews are not "perfidious" people but the sick to be cured. Jewish are to be loved individually and sincerely in order to free them from the prison where they are locked in. Only then will they be free from their grip and at the same time they will deliver themselves from the evil that lives and threatens all humanity.