TFC/TiU 10th June 2010 (MP3)

[Ognir]

http://theinfounderground.com/archives/ ... 6-2010.mp3

[axa0176]

Excellent I've been waiting for another show for a while

[joeymaclover]

Another Great Show!!!!    
Ognir reports live from floor of the UN during the vote for sanctions on Iran.  
Interviews Helen Thomas and Tayyip Erdogan.
DBS grows his own payot before the celebration of 3 weeks.
Another great show! :crazy:  :crazy:  :crazy:
     

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

A very good show. Like most of TFC/TIU shows, it keeps me thinking about the big picture.

[Helphand]

OK first congrats on interesting subject matter (as is virtually always the case) and some ideas for further research.

However, now the downer - and it's only a matter of my idea of etiquette

As with some other broadcasts I started to feel a mounting ire at what seemed to me like the constant interruptions of each other. When this happens it brings with it the danger of not being conversation and when that occurs, it does NOT make easy, assimilative listening. I think people get hyped up to some extent (understandably) and then jump in with impromptu reactions rather than always letting the other party complete their train of thought/line of argument. Not saying I could do any better - I couldn't - but that's the feeling I get...

For a somewhat more extreme example listen to the 6 June 2010 RBN/Republic Broadcast News edition of Officer Jack McLamb Show with Charlotte Isabyt where she just talks on and on and on over him, it's an effing soliloquy, a solipsistic harangue. Is she snorting cocaine? She sounds like she's huckstering her book in a schtettle (sp.?) someplace. That's not an interview.

A propos this RBN broadcast though after the one hour mark a caller in does mention Jonathan Williams' Legions of Satan (misquoted on fugaziquo as Saturn?) and says read "The Union Jack" (Helen Peters - online pdf first created 2005) - he says at least the Prologue/Dedication and the Epilogue. Caller said Legions of Satan was removed from Congressional Library in Reagan's era. Caller didn't go into the definition of "the Crown" but basically so far as I understand it, I suggest reading for the low-down E.C. Knuth's "The Empire of the City" (1945) which goes into the definitions. (There stated to be not "the Royal family" but more a reference to the embedded symbiosis of the overarching financial Jews ("City of London/Rothschild") and the British Elite (including the Royals); the Royals and English aristos being heavily infiltrated through intermarriage with Jews since the eighteenth century so that the separation of Jews and Elite is now almost meaningless - they are a bonded unity). But beware that he was writing long ago and the advent of the net means that one can put a different view on some of this given wider dissemination / discovery of some sources.
In similar and more recent vein is Frank Perida - The Unholy Alliance (1978). IMHO (again) he is the nearest to a correct, concise summary of who the controllers are. It's a pity the pdf version is pretty poor. But you can get a hard copy for US$2.50 from OMNI PUBLICATIONS / Christian Book Club of America http://www.omnicbc.com. Its only real issue for me is it is not documented i.e. no footnotes stating sources. (He is weak on Calvin / Knox and the writing gets very confused in the section on Hitler's identity: "Comparison of the thumbprints and graphological analysis of the postcard caused Sir Charles Warren, the Chief of Police of London in 1888, to come to the conclusion that Jack the Ripper and the British Duke of Clarence were one and the same person.  General Stuelpnagel had this information from his secret contact in Paris.  He also identified this same bloody thumbprint as being that of Adolph Hitler." ) This is a pity because it detracts from the good quality of the remainder.

The runner-up has to be Cherep-Spiridovich's (1926) "The Secret World Government Or 'The Hidden Hand' " where he names the controllers as "the 300" which he defines as 300 controlling (European) Jews in finance etc all of whom know each other, led by the "tigers of the political zoo", the Rothschilds (aka "Kings of the Jews"). His book *is* documented and often from Jewish sources.

In Dr. John Coleman's book "The Conspirators' Hierarchy: the Committee of 300" (1991) he avoids the direct Spiridovich approach when it comes to naming names and in general is too coy. But reading between the lines and having regard to the other sources named, you can work out who he means. Which process however defeats the objective of a book purporting to be an expose....

Reverting to the TFC broadcast:

@32:33 DBS mentions Tito - I suggest reading "The Plot Against the Church" - Tito was a JEW:

"YUGOSLAVIA
1. Marshal Tito, who with his real Jewish name is called Josif Walter
Weiss, originates from Poland. He was an agent of the Soviet secret service in
Kabul, Teheran and Ankara up to 1935. The true Brozovich Tito, in origin a
Croat, died during the Spanish civil war in Barcelona."

@44 mins - Judeo-Christianity - you need to read Jacob Elon Conner: "Christ Was Not A Jew" (1936) - and in particular his section on Judeo-Christianity / Ebionites. I think this is what Eustace Mullins drew on in writing certain portions of his "Mullins' New History of the Jews". (IIRC "Chain" Cobb on those Goyfire broadcasts a few years ago said "Judeo-Christianity" was not even in the dictionary till the early 1950s; but as this book will show you, the term was in use long before then).
Quotes from Conner:

"Surely it is a monstrous perversion of the truth--this claim that Christ was a Jew--that is now being used by Jews and modern Ebionites to the incredible damage of Christ's mission to all the world.  Says a recent authority,1  "Whoever makes the assertion that Christ was a Jew is either ignorant or insincere:  ignorant  when  he confutes  race and religion: insincere when he knows the history of Galilee, and partly conceals, partly distorts the very entangled facts in favor of his religious prejudices, or it may be, to curry favor with the Jews.  The probability that Christ was no Jew. that He had not a drop of genuinely Jewish blood in

___
1--Houston Stewart Chamberlain. "Foundations of the XIX Century," p. 211.

Earlier in this chapter it was related how the Judaisers or Judeo-Christians, or in a word, the Ebionites, came down from Jerusalem to the Greek coastal cities and tried to persuade the Greek Gentile Christians that they were not properly Christianized because they had not submitted to the rites of Judaism.  Also that this led to a conference in Jerusalem where the Gentile view was championed by Paul and other leaders, and it was thereupon adopted as the official doctrine of the Christian church.  In effect, it was the Christian "declaration of independence" from all other religions whatsoever, and especially from Judaism. It was the proclamation of the new religion that it was not a sect or branch of anything else.  It was agreed to by all, with some reservations that all could assent to. Nevertheless, in Jerusalem and its immediate surroundings, especially toward the east, the Judaistic idea persisted, and it was in these same surroundings that the New Testament canon was formulated, and in part, perhaps, written. Hence the ligaments in the gospels binding the New Testament back to the Old Testament prophecies, genealogies and messianic doctrines are to be accounted for as due to the influence of this Judeo1 Christian "heresy," as the earliest sources called it, and that, too, in disregard of the authority of the apostles' decision about twenty years2 earlier, the canon being dated about 69-70 A. D.
...
1--Graetz (Jewish historian), "History of the Jews," Vol. II, p. 273, tells us how the Judaeans and the elders of the Ebionites: "mingled together without reserve," for a time, but "it did not last long." Again he says that "the closer the Judaean-Christians of the second or third generation approached the views held by the pagan-Christians (Greek-Christians), the further they drifted away from Judaism." He mentions several names of the Talmud writers who were closely associated with the elders of the Christians, thus showing how closely Ebionitism or Judeo-Christianity approached Judaism. And it was in the midst of this influence that the New Testament was compiled!
2--That is to say, in 49 A.D. according to some authorities."

I think this kinda explains where the likes of Sherry Shriner (sic) are coming from...

In the TiU Inner Sanctum's Must-read/See Books and Videos section it is always interesting to note how few read the postings that have "church/religion" type headings. In fact these sources in my experience are some of the best *documented* ones and bear careful re-examination. Don't let the religious angle put you off, examine them on their merits dispassionately.

Last: the final recommendation for Conner's book is that it is banned from importation into the Britannic Elite/Judeo/Masonic/Bolshevist-controlled Canada as "hate" speech" despite being documented and entirely moderate in its language as befits its writer, a Ph.D. and academic. The book deserves to be spread far and wide among the Fundamentalist Christian mind-slaves. See brief reference to it in Must-read/See Books and Videos section. I feel another Book Blurb coming on...

OK lenghty drone / rant mode off, thanks and keep up the good work

[Ognir]

Yeah we'll try to do a new show tonight maybe

[Rockclimber]

I found one the books you referenced and so far it's a dandy (minus all the Aryan references so far, the info is good for it's time):

The Secret World Government or the Hidden Hand
http://www.scribd.com/doc/28098778/The- ... idden-Hand

If ANYONE can ever get their hands on the Legions of Satan (did it ever exist?) that would be great. If this book truly is for real, it must contain the most damning information ever written about them.