Cloud of Death followed by Tsunami traveling at 400-600 MPH 1/2

[Doc Holliday]

Richard Hoagland, a NASA scientist and adviser talks about a huge methane bubble building beneath the sea floor. 2 Part Youtube video from Coast to Coast AM radio show.

Inside government and BP research says this problem is only beginning.
The methane increasingly coming out of the well is proof the bubble is growing around the BP well and could soon explode.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMEr4FctWAM&NR=1

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Thanks for posting these Doc.  I'm a little doubtful on Richard Hoagland since he believes in Nazi UFOs and "Dark Mission" stuff, but he can present interesting scenarios. He kind of goes for worst case scenarios.   I will say that his point about gas and cavitation is the real deal and something very concerning.
I've been looking at this site's coverage since it seems to have posters from the Drilling industry with their point of views. Still not much good is happening with the spill and it could very well get worse if they don't have success from this point forward with the second lines.

This thread has the most analysis:
http://www.theoildrum.com/node/6631

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Found this:  :shock:

Experts: BP Lowballing Size of Leaking Oil Reservoir
George Washington's picture
Submitted by George Washington on 06/21/2010 18:15 -0500

→ Washington's Blog

On May 1st, I warned that the amount of oil spilling into the Gulf was much higher than either the government or BP were admitting:

    As a story in the Christian Science Monitor shows, the Gulf oil spill is much worse than we've been told:

     

        It's now likely that the actual amount of the oil spill dwarfs the Coast Guard's figure of 5,000 barrels, or 210,000 gallons, a day.

        Independent scientists estimate that the renegade wellhead at the bottom of the Gulf could be spewing up to 25,000 barrels a day. If chokeholds on the riser pipe break down further, up to 50,000 barrels a day could be released, according to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration memo obtained by the Mobile, Ala., Press-Register.

        As estimates of the spill increase, questions about the government's honesty in assessing the spill are emerging.

         

        ***

         

        "The following is not public," reads National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Emergency Response document dated April 28, according to the Press-Register [see this]. "Two additional release points were found today. If the riser pipe deteriorates further, the flow could become unchecked resulting in a release volume an order of magnitude higher than previously thought."

         

        An order of magnitude is a factor of 10.

         

        The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that John Amos, an oil industry consultant, said that NOAA revised its original estimate of 1,000 barrels after he published calculations based on satellite data that showed a larger flow.

         

        The 5,000 barrels a day is the "extremely low end" of estimates, Mr. Amos told the Journal.

    CNN quotes the lead government official responding to the spill - the commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Thad Allen - as stating:

        If we lost a total well head, it could be 100,000 barrels or more a day.

    Indeed, an environmental document filed by BP estimates the maximum as 162,000 barrels a day:

        In an exploration plan and environmental impact analysis filed with the federal government in February 2009, BP said it had the capability to handle a "worst-case scenario" at the Deepwater Horizon site, which the document described as a leak of 162,000 barrels per day from an uncontrolled blowout — 6.8 million gallons each day.

Now, I am warning that the amount of oil still in the reservoir might be much bigger than BP is admitting.

Specifically, BP claims that there are 50 million barrels worth of oil in the reservoir underneath the leaking spill site.

But the Guardian noted Friday:

    But the 50m figure cited by Hayward took some industry insiders by surprise. There have been reports the reservoir held up to 500m barrels – the figure quoted by Hayward's questioner, Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas.

     

    "I would assume that 500m barrels would be a more likely estimate," said Tadeusz Patzek, the chairman of the department of petroleum and geosystems engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. "I don't think you would be going after a 50mbarrel reservoir so quickly. This is just simply not enough oil to go after."

Indeed, Wolf Blitzer said:

    One -- one expert said to me -- and I don't know if this is overblown or not -- that they're still really concerned about the structural base of this whole operation, if the rocks get moved, this thing could really explode and they're sitting, what, on -- on a billion potential barrels of oil at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.

Bloomberg notes:

    The ruptured well may hold as much as 1 billion barrels, the Times reported, citing Rick Mueller, an analyst at Energy Security Analysis in Massachusetts.

Oil industry expert Matthew Simmons also puts the number above one billion barrels (see this Bloomberg interview, for example, where he says that - unless stopped - 120,000 barrels a day will leak for 25-30 years; that adds up to 1,095,000,000 to 1,314,000,000 barrels).

And Rob Kall claims that a source inside BP tells him:

    Size of reservoir - estimated by BP and its partner, Andarko to be between 2.5B and 10B bbl. (that's 100,000,000,000 gallons and 400,000,000,000 gallons).

    Yes - all of those numbers are BILLIONS.

Given that BP's nearby Tiber and Kaskida wells each contain at least 3 billion barrels of oil (see this, this, this and this), estimates of more than a billion barrels for the leaking Macondo reservoir are not unreasonable.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/expert ... -reservoir

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Found this:  :shock:

Weird about all the talk of "running out of oil" that's a lot of "Biotic sludge" creating Billions of Barrells.  Personally I'm in the Abiotic camp ...

Experts: BP Lowballing Size of Leaking Oil Reservoir
George Washington's picture
Submitted by George Washington on 06/21/2010 18:15 -0500

→ Washington's Blog

On May 1st, I warned that the amount of oil spilling into the Gulf was much higher than either the government or BP were admitting:

    As a story in the Christian Science Monitor shows, the Gulf oil spill is much worse than we've been told:

     

        It's now likely that the actual amount of the oil spill dwarfs the Coast Guard's figure of 5,000 barrels, or 210,000 gallons, a day.

        Independent scientists estimate that the renegade wellhead at the bottom of the Gulf could be spewing up to 25,000 barrels a day. If chokeholds on the riser pipe break down further, up to 50,000 barrels a day could be released, according to a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration memo obtained by the Mobile, Ala., Press-Register.

        As estimates of the spill increase, questions about the government's honesty in assessing the spill are emerging.

         

        ***

         

        "The following is not public," reads National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Emergency Response document dated April 28, according to the Press-Register [see this]. "Two additional release points were found today. If the riser pipe deteriorates further, the flow could become unchecked resulting in a release volume an order of magnitude higher than previously thought."

         

        An order of magnitude is a factor of 10.

         

        The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that John Amos, an oil industry consultant, said that NOAA revised its original estimate of 1,000 barrels after he published calculations based on satellite data that showed a larger flow.

         

        The 5,000 barrels a day is the "extremely low end" of estimates, Mr. Amos told the Journal.

    CNN quotes the lead government official responding to the spill - the commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Thad Allen - as stating:

        If we lost a total well head, it could be 100,000 barrels or more a day.

    Indeed, an environmental document filed by BP estimates the maximum as 162,000 barrels a day:

        In an exploration plan and environmental impact analysis filed with the federal government in February 2009, BP said it had the capability to handle a "worst-case scenario" at the Deepwater Horizon site, which the document described as a leak of 162,000 barrels per day from an uncontrolled blowout — 6.8 million gallons each day.

Now, I am warning that the amount of oil still in the reservoir might be much bigger than BP is admitting.

Specifically, BP claims that there are 50 million barrels worth of oil in the reservoir underneath the leaking spill site.

But the Guardian noted Friday:

    But the 50m figure cited by Hayward took some industry insiders by surprise. There have been reports the reservoir held up to 500m barrels – the figure quoted by Hayward's questioner, Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas.

     

    "I would assume that 500m barrels would be a more likely estimate," said Tadeusz Patzek, the chairman of the department of petroleum and geosystems engineering at the University of Texas at Austin. "I don't think you would be going after a 50mbarrel reservoir so quickly. This is just simply not enough oil to go after."

Indeed, Wolf Blitzer said:

    One -- one expert said to me -- and I don't know if this is overblown or not -- that they're still really concerned about the structural base of this whole operation, if the rocks get moved, this thing could really explode and they're sitting, what, on -- on a billion potential barrels of oil at the bottom of the Gulf of Mexico.

Bloomberg notes:

    The ruptured well may hold as much as 1 billion barrels, the Times reported, citing Rick Mueller, an analyst at Energy Security Analysis in Massachusetts.

Oil industry expert Matthew Simmons also puts the number above one billion barrels (see this Bloomberg interview, for example, where he says that - unless stopped - 120,000 barrels a day will leak for 25-30 years; that adds up to 1,095,000,000 to 1,314,000,000 barrels).

And Rob Kall claims that a source inside BP tells him:

    Size of reservoir - estimated by BP and its partner, Andarko to be between 2.5B and 10B bbl. (that's 100,000,000,000 gallons and 400,000,000,000 gallons).

    Yes - all of those numbers are BILLIONS.

Given that BP's nearby Tiber and Kaskida wells each contain at least 3 billion barrels of oil (see this, this, this and this), estimates of more than a billion barrels for the leaking Macondo reservoir are not unreasonable.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/expert ... -reservoir