OUR UNREPORTED ”COLD WAR” WITH ISRAEL

[MikeWB]

OUR UNREPORTED "COLD WAR" WITH ISRAEL
By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor
9/11 was like Pearl Harbor to America, uniting many, awakening bitter skepticism in a few.  Where Pearl Harbor began America's official role in crushing the Fascist juggernaut that threatened to dominate the world, 9/11 had quite the opposite effect.  America's response to 9/11 was oppression at home and a tirade of frenzied phobic reactions around the world.  No American institution suffered more than the military.  The team of Cheney and Rumsfeld, together since the disastrous Nixon years, began a process of purging America's military of talent and leadership, instead building a force to serve a sinister agenda of religious heresy and extremist politics.
Nearly a decade later, it isn't the economic collapse or the discredited military adventures that have now embittered a military leadership infrastructure that now sees itself as duped, dishonored and discarded.  A number of factors can be attributed, the proverbial "straw that broke the camel's back" as it were but it is 9/11 where things begin to fall apart.  The cover story, a group of Muslims with box cutters and a few remarkably unproductive hours of pilot training, simply hasn't held up.  America has had many airline hijackings, starting with the 1960s and was under strict terror alert on 9/11, despite the obfuscations of Donald Rumsfeld.  Top military pilots, among themselves and their fellow officers, voiced doubts about the "twin towers" scenario, doubts that began reaching a quiet crescendo pointing to 9/11 as an "inside job."
With the dozens of conspiracy theories and a weak and implausible cover story, one the 9/11 Commission itself eventually rejected, only one plausible answer was left, an answer very much "not for public consumption."  Few Americans know that a team of Israeli intelligence agents were arrested on 9/11 after being observed using "video" equipment to record the planes crashing into the towers.  After the disaster, the Mossad agents, soon to be arrested and released by the FBI, began celebrating as though they had completed a successful operation.  This enraged New Yorkers who mistook them for terrorists.  In fact, New Yorkers weren't wrong.
Only top members of America's military knew the truth, the "dancing Israelis" had remotely guided the two planes into the World Trade Center, not simply videoing, itself proof of guilt.  Military pilots, in particular, knew the planes were nearly impossible to maneuver at those speeds without Israeli designed auto-pilot systems, not unlike those used on Tomahawk/Cruise missiles.  Behind a flurry of "conspiracy theories," many totally implausible, some obvious to military leaders as part of an elaborate deception plan requiring widespread control of media assets, more subtext came to light.
Though warned of "career suicide" for speaking up, members of the military and, in particular, the intelligence community began putting the pieces together.  9/11 was an intelligence operation involving the United States, Great Britain, Israel and Saudi Arabia.  Everything was there, finance, private "black ops" contractors, but mostly, a pre-staged media frenzy on the front end, counterfeit intelligence on Iraq in the middle and a rigged investigation, the "9/11 Commission coverup" on the backside.  It didn't take FBI and intelligence agency officials long to track 9/11 planning back to 1999, not in Afghanistan but much closer to home.
Not a word of this would ever hit the press and any "conspiracy" group that got close to the truth would be shut down or infiltrated quickly.  By 2007, undeniable and overwhelming evidence of 9/11 wrongdoing, massive corruption in every aspect of defense and security and the attrition of America's readiness response capabilities began turning the tide.  What had been only "grumbling" about incompetence, political interference with the military and Washington's "blind eye" to Israeli abuses became a quiet revolt.
The "Minot-Barksdale" nuclear weapon incident that year, one forgotten, unexplained but one haunting us still may tell us how close we came.  Nuclear weapons were loaded onto a B-52 at Minot AFB, loaded illegally, bypassing layer after layer of security and control with dozens of military personnel involved in one of the most serious criminal conspiracies in our history.  When the plane was recalled and returned to Barksdale AFB in Louisiana, carrying at least six nuclear weapons, possibly as many as twelve, America's nuclear arsenal had been proven to have fallen into the hands of extremist elements.
70 of those involved, Air Force personnel with the highest security clearances in the country, the most heavily screen group in America's entire military, were discharged for wrongdoing.  Since that time, seven more of those involved have died in accidents or by "suicide" including one 4 star general.  A cult within the American military, Christian Zionists, had hijacked a plane load of nuclear weapons and were heading to the Middle East on a "mission from G-d."  Was Israel directly involved and, if so, what were the targets?
The military and intelligence community had, for some time, stopped looking on Israel as an asset or even a benign liability.  As early as the 1950s, Israel had organized terror campaigns against Americans in Egypt in order to establish the myth of a worldwide anti-American Islamic terrorist movement.  The "Lavon Affair" is suppressed in America's news, torn out of the history books as is the attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.  Israeli warplanes, initially disguised to appear as Egyptian, tried to sink an American warship in the Eastern Mediterranean in an attempt to force the United States to invade Syria and Egypt.  When the ship failed to sink, all hands aboard, as planned, more planes, these with Israeli markings, were called in followed by torpedo boats.  After hours of attack, with 201 of 296 crew members dead or wounded, the ship was still afloat, tattered American flag flying proud.  Except for the actions of President Johnson and Admiral Sidney McCain, America might well have gone to war against Israel in 1967.
In 2008, President Bush signed the Naval Vessel Transfer Act, insuring that Israel have a more advanced navy than any country in the region, guaranteed by US law.  Israel has only had two naval engagements in its history, one against an American ship and the other against the unarmed Mavi Marmara.  Both attacks, causing the deaths of American citizens, were performed using American weapons.
In 1987, Israeli spy, Jonathan Pollard was sentenced to life in prison for the single most devastating assault on America's security in her history.  110 CIA agents behind the Iron Curtain were captured, tortured and executed, destroying America's intelligence network at the height of the Cold War.  Military experts from the former Soviet Union claim that information they received from Israel, information stolen by Pollard, nearly pushed Russia to starting a nuclear war against the United States, a war Russia knew they could easily win using information supplied by Israel.
Despite the fact that Israel has made Pollard's birthday a national holiday, history books in the United States still claim Pollard was working for South Africa and Pakistan.  Did the undercurrent of suspicion and hatred of Israel by the military and intelligence services because of Pollard create the need to stage 9/11?
In 1991, three nuclear weapons, nearly identical in size to the Hiroshima bomb, "went missing" in the Middle East.  These weapons had been built, between 1975 and 1988, by Armscor , a South African/Israeli company, part of ten that were to make up the nuclear portion of apartheid South Africa's illegal inventory of weapons of mass destruction.  South Africa and Israel, aided by the Soviets, built, not only these nuclear weapons but an extensive array of biological and chemical weapons as well, some of which were used in Africa by the South African military.  Israel and South Africa tested one of these nukes on September 22, 1979.  The VELA satellite system detected the blast, confirmed by acoustic sensors, and established a detailed analysis of the materials and design.
These missing nukes were hijacked while being shipped to British forces in Oman, part of a convoluted deal arranged by Margaret Thatcher and involving current Prime Minister David Cameron, then 28, and Dr. David Kelly, British weapons scientist now believed murdered after threatening to go public about these missing weapons.  These three missing nuclear weapons, now believed to have been stolen by Israel, were the secret rationale for the invasion of Iraq in 2003.  When they weren't located, Israel claimed they had been shipped via ambulance to, first Syria and then Lebanon to be hidden in an X-ray facility to avoid detection.  America wasn't fooled by these ploys and those privy to the "lost nukes," those at the highest levels, had caught Israel again.
Then, in 2009, something utterly unforgivable happened.  On May 25, 2009, North Korea tested its first successful nuclear weapon.  It was confirmed to be one of the three missing nukes believed held by Israel, built in South Africa.  Did Israel, third largest arms exporter in the world, sell a nuclear weapon to North Korea?  Israel, known for peddling military technology to rogue nations, technology begged, borrowed or stolen from the United States, had crossed a line.
The military had long been resentful of Israel's habit of selling off munitions the United States "stored" in Israel for "safe keeping."  Several billion dollars worth of munitions stores had been shipped to Israel under a loose agreement allowing Israel to replenish her stocks from US supplies.  This "off the books" military aid to Israel, was supposed to make Israel more secure.  In fact, however, Israel has been selling these  American owned munitions around the world, some to America's potential adversaries including Venezuela.
Military contracts themselves have been a bone of contention.  With US unemployment levels at their highest  since the Great Depression, billions in defense and "Homeland Security" contracts are going to Israel, a country importing labor from Africa and Asia to keep its arms factories manned.  American companies that complain about being "run over" by Israeli lobbyists are quickly silenced.  Not only is the American economy being negatively impacted but America's defense industries as well.  American companies, some involved in our most secret projects, are being forced by the Israeli lobby in Congress to take on partners in Israel, sharing technologies that soon end up in China, Singapore or India.
Currently, Israel has received a $1.8 billion stockpile of munitions for a war on Iran they will never fight or, perhaps a new assault on Gaza, weapons from the depleted stockpiles of the American military.  Even more American munitions have been offloaded in Georgia and, perhaps shipped to forward bases in Azerbaijan to support an Israeli sneak attack on Iran.  At risk, of course, are American troops in Iraq and American ships in the Persian Gulf.  There are no Israeli forces within striking distance of Iran.
Our military is more than aware of this fact.
Today the Washington Post reported the following:
* Some 1,271 government organizations and 1,931 private companies work on programs related to counterterrorism, homeland security and intelligence in about 10,000 locations across the United States.* An estimated 854,000 people, nearly 1.5 times as many people as live in Washington, D.C., hold top-secret security clearances.
* In Washington and the surrounding area, 33 building complexes for top-secret intelligence work are under construction or have been built since September 2001. Together they occupy the equivalent of almost three Pentagons or 22 U.S. Capitol buildings – about 17 million square feet of space.
* Many security and intelligence agencies do the same work, creating redundancy and waste. For example, 51 federal organizations and military commands, operating in 15 U.S. cities, track the flow of money to and from terrorist networks.
* Analysts who make sense of documents and conversations obtained by foreign and domestic spying share their judgment by publishing 50,000 intelligence reports each year – a volume so large that many are routinely ignored.
What isn't being mentioned is the fact that hundreds of the government organizations are run by dual citizens, Americans holding Israeli passports or that a significant number of the private companies are Israeli owned or managed by individuals with strong ties to Israel, ties that, if examined, would represent a clear conflict of interest and security threat.  If America was allowed to openly acknowledge the areas of adversariality with Israel that have long existed, a significant number of the 854,000 people holding top-secret security clearances would immediately be deemed a risk.
Thus, terrorist plots that show the obvious signature of the Mossad, such as the Christmas 2009 "crotch bomber" in Detroit, can never be properly investigated.  Hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent with one purpose, support Israel's political and economic aims even if it endangers the security of the United States.
Israeli involvement in weapons deals, Venezuela, North Korea, Turkey, India, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan and dozens of other nations, creating a complex web of conflicting alliances makes the run up to World War I child's play in comparison.  With allegations of Israel managing, not only the money laundering but transshipment of $65 billion in heroin from Afghanistan into Russia and the west,  the penetration of Americas intelligence and defense infrastructure has become obvious, particularly to the military, long resentful and suspicious of the CIA-Mossad alliance.
With years of dominance of both Defense and Homeland Security by Israeli-Americans and, not only the top levels of the Pentagon staffed by Christian Zionists but service academy admissions stacked from the rolls of this same extremist minority, abuses were meant to continue for years unchallenged.  This, however, has not been the case.  Continual rumblings, always quickly denied, flow out of the Pentagon, challenging our perception of Israel as an ally or strategic partner.  In fact, numerous reports citing Israel as a threat have been quashed.
With two missing nuclear weapons in play and heavy handed interference in Washington politics and the American media, the current push for war with Iran has many military leaders increasingly watchful of staged incidents.  With no serious intelligence backing Iran's nuclear capabilities and the recent revelations from a kidnapped Iranian student purported to be one of their leading nuclear scientists, the scenario intended to duplicate the US invasion of Iraq is not progressing well.  Evidence of the Saudi-Israeli connection, made public by this incident, has been suppressed in the media but is carefully noted by military intelligence analysts.
A "timely" attack on the US, by necessity devastating in nature and tied to Iran, perhaps using more kidnapped Iranian citizens, is expected.   With congress and the press in lockstep with Israel, will the military be enough to stand up for American security and independence?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/19 ... th-israel/

[ahaze]

I appreciate the disclosures Gordon Duff provides in his analysis of "Our Unreported 'Cold War' With Israel".  He pulls together and calls out a lot of good details in assessing the dire circumstances we could now be facing with Israel feeling boxed in by its lies.

In one portion of his analysis he poinst out ...

In 1987, Israeli spy, Jonathan Pollard was sentenced to life in prison for the single most devastating assault on America's security in her history. 110 CIA agents behind the Iron Curtain were captured, tortured and executed, destroying America's intelligence network at the height of the Cold War. Military experts from the former Soviet Union claim that information they received from Israel, information stolen by Pollard, nearly pushed Russia to starting a nuclear war against the United States, a war Russia knew they could easily win using information supplied by Israel.

Jeff Gates recently posted the article "Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S." which I'll post below that details how Pollard's exploitation of the United States resulted not only in the torture and execution of 110 CIA agents behind the Iron Curtain, but how his treason also effectively forfeit "$20 trillion in U.S. Cold War defense outlays from 1948-1989 (in 2010 dollars)".

This following Gates article distinguishes tiers of intelligence personnel charting how Jonathon Pollard's operations track to Zionist supremacists.   Gates then maps out how Jewish operatives function in prominent U.S. roles exercising Zionist sympathies with a whole host of U.S. politicians acting as supporting cast members charting right to Rothschild helmsmen.  

I think of particular relevance Gates calls out the "intent" factor relevant to charging crimes of treason which seems an ever more crucial distinction to be drawn for those of us expecting war crimes charges to gain momentum.

_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/07/19/sayanim-israeli-operatives-in-the-u-s/
Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S.

By Jeff Gates STAFF WRITER/Editor

Americans know that something fundamental is amiss. They sense—rightly—that they are being misled no matter which political party does the leading.

A long misinformed public lacks the tools to grasp how they are being deceived. Without those tools, Americans will continue to be frustrated at being played for the fool.

When the "con" is clearly seen, "the mark" (that's us) will see that all roads lead to the same duplicitous source: Israel and its operatives. The secret to Israel's force-multiplier in the U.S. is its use of agents, assets and sayanim (Hebrew for volunteers).

When Israeli-American Jonathan Pollard was arrested for spying in 1986, Tel Aviv assured us that he was not an Israeli agent but part of a "rogue" operation. That was a lie.

Only 12 years later did Tel Aviv concede that he was an Israeli spy the entire time he was stealing U.S. military secrets. That espionage—by a purported ally—damaged our national security more than any operation in U.S. history.

In short, Israel played us for the fool.

From 1981-1985, this U.S. Navy intelligence analyst provided Israel with 360 cubic feet of classified military documents on Soviet arms shipments, Pakistani nuclear weapons, Libyan air defense systems and other intelligence sought by Tel Aviv to advance its geopolitical agenda.

Agents differ from assets and sayanim.  Agents possess the requisite mental state to be convicted of treason, a capital crime. Under U.S. law, that internal state is what distinguishes premeditated murder from a lesser crime such as involuntary manslaughter. Though there's a death in either case, the legal liabilities are different—for a reason.

Intent is the factor that determines personal culpability. That distinction traces its roots to a widely shared belief in free will as a key component that distinguishes humans from animals.

Agents operate with premeditation and "extreme malice" or what the law describes as an "evil mind." Though that describes the mental state of Jonathan Pollard, Israeli leaders assured us otherwise—another example of an evil mind as the U.S. was played for the fool.

Played for the Fool, Again

Pollard took from his office more than one million documents for copying by his Israeli handler. When those classified materials were transferred to the Soviets, reportedly in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews, this spy operation shifted the entire dynamics of the Cold War.

To put a price tag on this espionage, imagine $20 trillion in U.S. Cold War defense outlays from 1948-1989 (in 2010 dollars).The bulk of that investment in national security was negated by a spy working for a nation that pretended throughout to be a U.S. ally.

Pollard was sentenced to life in prison. Israel suffered no consequences. None. Zero. Nada. Not then. Not now. Then as now, we were played for the fool.

At trial, Pollard claimed he wasn't stealing from the U.S.; he was stealing secrets for Israel—with whom the U.S. has long had a "special relationship." He thought we should have shared our military secrets with them. That's chutzpah. That also confirms we were played for the fool.

Looking back, it's easy to see how seamlessly we segued from a global Cold War to a global War on Terrorism. In retrospect, the false intelligence used to induce our invasion of Iraq was traceable to Israelis, pro-Israelis or Israeli assets such as John McCain (see below).

Even while in prison, Pollard's iconic status among Israelis played a strategic role. Was it just coincidence that Tel Aviv announced a $1 million grant to their master spy less than two weeks before 911? Is that how Israel signaled its operatives in the U.S.?

Did that grant have any relationship to the "dancing Israelis" who were found filming and celebrating that mass murder as both jets smashed into the World Trade Center?

Absent that provocation, would we now find ourselves at war in the Middle East? Surely no one still believes that America's interests are being advanced in a quagmire that has now become the longest war in U.S. history.

"I know what America is," Benjamin Netanyahu told a group of Israelis in 2001, apparently not knowing his words were being recorded. "America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction."

Let's face it: the U.S. was again played for the fool.

With oversight by Israeli case officers (katsas), Israeli operations proceed in the U.S. by using agents, assets and volunteers (sayanim). Let's take a closer look at each.

The Sayanim System

Sayanim (singular sayan) are shielded from conventional legal culpability by being told only enough to perform their narrow role. Though their help may be essential to the success of an Israeli operation, these volunteers (sayanim also means helpers) could pass a polygraph test because their recruiters ensure they remain ignorant of the overall goals of an operation.

In other words, a sayan can operate as an accomplice but still not be legally liable due to a lack of the requisite intent regarding the broader goals—of which they are purposely kept ignorant. Does that intentional "ignorance" absolve them of liability under U.S. law? So far, yes.

Much like military reservists, sayanim are activated when needed to support an operation. By agreeing to be available to help Israel, they provide an on-call undercover corps and force-multiplier that can be deployed on short notice.

How are sayanim called to action? To date, there's been no attempt by U.S. officials to clarify that key point. This may explain why Pollard was again in the news on July 13th with a high-profile Israeli commemoration of his 9000th day of incarceration.

To show solidarity with this Israeli-American traitor, the lights encircling Jerusalem were darkened while an appeal was projected onto the walls of the Old City urging that President Obama order Pollard's release from federal prison.

Pollard has long been a rallying point for Jewish nationalists, Zionist extremists and ultra-orthodox ideologues. In short, just the sort of people who would be likely recruits as sayanim. The news coverage given this Day of Adoration may help explain how Israel signals its helpers that an operation is underway and in need of their help.

Are pro-Israelis once again playing Americans for the fool?

When not aiding an ongoing operation, sayanim gather and report intelligence useful to Israel. This volunteer corps is deeply imbedded in legislative bodies, particularly in the U.S.

Thus far, this Israeli operation has advanced with legal impunity as the Israel lobby—though acting as a foreign agent—continues even now to pose as a "domestic" operation.

Morris Amitay, former executive director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, explains how this invisible cadre aids the Israel lobby in advancing its geopolitical agenda:

"There are a lot of guys at the working level up here [on Capitol Hill]...who happen to be Jewish, who are willing...to look at certain issues in terms of their Jewishness...These are all guys who are in a position to make the decision in these areas for those senators...You can get an awful lot done just at the staff level."

What sayanim are not told by their katsas is that an Israeli operation may endanger not only Israel but also the broader Jewish community when these operations are linked to extremism, terrorism, organized crime, espionage and treason. Though sayanim "must be 100 percent Jewish," Ostrovsky reports in By Way of Deception (1990):

"...the Mossad does not seem to care how devastating it could be to the status of the Jewish people in the Diaspora if it was known. The answer you get if you ask is: "So what's the worst that could happen to those Jews? They'd all come to Israel. Great!" [Mossad is the intelligence and foreign operations directorate for Israel.]

Assets, Agents and Sayanim

Assets are people profiled in sufficient depth that they can be relied upon to perform consistent with their profile. Such people typically lack the state of mind required for criminal culpability because they lack the requisite intent to commit a crime.

Nevertheless, assets are critical to the success of Israeli operations in the U.S. They help simply by pursuing their profiled personal needs—typically for recognition, influence, money, sex, drugs or the greatest drug of all: ideology.

Thus the mission-critical task fulfilled by political assets that the Israel lobby "produces" for long-term service in the Congress—while appearing to represent their U.S. constituents.

Put a profiled asset in a pre-staged time, place and circumstance—over which the Israel lobby can exert considerable influence—and Israeli psy-ops specialists can be confident that, within an acceptable range of probabilities, an asset will act consistent with his or her profile.

Democrat or Republican is irrelevant; the strategic point remains the same: to ensure that lawmakers perform consistent with Israel's interests. With the help of McCain-Feingold campaign finance "reform," the Israel lobby attained virtual control over the U.S. Congress.

The performance of assets in the political sphere can be anticipated with sufficient confidence that outcomes become foreseeable—within an acceptable range of probabilities. How difficult was it to predict the outcome when Bill Clinton, a classic asset, encountered White House intern Monica Lewinsky?

Senator John McCain has long been a predictable asset. His political career traces its origins to organized crime from the 1920s. It was organized crime that first drew him to Arizona to run for Congress four years before the 1986 retirement of Senator Barry Goldwater.

By marketing his "brand" as a Vietnam-era prisoner of war, he became a reliable spokesman for Tel Aviv while being portrayed as a "war hero." No media outlet dares mention that Colonel Ted Guy, McCain's commanding officer while a POW, sought his indictment for treason for his many broadcasts for the North Vietnamese that assured the death of many U.S. airmen.

As a typical asset, it came as no surprise to see McCain and Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, a self-professed Zionist, used to market the phony intelligence that took us to war in Iraq. McCain's ongoing alliance with transnational organized crime spans three decades.

His 1980's advocacy for S&L crook Charles Keating of "The Keating 5" finds a counterpart in his recent meetings with Russian-Israeli mobster Oleg Deripaska who at age 40 held $40 billion in wealth defrauded from his fellow Russians.

McCain conceded earlier this month in a town hall meeting in Tempe, Arizona that he met in a small dinner in Switzerland with mega-thief Deripaska and Lord Rothschild V.

For assets such as McCain to be indicted for treason, the American public must grasp the critical role that such pliable personalities play in political manipulations. McCain is a "poster boy" for how assets are deployed to shape decisions such as those that took our military to war. In the Information Age, if that's not treason, what is?

The predictability of a politician's conduct confirms his or her qualifications as an asset. They are routinely developed and "produced" over lengthy periods of time and then—as with John McCain—maintained in key positions to influence decision-making as key junctures.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was candid in his assessment four weeks after 911. He may have been thinking about John McCain when he made this revealing comment:

"I want to tell you something very clear, don't worry about American pressure on Israel, we, the Jewish people control America, and the Americans know it." [October 3, 2001]

Indictments for Treason

Are assets culpable? Do they have the requisite intent to indict them for treason? Does John McCain possess an evil mind? Did he betray this nation of his own free will or is he typical of those assets with personalities so weak and malleable that they can easily be manipulated?

As federal grand juries are impaneled to identify and indict participants in this trans-generational operation, how many sayanim should the Federal Bureau of Investigation expect to uncover in the U.S.? No one knows because this subtle form of treason is not yet well understood.

Victor Ostrovksy, a former Mossad katsa (case officer) wrote in 1990 that the Mossad had 7,000 sayanim in London alone. In London's 1990 population of 6.8 million, Israel's all-volunteer corps represented one-tenth of one percent of the residents of that capital city.

If Washington, DC is ten times more critical to Israel's geopolitical goals (an understatement), does that mean the FBI should expect to find ten times more sayanim per capita in Washington?

What about sayanim in Manhattan, Miami, Beverly Hills, Atlanta, Boston, Charleston, Charlotte, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, Denver, Detroit, Houston, Kansas City, Minneapolis, New Orleans, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Portland, Sacramento, San Diego, Seattle, St. Louis, Tampa, Toledo?

No one knows. And Tel Aviv is unlikely to volunteer the information. This we know for certain: America has been played for the fool. And so has our military.

This duplicity dates back well before British Foreign Secretary Alfred Balfour wrote to an earlier Lord Rothschild in 1917 citing UK approval for a "Jewish homeland." In practical effect, that "homeland" now ensures non-extradition for senior operatives in transnational organized crime.

To date, America has blinded itself even to the possibility of such a trans-generational operation inside our borders and imbedded inside our government. Instead the toxic charge of "anti-Semitism" is routinely hurled at those chronicling the "how" component of this systemic treason.

Making this treason transparent is essential to restore U.S. national security. That transparency may initially appear unfair to the many moderate and secular Jews who join others appalled at this systemic corruption of the U.S. political system.

Yet they are also concerned that somehow they may be portrayed as guilty by association due to a shared faith tradition. That would be not only unjust to them but also ineffective in identifying and indicting those complicit.

This much is certain: a Democrat as president offers no real alternative to a Republican on those issues affecting U.S. policy in the Middle East.

Today's corruption predates the duplicity in 1948 that induced Harry Truman to extend recognition to this extremist enclave as a legitimate nation state. Our troubles date from then.

That fateful decision must be revisited in light of what can now be proven about the "how" of this ongoing duplicity—unless Americans want to continue to be played for the fool.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Jeff Gates recently posted the article "Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S." which I'll post below that details how Pollard's exploitation of the United States resulted not only in the torture and execution of 110 CIA agents behind the Iron Curtain

Well at least one good thing came of his spying.  :clap:

[ahaze]

Woops, I see Wimpy posted this article separately, and I agree it stands on its own merits.  Even so, all the treasonous duplicity in motion Gordon Duff calls out appears to function on the rogue gaming of both sides against the middle Gates calls out.

Jeff Gates recently posted the article "Sayanim — Israeli Operatives in the U.S." which I'll post below that details how Pollard's exploitation of the United States resulted not only in the torture and execution of 110 CIA agents behind the Iron Curtain

Well at least one good thing came of his spying.  :clap:

How can Pollard's successes be seen as a good thing when so greatly empowering the JWO?

Plus, the distinctions Gates calls out pertaining to "intent" and range of culpability - from agents to assets to sayanim - makes plain the ranks Zionist keepers stand ready to sacrifice, so endorsing the sacrifice sounds like JWO advocacy to me.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

How can Pollard's successes be seen as a good thing when so greatly empowering the JWO?

You said 110 Yank CIA rats got executed in Red Russia because of Pollard's spying. A victory for the free world. :up:

[ahaze]

You said 110 Yank CIA rats got executed in Red Russia because of Pollard's spying. A victory for the free world. :up:

JWO engendered Red Russia achieved "a victory for the free world" dismantling the "Democratic" world's covert intelligence network operating behind the iron curtain?  This is getting more Orwellian with every post!  :crazy:

[abduLMaria]

You said 110 Yank CIA rats got executed in Red Russia because of Pollard's spying. A victory for the free world. :up:

JWO engendered Red Russia achieved "a victory for the free world" dismantling the "Democratic" world's covert intelligence network operating behind the iron curtain?  This is getting more Orwellian with every post!  :crazy:

it may not make sense when you look at it from the US vs. Russia point of view.

but, maybe 1% of the US spies worldwide - vaporized - ZAP !

given that they are not walking embodiments of the Christian principles they claim to honor, i think that could be seen as progress.

incremental progress is incremental progress !

US spies = Talmudic agents.