Keeping USA topics in the USA forum...

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I think we need to keep the USA topics... focused on the "American people" in the USA forum pretty much because that's where they belong.

And if you have concerns about any particular TIU member and their point of view, just chat in personal email or let your comments on other members rip here in the "Personal Thoughts" away from other topics... and have the testicular fortitude to confront people directly and not slime-annoy-P.O. indirectly in the larger forum.  

We are a global community I hope of "researchers and advocates" first and foremost trying to make a better future. Have a little bit of heart for people not entirely "Jew wise" at this point in time who may be mixed up in typical Jewish media/financial/political scams.

So aim right.  

-CSR

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Moving all of my anti-Yank posts to some obscure section of the forum was a low blow and mild censorship imo. I'm sure you wouldn't have bothered moving an anti-canadian or anti-brit post. I post in the current news section so it gets more views and replies or else it's just an empty thread with no replies or comments. Leave it in the original section for awhile until the discussion dies out, then you can move it.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

No. Sorry but that is clearly where it belongs.  

[abduLMaria]

Moving all of my anti-Yank posts to some obscure section of the forum was a low blow and mild censorship imo.

it's not mild censorship.  it's censorship censorship.

lots of websites move subjects like 9-11 to a "conspiracy" section, which is placed in a far corner of the website.

i suggest moving the USA section to the "Zionist Crime Evidence and "Jewish" Influence/Power" forum category, which would then have 5 sub-categories.

the USA is key to the Zionists' plans.  without the USA, Israel would be a layer of slime buried in the Negev Desert dust.

[Wimpy]

Moving all of my anti-Yank posts to some obscure section of the forum was a low blow and mild censorship imo. I'm sure you wouldn't have bothered moving an anti-canadian or anti-brit post. I post in the current news section so it gets more views and replies or else it's just an empty thread with no replies or comments. Leave it in the original section for awhile until the discussion dies out, then you can move it.

-MSMD

[§N9sh2bj]

one or two times is okay, to get the monday-night football watcher off his ass.

three or more times, and in such short succession, hurt your purpose, don't help it.

[Wimpy]

Moving all of my anti-Yank posts to some obscure section of the forum was a low blow and mild censorship imo. I'm sure you wouldn't have bothered moving an anti-canadian or anti-brit post. I post in the current news section so it gets more views and replies or else it's just an empty thread with no replies or comments. Leave it in the original section for awhile until the discussion dies out, then you can move it.

-MSMD




Thanks for the perfect caption Negentropic,

Please NOTE everyone that someone has altered my post.  I suppose this may be funny but it also implies that all posts are subject to alteration by anyone with administrative access and an ax to grind.

Do we, as a group, find this to be acceptable behavior.  If not, then how can this be avoided in the future?

[Christopher Marlowe]

1. I rarely search by topic index, so this is all a non-issue to me. I use the "view new posts" feature.  

2. This latest post has made me nostalgic for junior high school. I remember what passed for rhetoric back then was to say something wickedly obscene very loudly and very quickly. As a young boy, I felt  captured by raging hormones and fearful of being singled out for my shortcomings.  I remember having a basic understanding of the sex act, but lacking enough confidence to correct anyone's peculiar assertions as to some arcane sexual practice.

Like for example, if anyone was to assert that they could sodomize and fellate another person at the same time, I would have been too embarrassed to wonder allowed if such a thing was possible.  Now that I am older, I am wise enough to say, "WTF?" Also, I am happy to know that I have never even pondered such a thing until this time. (This makes me happy because I would consider a person who attempts such a maneuver to be a hopeless degenerate.   )

[Wimpy]

Certainly I agree with you CM.  What causes me concern and alarm is the fact that someone, oh I wonder whom, accessed my post and modified the original content.  This was someone with administration privileges and they had obviously abused their charge.  This same person of known adolescent mentality would also have access to my email address which would grant access to  further possible mischief.  A line has been crossed and it is well beyond acceptable and, yes, I have been getting a much higher frequency of spam email recently.

[Ognir]

I'm not a big fan of censorship !

[Wimpy]

Is it 'anything goes' then?  

Give me admin privileges so I can modify any post at my discretion.  I even promise not to use profanities or obscenities.  :clap:

[Christopher Marlowe]

wonder aloud
wander allowed
wand 'ere a loud
one dare allowed
one'd her aloud
Juan d'Aire: a lout

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Hi Wimpy,

I have some admin privileges  and have edited the posts because they contained unnecessary profanity. The editing wasn't directed at you.

To see this crap suddenly develop among long-term members, who I really consider on "good-terms", is kind of surprising to say the least.  I rarely edit posts unless it appears a person is "causing trouble".  I've caused some trouble in the past but not due to childish profanity directed at members.   IMHO, if a person wants to be a "juvenile" with unnecessary name calling then get a Facebook account to trash talk and get out of TIU.  This site has quality material contributed by many posters and doesn't need "trite" B.S. tossed at other members.  In my book, if a person is going to insult another, at least be clever about it and not resort to crass profanity. But this also means that other members need to be on their toes a little and report crap or fight crap that annoys.  

That's why the editing happened.

Things I will delete:
1. Useless, out of place profanity  that is usually in the form of an insult directed at long-term members.  
2. Sick stuff that doesn't belong on this site -- example the Hutaree's sick Jew crap...

Things I will move:
1. Focused topics wildly out of place or "shotgunned" across the site.
2. Trash topics -- usually in the form of provoking others for no good reason.

--The CSR

[Wimpy]

CSR,

Obviously your philosophy of editing is quite different to what had happened to my post; silly as my post and the added sentence fragment were.

I have posted on many different sites over a dozen years and never had anyone add language to one of my posts.  There is an enormous difference between you deleting a post, which has happened to me on many occasions over the years, and someone attempting to place words into my dialogue in an ill attempt at humor and impersonation.

This may seem trivial to some but it portends a dangerous precedent, particularly on this "TRUTH" site of TIU.  Whether I am failing at making my point, as it is obvious to me and I was expecting a chorus of outrage, I do apologize.  However, we hide behind our avatars and strive for a certain but nominal anonymity here and at other sites.  I attempt anonymity not to hide from my peers but to make the PTB work a little to figure out who I am.  Clearly there are some here who need to hide everything about who they are and their online anonymous presence is completely contrived and deceptive.

Supposing one of these people with questionable intentions, or possibly one with harmful intentions, is awarded administrative privilege and gains access to data that would otherwise be difficult to gather and also be in a position to deviously change wording on a post.  We could all find ourselves, one-day, sitting in front of a tribunal having to answer for "Writing" something we didn't. But it wasn't me it was someone else!!, I would say, an administrator, yeah that's it, an administrator wrote that on my post.  Honest it wasn't me, as I scream while choking on the water from boarding.

If a poster wishes to be inappropriate in their use of language or in writing personal attacks aimed towards their perceived foes, then by all means edit "out" or delete.  I do not have a problem with that what so ever.  I've had websites and website privileges and have done so myself; but  Don't put words in my mouth.  In fact, there is no way for me to prove, at this point in time, that it wasn't me who posted those last few words on that post.  

I Do Request that an administrator delete all the words after "NEGENTROPIC!"    CSR?

You should now know what my objections are and hopefully you understand my alarm.  If not then let me add this:  "A mans' got to know his limitations"-Dirty Harry to MSMD

[Wimpy]

wonder aloud
wander allowed
wand 'ere a loud
one dare allowed
one'd her aloud
Juan d'Aire: a lout

A lout?

[Wimpy]

CSR, Thanks for editing my post back to the original.