thoughts on henry makow???

[Large Sarge]

makow is hinting the holocaust happened, and blaming the illuminati....
 
hmmmmm
 
what to make of him?
 
 
 
Bormann Ran Hitler for the Illuminati
May 4, 2009


 
By Henry Makow Ph.D.

(Expanded from June 2007.)

The second most powerful man in Nazi Germany, Martin Bormann, was a "Soviet" (i.e. Illuminati) agent who ensured the destruction of both Germany and European Jewry.

Thus, he advanced two of the Illuminati's main goals: integrate Germany into a world government by annihilating its national, cultural and racial pretensions, and establish Israel as the Masonic banker's world capital by threatening European Jews with extermination.

The Illuminati are a loose alliance of Jewish finance and the British/America/European aristocracy joined by marriage, money and belief in the occult (Freemasonry). Winston Churchill, a Freemason whose mother was Jewish, fits this description.


They own vast interlocking cartels (banking, oil, pharmaceuticals, war, chemicals, minerals, media etc.) and control society and government through corporate and professional groups, the media, education, secret societies, think tanks, foundations and intelligence agencies. Their goal is "to absorb the world's wealth" (in Cecil Rhodes' words) and control its citizens using propaganda, "education" and social engineering.

Nations (Britain, US, Israel) movements (Zionism, Socialism, Nazism, Communism) and people (Americans, Germans, Jews) are their pawns to be sacrificed to their demented megalomaniac scheme for global dictatorship. Bormann's career illustrates how they orchestrate wars to advance this long-term objective.

Martin Bormann (1900-?) was the organizer, treasurer and paymaster of the Nazi Party and controlled its powerful machine. He was the contact with Illuminati bankers and industrialists who financed the Nazi Party and donated millions to Hitler. As Deputy Fuhrer and Hitler's Secretary, Bormann signed Hitler's paycheck and managed his accounts. He  determined whom and what Hitler saw, and acted in his name.

Goering said "Bormann stayed with Hitler day and night and gradually brought him so much under his will that he ruled Hitler's whole existence." ("Martin Bormann" by James McGovern, p.160)


Hitler made Bormann the Executor of his will. Bormann, not Hitler, owned the Berghof. "The entire complex on the Obersalzberg, consisting of 87 buildings and worth over one and a half million marks, was legally registered in Bormann's name. (McGovern, p.128)

In 1972 Gen. Reinhard Gehlen (head of Wehrmacht Soviet Intelligence) revealed that Bormann had been a Soviet spy, a view shared by many top Nazi generals and officials including Gottlob Berger, a SS Lieutenant General who knew Bormann well. "Bormann did the greatest harm of anyone," Berger testified at Nuremberg. (McGovern, 181)


The implications are staggering. Remember what Winston Churchill said. "This war is not against Hitler or National Socialism but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest." (Emrys Hughes, Winston Churchill, His Career in War and Peace p. 145)

The Nazi Party was created, and the Second World War staged in order to  lead the German people into a diabolical trap, after fatally compromising them morally.

In "The Bormann Brotherhood" (1972) William Stevenson says Bormann "gave the lowest priority to the fate of Germany..He was concerned instead with a future based on Nazi  philosophy, financed by Nazi loot, supported by a personally loyal Brotherhood..." (62) Is this the Illuminati?

It is possible that the next world war also will be staged, this time to undermine the United States.  

BORMANN

It is unlikely that Bormann perished in war-torn Berlin, as the Illuminati would like us to believe. A man who carefully prepared for the survival of the Reich by setting up 750 corporations in neutral countries would have provided for his own escape. There have been reports that the Russians rescued Bormann and set him up in Moscow. Other reports placed him in South America. Adolph Eichmann's eldest son, Horst claimed he had many conversations with him in Argentina. (McGovern, p.194)

Obviously Bormann was working for both the Soviets and the Nazis, i.e. he was working for the Illuminati.

Two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Louis Kilzer makes the case that Bormann was a "Soviet" spy in his book "Hitler's Traitor" (2000). He examined the wire traffic between the spy known as "Werther" and Moscow and determined that only Bormann had access to this information. Bormann told Hitler he wanted a record for posterity and had stenographers transcribe Hitler's war conferences.

The Soviets were able to ask very detailed questions about Nazi defenses and intentions. The result was the decisive Nazis defeats at Stalingrad and Kursk. "Bormann had been as useful to Russia as fifty Red Army divisions," Kilzer writes. (61)

"His value to Stalin began early. In 1941, when Germany could have used millions of Ukrainian nationalists to defeat Soviet rule, Bormann decided that they deserved only, "enslavement and depopulation. ...Faced with ... genocide by the Germans or political domination by the Soviets, the Ukrainians chose to live and by so doing ruined German hopes for an easy conquest." (261)

Borman used the Nazi defeat at Stalingrad as an excuse to begin the extermination of Jews, the second Illuminati goal.

In the words of the Nuremberg prosecutor, Bormann was a "prime mover in the program of starvation, degradation, spoliation and extermination." He shielded Hitler from the grisly details, forbidding Himmler from discussing the subject with Hitler and filing Himmler's reports. (261)

"Bormann's role with the Ukrainians and the Jews was only part of his devastating effect on the Third Reich," Kilzer writes. He blocked Albert Speer's attempt to move the economy to a "total war" footing until it was too late. "Bormann's influence," Speer concluded, "was a national disaster." (263)

Kilzer goes into great detail about Bormann's contacts with the Soviet espionage system, profiling many of his handlers. Even one of Bormann's mistresses, Marie Rubach Spangenberg, was active in the German Communist underground. (264)

Bormann encouraged Hitler to ignore the threat of encirclement at Stalingrad. Hitler's decisions "ceased to have anything in common with the principles of strategy and operations," General Halder noted in his diary. (McGovern, 82)

Bormann won Hitler's total allegiance by pretending to be his ruthlessly efficient instrument. When Bormann was criticized, Hitler replied, "Everybody has failed me but Bormann...who ever is against Bormann is also against the State! I'll shoot the lot of them..."(McGovern, 101.) And, "Bormann's proposals are so exactly worked out that I need only say yes or no..." (98)

Bormann subtly influenced Hitler to fire competent generals and did nothing to interfere with the gradual poisoning of the Fuhrer by his personal physician, Morrell.  


The question remains, "Was Hitler himself a traitor?" Did he also serve the Illuminati? Kilzer remarks that Hitler was surprisingly lenient to dissent within the ranks and cultivated a "culture of treason." (Kilzer, 6) Was Hitler aware of Bormann's role and played along? I am still searching for this answer.

CONCLUSION

William Stevenson provides a suitable conclusion: "Bormann represented secret power; and in our disheveled human condition, we suspect that the trappings of democracy are more of a dangerous camouflage...that real power begins where secrecy begins. Martin Bormann ... possessed that secret power...to such a degree that he was able to escape the gallows." (9).

 
Bormann's example suggests that the Illuminati modus operandi is to empower someone who is predisposed or even brainwashed  to do what they want. While he still has personal volition, they subtly manipulate him.  


The lesson of this story is that the "news" upholds the "camouflage of democracy." Don't pay too much attention or invest your best energies. History is a play. The Illuminati control all the politicians who stand a chance.They control the mass media.  

Louis Kilzer's book was published by a tiny publisher in Navato CA. This shows that the large banker-controlled New York publishers want to keep Bormann's secret as much as any Nazi.

We live in a world where the dominant elite has organized into a sinister secret society to plot against humanity. It is creating a "New World Order" symbolized by the unfinished capstone on the pyramid on the US Great Seal.

Its symbols are everywhere but we are not allowed to protest them. Success depends on our willingness to  betray our fellow citizens, nation and civilization and to allow this malignant power to grow in our midst.

[veritasvincit]

not a fan - way too many distractions - is this deliberate?

come on - "save the males" - how about we save humanity?

[Jenny Lake]

I've got no opinion on Makow --that would come by getting familiar with his conclusions-- but Hitler would have needed a powerful handler. The historical part of this post is fully plausible to me from the little I know. Things feel like they're veering offtrack anytime someone injects too much 'leading' that can't be objectively validated.

[kolnidre]

not a fan - way too many distractions - is this deliberate?

come on - "save the males" - how about we save humanity?

Saving humanity is the point. Makow's little pun is intended as a jab at feminism, which is one of the very potent tools used against the whole of humanity. Not only does it cow men and turn them into little wimps, it makes women into men and puts the sexes at odds, which of course divides humanity while saddest of all robs each individual of their natural potential.

I like Makow. So what if he thinks "The" Holocaust(TM) happened. There should be plenty of room for free speech among those who stand up for humanity against those with no empathy and only antipathy for the goyim. If it weren't for varied shades of belief we wouldn't be able to benefit from the work of the likes of Edwin Black (The Transfer Agreement) and Norman Finkelstein (The Holocaust Industry), among many others who point out the crimes of the Zionists, just like we can get vital information even from Israeli newspapers and TalmudVision (Ringworm Children, the documentary on Herzl and Zionism whose title escapes me at the mo').

[blueocean]

I think Makow is a pretty descent guy,


His interview with Chrisdtopher Jon Bjerkness is excellent.


he has some pet projects that he focuses upon, that's okay.


Kolnidre is right that we need diversity to beat the ZOG

[veritasvincit]

my point is this - if he is fighting for men's rights he is no better than the feminists that he purports to be at odds with.  Anytime you start to form your little groups whether they be feminists (which I am no fan of either) or meninists (just a word I made up) it distracts from the macro problem and causes even greater breeding for the goyim to fight against one another.  What greater tool to use than to use gender against gender.  I do believe that the feminist movement for the most part has destroyed the traditional family unit and the genders have moved further away from their natural and inherent gifts i.e. woman; the feminine and the nurturer - man; the masculine and the worker.  Both can be intelligent but there are just some things that a woman cannot compare to a man such as physical strength which comes down to biology and a man cannot compare to a woman's nurturing capabilities which again comes down to biology and nature to ensure she is the one who will nurture the children and spouse.

blueocean wrote:
Kolnidre is right that we need diversity to beat the ZOG

I agree Kolnidre & blueocean, that we need diversity to beat the ZOG however,

If you are going to identify a problem - be honest about who are at the helm of the problem.  Don't dilly dally around the issue.  When, who, how and why did the feminist movement start?  Why does the media portray men and women the way they do and who controls the media?  Why do the universities have courses devoted to the feminist movement but nothing devoted to male studies and who control and fund the universities?  Why are the major feminists j-e-w-ish?

[kolnidre]

I agree Kolnidre & blueocean, that we need diversity to beat the ZOG however,

If you are going to identify a problem - be honest about who are at the helm of the problem.  Don't dilly dally around the issue.  When, who, how and why did the feminist movement start?  Why does the media portray men and women the way they do and who controls the media?  Why do the universities have courses devoted to the feminist movement but nothing devoted to male studies and who control and fund the universities?  Why are the major feminists j-e-w-ish?

If you look around his site or read his books you'll see that Makow addresses these issues. I don't really get the message that he's just doing the old dialectical dance and pitting males vs. females; rather, he is showing how feminism erodes humanity for all of us of either sex, or should I say any of the myriad "genders?" When it comes to the sexes I think of him as a Libertarian, in that he wants men and women to aknowledge and respect our differences, and leave each other alone about them.

Sometimes I stop and think how hard it must be for someone raised as a Jew and who went to Israhell to live in a kibbutz to stand up and point out the crimes of his own crowd. In such cases it triggers a conflict betwen one's identity with the tribe on the one hand and with the whole of humanity on the other. Heck, it's hard enough for, say, a San Francisco Giants fan, to go beyond just rooting for the uniform and seeing anything wrong with Barry Bonds' behavior. We all want to feel good about our own crowd. Even if he's a bastard, at least he's our bastard, the justification goes.

Based on his work I feel Henry's proven he sides with humanity.

[nik]

Great article. I've been looking into Bormann for a while now.

[Papillon]

Where can I find his interview with Chrisdtopher Jon Bjerkness?

Thx, Papillon.

[kolnidre]

Where can I find his interview with Chrisdtopher Jon Bjerkness?

Thx, Papillon.

Ask and ye shall receive:

http://www.sendspace.com/file/s7payw

I edited the commercials out since with RBN it's so easy with the regular breaks.

[Jaro]

I used to think Makow was honest until he started promoting Project Monarch http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1461887 victims like Brice Taylor, Cathy O'brien, Svali, Kathleen Sullivan, Mary Ann and others who promote "Nazi Mind Control" of the eeeevil Josef Mengele and the Fourth Reich which is Jewish propaganda. He also gave a platform for shills like Zagami and Fulford.

[Shiksa Rage]

I also used to like Makow, and still do find some of his writings useful. However, alarm bells rang when he started to promote people like Svali and Greg Szymanski. He also recently promoted Jonathan Elinoff's 'Core of Corruption' video the purpose of which seems to be to divert people away from Israels involvement in 9/11.

It was through Makow, though, that I discovered DBS. He provided a link to Andrew Hichcock's timeline of the Rothschilds.

[Jaro]

And what's up with all the enthusiastic comments under each article... seems a bit contrived to me.
Maybe as a teacher he gives bonus marks to his students who join in on NWO discussion with him?  :ugeek:  :lol:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

And what's up with all the enthusiastic comments under each article... seems a bit contrived to me.
Maybe as a teacher he gives bonus marks to his students who join in on NWO discussion with him?  :ugeek:  :lol:

  Indeed.

[thirdeyewise]

I also used to like Makow, and still do find some of his writings useful. However, alarm bells rang when he started to promote people like Svali and Greg Szymanski. He also recently promoted Jonathan Elinoff's 'Core of Corruption' video the purpose of which seems to be to divert people away from Israels involvement in 9/11.

It was through Makow, though, that I discovered DBS. He provided a link to Andrew Hichcock's timeline of the Rothschilds.

He even promoted Leo Zagami just recently

[kolnidre]

He even promoted Leo Zagami just recently

Goodbye, Henry. You should have stuck to feminism.

Benjamin Fulford also said recently that he was visited in Japan by an emissary from the Vatican. When asked to describe this shadowy liaison he admitted it was none other than the worshipful master DJ, Leo Zagami.

See ya, Ben!

[thirdeyewise]

I did look up when he was promoting zamagi and it was mid 2008 so it was not as recent as i thought, although his articles seem like one big "JEWS ARE NOT AWARE OF THIS" excuse

Benjamin Fulford also said recently that he was visited in Japan by an emissary from the Vatican. When asked to describe this shadowy liaison he admitted it was none other than the worshipful master DJ, Leo Zagami.

Speaking of the two clowns, here they are negotiating the fate of the Goyim:

[youtube:gvdf47pd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqPg-mc1CIQ[/youtube]gvdf47pd]

[youtube:gvdf47pd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tnNTDWdIJek[/youtube]gvdf47pd]

[scorpio]

Makow and Fulford are both a couple of kooks - both part Jewish as well.
Makow Admits in the beginning of Cruel Hoax That his Jewish mother bought him a condo(from his inheritance) for when he graduated college.
He also admits that he lived on a Kibutz  in Israel.
Fulford admitted on a recent interview with Rense that his family was part jewish and part of the Illuminati  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

[Rockclimber]

Makow and Fulford are both a couple of kooks - both part Jewish as well.
Makow Admits in the beginning of Cruel Hoax That his Jewish mother bought him a condo(from his inheritance) for when he graduated college.
He also admits that he lived on a Kibutz  in Israel.
Fulford admitted on a recent interview with Rense that his family was part jewish and part of the Illuminati  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Didn't FulOF***ford talk about UFOs on that show as well? I was thinking, coo coo, coo coo

[thirdeyewise]

according to Fulford the chinese mafia was unsatisfied by the way the illuminati was conducting business and issued an ultimatum:
""Desist with your plans for world depopulation or  else you and your families will be assassinated.We have trained ninjas close to them all.
They will be wiped out in a matter of hours."

can you imagine what that fight would look like?

[scorpio]

Those two above must be the 'trained ninjas'  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
The illuminati Is really fkd now. They better sleep with one eye open!

One other observation on that last Fulford interview:
It seemed that even Rense was having trouble buying that load of crap!

[thirdeyewise]

some continued critique on Henry Makow can be seen on this thread:

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=7872

[thirdeyewise]

John Kaminski article on Henry Makow:

Obliterating Henry

Jewish disinfo the specialty of popular Rense columnist

12/9/2009

Jewish poseur turned Christian evangelical Henry Makow is a wily Sanhedrin counterintelligence agent who has perhaps misled more well-meaning people now currently writing on the Internet than any other popular Web writer. Makow magnanimously closes his story "The Jews' worst enemy is now ours," by reluctantly concluding, "Just as in the Holocaust, Illuminati Jews were probably part of 9-11. The Jews' worst enemy is now all of ours."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha! Probably! As if Henry wasn't really sure.

Jewish kingpins pulled off 9/11. All those Mossad junior executives surrounding Bush and Cheney. What was that guy's name who schmoozed the 9/11 commission, Zelikoff? A very unprofessional coverup, if I do say so, but what proved the decisive factor was the Jewish media mindlock that hid the details of the greatest crime in American history behind the folds of waving flags and yellow ribbons. (And then sabotaged the 9/11 skeptics movement that followed; but more on that later.)

The richest Jewish puppeteers in the world, David Rockefeller and Jacob Rothschild, signed off on this caper at a Bilderberg meeting, and it was carried out by the operations wing of the world Jewish financial octopus and its treacherous minions in the Mossad-dominated U.S. government as part of this omnidirectional push to exterminate people, and then turn them into thoughtless robots, a goal which has nearly been achieved.

I love Makow's divide and elude strategy. It's so typically Jewish. You see it everywhere, on Rense.com and with Alex Jones, AFP and the Barnes Review, Global Research and Online Journal, Uruknet: all polluted by subterranean Jewish money and hence subject to subterranean Jewish control. All pretending that the Jews aren't behind everything. It's them bad Illuminati Jews that are messing with us. Good Jews need to fight back, that's what Henry is always saying.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Point A. The problem is not the Zionist Jews. The problem is not Illuminati Jews. The problem is not Communist Jews, lesbian Jews, transgender Jews, Torah true Jews (a meaningless distinction), or Jews for the Molesting of Young Boys.

The problem is the Talmud.

Throughout human history, it has been and is the heart of darkness.

It is an excuse to murder, rob and plunder everyone and everything on Earth.

It commands Jews to regard all Jews as divine, and anybody else as cattle.

This is how they can kill Palestinian children without a tear, and then remove their organs so some old Israeli perverts can live a few years longer.

This is how they can subtly hoodwink every country in the world into giving up their most valuable possessions in exchange for intoxicating illusions.

That's what did us in. And Makow, bless his tortured soul, has given us a perfect syllabus of how Jewish writers like Noam Chomsky, William Blum, and Howard Zinn (who said finding the culprits of 9/11 wasn't important — way to be Jewish, Howard) take legitimate observations about American stupidity and excoriate it to the max without mentioning that one simple, ubiquitous fact that obtains in almost all situations — the Jewish puppetmasters and their network of depraved corruption that runs the entire world from behind the scenes.

This is the great fact that still eludes Americans, even now, in their darkest days.

So there I was, reading a book about World War II, and I wanted to check biographical information about the author, and there, two entries down the Google queue, was Makow's story. The Jews are always right there to twist the information as fast (but stealthily) as possible.

Immediately I encountered a version of history from Makow that was substantially different from the version I was reading. www.savethemales.ca/002030.html

Notice how Henry always creates an escape hatch for the Jews.

Jews who belonged to the (Masonic) Illuminati conspiracy "sided with the Luciferian German Nazis to exterminate millions of their own race in what amounted to an inter-Jewish civil war and ethnic cleansing operation..."

Not all Jews, says Henry. Just those in the Masonic Illuminati conspiracy.

Great. We're supposed to feel sorry for two groups of Jews fighting each other and destroying the world in the process.

Just like the Holocaust religion commands us to worship suffering as the divine expression of Judaism.

Always the victims, aren't they?

They are really the perpetrators of all our afflictions, with a philosophy that is dangerous to life itself.

Always, Henry and all the Jewish writers leave themselves a way out for people to think, well, at least there are some good Jews out there.

The world breathlessly awaits evidence of this.

Makow wrote:

" . . . as a child Eichmann was persecuted because he looked Jewish. Eichmann's stepmother had Jewish relations and he associated with Jews. Later, as a Gestapo officer, Eichmann learned Hebrew, visited Palestine and worked closely with Zionists preparing Jews for emigration."

Ha ha ha ha ha ha.

Hennecke Kardel, a former German infantryman who later lived in Switzerland, wrote in 1974:

"The only reason for the name change to 'Eichmann' was to get away from the ancestors name and from the history of Jewish people", wrote the Jewish names researcher G. Kessler in Leipzig, 1935.

So Makow is caught in a lie. Eichmann was Jewish.

This was almost as bad as his famous gaffe involving the Balfour Declaration in which Britain guaranteed the territory of Palestine to the Jews. Henry blamed it all on British Christians.

And get this. When you Google the author Hennecke Kardel, whose story should come up first but Henry Makow's. This is how Jews work together to keep people in the dark and destroy their lives. Google is Jewish pretending to be not. Makow is Jewish but pretends to be not. The United States is a robotized killer Jewish puppet making war on the world, pretending to be not.

Throughout human history, the Talmud is the heart of darkness, and the Bible and the Qu'ran are complicit in concealing this fact.

Be more discriminating, people. The Jewish spinmasters control virtually all the words in the world. It's up to you to discover how to elude the censors and distractors like Makow and find out what's really going on.


http://www.johnkaminski.info/

[thirdeyewise]

Henry Makow article on Obama possibly having Jewish blood (sabbatean).

sample:

"Stanley Anne" was an "idealistic" part-Jewish woman who got her Ph.D. and worked for Timothy Geitner's father in Indonesia at the elite Ford Foundation. Some suspect she did double time for the CIA."

(Timothy Geithner and Obama's family knew each other - what are the odds?)


http://www.henrymakow.com/is_obama_literally_americas_fi.html

[veritasvincit]

I take back what I said about Henry.................................................

Henry does have some insightful articles on his website

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Possessiveness is part of Marriage

(A break from the drumbeat of despair, this slightly revised article originally appeared May 3, 2008)

My wife recently asked me why I loved her. Instead of enumerating her good qualities, I answered simply and honestly: "Because you belong to me. "

At the risk of being politically incorrect, what many men seek in marriage is not great beauty, brains or sex, but the simple feeling of "possessing"  a woman. In other words, what they seek is a degree of ownership or power. (Gasp!)

And I believe that, in their heart, many women have the complementary craving, to totally "belong" to their husband.

This is the key to intimacy,  how two people become one. When a man wins a woman's love, she entrusts herself to him. And of course he aspires to be worthy of this responsibility.

Thus, a woman empowers her husband. Men and women were designed to complement each other, not to compete or fight. Most marriages break up due to competition for power.

When I reflect on my marriage, I get most satisfaction from the fact that my wife is "mine." She makes other women redundant. I no longer feel one of them holds the missing key. I have what I want. My wife helps me fulfill my goals. And she gets security and caring from this bond.

The origin of this "possessiveness" is quite real and practical. Men need to "own the womb" to ensure their wives conceive their child and not another man's. Women want to rear an offspring that is the fruit of their love and commitment.

Marriage is the exchange of feminine worldly power for masculine love and protection. Of course, women retain other forms of power, i.e. aesthetic, moral, emotional, intellectual etc.

We live in a toxic environment for marriage. The Illuminati (Masonic) central bankers, who control modern politics, education and kulture, continue to sabotage this exchange by constantly attacking woman's trust in men.  

Men are irresponsible "abusers." Marriage is exploitative and oppressive. Women must be  "independent." How can a person belong to another? Women must be "strong and independent." The more sex the better. Yadda, yadda, yadda.

Women! If you want to be independent, why get married?

Plain and simple, our "feminist" political leaders and educators are dupes and opportunists at best, impostors or traitors at worst. No honest government allows its men and women to be turned against each other.


SEX AND THE CITY

A reader in his early 20's writes that the TV show "Sex and the City" has molded girls of his  generation.

This lesbian-tinged quotation is their watchword: "Maybe our girlfriends are our soul mates and guys are just people to have fun with."
 
Today's young woman "sees no value in a marriage or boyfriend-girlfriend relationship; rather she just gets random sex from guys and emotional/interpersonal stuff from friends," my correspondent writes.

"It's influenced all girls my age because they see some value to sleeping around-- like being a whore is some "strong women" empowering thing..."

Paradoxically the TV show was about four aging career women who are looking for marriage and/or family but find they are incompatible with men. The reason of course is that, due to their feminist (i.e. lesbian) brainwashing, they think men and women are identical. They are confused -- want to control a man and yet be possessed at the same time. They have lost the knack of feminine love (i.e. to surrender, trust and empower.)  

Similarly feminism has also molded men to seek sex and extended adolescence instead of marriage. It has undermined and emasculated men so that often they can neither demand nor command a woman's trust.

Thus, the Sex in the City women end up in a series of unsatisfying sexual encounters with men who cannot love. They cannot commit and marry and, as a result, they suffer from arrested development. But all along they console each other in coffee shops and chic boutiques and pretend they have sacrificed marriage for their women's lib principles and their friendship is superior to what they really want.

When a woman chooses a man to love, she will defer to his superior judgment and power. This is the only kind of man she should marry. This is how a woman loves. Similarly, a man cannot love a woman who defies and challenges him constantly.

Sex is the sacred symbol of heterosexual possession, intimacy and exclusivity.  The more men a woman belongs to sexually, the less likely she'll ever belong to any.

It's no coincidence that the Creator of "Sex and the City" is Darren Starr, a homosexual.
I have defined homosexuality as "failure to bond permanently with a member of the opposite sex, caused by confusion over sexual identity, resulting in arrested development." Heterosexuals are being re-engineered to fit this description.


ENLIGHTENED "OWNERSHIP"

You don't win a woman's trust by attempting to dominate or suffocate her. Rather you show her how you live, and want to live, and invite her to take a honored place in your life.

You respect her individuality. For example, you don't try to impose your ideas on her. Naturally you will choose someone who has an affinity with you. But you are not looking for your clone. You should value her perspective and enjoy the differences.

I get letters from men who complain that their women can't buy into the "Conspiracy." So what? Do you really want the madness mirrored back to you? If what we're saying is true, it will become apparent to everyone eventually. People in possession of the truth do not have to impose it.

Another example. I can't imagine a man ever insisting on having sex with his wife when she's not in the mood. There's no faster way to turn a woman off a man, and off sex. (Of course if she never wants sex, the marriage is broken.)

On the other hand, a man won't let his wife engage in activities that endanger her or their marriage.

CONCLUSION

When a man loves a woman, he wants her to be happy. He wants her to want to be his.

I'm not saying all marriages have to be this way. I'm not saying my marriage is perfect. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Whatever works for you is best for you.

I am saying there is a place for "possession" in many marriages. If I am right, the quality men should seek is feminine receptivity: i.e. the ability to love, trust, belong.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Large Sarge, my opinion is that Makow's insights into feminism and Illuminati psycho-sexual-terrorism are spot on; However, I believe him to be a shill as far as any Jew/Commie talk is concerned.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I see Makow as a form of kind of "apologia" for the Jewish Protocols - Parasitism. He may sincerely feel and believe the Jew-Talmudic attacks on Western Christianity and general good is sad and in all respects, "Tragic". Over the years, I've seen him as kind of a Jewish "Psychologist" for the "Westerner" or "Easterner" (i.e, Muslim world). Or maybe he's a "sportscaster" on the cultural fights between Jews and Goyim. I don't know why Jews like him or CJB don't just chuck the whole Jew World view as basically "Satanic" and ATTACK IT front and center. They've read the Protocols and should stop Bullsh*tting themselves and their readers, IMHO.

Kaminski is basically calling him out which is good.... Makow has to either be a "Jew", and drop all pretenses and stop writing,  or "Don't be a Jew", and come at them with unrelenting attacks.... it really comes down to this.

 You've seen one Jew Menshevik, you've seen them all. They are still fighting for Jew Power.

JEWS IN THE RED REVOLUTION IN RUSSIA

The Menshevik Revolution - 1905

From a speech given to the National Geographic Society, Washington, DC, on December 14, 1906, by William Elroy Curtis and published in National Geographic Magazine for May, 1907 (pp. 313-314)

PREMIER STOLYPIN IS ABLE AND BRAVE

[...] He referred to the starving Jews, and while he did not feel at liberty to grant them the full rights enjoyed by other subjects without the concurrence of the douma, he has relieved them from the most severe of the restrictions under which they have been suffering, and now they can go about Russia with an ordinary passport. They may engage in any business, but are not yet allowed to buy land outside of the pale of settlement. Jewish children are now admitted to all the schools and universities of Russia without condition. The members of that race are now enjoying nearly all the liberties of those of other races and religions, except that there has been no change in passport regulations, which has been promised from year to year. Foreign Jews are still compelled to explain the object of their visit before they are permitted to pass the boundary. Mr. Stolypin will undoubtedly remove that humiliation in due time.

THE VENGEANCE OF THE JEWS

Perhaps these reforms are the cause of the present tranquillity, because the revolutionary leaders nearly all belong to the Jewish race and the most effective revolutionary agency is the Jewish Bund, which has its headquarters at Bialystok, where the massacre occurred last June. The government has suffered more from that race than from all of its other subjects combined. Whenever a desperate deed is committed it is always done by a Jew and there is scarcely one loyal member of that race in the entire Empire. The great strike which paralyzed the Empire and compelled the Czar to grant a constitution and a parliament was ordered and managed by a Jew named Krustaleff, president of the workingmen's council, a young man only thirty years old. He was sent to the penitentiary for life, and had not been behind the bars more than three weeks when he organized and conducted a successful strike of the prison employees. Maxim, who organized and conducted the revolution in the Baltic provinces, is a Jew of marvelous ability. Last fall he came over here lecturing and collecting money to carry on the revolutionary campaign, but for some reason has vanished and nobody seems to know what has become of him. Gerschunin, the most resourceful leader of the terrorists, who was condemned to life imprisonment in the silver mines on the Mongolian frontier, has recently escaped in a water cask, and is supposed to be in San Francisco. He is a Polish Jew only twenty-seven years old. I might enumerate a hundred other revolutionary leaders and every one of them would be a Jew. Wherever you read of an assassination or of the explosion of a bomb you will notice in the newspaper dispatches that the man was a Jew. The most sensational and dramatic episode that has occurred since the mutinies was on October 27, when, in the very center of Saint Petersburg, at the entrance of Kazan Cathedral, four Jews held up a treasury wagon and captured $270,000. They passed the package to a woman, who instantly vanished, and no trace of her has ever been found; but they were all arrested and were promptly punished. On the 8th of November a few Jewish revolutionaries entered a treasury car near Ragow, in Poland, got $850,000, and disappeared. Every deed of that kind is done by Jews, and the massacres that have shocked the universe, and occurred so frequently that the name "pogrom" was invented to describe them, were organized and managed by the exasperated police authorities in retaliation for crimes committed by the Jewish revolutionists.

MANY REFORMS ALREADY INSTITUTED BY PREMIER STOLYPIN

But Mr. Stolypin has evidently arranged a truce. He has crushed out the conspirators in the police department who organized and directed the "pograms" [sic.-KAS] and has given the Jews more liberty and more justice than they ever enjoyed before. He has appointed a commission to prepare a law placing them upon the same footing as Protestants, Roman Catholics, and members of other religious faiths. Mr. Stolypin is an able, honest, and grave man, of broad horizon and liberal views and a high sense of justice. He has already done wonders. Every week some important reform is ordered, some tyrannical regulation revoked, some concession granted. [...]

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

CSR. Good points. I doubt Makow's alleged or implied conversion to Christianity. When you look at legitimate Jewish converts to Christianity, like Freedman and Vanunu, they completely discarded their Jewry.