US Military Officers Challenge “official Bush version”

[Anonymous]

US Military Officers Challenge "official Bush version"

The Pakistan newspaper "Pakistan Daily" has recently published a powerful article entitled "USA Military Officers Challenge Official Account of September 11" . This article succinctly presents the views of 25 outstanding, courageous,  US military officers who have spoken out against the Bush Administration lies about the 9/11 atrocity. The views of these men are particularly noteworthy because of their unquestionable patriotism, their military service and their technical expertise.

What these American military officers are saying is actually unexceptional in the sense that it has all been said by themselves and others before. Thus not just military men and scientists recognize the "impossibility" of the "official Bush version" e.g. an aviation gas fire cannot melt or even soften steel; it is hard enough to crash a light aircraft at ground level into a tree-surrounded building like the Pentagon, let alone a huge airliner; the absence of passenger effects from the various sites; the minimal-resistance collapse of the Twin Towers mimicking "perfect" demolitions;  the collapse of the WTC7 building that had not been hit by a plane and which had suffered only minor fires etc etc.

Thus here is just one expert opinion in the "Pakistan Daily" article from US Navy Commander Kolstad about the "official Bush version" account of American Airlines Flight 77 that allegedly crashed into the Pentagon:

"At the Pentagon, the pilot of the Boeing 757 did quite a feat of flying.  I have 6,000 hours of flight time in Boeing 757's and 767's and I could not have flown it the way the flight path was described. I was also a Navy fighter pilot and Air Combat Instructor and have experience flying low altitude, high speed aircraft.  I could not have done what these beginners did.  Something stinks to high heaven!"

Indeed one must ask the question: what Bush-complicit Anglo-American bureaucrats, politicians, academics and Mainstream journalists have the technical background and experience to contradict the critical assertions of US Navy Commander Kolstad and his US military colleagues?

The following key quote from one of these 25 American heroes, former U.S. Air Force pilot Lt. Jeff Dahlstrom, is a very reasonable summation of what may well have happened on 9/11 and why it happened:

"The US government and the news media, once again, were lying to the world about the real terrorists and the public murder of 2,972 innocents on 9/11. The 'Patriot Act' was actually written prior to 9/11 with the intention of destroying the US Constitution and Bill of Rights.  It was passed by Congress, based upon the government's myth of 9/11, which was in reality a staged hoax."

"9/11 was scripted and executed by rogue elements of the military, FAA, intelligence, and private contractors working for the US government. In addition to severely curtailing fundamental rights of Americans, the 9/11 crime was then used by this administration, the one I originally voted for and supported, to justify waging two preemptive wars (and most likely a third war), killing over 4,500 American soldiers, and killing over one million innocent Afghan and Iraqi people. It was all premeditated. Treason, a false flag military operation, and betrayal of the trust of the American people were committed on 9/11 by the highest levels of the US government and not one person responsible for the crimes, or the cover-up, has been held accountable for the last six years."

In addition to the trashing of American wealth, health, rights, reputation and institutions, the Zionist-Bush War on Terror has devastated a swathe of countries from Occupied Somalia to presently US-bombed Pakistan - post-invasion excess deaths in the Occupied Iraqi and Afghan Territories total 2 million and 3-7 million, respectively; post-invasion under-5 infant deaths total 0.6 million and 2.3 million, respectively; and refugees total 4.5 million and 4 million, respectively (see "Palestinian, Iraqi, Afghan, Biofuel and Climate Genocides – Silence Kills and Silence is Complicity").

Indeed the only countries not bombed by the US or its surrogates as you go from the Kenya border with Occupied Somalia to the Indian border with US-bombed Pakistan are Egypt (ruled by a grossly human rights-abusing, US-backed dictatorship), Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States (US-backed royal dictatorships) and Iran (a clerically-dominated democracy subject to continual threats of nuclear or conventional annihilation by Apartheid Israel or the US; a major player in defending the World from the US-restored and US-sanctioned Afghan opium trade; and subject to violent US-backed terrorism).

However the anti-Arab, anti-Semitic, Islamophobic, Zionist-backed Bush War on Terror – in horrible reality a cowardly and racist War on Arab, Muslim, Asian and non-European Women and Children – has come at an appalling cost to America and to the world in general. Thus 2001 Economics Nobel Laureate Professor Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia University) has stated that the $3 trillion accrual cost of the Iraq War alone has bankrupted America. The 4-fold increase in the price of oil since the invasion of Iraq, undiminished greenhouse gas pollution, market speculation, the collapse of the US dollar and the legislatively mandated biofuel perversion (feeding food to cars) has led to a global food price crisis that threatens "billions" according to the UK Chief Scientist Professor John Beddington FRS (see "World War 2 Bengal famine Remembered. Rice Price Triples in 1 Year" on MWC News and "Global Food Price Crisis. US Biofuel & CO2 Threaten Billions" on MWC News).

Sensible, educated  people aware of the long track record of American and indeed Anglo-American "lies for war" over several centuries were immediately sceptical about the "official Bush version" of the 9/11 atrocity. However the World remains blitzed by a mountain of propaganda from the Zionist-, Bush-ite- and neo-Bush-ite-beholden Mainstream media of the Western Murdochracies. Nevertheless Scholars for 9/11 Truth and others commenced carefully analysing the 9/11 atrocity in a scientific fashion, noting that science involves the critical testing of potentially falsifiable information. In contrast, the Bush Administration responded with lies, removal of evidence, propaganda and anti-science spin – noting that spin involves the anti-scientific selective use of asserted facts to support a partisan position.

Public scepticism began to seriously mount after the realization that the Bush Administration had been lying about Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (a recent US think-tank report estimates that the White House had told a total of 935 lies about Iraq alone after 9/11 and before the invasion of Iraq). It is useful to see this mounting scepticism as reported by MWC News (and indeed by some Mainstream media, notably in non-English-speaking countries) over the last few years.

In July 2005 MWC News reported the extraordinary Mainstream media (Washington Post) reportage of the dissenting views of Professor Morgan Reynolds (a distinguished, "Establishment" emeritus professor at Texas A&M who was chief economist in the Department of Labor under George W. Bush and who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas, Texas) : "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling" (see "Lies, Slies & Media Breakthrough over 9/11").

In August 2006 MWC News could report the extraordinary "rubbing out" of huge atrocities from public perception by Mainstream media (see "9/11, Media Lying. Compulsory Lies Downunder").

By December 2007 MWC News could report the "insider" views of former 7-year president of Italy, law professor, senator for life and intelligence intimate Professor Francesco Cossiga,  reported in top Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera (but ignored by Anglo-American mainstream media. In short, the "intelligence insider" view from former Italian President Francesco Cossiga was that the CIA and Israeli Mossad were responsible for 9/11, that it had been done to further US and Zionist power  and that intelligence services know about it (see "Were US & Israel behind the 9/11?").

By June 2008 MWC News (but not Anglo-American mainstream media) could report that 2 Swiss scholars, Professors Daniele Ganser and Albert A. Stahel of the prestigious, Nobel Laureate-associated  Zurich ETH, reported in the largest Swiss newspaper, "Blick", have seriously questioned the "official Bush version" of what happened on 9/11 "the more we research, the more we doubt the Bush version" (see "US Responsible for 9/11?").

Now in May 2008 we have this "Pakistan Daily" report of 25 US military officers questioning the "official Bush version" of the 9/11 atrocity – and doing so from their various perspectives as top aviation, intelligence and security experts. Indeed Professor Richard Falk, an outstanding Jewish American expert on International Law (and recently banned from inspecting the Occupied Palestinian Bantustan Concentration Camps run by Apartheid Israel), has also called for proper judicial scrutiny of the 9/11 atrocity.

The truth is slowly emerging into the public arena despite the traitorous and racist dishonesty of the Mainstream media of the Western Murdochracies. One hopes that the truth about 9/11 will emerge in time to save Iran (population over 70 million, half of them children, three quarters women and children) from destruction at the hands of racist, genocidal Bush America and Apartheid Israel.

Dr Gideon Polya,  MWC News Chief political editor, published some 130 works in a 4 decade scientific career, most recently a huge pharmacological reference text "Biochemical Targets of Plant Bioactive Compounds" (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, New York & London, 2003), and is currently writing a book on global mortality ---
Other articles by this author