Book Blurb: Eustace Mullins - Mullins' New History of the Jews (1968)

[Helphand]

Eustace Mullins: Mullins' New History of the Jews (1968)

  An engaging but at times strident monograph on the subject to which the late Eustace Mullins had (in 1968) devoted some "thirty-six years of constant research".
  Some of the reinterpretations of customarily accepted historical "events" are radical. However, as the truth is often stranger than fiction

• , you, the reader, must judge for yourself.

  {

• Alex Linder, one of those nasty White Nationalists vocal in the VNN/Goyfire audio conferences sometime between about 2005-2008, remarked that in a former life he had been employed in technical editing. One day he had cause to read some morticians' trade journal on the technical requirements affecting interment, notably the depth to which corpses must be buried to avoid being scented by dogs and other animals and dug up. The conventional "6' under" (minimum) was, he reported, increased in the case of Jews to "12' under". And he wasn't joking. Is this a Jewish cult requirement or just another instance of Mullins's "Biological Jew"?}

Chapter 1: Jews and Civilisation.

[page 8:]

...First of all the Jews have survived because they are masters at confusing the issues. After the crucifixion of Christ, when His message of salvation began to attract thousands of followers, the Jews made a typical move. Rather than oppose Him, they tried to take Him over. They proclaimed to the world that Christ was a Jew. Therefore, one could become a Christian merely by doing whatever the Jews ordered you to do.
  In doing this, the Jews ignored Isaiah, 5;20, "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"
  Incredibly enough, millions of people were tricked by this stratagem of the Jews. Despite all records which proved that Jesus Christ in His physical form was a blue-eyed, flaxen-haired gentile from Galilee, thousands of Christian ministers tell their congregations, "Let us worship Christ the Jew." Not only is this the ultimate blasphemy against Our Savior, but it also violates every canon of common sense. If Christ was such a good Jew, why did the Jews demand that He be crucified?

[page 9:]

...But here too, the Jew has not failed to meet the competition. He has flooded the art world with meaningless daubs, in some cases made by dogs and monkeys, as the ultimate expression of the Jewish contempt for the gullibility of the goy, or gentile; he has turned the world of music into the cacophonous screechings of automobile horns and mindless poundings of drums; he has turned the world of writing into repetitious tales of human debauchery.


Chapter 3: The Origin of the Jews.

[page 18:]

...It was Ezra Pound who launched upon a study of Byzantine civilization, and who reminded the world of this happily non-Jewish land. From the Byzantines, Pound derived his non-violent formula for controlling the Jews. "The answer to the Jewish problem is simple," he said. "Keep them out of banking, out of education, out of government."
  And this is how simple it is. There is no need to kill the Jews. In fact, every pogrom in history has played into their hands, and has in many instances been cleverly instigated by them. Get the Jews out of banking and they cannot control the economic life of the community. Get the Jews out of education and they cannot pervert the minds of the young to their subversive doctrines. Get the Jews out of government and they cannot betray the nation.

[pages 19-20:]

...Although the Jews appear and reappear in the histories of other nations for five thousand years, they were never able or willing to establish a nation of their own. This is a sorry record for such a distinguished race, and incredible when one considers that they were the favorite people of God. Indeed, no other people has such a pathetic record of civilization. Even the African pygmies developed a civilization of their own. Most records of the Jews are such a mixture of fact and fiction that it becomes a matter of detective work to track down the truth.
  The origin of the Jews is revealed by the origin of their tribal name. The word "Jew" was unknown in ancient history. The Jews were then known as Hebrews, and the word Hebrew tells us all about this people that we need to know.
...Hebrew means "one who is from across the river." Rivers were often the boundaries of ancient nations, and one from across the river meant, simply, an alien. In every country of the ancient world, the Hebrews were known as aliens. The word also, in popular usage, meant "one who should not be trusted until he has identified himself." Hebrew in all ancient literature was written as "Habiru". This word appears frequently in the Bible and in Egyptian literature. In the Bible, Habiru is used interchangeably with "sagaz", meaning "cutthroat". In all of Egyptian literature, wherever the word Habiru appears, it is written with the word "sagaz" written beside it. Thus the Egyptians always wrote of the Jews as "the cutthroat bandits from across the river". For five thousand years, the Egyptian scribes identified the Jews in this manner. Significantly, they are not referred to except by these two characters.  

[pages 21-22:]

...The record of the Hebrews is at great variance with the Jewish claims to "a great culture". But all Jewish claims of culture are entirely without foundation. The Horizon Book of Christianity, a standard reference work, says, page 10,
  "The Jews began as an agglomeration of small tribes who later attained independence only in the interlude between the rise and fall of great empires. They have bequeathed no monuments testifying to magnificence. There are no tombs of Hebrew kings with chaplets of gold and chariots studded with jewels. Palestine archeology has unearthed no statues of David or Solomon, but only water pots like the one from which Rebecca watered the camels of Abraham's servants."
  The Oriental Institute of Chicago contains one of the world's definitive collections of the fine arts, specializing in Egyptian, Syrian and other cultures of the Near East, in the area which the Jews claim as their origin. One would expect to find the Jewish contribution to civilization well represented here. After walking through vast halls filled with great works of art, splendid statues, exquisite jewels, and other artifacts from the tombs of Egyptian and Assyrian conquerors, we come to the Jewish exhibit. Here is a glass case filled with broken bits of clay pots, crude, undecorated, and unglazed utensils which might have come down to us from the Stone Age. This is the great Jewish culture about which we have heard so much. It is all that they have to offer.
  The fact is that the Jews were known only as destroyers in the ancient world. They produced no art, founded no dynasties, built no great cities, and, alone of ancient peoples, had no talent for the finer things of civilized life. Is this not at variance with the Jewish claim that they, and they alone, are the sole torch-bearers of civilization?
  It is also a fact that the Jews, who were not always successful bandits, eked out a precarious living in Palestine, and they were often on the verge of starvation.

[pages 24-25:]

A considerable portion of Egyptian literature deals with the social distress of this period, when the Jews were undermining the greatest civilization known to man until that time. Thus, we have "Admonitions of an Egyptian Sage from a Hieratic Papyrus in Leiden," translated and published by Alan H. Gardiner in 1909. Gardiner translates:
"Egypt was in distress; the social system had become disorganized; violence filled the land. Invaders preyed upon the defenseless population; the rich were stripped of everything and slept in the open, and the poor took their possessions. It is no merely local disturbance that is here described, but a great and overwhelming national disaster. The Pharaoh was strangely inactive."
Another source, the famous Ipuwer Papyrus, says, "The towns are destroyed... years of noise. There is no end to noise. The fish in the lakes and rivers die, and worms, insects and reptiles breed prolifically."
What a strange occurrence! No battles are described; the empire was not attacked from without. The description is oddly like the French and Russian Communist Revolutions ... the rich were stripped of everything and slept in the open. There are also parallels to modern America... the fish in the lakes and rivers die... there is no end to noise.
  One of the great sources of Egyptology is Manetho's History of Egypt. He describes the downfall of the empire as follows:
  "A people of ignoble origin from the East, who had the audacity to invade the country, which they mastered by main force, without difficulty or even a battle."
  Although incredible, this happened again and again in the ancient world. How did it happen to the most powerful empire ever known? It has already happened in Babylon. The Jews paved the way for the conquerors. These conquerors of Egypt were the Hyksos, or Shepherd Kings, who won Egypt without a battle and maintained an iron dictatorship over the people for 511 years.

[pages 26-7:]

...Although these are the facts of the Jewish sojourn in Egypt, a sordid record of treachery and destruction, these facts are related here for the first time in English, although these sources have been known for centuries. The true origin of the Jews, and the definition of Habiru and sa-gaz as it describes the nature of this people, have long been known to Biblical scholars. Why did they deliberately withhold all mention of the fact that throughout the ancient world, the Jews were known and feared as cutthroats and bandits? First of all, they believed the Jewish lie that Christ was a Jew. If they published their findings, about the origin of the Jews, they would be identifying Christ as a descendant of bloodthirsty outlaws. Obviously, this could not be true. Consequently, they omitted all references to Habiru and sa-gaz from their works. Literally thousands of scholars have withheld this vital information in the thousands of books published about ancient history during past centuries. Now we must re-evaluate the entire history of the early civilizations in the light of what we know about the Jews.
  Another area in which the scholars and the universities have been greatly remiss is their incredible glorification of the Hebrew language. We have been told that Hebrew is one of the great languages of all time, that much of the world's great literature was written in it, and that it is a language formulated to express the most noble sentiments. Yet we have only to open the Encyclopaedia Britannica to find that Hebrew is a very limited language with only 500 or so basic words, much like the Basic English publicized during the Second World War. Furthermore, according to the Britannica, Hebrew is not really a language at all, but a composite of other Near Eastern tongues. The Britannica says,
  "A composite language of the Semitic peoples; consisting of Aramaic, Canaanite, Arcadian and Assyro-Babylon."
  In plain words, Hebrew was simply the Yiddish of the ancient world, a polyglot jargon which the Jews used in their underworld activities. Thus another Jewish lie is exploded. And the great literature supposedly written in this language is another myth, with no basis in fact. The Gospels of the New Testament, so most Biblical scholars tell us, were written in Greek, rather than in Hebrew. Jewish writers admit that most of the "Hebrew" writings were merely taken freely from Babylonian and Egyptian sources. The Psalms, supposedly a series of great Hebrew poems, were taken word for word from Akhenaton's Hymns to the Sun, written 600 years earlier in Egypt. Horace Meyer Kallen, a professor at the Jewish New School of Social Research, says that the Book of Job was lifted bodily from an early and obscure Greek play. Velikovsky admits that there are "many parallels" between the Vedic Hymns and the Books of Joel and Isaiah. The Decalogue was taken wholly from the Egyptian Book of the Dead. And so on, throughout the entire list of "great Jewish writings." Yet the students of our universities know nothing about all this. They accept without question the statements of their professors (who are mostly Jews, nowadays), the myth of the great Hebrew language and the great Hebrew literature. The fact is that the Jews, entirely lacking in creative talent of any kind, stole literature just as they stole everything else from the peoples who tolerated them.


Chapter 7: Jews in Europe.


[pages 82-4:]

...Whenever possible, after a victory, as during the Cromwell Puritan reign in England, the Jews excercised their law of the talon against the helpless gentiles. History is filled with stories of Jewish atrocities against women and children, from the Book of Esther down to the atrocities which they committed against the Arabs in Israel. One of the most terrible examples of this Jewish viciousness was the Spanish Inquisition. Although usually denounced as a "Catholic" phenomenon, the Inquisition from its very inception was a Jewish exercise, and most of its victims were good Christians. The original purpose was to discourage members of the Jewish community from becoming "marranos", or rice-Christians. Many Jews had become nominal Christians in order to improve their chances of doing business with the gentiles. In Spain and Portugal, the marrano movement had become widespread, and the Elders of Zion decided that they must put a stop to it. As usual, they would use the gentiles to do their dirty work for them. What was more natural than for the Elders to use the Church for their evil purposes?
  At this time, Torquemada had risen rapidly in the hierarchy of Spanish Catholicism. The Church was not anti-Jewish, as was proven by the fact that many Jews were able to become high-ranking Catholics. At this very time, in 1483, the Spanish government had appointed a Jew, Isaac Abrabanel, as Administrator of the State Finances, in order to raise money to drive the Jews out of Granada. Thus, Spain could hardly be said to be an anti-Jewish nation at the time of the Inquisition. However, the Jews were able to devise a plan which would force the Church to persecute the marranos.
Torquemada informed his superiors in the Church that many marranos were not Christians at all, which was quite true, and that they still kept Jewish holy objects in their homes and sacrificed to them. The bishops were horrified at such treachery, and they asked Torquemada what should be done. He suggested that the marranos should be brought before a Catholic board of inquiry, and questioned about their betrayal of the Christian faith to which they pretended to belong. The bishops agreed, and since it was Torquemada who had originated the idea, they put him in charge of the Inquisition.
Within a few weeks, Torquemada had summoned hundreds of Jews, and many Christians as well, to his Inquisition. The bishops were horrified to learn that he had set up a secret police throughout Spain, in the name of the Catholic Inquisition, and that he was subjecting people to the most hideous tortures. When they remonstrated with him, and begged him to stop carrying out such iniquities in the name of Jesus Christ, he merely smiled philosophically at them, and murmured,
"Perhaps you too are wavering in your faith?"
At this bold threat that they too might be brought before his Inquisition, the bishops were forced to let him continue his work. He financed an army of spies by confiscating the fortunes of everyone brought before his Inquisition, for the victims always confessed.
For centuries, the Church has been denounced for the crimes of the Inquisition, yet those bishops who tried to prevent Torquemada from carrying out these atrocities were themselves burnt at the stake. As usual the Jews have fastened the responsibility for their crimes upon someone else. The influence of Torquemada soon permeated the highest councils of the Catholic Church, and in some countries, converted it into an instrument for the oppression of the working people. ... one man finally risked his life to protest. He was Martin Luther. It was never Luther's intention to effect a schism in the Church, or to lead a separate religious body. He simply wished to reform the Church from within, expel the Jews, and put an end to their unchristian practices. In 1524, he published one of a series of attacks on the Jews, "Letters Against the Sabbatarians, Concerning the Jews and Their Lies, Concerning the Shem-Ha-Mephorash".
Had Luther been able to prevail against the Jews, and reform the Church from within, there might never have been a Protestant Church. However, the Jews were too powerful and he was unable to dislodge them. He had translated the Talmud, because he was one of the greatest scholars of all time, and he knew exactly what the Jews were and what their purposes were.
One of today's leading scholars, Father James E. Bulger, told this writer,
"If Luther had been able to reform the Church from within, the people would have been spared the terrible religious wars which devastated Europe for so many centuries. The Jews sought to destroy Luther by massacring all of his followers, and these so-called religious wars which they instigated are one of their most vicious crimes against humanity."


Chapter 9: Jews and the United States.


[page 124:]

...How did the freedom-loving American people become slaves of the Jews? First of all, Americans do not stick together. Second, many sincere and misguided Americans believe the blasphemy that Christ was a Jew, and that the Jews are our natural rulers because our God is a Jew. Third, the Jews spend fortunes every year to cover up their crimes, while Americans spend nothing to find out what the Jews are doing. Our history has been falsified to conceal Jewish guilt for starting the Civil War and many other American disasters.


[page 125:]

...This did not satisfy the Jews. They informed him that the American people were printing and circulating their own paper money, and this had created great wealth and prosperity in the colonies. King George III was forced to issue an order banning this interest-free money, and stipulating that the colonists could only use Bank-of-England money which was printed by the Jews. Within a few months after this order went into effect, the colonists were in the throes of a terrible financial depression. Trade slowed to a standstill, and many Americans were ruined. The colonists decided to fight back, and the result was the American Revolution. Benjamin Franklin commented that the colonists had no objection to the little tax on tea, but they could not stand the curtailment of trade which followed the banning of the native currency. However, it suited the Jews to publicize a minor incident, the Boston Tea Party, and to obscure the real reason for the revolt.


Chapter 10: Jews and our Future.

[page 146:]

...Unable to accept himself for what he is, the Jew invents other explanations of himself, and when he begins to accept these delusions as reality, this is legally defined as insanity. Dr. Martin F. Debivoise recently concluded a ten-year study of Jews in New York. He found that 43% of them were mentally disturbed to the degree that they should be hospitalized. He also made a study of one thousand marriages between Jews and gentiles during this period. He found that 847 of these marriages ended in divorce within five years; in 681, there were no children, and of those who had children, 73% developed leukemia or cancer before the age of puberty. Typical was the death of the son of John Gunther from cancer as a product of one of these mixed marriages.

[page 147:]

...In 1952, a document reached the western democracies which proved that the Jews were anxious to move rapidly ahead with their familiar plans for dictatorship over the gentiles. The unchallenged transcript of a speech by Rabbi Emanuel Rabinovich was documented as having been delivered before the Emergency Council of European Rabbis in Budapest, Hungary, January 12, 1952:

  "The goal for which we have striven so concertedly for three thousand years is at last within our reach, and because its fulfillment is so apparent, it behooves us to increase our efforts and our caution tenfold. I can safely promise you that before ten years have passed, our race will take its rightful place in the world, with every Jew a King, and every gentile a slave! (applause from the gathering).
..."Within five years, this program will achieve its objective, the Third World War, which will surpass in destruction all previous contests. Israel, of course, will remain neutral, and when both sides are devastated and exhausted, we will arbitrate, sending our Control Commissions into all of the wrecked countries. This war will end for all time our struggle against the gentiles. We will openly reveal our identity with the races of Asia and Africa. I can state with assurance that the last generation of white children is now being born. Our Control Commissions will, in the interests of peace and wiping out interracial tensions, forbid the whites to mate with whites. The white women must cohabit with members of the dark races, and the white men with black women. Thus the white race will disappear, for mixing the dark with the white will be the end of the white man, and our most dangerous enemy will become only a memory. We will embark upon an era of ten thousand years of peace and plenty, the Pax Judaica, and our race will rule undisputed over the earth. Our superior intelligence will easily enable us to retain mastery over a world of dark peoples.
  "(Question from gathering): Rabbi Rabinovich, what about the various religions after the Third World War?
  "RABINOVICH: There will be no more religions. Not only would the existence of a priest class remain a constant danger to our rule, but belief in an afterlife would give spiritual strength to irreconcilable elements in many countries, and enable them to resist us. We will, however, retain the rituals and customs of Judaism as the mark of our hereditary ruling caste, strengthening our racial laws so that no Jew will be allowed to marry outside of our race, nor will any stranger be accepted by us.
  "We may have to repeat the grim days of World War II when we were forced to let the Hitlerite bandits sacrifice some of our people, in order that we may have adequate documentation and witnesses to legally justify our trial and execution of the leaders of America and Russia as war criminals, after we have dictated the peace. I am sure you will need little preparation for such a duty, for sacrifice has always been the watchword of our people, and the death of a few thousand Jews in exchange for world leadership is indeed a small price to pay."
...This document, which originally reached this country in Yiddish, was translated by Henry H. Klein, a Jew who was horrified by the plans of his people to precipitate an atomic war. Klein later died mysteriously in New York, after a Central Intelligence Agency man visited him. The CIA now has the original of this document in its files in Washington.

[page 151:]

...As President of the International Institute of Jewish Studies, and having spent thirty-six years of constant research on the Jewish problem, I state with certainty that to be Jew-wise is to survive. To accept Jewish domination not only means that one abandons all precepts of human civilization which have accreted over five thousand years of recorded history: it also means that one accepts a zombie mode of existence, a life in death which excludes all of the glory and honor of living in Christ.

[/tab]

.

Eustace Mullins - Herbert Hoover & The House of Rothschild


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIS6i2iABlI[/youtube]1nchrw5o]


_________________  __  __________________


Eustace Mullins - Stalinists and Trotskyists in the US


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iIITfI1tDE[/youtube]1nchrw5o]


_________________  __  __________________


The Rockefeller Medical Conspiracy


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cNGvoCNhRlA[/youtube]1nchrw5o]


_________________  __  __________________


Hospitals, Temples of the Occult


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w01nBWDVaS8[/youtube]1nchrw5o]


_________________  __  __________________


The Bankers behind Hitler, Stalin and Israel 1/6


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6_tuFF_Now[/youtube]1nchrw5o]


_________________  __  __________________


Eustace Mullins - IG Farben & The Medical Monopoly


[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCaTWf-WZ3I[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - Reverend Billy Graham, Mason

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANe7LvF3UmE[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________


Queen Elizabeth II and George Bush, the world's two biggest drug dealers

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZFEH4jqnGU[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________


Ezra Pound, political prisoner from 1945 to 1958

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyurZlvFc3s[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - The Bechtel Corporation

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWLeO9RNjGM[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - The Washington Post

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j79SLJ2Ub44[/youtube]1nchrw5o]
_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - Stalinists and Trotskyists in the US

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iIITfI1tDE[/youtube]1nchrw5o]
_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - Aluminum Toxicity & Alzheimer's Disease

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJ7GNTSELi8[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - How Woodrow Wilson became President

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9ga6yc7r1A[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - The John Birch Rockefeller Society

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8NQvMTtQ6Q[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - Senator Joe McCarthy (1908-1957)

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8mwMbmM3_g[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - The Reign of Terror

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vHWIyIbfX0[/youtube]1nchrw5o]
_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - No Justice in American Courts

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFESJaLfhnU[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins, "conspiritologist"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkqIVXdwA6c0[/youtube]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - IG Farben & The Medical Monopoly

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCaTWf-WZ3I[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins with Sherman Skolnick 1/7 - and Lenny Bloom in Cloak and Dagger, January 2005

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB_G_7aevNo[/youtube]1nchrw5o]
_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins, the worlds leading expert on Central Banks, pt 1/2 - with Paul Fromm in Washington, Nov 25, 2002, for Radio Freedom Toronto.

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvaALrxwlYI[/youtube]1nchrw5o]
_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - What I've Learned Over The Years 1/6

Scriptures for America Ministry's Annual Branson Missouri Gathering, May 31, 2009.
Interviewed by Jesse Lee, introduced by Pastor Pete Peters.

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE6P6aJHvCs[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins with Pastor Pete Peters 1/6


 In 'Scriptures for America', April 21, 2003.

Discussing Ezra Pound, Joe McWilliams, Senator Joe McCarthy, H.L. Hunt, Francis Yockey, Father Coughlin, Henry Ford, Elizabeth Dilling, and others, plus some of Eustace's books, like Murder by Injection, The Secrets of the Federal Reserve, The Biological Jew, The Curse of Canaan and Mullins' New History of the Jews.

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHwOKl03YMA[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________


Eustace Mullins - How the Rothschilds created Israel, pt 1 of 5 - With DBS

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5Df_g95Mr8[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - Demonology of History 1/8  -  With Bill Brumbaugh in 2001

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rqfd9EtC138[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

Eustace Mullins - The Hegemony of Parasitism 1/13

[youtube:1nchrw5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5iQo0FjO64[/youtube]1nchrw5o]

_________________  __  __________________

For more look here


http://www.youtube.com/user/RaisingKundalini#p/a


.
.

.
.

[Whaler]

Helphand, I really like these book blurbs. I find them very interesting.

[Helphand]

1) Videos - thanks for the urls. EM always came across as unceasingly humorous.
Regarding drugs/opium trade and just who runs it, this is one topic on which John Coleman's Committee of 300 does seem to have some plausible information to offer.
In which connection, regarding the recent prostitute murders in Bradford, Yorkshire, UK: the women were all (iirc) described as hooked on drugs of one sort or another. One of the deceased had at times even worked the streets with her own daughter. Yet in the news reports I can't recall David Cameron or any other politician mentioning drugs as complicit in the problem and needing urgent attention higher up the supply chain. If you read the relevant bits in Coleman's book (including the historic source book(s) there quoted) and other  materials specifically about the involvement of the British Crown in the illicit drugs industry you may reasonably deduce why this subject was notably absent from the episodes of hand-wringing.

Coleman's book also suggests one means of eliminating the trade of distribution.

2) Book Blurbs: the reasoning behind my wish to inflict these is summarised in:

http://theinfounderground.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=10656

Of course I stole the idea from CrackSmokeRepublican and others who have previously digested books here. The common rubric might help the incorrigibly masochistic to find them together though.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Great quotes there H.H. really enjoy the Eustace Mullins vids and collection of quotes.  The Book Blurbs idea is a good one and can really become a resource to share.  :up:

[thirdeyewise]

A question about Eustace Mullins:

I'm curious, when this great teacher starts talking about Hitler being funded by the Rothschilds, do some of you slip into a temporary coma or do you just
go cook dinner during the uncomfortable parts of these audios?

Oh that's right, I am not supposed to mention that. Sorry that video jogged my memory.

[/tab]

A question about Eustace Mullins:

I'm curious, when this great teacher starts talking about Hitler being funded by the Rothschilds, do some of you slip into a temporary coma or do you just
go cook dinner during the uncomfortable parts of these audios?

Oh that's right, I am not supposed to mention that. Sorry that video jogged my memory.

Jim Condit - The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 518563654#

.
.

[thirdeyewise]

Jim Condit - The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler


http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid ... 518563654#

.
.

You don't have to convince me. I am way past that point. i am just curious why people on a forum that is supposed to be looking for the
truth, have such an Aversion to the very thing.

[Helphand]

A propos funding of Hitler by the Rothschilds, for the savants here I guess it's needless to mention (again probably...) among others, Sidney Warburg's pre-World War II book (in English translation): "Hitler's Secret Bankers" (scan copies on the net including on scribd as Wartburg (sic)).

And Pidcock in DBS's interview(s) with him remarked on Arthur Swan and his "Other Road to Serfdom" (crit. of Hayek) that AS had told the authorities he saw no reason why he should be enlisted to fight Germany since the Bank of England had been funding Hitler. AS was apparently imprisoned for refusing to fight the er, good fight.

[thirdeyewise]

A propos funding of Hitler by the Rothschilds, for the savants here I guess it's needless to mention (again probably...) among others, Sidney Warburg's pre-World War II book (in English translation): "Hitler's Secret Bankers" (scan copies on the net including on scribd as Wartburg (sic)).

And Pidcock in DBS's interview(s) with him remarked on Arthur Swan and his "Other Road to Serfdom" (crit. of Hayek) that AS had told the authorities he saw no reason why he should be enlisted to fight Germany since the Bank of England had been funding Hitler. AS was apparently imprisoned for refusing to fight the er, good fight.

Talking about Hitler being funded by Jews or being led by crypto Jews, is a no no here @ TIU, no matter how much evidence you can produce.
You have been warned.

[GordZilla]

A propos funding of Hitler by the Rothschilds, for the savants here I guess it's needless to mention (again probably...) among others, Sidney Warburg's pre-World War II book (in English translation): "Hitler's Secret Bankers" (scan copies on the net including on scribd as Wartburg (sic)).

And Pidcock in DBS's interview(s) with him remarked on Arthur Swan and his "Other Road to Serfdom" (crit. of Hayek) that AS had told the authorities he saw no reason why he should be enlisted to fight Germany since the Bank of England had been funding Hitler. AS was apparently imprisoned for refusing to fight the er, good fight.

Talking about Hitler being funded by Jews or being led by crypto Jews, is a no no here @ TIU, no matter how much evidence you can produce.
You have been warned.

I think that's going a bit far. This debate has been ongoing for awhile. Personally , for me the jury is still out. I know there would be heavy forces at play to suggest Hitler was founded by Zionists (I reframe from  using  "Jews" here on purpose) and often these sources, in my opinion, seem to be questionable. So for me; I look to what Hitler had do say and what he did.  Hitler froze rates on the Reichsmark, during WW2.  He allowed it to stabilize and hold its value. In the process many Jewish bankers took issue with his policy. He also said a great deal of other things that made sense as well, how people should live, what they should expect from their government, etc etc - again many of which policies were not very 'Jew Friendly'.

 At the same time one could argue that Germany helped the Zionists in a big way to populate the illegally stolen land known as 'Israel'. Hitler repeatedly encouraged Jews to leave Germany proper, and a great deal of them did. So there is that side of the argument as well. However that could easily be explained away as just a mere convenience to the Zionists, after all Hitler wasn't Jew friendly, he knew they were destroying his country and he knew something must be done about it. He knew as early as the 20's that the Jews had a big hand in the first world war, he knew they were responsible for it and his county's resulting economic crisis. He had a lot of very valid reasons to dislike and distrust the Jew and he voiced these opinions often.
So from that perspective, although plausible, I highly doubt( knowingly) he would receive financial aid from the Rothschilds, unless of course - and this could very well be the case - he was planning all along to use those monies against them.

I don't know if, now, we will ever get to the bottom of the story when it comes to that aspect of Hitler's regime. I don't think there is any other period of history more lied about than WW2. I personally don't feel much need to investigate the financal asspects of it . The fact the Holocaust was a lie, and Hitler did say some incredibly insightful things about his enemy is enough for me to respect this man.

We would be so lucky today to have half the leader he was.

But yeah debate away, if you are concerned about how he was financed, I've never seen that particular debate shut down here at TiU

[thirdeyewise]

I've never seen that particular debate shut down here at TiU

Trust me it has been shut down, at least 3x (by one particular person). The funny thing is everybody else discusses it, even DBS, Eustace Mullins, John Kaminski and a whole host of other researchers, but not on this forum.

I wrote some stuff on it over @ theforbiddentruth, if you want to take a look. Just search Adolf Hitler.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

This is really wonderful stuff. Thanks for posting this Helphand.  

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I think that's going a bit far. This debate has been ongoing for awhile. Personally , for me the jury is still out. I know there would be heavy forces at play to suggest Hitler was founded by Zionists (I reframe from  using  "Jews" here on purpose) and often these sources, in my opinion, seem to be questionable. So for me; I look to what Hitler had do say and what he did.  Hitler froze rates on the Reichsmark, during WW2.  He allowed it to stabilize and hold its value. In the process many Jewish bankers took issue with his policy. He also said a great deal of other things that made sense as well, how people should live, what they should expect from their government, etc etc - again many of which policies were not very 'Jew Friendly'.

 At the same time one could argue that Germany helped the Zionists in a big way to populate the illegally stolen land known as 'Israel'. Hitler repeatedly encouraged Jews to leave Germany proper, and a great deal of them did. So there is that side of the argument as well. However that could easily be explained away as just a mere convenience to the Zionists, after all Hitler wasn't Jew friendly, he knew they were destroying his country and he knew something must be done about it. He knew as early as the 20's that the Jews had a big hand in the first world war, he knew they were responsible for it and his county's resulting economic crisis. He had a lot of very valid reasons to dislike and distrust the Jew and he voiced these opinions often.
So from that perspective, although plausible, I highly doubt( knowingly) he would receive financial aid from the Rothschilds, unless of course - and this could very well be the case - he was planning all along to use those monies against them.

I don't know if, now, we will ever get to the bottom of the story when it comes to that aspect of Hitler's regime. I don't think there is any other period of history more lied about than WW2. I personally don't feel much need to investigate the financial aspects of it . The fact the Holocaust was a lie, and Hitler did say some incredibly insightful things about his enemy is enough for me to respect this man.

We would be so lucky today to have half the leader he was.

But yeah debate away, if you are concerned about how he was financed, I've never seen that particular debate shut down here at TiU

Much agreed with GordZilla above. Hitler was largely semi-homeless for much of his young adult life. I think simple "hard-living" in a very Jewish Vienna hardened him towards the largely corrupt Jewish world. Always remember, he was a politician and a Nationalist.  I don't think at TIU, we all have the same perspective of Hitler, but I do know Jim Condit doesn't seem to push Kuzbieck's book, "The Young Hitler I Knew" very much since it doesn't fit with the Rothschild story and the whispered scandals about him. Remember too that the Nationalist Socialist party was financially weak for 10+ years and relied primarily on small donations from working class members.  I see him much like Napoleon who took the role as it came to him -- and remember that a lot of Jewish money funded the German Communist party from Russia, USA and Europe. I think the Jews largely caused Germany's hyperinflation, but I don't see Hitler as a "secret Rothschild" in secret partnership with Global Jewry.  With or without Hitler, the Jew controlled Soviet Union was set to invade Europe with a large fielded army in 1941.

But hey, debate away  :think:

[thirdeyewise]

Much agreed with GordZilla above. Hitler was largely semi-homeless for much of his young adult life. I think simple "hard-living" in a very Jewish Vienna hardened him towards the largely corrupt Jewish world. Always remember, he was a politician and a Nationalist.  I don't think at TIU, we all have the same perspective of Hitler, but I do know Jim Condit doesn't seem to push Kuzbieck's book, "The Young Hitler I Knew" very much since it doesn't fit with the Rothschild story and the whispered scandals about him. Remember too that the Nationalist Socialist party was financially weak for 10+ years and relied primarily on small donations from working class members.  I see him much like Napoleon who took the role as it came to him -- and remember that a lot of Jewish money funded the German Communist party from Russia, USA and Europe. I think the Jews largely caused Germany's hyperinflation, but I don't see Hitler as a "secret Rothschild" in secret partnership with Global Jewry.  With or without Hitler, the Jew controlled Soviet Union was set to invade Europe with a large fielded army in 1941.

But hey, debate away  :think:

In the latest TIU/TFC audio (10-06-2010) @ 50:30 Ognir states:

"We've had dictators all over the world, we still have them. You name me one country that we have a dictator, that doesn't work with the Jewish banker, not one. There isn't one, they all do."


From The French Connection site:



"every step of Nazism was financed by wall street bankers." – Eustace Mullins

It blows my mind how some of you (seemingly smart people) can come up with conclusions other than the obvious, where it comes from is beyond me?

[GordZilla]

Much agreed with GordZilla above. Hitler was largely semi-homeless for much of his young adult life. I think simple "hard-living" in a very Jewish Vienna hardened him towards the largely corrupt Jewish world. Always remember, he was a politician and a Nationalist.  I don't think at TIU, we all have the same perspective of Hitler, but I do know Jim Condit doesn't seem to push Kuzbieck's book, "The Young Hitler I Knew" very much since it doesn't fit with the Rothschild story and the whispered scandals about him. Remember too that the Nationalist Socialist party was financially weak for 10+ years and relied primarily on small donations from working class members.  I see him much like Napoleon who took the role as it came to him -- and remember that a lot of Jewish money funded the German Communist party from Russia, USA and Europe. I think the Jews largely caused Germany's hyperinflation, but I don't see Hitler as a "secret Rothschild" in secret partnership with Global Jewry.  With or without Hitler, the Jew controlled Soviet Union was set to invade Europe with a large fielded army in 1941.

But hey, debate away  :think:

In the latest TIU/TFC audio (10-06-2010) @ 50:30 Ognir states:


"We've had dictators all over the world, we still have them. You name me one country that we have a dictator, that doesn't work with the Jewish banker, not one. There isn't one, they all do."


From The French Connection site:





"every step of Nazism was financed by wall street bankers." – Eustace Mullins

It blows my mind how some of you (seemingly smart people) can come up with conclusions other than the obvious, where it comes from is beyond me?

I didn't make  a conclusion, nor will quoting DBS or Eustance make me come to one, after all Wednesday night's Piper report he was talking about how they were not founded by Jewish bankers. So ... should I quote him now as proof? NO! I, as always, will make MY own decisions. Truth is there is not too many root sources to choose from to show this 'connection' to Zionist bankers, and as I stated before I personally find them questionable. I wonder how you yourself are so sure?

  Don't follow anyone, find out for yourself, and if you can't than you shouldn't 'conclude' anything. As I had stated before I can only go by what I see and hear from those involved, those that were there and even then I still can't be sure to 100% to either side of this argument.

What I am sure of is it hardly matters to the problem we have before us now. Who financed Hitler will never be that much of a concern to me, the only one's – I feel- that will concern themselves with these matters are those trying to confuse the issue, the issue IS; the Talmudic Jews are not our friends and need to be exposed and/or eliminated.

That's my take on it anyways.


P.S> nothing 'obvious' about it, in fact that's exactly the problem with this debate.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Don't think for a second that the support of Hitler and Nazis from "outside" funds ( Wallstreet [Jews/Gentile] banks) isn't looked at.

However, you must keep in mind that the Brownshirts were a lower-middle/middle class movement, mostly "unfunded" from 1919-1933. Politically I see more money coming from Nationalist German (Non-Jew) industrialists in far more amounts than the so-called "Jew Banks".  Frankly, I think most of Wallstreet wanted to make a buck off of Germany's re-industrialization and actually saw the Weimer Republic frustrating this since it followed the Treaty of Versailles and forbade a German Wehrmacht.  
Bottom line, Hitler, however you might think of him, was not from a background or a position to "gain" massive funds until he emerged as a clear Political "winner" in the 1930s as the Weimer Govt. basically imploded from Austrian-American bank failures.  Hitler and the Nazis were never clear winners and a safe bet. I'm sure the Wallstreet Jews hedge themselves by doling out funds to Centrists, Communists, and N.S.s.  Condit gets many things right, but he does stretch a few things when it comes to Hitler and the Nazis... I see the book "The coming of the Third Reich" by Richard J. Evans as pretty good in describing the Nazis from 1919-1936. It doesn't hide anything. It pretty much shows the Nazi party as "dead broke" and in-fighting from 1919-1933.  Always remember that Hitler was unknown and homeless for nearly a decade, then some Austrians with an axe to grind called him a "Rothschild" after he emerged speaking from the inflation torn and bankrupt German streets. Are we looking at a Trotsky, Lenin or Stalin here that were buffered by Wallstreet Jew money for years?  

The big money came much, much later and the Nazis probably didn't need it after the German industrialists saw Hitler as the path to new contracts. Most of it actually came from confiscating "Jew" fortunes in the 1930s.  Overall, I think it was German industrialist's money rather than Rothschild money that granted Hitler the leg up.  Since the early 1920s,  the Nazis were in combat with a far better Jew funded and Jew run Communist party in German in the 1920s.  Like I said, Condit can't connect Hitler back with Kuzbieck his only friend. It's like saying, is DBS funded by Rothschild?

[thirdeyewise]

I wonder how you yourself are so sure?

Logic, common sense, an understanding of the Jewish modus operandi,....the evidence

the only one's – I feel- that will concern themselves with these matters are those trying to confuse the issue

How about those that have a love for history?
How about those that are looking for the whole truth?

so we can investigate all the events that have led us to the place we are in today but if you look into the greatest political figure of the 20th century, the man who is the reason Israel even exist, then...."your confusing the issue!"

that is kind of funny.

Maybe you can relate to logic if it's shown in the light (CI site) you require:
http://thy-weapon-of-war.blogspot.com/search/label/Kosher%20Nazis



A paradigm shift:

"If Christianity is to be destroyed in Europe, Germany must first be removed from the picture." (ANTI-CHRIST, by F. W. Nietzsche, p.179, 180)

and what was Nazism's end result:

[GordZilla]

As far as I understood the Belfour Declaration came before Hitler, to me that would make it obvious that he is not the man responsible for the creation of Israel. And frankly whomever funded Hitler, really has no bearing on the poison we are facing today. The Belfour Declaration came before, and the deed would have be done with or without Hitler, and for that matter with or without funds being sent to Hitler from Zionists. The plan was already put into play before Hitler even realized that he and his entire country had been betrayed by these treacherous people.

That's why I feel its almost irrelevant. The plan would move forward  (and was already)  without or without this man. That is not proof he was a puppet for them. And again most of what I read about him, and from him, the more it would seem he'd be a welcome member at a forum like this one. His insights and observations about the Jew, from his own words, seem to be not that far off from most of ours here today. That much about him I know. So if funding came in from the Zionist's then I am under the belief he would have used it against them regardless. Perhaps,  as I stated in a previous post, he may just have played right into their hands by insisting they remove themselves from  Germany.  So in that sense he may have helped the situation. He certainly did not help the Bolsheviks with theirs, which is also an odd point if you were to argue he was a Zionist puppet.

 So to sum up, I am more leaning towards the opinion of; At worse he was an unknowing tool in their greater plan who could have been substituted  with  any other man - or bypassed altogether. He was also a man , whom to me -and again from his own words- seem to reflect a lot of the same opinions many of us share. So I remain, for now, with  my opinion of; Who funded him is really small potatoes in the greater scheme of things. I still agree with a lot of what he had to say and couple that with the fact he is still the most hated person to virtually all Jews (oddly right up there with Jesus)  ... well then I find it hard to believe he was a willing puppet of the Zionists . I think if you are arguing that he was then you have yourself an uphill battle ahead of you, but I will still read threw the reasons why you do believe that,  I will consider your points, and lastly I'll admit its truth if in fact you can show it to be so.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

the man who is the reason Israel even exist

How is Hitler responsible for the creation of Israel? Just because he participated in WWII? Why not say Stalin is the founder of Israel, or FDR or Truman, or Churchill? They all participated in the war too didn't they? Why single out Hitler for no apparent reason? The establishment of the state of Israel was the work of the British under Rothschild orders. Hitler didn't sign the Balfour declaration, Germans didn't make way for the Jews in Palestine and ship them in by the planeloads, those were Brits. ROTHSCHILD created Israel, not Hitler. You're parroting blatant falsehoods and nonsensical statements here and then getting mad at us for pointing them out.  :lol:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

As far as I understood the Belfour Declaration came before Hitler, to me that would make it obvious that he is not the man responsible for the creation of Israel. And frankly whomever funded Hitler, really has no bearing on the poison we are facing today. The Belfour Declaration came before, and the deed would have be done with or without Hitler, and for that matter with or without funds being sent to Hitler from Zionists. The plan was already put into play before Hitler even realized that he and his entire country had been betrayed by these treacherous people.

That's why I feel its almost irrelevant. The plan would move forward  (and was already)  without or without this man. That is not proof he was a puppet for them. And again most of what I read about him, and from him, the more it would seem he'd be a welcome member at a forum like this one. His insights and observations about the Jew, from his own words, seem to be not that far off from most of ours here today. That much about him I know. So if funding came in from the Zionist's then I am under the belief he would have used it against them regardless. Perhaps,  as I stated in a previous post, he may just have played right into their hands by insisting they remove themselves from  Germany.  So in that sense he may have helped the situation. He certainly did not help the Bolsheviks with theirs, which is also an odd point if you were to argue he was a Zionist puppet.

 So to sum up, I am more leaning towards the opinion of; At worse he was an unknowing tool in their greater plan who could have been substituted  with  any other man - or bypassed altogether. He was also a man , whom to me -and again from his own words- seem to reflect a lot of the same opinions many of us share. So I remain, for now, with  my opinion of; Who funded him is really small potatoes in the greater scheme of things. I still agree with a lot of what he had to say and couple that with the fact he is still the most hated person to virtually all Jews (oddly right up there with Jesus)  ... well then I find it hard to believe he was a willing puppet of the Zionists . I think if you are arguing that he was then you have yourself an uphill battle ahead of you, but I will still read threw the reasons why you do believe that,  I will consider your points, and lastly I'll admit its truth if in fact you can show it to be so.

Well said Gord.
If he actually believes that "Hitler is the reason for Israel's existence" then I think we might be wasting our time with this guy, clearly he is not thinking straight.

[thirdeyewise]

I think if you are arguing that he was then you have yourself an uphill battle ahead of you, but I will still read threw the reasons why you do believe that,  I will consider your points, and lastly I'll admit its truth if in fact you can show it to be so.

Thank you for showing some maturity. Someone else decided to show their age.

[Helphand]

Update:

EustaceMullins-Mullins'NewHistoryOfTheJews(1968).pdf


http://www.datafilehost.com/download-7bab79c5.html

[thirdeyewise]

If he actually believes that "Hitler is the reason for Israel's existence" then I think we might be wasting our time with this guy, clearly he is not thinking straight.

How is Hitler responsible for the creation of Israel?

Early in 1935, a passenger ship bound for Haifa in Palestine left the German port of Bremerhaven. Its stern bore the Hebrew letters for its name, "Tel Aviv," while a swastika banner fluttered from the mast. And although the ship was Zionist-owned, its captain was a National Socialist Party member. Many years later a traveler aboard the ship recalled this symbolic combination as a "metaphysical absurdity."1 Absurd or not, this is but one vignette from a little-known chapter of history: The wide-ranging collaboration between Zionism and Hitler's Third Reich.

On this basis of their similar ideologies about ethnicity and nationhood, National Socialists and Zionists worked together for what each group believed was in its own national interest. As a result, the Hitler government vigorously supported Zionism and Jewish emigration to Palestine from 1933 until 1940-1941, when the Second World War prevented extensive collaboration.

Indeed, during the 1930s no nation did more to substantively further Jewish-Zionist goals than Hitler's Germany.  - Mark Weber (Institute for Historical Review)

http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v13/v13n4p29_Weber.html

http://mp3.oraclebroadcasting.com/Truth_Hertz/Truth_Hertz.2010-08-11_16k.mp3

[rusix]

Trust me it has been shut down, at least 3x (by one particular person)

Call out the douche!

Everyone agrees on the funding it seems... who's the topic killer?