"And Now on BBC1, the 6 o'clock N^hJews."

[Helphand]

BBC TV News BBC1: 6pm-6.30 pm Wednesday 20 October 2010.
Reporting on the UK Government Spending Review, Biggest Cuts Since Second World War.


"Diversity" must have a different meaning at the BBC. Out of the anchor newsman and the Editors/local reporters on this sample "news" programme there are 33% Jews.

In order of appearance:

01) George Alaghia - Sri Lankan or thereabouts, wrote a whiney book about hostile racial environment he experienced in England as a child. Didn't stop him hanging around and sucking the public teat to the accompaniment of liberal handwringing. News anchorman.
02) (first name missed) Landau.
03) Tom Simons.
04) Hugh Pymm.
05) Daniel Sandford.
06) Stephanie Flanders.
07) Sophie Hutchinson.
08) Colette Hume - Cardiff.
09) Glenn Campbell - Edinburgh.
10) Mark Simpson - Belfast.
11) Mark Easton - Home Editor.
12) Nick Robinson - Political Editor. (In the background someone presented a clearly visible placard reading on one side "Bring The Troops Home" and on the other "Cut The War Not The People". This made apologetic George almost speechless - he couldn't ad-lib.)

+ A Weather waif.
+ A Pakistani or similar female presenter of local London news at 6.30.

So out of 12 main presenters not less than 4 clearly are, by name and appearance/demeanour, Jews. Which is to disregard any more unnoticed, symbiotic cases. (Who'd have guessed J.K. Rowling was a kike till advancing age unkindly revealed her racial origins?) And out of the same total of 12, only 4 (apparently) white Englishmen. Or from another perspective, 33% were Jews and only 25% were women.

Still, things must be looking up! Only 33% of the BBC news presenters on this occasion are plainly Jewish. Maybe the prospect of cuts at the BBC makes the beeb a less attractive prospect. But that means the Jew representation is still AT LEAST equal in this programme to the white male representation. Whereas Jews are only (allegedly) 2/10 of 1% of global population.

If there were as many Muslim MPs in the House of Commons as there are Jewish MPs pro rata  to representation in the general population, 2/3 approximately of the seats would be occupied by Muslims. That just shows the Jewish voice is too loud.

Back to "diversity". What this program typically shows is that diversity is for the goyim, not for the Jew.

And check out BBC Chairman Thompson's planar occiput.



Dr. William Pierce:
2000: "The Rubes and the Carnies".

@22:20 Now I'll state a fundamental truth, which is basic to an understanding of the nature of the Jews and of the
Jewish role in our civilisation. That truth is that the Jews as a whole are myth-makers, illusion-builders or to put it
less politely, they are tricksters. Their whole existence among us is based on deception and illusion and
misdirection. Some of them are very clever, some of them are creative, but they ARE quite alien in their nature. It
is almost as if they had landed here from another planet. They disguise their alienness with a remarkable talent for
deception. We are like a bunch of Rubes at a circus, at a carnival; and they are the Carnies. And where the Rubes
are concerned, the Carnies stick together. Certainly not every Jew is involved in slave dealing or child
prostitution or welfare fraud or is a member of the Organisazia or, in the case of older Jews, belonged to the
Communist party. But whenever the call "Hey, Rube" goes out, ALL of the Carnies do their part to assure that the
Carnies win the fight, which is why you didn't hear about the Israeli Consulate in Rio de Janeiro being a centre
for child prostitution until _I_ told you about it today. The nice, non-Communist, non-Gangster Jews who control
your media thought that it would be better for the Rubes not to know about it."

---
"(Lord Chief Justice of England) Rufus Isaacs' brother was the power behind the British Broadcasting Co., and appointed
its chief, Sir John Reith...."

[bigwaga]

The UK is 100% controlled by jews. They have been at the tiller a lot longer than the US. We have no guns here in the UK, we are completly unarmed, the only way we can resist it through non conpliance. I don't pay my council tax, credit card bills or mortage, fuck em! We need to resist and stop being feckin' sheep. If they chuck me out my house, i'll live in a feckin tent! But my house was valued at 92,000, but my neighbours sold for 74,000, i'm not sure if the bank would want to to admit that thier 92,000 asset is now only worth 74,000. That's a bit of a loss if you ask me. We need to lose the fear!!

John

[Helphand]

Different stats from this link:
http://www.intifada-palestine.com/2010/ ... arliament/

I rarely watch TV now because it bores me without trying and (as?) I know it's nearly all a lie.

One thing I do notice is that in the current affairs/general interest time-sinks like the property shows, particularly on C4 and Five,  you get the idea that a lot if not all the participants have been selected from some sort of hidden network for their common, er demeanour.

What was that recent-ish BBC2 TV(?) program about the internet presented by some US woman with a Polish name who had quite a hint of Babs Streissand eyes? She interviewed a woman professor from Newcastle University (likewise) whose real agenda behind her strictures over the internet and its(her) alleged effect on children's social skills etc etc  was to LOCK IT DOWN. NOW. OK? We don't want more info getting out do we.

[Helphand]

I since checked out a tape of the offending TV program and find the details are as follows. The excerpt below is far more concerning given the "authority" of their source.

Dr Aleks Krotoski
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-21b9123d.html

--mp3 under 1MB.

One Baroness Susan Greenfield, described as a neuroscientist, of Oxford University, is described by her co-religionist interlocutor as someone who "tirelessly voices her concern" that using the internet will distort children's sense of reality and leave them in an infantilised mental state. She thinks that the internet is a world without consequences. "When I talk to parents and people individually I've yet to meet someone who's disagreed with me. Everyone seems to feel a kind of uneasy fear and a poorly articulated worry that they can't readily put into words but nonetheless they feel there's something that needs to be done" she says, nodding sagely, head tilted to the side, with those big, brown, school-ma'mish eyes stretched w-i-d-e open to emphasise her point to the infant idiots that she imagines are waiting on her every word. Fade-out with music-box, nursery style accompaniment in the background. Tavistock Institute!

Spoken with all the self-assuredness of the religious zealot who knows what's best for you. Except in the case of the Baroness, it is not what's best for you that matters to her, but what's best for her TRIBE.

Well Baroness, I think your so-called concerns are just a dishonest ploy from a typically paranoid and delusional* Jew who wants us to step out of the reality zone. But reality is our friend, because it warns us of danger where danger exists. And you represent a clear and present danger.

Your real concern is with the free flow of information that still occurs on the net - notwithstanding efforts of you and your fellow travellers. Your sense of unease is simply the cognitive dissonance you are experiencing as a result of your insane racial urge to control others in the most minute respects - including to the extreme of whether they live or die - whilst at the same time being compelled to watch them doing the opposite, a state of affairs over which you are powerless when it comes to the near last bastion of any sort of individual freedom, the internet.

Using the internet does have its consequences - ask the paedophiles who've been busted for sharing child pornography in Operation Ore/Awe (naturally excluding the judges, lawyers, police, government officials and other "senior" members of society, including I dare say a few child abusing Jews like "Lord" Greville Janner, barrister and former head of British Jewry, whom The Powers That Be have decided to exempt from the consequences of THEIR actions); or those who have been imprisoned for speaking the truth about the Jewish Holocaust, like Ernst Zundel or the Heretical Two in the UK.

Conversely, watching TV in a dumb stupor - TV, that mesmeric, alpha brain wave-inducing, one-eyed Jew in the corner of the room - evidently causes the Baroness no concern. The reason is simple; Jews control that, and they do not control completely - yet - the internet.

Let me remind all of you, ladies and gentlemen, that you as taxpayers are paying for all this SHIT. First, the BBC purveying this deceitful garbage and second, for the Baroness to displace some white man from an academic post in a leading university so she can abuse her position for THE TRIBE.

Baroness, Universe abhors disequilibrium; we are near the tipping point.


____
*
William Zebrina Ripley: "The Races Of Europe" (1899)
http://www.archive.org/download/raceseu ... pluoft.pdf

page 385:
"In conclusion, it may be said that these people are prone to nervous and mental disorders; insanity, in fact, is fearfully prevalent among them. Lombroso asserts it to be four times as frequent among Italian Jews as among Christians. This may possibly be a result of close inbreeding in a country like Italy, where the Jewish communities are small.
It does not, however, seem to lead to suicide, for this is extraordinarily rare among Jews, either from cowardice as Lombroso suggests, or more probably for the reason cited by Morselli namely, the greater force of religion and other steadying moral factors."


Eustace Mullins: Mullins' New History of the Jews (1968), page 146:
http://www.datafilehost.com/download-7bab79c5.html

"Unable to accept himself for what he is, the Jew invents other explanations of himself, and when he begins to accept these delusions as reality, this is legally defined as insanity. Dr. Martin F. Debivoise recently concluded a ten-year study of Jews in New York. He found that 43% of them were mentally disturbed to the degree that they should be hospitalized. He also made a study of one thousand marriages between Jews and gentiles during this period. He found that 847 of these marriages ended in divorce within five years; in 681, there were no children, and of those who had children, 73% developed leukemia or cancer before the age of puberty. Typical was the death of the son of John Gunther from cancer as a product of one of these mixed marriages."


Martin Luther - On the Jews And Their Lies (1543)
[AAARGH PDF edition, 2009]

Yet they presume to step before God with such a heart and mouth; they utter, worship, and invoke his holy name, entreating him to return them to Jerusalem, to send them the Messiah, to kill all the Gentiles, and to present them with an the goods of the world. The only reason that God does not visit them with thunder and lightning, that he does not deluge them suddenly with fire as he did Sodom and Gomorrah, is this: This punishment would not be commensurate with such malice. Therefore he strikes them with spiritual thunder and lightning, as Moses writes in Deuteronomy 28:18 among other places: "The Lord will smite you with madness and blindness and confusion of mind." Those are, indeed, the true strokes of lightning and thunder: madness, blindness, confusion of mind.

[Helphand]

And now some more corroboration of the comments above concerning the "Jewish" propensity to hyperbole, paranoia, aggressiveness and the need to control - this time from  A Jew, Michael Bradley (nom de plume)


Michael Bradley (Jewish author's nom de plume) - The Iceman Inheritance (1978)
http://www.lust-for-life.org/Lust-For-L ... itance.pdf

  "And maybe some Neanderthal emotional and behavioral traits persisted among the Ashkenazim along with the
physical ones.
  Their "chosen people" pretension is a typical Neanderthal in-group obsession that is actually a genetic racist
predisposition against all other humans. It is a genetically determined "us against them" mentality. Their higher level
of known Neanderthal aggression against outsiders is responsible for their disproportional social influence
wherever they have settled in the West.
  Their men's feelings of sexual inadequacy are a Neanderthal genetic legacy reflected in much more
frequent confusion of sexual orientation than occurs among males of other Caucasian ethnic groups and other races. It
has been the subject of too-numerous Jewish-authored books and screenplays, and Woody Allen's work (and
private life) is a very well known example of this Jewish predicament.
  This genetic Neanderthal psychosexual maladaptation has also bequeathed to Jews a tendency toward emotional
instability and hysteria when they feel nervous or threatened... which is all the time when they are not in
absolute control. And they are arrogant, but uneasy, even then. An ethnic symptom of this emotional instability is the
Jewish tendency toward hypochondria. Even they cannot (yet) control death.
  This unfortunate combination of high aggression combined with a tendency toward hysteria and emotional instability
has proved to be a dangerous and tragic situation over the course of Western history. Their aggression encourages
continual Jewish attempts to control societies, while the emotional instability makes it difficult for most Jews to
distinguish reasonably between justified social _criticism_ by their non-Jewish neighbors and _attacks_.
  Insensitive even to objective concerns about inordinate Jewish influence in societies, and reacting with hysterical
aggression to any such supposed "attack" on their behavior and pleas from non-Jews to limit it, Jews have _always_
provoked violence against themselves. And then they, with much emotional satisfaction, feel victimized and attribute
the situation to innate "anti-Semitism" among their neighbors.
  This tragic cycle happened most recently in Nazi Germany, of course, but it had happened previously in almost all
European countries. This historical pattern is the social result of Neanderthal _genetic_ traits of high aggression and
emotional instability caused by Ice Age psychosexual maladaptation. All this is very clear to me _now_.
  The Iceman Inheritance as published in 1978 had been written only in terms of "Caucasians", "Western humanity",
"white men" and so on. But with my research after the New York Times op-ed polemic of July 1992, I soon
discovered that it was really a much more relevant penportrait of Ashkenazi "Jews". Some other scattered
European ethnic groups share generally similar physical characteristics, of course, but not nearly so strongly and
consistently as Ashkenazi Jews.
  The Ashkenazi Jews, as a group, exhibit lingering Neanderthal traits most strongly among living Caucasians
because of Jewish prohibitions against marriage with outsiders. Their Neanderthal genes have been kept "all in
the family", as it were. These Neanderthal genes were not diluted by intermarriage nearly as much as with most other
Caucasians." "