A CONCEPT EVERY IDIOT SHOULD UNDERSTAND.

[Panoptimist]

I'm tired of it. I'm tired of trying to speak to people both in this particular arena, and in the "truth movement" in general when they have NO FUCKING CONCEPT of revolutionary history.

I'm tired of useful fucking idiots like Ryan Dawson and Mike Rivera who will talk about Israel but won't say JEW or FREEMASON.

These GOONS use the most important of truths as part of a little game they play online called "conspiracy" simply to increase page views and have something to talk about. They're A FUCKING FRAID to DIG DEEP to the real truth. To pull this fucking rotten tooth, roots and all.

The issue of JEWS will never be understood by people until people understand this VERY SIMPLE concept, illustrated simply in the following paragraphs by Nesta Helen Webster.

I'm TIRED of this TSA bullshit. I'm TIRED of Alex Jones. I'm TIRED of Wikileaks. This BULLSHIT needs to stop. People need to know the agenda so they know when to FLAT OUT IGNORE DIVERSIONS like Jewns and Jewleaks. It's all been documented clearly for hundreds of years. WHY ARE PEOPLE SO FUCKING PATHETICALLY IGNORANT?

Regardless, as soon as people begin to understand the following concept and the purpose it serves as the basis for the cultivation of all modern/contemporary civilization then we may begin to see "change". Until people begin to understand Amerika for the Jew/Masonic social experiment it truly is, and understand the purpose a constitution really serves, we are fucked:

To whatever agency we attribute it, however, the mechanism of the French Revolution distinguishes it from all previous revolutions. Hitherto the isolated revolutions that had taken place throughout the history of the world can be clearly recognized as spontaneous movements brought about by oppression or by a political faction enjoying some measure of popular support, and therefore endeavouring to satisfy the demands of the people. But in the French Revolution we see for the first time that plan in operation which has been carried on right up to the present moment--the systematic attempt to create grievances in order to exploit them.[stage discovers Hegel]

[GET READY FOR A WOMAN WRITER OF A CENTURY AGO TO EXPLAIN TO YOU WHAT ALEX JEWNS, TSA, WIKILEAKS, ETC. IS ALL ABOUT...YOU READY?]

The most remarkable instance of engineered agitation during the early stages of the Revolution was the extraordinary incident known to history as "The Great Fear," when on the same day, July 22, 1789, and almost at the same hour, in towns and villages all over France, a panic was created by the announcement that brigands were approaching and therefore that all good citizens must take up arms. The messengers who brought the news post-haste on horseback in many cases exhibited placards headed: "Edict of the King," bearing the words "The King orders all chateaux to be burnt down; he only wishes to keep his own!" And the people, obedient to these commands, seized upon every weapon they could find and set themselves to the task of destruction. The object of the conspirators was thus achieved--the arming of the populace against law and order, a device which ever since 1789 has always formed the first item in the programme of the social revolution.

It is is said that the idea originated with Adrien Dupont and has therefore been attributed to the Orleaniste conspiracy, but Dupont was not only an intimate of the Duc d'Orleans, but an adept of illuminized (Jewlluminized) Freemasonry, and the organization of the "Great Fear" may well have been masonic. This explanation seems the more probable when we remember that the plan of the lodges even before they became illuminized had been "to make a revolution for the benefit of the bourgeoisie with the people as instruments." With this end in view the conspirators held up the food supplies, blocked all reforms in the National Assembly, and organized demonstrations directly opposed to all interests of the people. From the attack on the factory of Reveillon in April 1789 to the murder of the baker Francois in October, nearly every outrage was directed against men who had fed and befriended the poor.

Under the domination of the Tiers Etat--almost entirely composed of bourgeoisie far more occupied with their own grievances against the nobles than with the sufferings of the people--the legislation carried out by the National Assembly cannot be described by so mild a word as "reactionary"; it was frankly and ruthlessly repressive of all Socialistic or even democratic ideas. Not only was property safeguarded by new laws, but suffrage was extended only to citizens possessing certain incomes, whilst the trade unions that had existed peacefully under the name of "working-mens corporations" were rigorously suppressed by the famous "Loi Chapelier" on June 14, 1791.

By this glaringly anti-democratic act working-men were forbidden to "name presidents, keep registers, make resolutions, deliberate or draw up resolutions on their pretended common interests," or to agree on any fixed scale of wages. The wording of the first Article runs as follows:

'The annihilation of all kinds of corporations of citizens belonging to the same state of profession being one of the fundamental basis of the French Constitution, it is forbidden to reestablish them on any pretext or under any form whatsoever.'

This law was passed without a word of protest from Robespierre or any of the so-called democrats of the Assembly.

[NOW FOR THE MEAT]

As to the "Constitution" held up before the eyes of the people as the supreme benefit of the Revolution was to confer on them, it will be noticed that every step on the road to its final promulgation was marked by a fresh outbreak of revolutionary agitation. No sooner had its first principles been placed before the Assembly by Mounier, Clermont Tonnerre, and other honest democrats than a price was placed on the heads of these men by the revolutionaries of the Palais Royal, and an attempt was made to march on Versailles. When two years later the King finally accepted the Constitution, this immense concession to the demands of the people, which if the Revolution had been made by the people would undoubtedly have ended it, became the signal for a fresh outbreak of revolutionary fury, expressed by the hideous massacre known as the "Glaciere Davignon." Can we not believe then that there may be some truth in the Pere Deschamps statement that "the cry of Constitution has been in all countries the word of command of the Secret Societies," that is to say, the rallying cry of revolution? We shall find further confirmation of this theory later in the history of the revolutionary movement in Russia.

SO, WE MUST UNDERSTAND THIS: BEFORE WE GO AFTER THE GOVERNMENT, WE NEED TO RID IT OF DISEASE. THIS DISEASE TAKES ITS FORM IN JEWRY/CRYPTO JEWRY (AKA FREEMASONRY), AGENDA WRITTEN AND SUPPORTED IN FULL BY THE SMUT BOOK KNOWN AS THE TALMUD. HOW CAN WE SEE WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR SYSTEM WITHOUT RESTORING WHAT ACTUALLY EXISTS OF IT? IT APPEARS 'THE CONSTITUTION' MAY NOT BE THE ANSWER WE'RE LOOKING FOR, ANYWAY.

[Christopher Marlowe]

Very interesting quote.  

When the Articles of Confederation gave way the the US Constitution, that opened the door for the progressive take-over of the states by Washington.  Now there does not seem to be a single sphere where the federal government does not intrude.  And it is all done outside the express constitution: the 9th and 10 Amendments should set limits, establishing a least a presumption that the Federal government does not have the power if it is not expressly delegated.

9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
10. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

But the Supreme Court has no trouble taking the commerce clause and using that to justify everything.  

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

Oh yeah.  That little f*cking clause justifies the federal government coming into your state and arresting people for selling weed out of a dispensary.  
It's total bullsh*t.

But.....
The Constitution is the law. While it is true that the document has been abused, it still beats anarchy or a police state. While I might favor the Articles of the Confederation in the future after some good government has returned, I feel more comfortable with supporting the Constitution as the primary source of law for now.  

I can say that I agree with the Constitution.  I would make a few changes, but I am familiar with it and the policy concerns involved in most constitutional issues.  If people were going to have a revolution in this country, it would be lawful to say they supported the Constitution.  Restoring the Constitution is a valid undertaking, whereas restoring the Confederation lacks legitimacy.  And it's been tried.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Yep, pap. It's classic Liberal anti-semitism. They only oppose Jewry as far as it being an occupying force in Palestine, but never get into the core issues of its long revolutionary activities, the Talmud, and everything else.