Kevin MacDonald: Trudie Pert on Birthright Israel

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Kevin MacDonald: Trudie Pert on Birthright Israel

Kevin MacDonald:  Trudie Pert's current TOO article "Birthright Israel: A Model Ethnic Charity" shows once again that, despite being pillars of multicultural righteousness, the laws of political correctness do not apply to the organized Jewish community. As noted in the article, Charles Bronfman, one of the largest funders of Birthright, obviously has a deep attachment to Jewish DNA. Birthright has successfully raised the percentage of Jews who marry Jews to 72%. Given that the program will reach one third of young Jews and given that a lot of Jews who don't go are from the more conservative wings of Judaism who are not in need of a program like this or have already been to Israel, it suggests a major effect on retaining the ethnic basis of Judaism in the Diaspora. It reminds us that for the early Zionists, the main reason for establishing Israel was to preserve Jewish DNA:

    [These] Jewish racial Zionists, such as Arthur Ruppin ... were motivated by the fear that Diaspora Judaism would lose its biological uniqueness as a result of pressures for intermarriage and assimilation.

    Among the Zionists, the racialists won the day. Ruppin's ideas on the necessity of preserving Jewish racial purity have had a prominent place in the Jabotinsky wing of Zionism, including especially the Likud party in Israel and its leaders—people like Ariel Sharon, Menachem Begin, and Yitzhak Shamir. (Here's a photo of Sharon speaking to a Likud Party convention in 2004 under a looming photo of Jabotinsky.) Jabotinsky believed that Jews were shaped by their long history as a desert people and that the establishment of Israel as a Jewish state would allow the natural genius of the Jewish race to flourish, stating, for example: "These natural and fundamental distinctions embedded in the race are impossible to eradicate, and are continually being nurtured by the differences in soil and climate."  As Geoffrey Wheatcroft recently pointed out, at the present time Israel "is governed by [Jabotinsky's] conscious heirs."

Israel is obviously living up to its intended function of preserving Jewish DNA — not only in Israel, but via Birthright, in the Diaspora as well.

The other important point about Pert's article is the complete lack of this sort of thinking by wealthy White philanthropists. Bill Gates gives billions to non-Whites and actually excludes Whites — even poor Whites — from applying for his aid programs. Gates and other wealthy Whites are behaving according to conventional attitudes of multicultural America, reaping the public acclaim in the media and doubtless feeling morally righteous. (Again, George Gilder's sense of moral righteousness comes to mind.) We have to change all that.

http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?p=889&cpage=1

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Yep, the Holocaust guilt concept has duplicated itself and morphed into the multicultural guilt complex. Whites are all to happy to give away their jobs, land, and rights to non-European immigrants. Whites have had a hand in their own demise.

[Whaler]

Weird comments from MacDonald in the following article.  :?


White Nationalist Professor Calls for "Deal" with Israeli Far Right
http://theuglytruth.wordpress.com/2011/ ... far-right/

By Michael Hoffman | March 10, 2011

In a radio interview with Croatian academic Dr. Tom Sunic, broadcast on Dr. Sunic's online "Race and Reason" program on Dec. 21, 2010, White nationalist Professor Kevin MacDonald of California State College at Long Beach, called for a "deal" with the Israeli "Far Right" for the expulsion of Palestinians from Palestine, in return for the expulsion of Muslims from Europe.

Prof. MacDonald is the editor of the racialist periodical, "Occidental Observer: White Identity, Interests and Culture."

The following are quotes from a transcript of the broadcast:

Prof. Kevin MacDonald:

"...People like (Holland's) Geert Wilders is the prototype of this type of politician...Yeah, they're very pro-Zionist and they're not only pro-Zionist, they're in favor of the most radically Right-wing segments of the Israeli political spectrum, so you're talking about the settler movement, this sort of radical ethno-nationalist, and, of course, what they have in common is that they are very critical of Islam. Actually, from my point of view I wish these people well. If they are successful in developing political parties that are opposed to Muslim immigration and are opposed to Muslim culture becoming mainstream in Europe, I think that's all to the good.

...Wilders' statements on Islam are accurate and on the money...I think he's doing a really good job...

"...What they want in Israel is this apartheid society, this racialist society...There's increasing tension. Israeli is being delegitimized
everywhere in the world...There is this element on the Far Right in Israel that want to make alliances with similar-minded people in Europe or wherever. Uh, they can find this common ground. It's a good development over all...

"...If we could get the Muslims out of Europe as a deal where Israel survives and throws out the Palestinians to Jordan, I would take that deal in a heartbeat..."

Dr. Sunic: "Excellent. Well, Kevin, I always enjoy talking to you..."

(End quote)

http://reasonradionetwork.com/downloads ... 101221.mp3

Hoffman's Comment

The pursuit of racial purity or racial geo-political ("blood and soil") policies, when divorced from truth and justice, is an accessory to evil.
It is no mystery that Right-wing nationalists like Prof. MacDonald view Islam as far more deadly to the West than Judaism. Though he claims to markedly differ with the neocons, MacDonald's views are consonant with theirs, at least in this respect, and no wonder: if you are any type of racist then you are already Talmudic, whether you know it or not. The Babylonian Talmud is a fount of racism. What is this writer's definition of racism? Self-worship. It is the elevation of the carnal above ideals; the idolization of the corporeal, and the corrosion of the spiritual.

Kevin MacDonald forgets or perhaps does not even know that Orthodox Judaism, the Judaism practiced by the Israeli Far Right, despises western civilization with an intense hatred. In Judaism, western civilization is secretly execrated as "kochi ve'otzem yadi" (cf. "Judaism Discovered," pp. 932-939).

Who was it that lobbied in the 1970s, 80s and 90s for Muslims to enter Europe? Numerous Zionist organizations and media were behind this effort. Who aided the Muslim armies with intelligence and through internal subversion of western nations in places like Spain in the fifteenth century? Judaism and Islam were united for hundreds of years. The medieval Catholic Church was at war with both.

It is short-sighted in the extreme to view the current Muslim presence in Europe as a circumstance that can be ameliorated by a western alliance with the Christ-hating Talmudic butchers in the Israeli settlements and the Likud and Shas parties.

 —Michael Hoffman

[mp3:s2rzsl9i]http://reasonradionetwork.com/downloads/tsj/TS_20101221.mp3[/mp3:s2rzsl9i]

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Why does he refer to MacDonald as a white nationalist? He is not a white nationalist per se.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

I kind of see MacDonald as a "National Social Biologist"... continuing in the traditions of 20th century "human condition" researchers  such as Madison Grant. NeoCons and Bolshevik Jews were actually diametrically opposed to one another on the issue of "Human Intelligence" and "Measures".  At the end of the road, however, both types of Jews want to basically  "Sink" the White-Indo European presence in Europe-N.A. by allowing "Smart" 3rd worlders to enter US-Europe universities while also allowing "illiterate" Tomato pickers/Inner-city Blacks to enter US highschools. It is completely calculated, greedy, destabilizing, and of course Jewish.

 MacDonald likely sees this and throws the gambit concerning "Palestinians"...  the Protocolist Jews of course, can't have it when the "Third Temple" is involved.  To be honest, while I have sympathy for "unjust" situations, I don't want to see a lot of "imports" into the USA from countries without Indo-European Christian culture. My family has lived here a very, very long time and has "earned" it's stripes much more than any "escaping" Jew or recent Jew Inspired 1965 immigration Act arrival has. In 1940s-1950s America, it was pretty good with low "Jew-fluence". Today is a mess because of the Jews are completely in High Scam Mode... and it will only get worse as far as I can  tell at this point, honestly.  There was a reason Americans limited immigration from 1924-1965 and the reason was simply "JEWS".... if you want to throw in "Muslims" as reason for "restriction"  be my guest. Muslims live pretty well outside of America-Europe... why should they desire to go where they don't have a real stake in things?  Why move to a "Chrisitan" mostly White-Indo European country? Actually, I would rather have Lebanese-Palestinians 100% imported into the US-Europe if that allowed for the full repatriation of all other Muslims back to their respective countries.... it may be "racialist" but pragmatic. Who wants a Muslim Europe/US  or a heavy Hindoo Europe/US? Except Muslims, Jews and Indians?  

Actually the Rape of White women was very low in the USA and Europe as long as Blacks and Jews feared Whites in England, Canada, France, and in the USA.  

Everyone knows about the Rape of Italian women by Algerians-Bedouins in WWII... Jew approved of course from Jew High Command.  

When it gets close to home or neighborhood--- you draw the line of who is a "friend" and who is an "enemy"... If you attack white women, you are likely Black or a 3rd World arrival, and therefore, an enemy... if you attack Indo-European culture... you are likely a backstabbing Jew and an Enemy.  Call it crazy but it is what it is ...literally. I'd rather be crazy than stupid... and I'm not stupid.  

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Hoffman has the religious side of the Jewspiracy nailed, while MacDonald has the cultural and racial side of the Jewspiracy nailed. They are both great researchers. Hate to see them at each others' throats.

I don't agree with everything in Hoffman's Judaism Discovered, but it is a great piece of work. I have yet to read anything by MacDonald, other than blogs and such. Got some of his books on the way.

I am definitely uneasy about Mark Glenn.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Good point there Timothy which I largely agree with. Both books are definitive but they sort of keep to their "channel" as flood waters pour out.  

Here's a couple of recordings on Culture of Critique.

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-31407/TS-295775.mp3

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-31407/TS-300769.mp3

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-31407/TS-302968.mp3

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

A show about the EDL and Muslim immigration to Europe/US over at VOR.  Looks like it is a hot topic about now.  Of course the J-Tribe let loose the immigration restrictions in the 1960s. They want all of Europe and the USA/Canada to become an "Austro-Hungarian Empire" or "Bolshevik Empire"... why? It is basically easier to rule and collectively scam like they did in Vienna for decades.  I'm not anti-Muslim, but I am anti-Muslim immigration and I'm anti-Sharia Law.  The EDL is kind of like the US military at this point in time... a collection of people wanting to do violence in a revenge mode against Muslims... however, they rarely if ever question who is funding the "movement" or political "bills"... which of course are Zionist Talmudic Jews -- they want to make the Jewish Middle East conflict (scams)  "our" collective problem from a "Judeo-Christian" perspective.   The EDL and US-Nato Military are basically "Golem" for their Jewish masters aimed against Muslim people. Yeah... a Jew inspired "21st Century Crusade"... is still a Jew Scam no matter how many "masks", "CNN Propaganda" or "St. George dress up" people do.  The IDF is no different except it has 100% Jewish "body", carry .223 autos,  and they don't wear masks.  At the end of it, I entirely blame the J-Tribe for it all, particularly the SCAMMING JEWS in Western countries.  

I largely agree with the German's comments below...Muslims are great people to visit ... not live beside... do you want Wedding Bells in the future or some Islamic Cleric reciting an Arab-Muslim prayer from a loud speaker?  I'll always take the bells...and let them ring!  -- CSR  

---------
The Stark Truth: The EDL, Muslims, and More on Feminist Decay

March 9, 2011 · Print This Article
EDL Street Protest

Robert Stark & Mike Conner discuss:

    * How almost half of Britons would support a nationalist anti-immigration party;
    * The English Defense League and its support of Zionism;
    * The Muslim Question—To ally, or not to ally;
    * A quick update on the situation in Libya;
    * How feminism, by declaring men optional, harms women's happiness.
    * A men's point of view on dating and marriage in the modern age.



http://reasonradionetwork.com/_archive/ ... 110309.mp3


-----

#  German on March 12th, 2011 2:46 am

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fn4cHm_h0mw

Mike it totally gives me a pleasure to see that we two agree 100%
- EDL – WINNING!
- Zionism – WINNING!
- Muzzie Question – WINNING!
- uniforms and swastika in America – WINNING!
- "feminism" – WINNING!
- dating – WINNING!

So we're not bi-WINNING! but hexa-WINNING! ;-)

Yes, the EDL is totally delusioned. Sometimes it seems they fight more for Israel than for England. Even if they just use the Jews as figleaf it's simply disgusting. They're maniac about the need to love the Jew. But what they, as other jew slave right wing parties, will never understand, the left will call them "eeevil Natzis" anyways and the Jews will go on to hate these Goyim, even if they pretend to be their "friends" and being anxious for Europe.

Mike you said the BNP is not yet on this path, I agree but there are tendencies to move in this direction.

For example, Darby and Kemp try to move the party in this direction and said that the Jewish issue is a non-issue and a "conspiracy theory". And even Griffin on a recent Jim Giles broadcast said that one cannot blame the Jews for Communism, Bolshevism, 66 million dead in Russia and Eastern Europe, immigration-invasion etc.

For him these are just "bad Jewish individuals".

And on one party meeting of the BNP I saw an idiot child with a T-shirt, on which a crossed out swastika was depicted.
Saying that they, the BNP, are the real anti-fascists.

Some of these people really go crazy paths and ridicule themselves. They're really maniac about proving not being an "eeevil Natzi".

And for MCP, as you Mike I greatly admire him.
He's a brilliant mind and I love his way to speak.
But on the Muzzie issue he's totally out of touch.
He does simply not understand what Muzzies do every day in every European country.

When you tell him what horrible crimes they commit to Whites and that almost all European prisons are filled 80-90% with Muzzies and that in all big cities 90% of the rapists are Muzzies, you just get a laconic "OH THEM MOOZLUMS!" (MooseLimbs)  from him.

There he's totally stubborn.

He also doesn't understand the deeper layer of the Muzzie conflict.

He doesn't understand that religion is just the surface, the thing the Muzzies use to legitimize their crimes.
In the core it's the brown race who wants to destroy, or at least conquer, the white race!
The religion they just use as an ideology, building mosques demonstrate their power and claim of soil.

So the Muzzies in Europe are exactly what the Chupacabras are in America: Brown people who go after white people.
In Europe they just use a religious cover.

Why do you think, when the riots happened in France, the "youths"=black and brown Muzzies said straight into the tv cameras: "We kill everything which is white!"

Because it's no religious conflict, but a race war!

I fear MCP will never understand that.

So my credo will always be: No JEW! No Muzzie! Just right.

And for uniforms and swastikas in America, you're also totally right Mike. To use a swastika in America makes absolutely no sense, because it is branded in the sheeples' minds as sign of "evil".
I think they despise it even more than the Satanic pentragram.
And that's kinda ironic, because the swastika and the pentagram have a similar evolution.
First the pentagram was a Christian symbol, symbolizing the five wounds of Christ and later it became a sign for satanism.
Same with the swastika, first a sign of Aryan awakening and now stigmatized as a sign of "evil".

But besides that, I think Commander Rockwell was the greatest American! HE walked the walk! HE dared it, HE risked all.
And he was a great orator.

For Libya and Gadafi:
Mike, I totally hate this guy!
This Meth-faced alcoholic said 2-3 years ago:

"Allah has granted us a great victory, without weapons, we don't need terrorism. In 3 generations Europe will be a Muslim continent."
For that alone we should have poped him out with snipers.
And for killing Whites in Lockerbie and Berlin.
So this running Muzzie dog can go to hell in my opinion.

But unfortunately I think he will stay.
He has tanks, jets and other modern weapons and tons of money to buy Negroes to do the dirty job,
The rebels just have old rifles and weapons they capture.
So I think he will prevail at the end.

I loved the "chauvinistic" "sexist" part at the end!
I call it MANLY and NATURAL!
But I wonder what Carolyn has to say about that. ;-)

P.S. Mike can you do anything about the volume of the intro music of ALL shows? It really drones and my ears almost fall off.

--------

# Luke on March 12th, 2011 6:15 am

I agree wholeheartedly with The German, regarding the obsession that Michael Collins Piper has about constantly kissing up to Muslims. However, I will say that it is a huge stretch to continue to shower undeserved praise on MCP – this man, per The German – has a 'brilliant mind'? Well, let me ask everyone a very important and insightful question. This question will require us all to physically engage our brains and actually do some heavy thinking, okay? Ready?

Over the last decade, since the Israeli-Mossad/CIA false flag event of 9-11, we all have seen the relentless efforts by the jews who occupy all the major choke points in our government to demonize and to create the impression in the public's mind that patriot and white nationalist groups or organizations are just as dangerous as those already heavily demonized Muslims and Islamic radicals, right? Anyone who votes for the Constitution Party, anyone who supports the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, anyone who correctly see's the government as the biggest enemy and biggest threat to our precious liberties and freedom, anyone who opposes fighting endless wars for jews around the world, anyone who resists the idea that Whites should stand idly by and allow hundreds of millions of third world non-white aliens to flood into their nation and displace them, anyone who basically opposes any part of the jewish agenda – these are the people who our Zionist Occupied Government have been constantly trying to demonize and insinuate are connected at the hip with these Muslim and Islamic terrorists. Endless 'advisories' and 'special reports' are being written by the anti-white racist jews at the SPLC and ADL, passed along to the Homeland Security/KGB Department that are then released which seek to demonize these patriots and white nationalists and anyone else who is awake to the evil jewish agenda, right? So, along comes Michael Collins Piper – a well known figure and voice in the American patriot movement – but, not really what anyone would call a white nationalist, per se. MCP starts his pro-Muslim tirades, using his radio program to try to convince his mostly white listeners that – hey – we need to form an alliance with these Muslims, because after all, they are fighting the jews, too!

Question: Would it not be the biggest wet dream that ZOG could ever hope to experience, for patriots and white nationalists to take MCP's advice? Would patriots and white nationalists not be playing right into the hands of ZOG – giving them the very sword they desperately need to prove their dream-come-true guilt-by-association connection? Hey, I can even envision the Homeland Security/KGB Department arming those drones and sending them out with missiles to be fired at buildings or other meeting places where white nationalists and patriot groups have gathered for meetings or conferences. Or, as they've been doing in Iraq and Afghanistan, using predator drones to fire missiles at cars or vans or SUVs driving down the road – with 'suspected' domestic terrorists inside them. No trial, no probable cause, no evidence needed – just a jewish 'hunch' and presto! You get vaporized! So, let me ask The German and anyone else who clings to the idea that MCP has a 'brilliant mind'. Does this effort by MCP to snooker white nationalists and patriots into forming alliances with Muslims sound like the product of a 'brilliant' tactical thinker?

I think not. And, either MCP is amateurishly naive and dangerously short sighted – or else there is some other motivation for his sloppy behavior, and this possibility carries with it some pretty unsavory thought patterns.

------
# johnUK on March 12th, 2011 11:52 am

We have already allied with the Muslims and always supported them since 79 against Christians especially Pan Turkish fascism from the Balkans to China so the US/British empire can control the Eurasian energy sphere.

MCP is right in regards to the Muslim threat that it is completely phoney given the fact that the main financiers of international terrorism are billionaire individuals linked to the establishment like the Saudis and the other Gulf states like Qatar.

Most if not all of the terrorist attacks that do not turn out to be phoney in the US and Europe have a Balkan connection like the latest incident in Frankfurt.

In Germany the domestic BND intelligence working with Turkish intelligence allowed Germans of Turkish descent to be recruited from Mosques and Universities to fight there proxy wars starting in Bosnia.

And now like here in Britain they have a problem with their native Muslim population which they helped ferment and support. Boo hoo!

@A German

German TV documentary in 98 couple of years said that the Berlin disco bombing was a Mossad and US were behind the 86 Berlin disco bombing and we know from Mossad defector Victor Ostrovsky that Mossad faked the communications traffic coming out of Libya that implemented them in the attack.

http://100777.com/node/101

With the case of Lockerbie there is serious doubts that Libya was behind the bombing.

"Evidence used against Abdelbaset Ali Mohamed al-Megrahi, the Libyan convicted of the Lockerbie bombing, was subject to deliberate destruction and manipulation for political reasons, according to leaked documents from his defence team. The allegations suggest authorities on both sides of the Atlantic attempted to mislead the original inquiry into the 1988 disaster to divert attention away from the original Iranian-backed suspects to Libya, with evidence apparently tampered with, destroyed and overlooked. In a decision that could send shockwaves through the Scottish legal system, the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) is expected to conclude this week that the conviction of Megrahi – jailed in 2001 for his part in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 which killed 270 people – is unsafe. Amid claims from his defence team of a 'co-ordinated effort to mislead the court', tantamount to a perversion of the course of justice, the SCCRC is studying hundreds of documents and photographs that suggest evidence was deliberately fabricated, manipulated or ignored by police and CIA operatives. Should Megrahi's case be referred back to the appeal court, his legal team intends to lodge an application for him to be freed while the court decides whether to quash his conviction or order a retrial. Megrahi's team believes the evidence was manipulated to avoid antagonising Iran at the time of the first Gulf War. Tam Dalyell, a long-term Lockerbie campaigner, last night said the SCCRC report should be made public, followed by a public inquiry."


Lockerbie evidence 'was tampered with, destroyed and overlooked'

http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=989552007

"A senior Scottish police officer, now retired, claims that American intelligence agents planted one of the fragments of the cassette-player in order to implicate the Libyans. Doubts have been cast on the reliability of an expert forensic scientist who gave evidence about the detonating of the bomb — three other convictions in which he gave testimony have been quashed. And it now seems that tests on the suitcase may have been misrepresented to the court. All this might easily be dismissed as the conspiracy fog that tends to gather around cases of this kind. Except that last weekend Lord Fraser himself, who was in charge of the Crown evidence, suggested that he too had begun to have doubts. In an interview with The Sunday Times he said that the Maltese shopkeeper, Tony Gauci, whose identification of the two Libyans was central to the prosecution case, might not have been a reliable witness.... Gauci's evidence was critical in linking al-Megrahi to the attack. Without it, al-Megrahi would certainly have walked free. Lord Fraser's remarks have been described as 'an extraordinary development' by Tam Dalyell, who was a key figure throughout the investigation. Senior legal experts in Scotland have expressed amazement at his comments. And William Taylor QC, al-Megrahi's defence advocate, has called for a review of the case....Does any of this matter now, so many years after the event? After all, there have been no noticeable protests from the Libyan Government. So long as al-Megrahi is allowed to serve the rest of his sentence in Libya, rather than in Scotland, it is unlikely to want to resurrect a case that could undermine its newly established relationship with the West."
It's time to look again at Lockerbie

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0, ... 63,00.html
# Carolyn on March 12th, 2011 6:05 pm

@German,

Thanks for thinking of me. You wrote:

"I loved the "chauvinistic" "sexist" part at the end!
I call it MANLY and NATURAL!
But I wonder what Carolyn has to say about that. ;-)"

Oh, it's not a topic I'm too concerned about, but I thought Mike made sense. But speaking of 'manly' traits, I like what you said here:

"I think Commander Rockwell was the greatest American! HE walked the walk! HE dared it, HE risked all.
And he was a great orator."

Rockwell wore a uniform and made it work! That's because he was authentic, the real deal. And quite a man. The women loved him ... hundreds wanted to sleep with him! It was the same with Adolf Hitler. So guys, don't be too quick to dismiss uniforms ... but it depends on who's wearing it. Haha ....

BTW, I thought it was a real good program. I find Luke's comments interesting too.
# Carolyn on March 12th, 2011 6:24 pm

@Luke,

I think your last paragraph is wrongly stated. Mike Piper is just being Mike Piper. He never was a "white nationalist." He's been a nationalist and a populist in the past. In today's United States of America, populism means something different than it did in the 1950′s. Nationalism is also not the same. I think Mike Piper is simply seeing nationalism and populism in today's environment, and accepting what that is.

We don't accept it that way. That's the difference.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Keep in mind.. the EDL  are similar to the "Koch" Zionist Billionaire funded  "Tea Party" with a Football hooligan element... smells sick Jewish IMHO -- CSR

Wednesday, 9 February 2011
Has Richard Desmond    decided to back the English Defence League?


By Ian Burrell, Thursday, 10 February 2011, from The Independent

"Front page", boasted the Facebook page of the right-wing English Defence League yesterday as it triumphantly linked its followers to a headline in Richard Desmond's Daily Star that noted that the anti-Islamic organisation was to become a "political party".

It's a rare thing for the Star to "splash" on politics. And although the coverage referred to the EDL as being a "far-right group", it reported its activities in an uncritical manner and noted that, in a phone poll of readers the previous day, 98 per cent of respondents had "said they agreed with the EDL's policies".

The media website Engage immediately asked "Is the EDL the Daily Star's New Friend?" A day earlier the newspaper had run a story saying that the EDL would "fight for heroes" and claiming that two Muslim councillors had "snubbed" a soldier by not rising to their feet when he was being given a standing ovation for winning a George Cross.

Yesterday's story carried the headline "EDL Chief: Vote Us Into Parliament!" It reported the wish of the group's leader – who uses the pseudonym Tommy Robinson – to appear on the BBC's Question Time.

"The EDL boss said that, unlike bumbling BNP leader Nick Griffin, 51, he would be a surefire hit on the show," the paper said. The article appeared alongside the Star's coverage of upheaval in Egypt, a piece that began: "Thousands of illegal immigrants will flee riot-torn Egypt and flood to Britain."

The paper's report that the EDL was preparing to field MPs was accompanied by Mr Robinson's observation that the group's 74,000 following on Facebook would exceed the online support of the three main political parties by the end of the year.

Among those Facebook followers yesterday, the Daily Star's apparent warmth to the group and a lead editorial headlined "Don't dare ignore EDL", was a source of pride and exhilaration.

Stephen Martin, who uses the slogan "British by Birth, English by the Grace of God", described his morning commute. "TODAY i sat there with my daily star with PRIDE, the pictures and banners were fair, the write up was fair, the Star comment was fair and 98 per cent back us (including everybody sat with me)," he wrote. "We have a voice now, 25p a day, if they have 74,000 new readers, we have a BIGGER voice."

Tom Evans ("English and Fuckin' Proud of It") agreed. "i think everyone should support the daily star and buy it a couple times a week at least lol... they are the only one to stand up for the EDL." He said other EDL followers were thrilled at the "awesome" and "amazing" 98 per cent approval rating from Star readers.

The newspaper's long-standing editor Dawn Neesom is one of Fleet Street's stalwarts. A proud East Londoner and keen kickboxer, she follows West Ham United home and away and prides herself on being in touch with the instincts of the Star's working-class readership.

The EDL draws much of its support from football followers. Sources said it was Ms Neesom's decision to give the group such a high profile, and not that of the paper's owner Mr Desmond.

Ivan Lewis, shadow Culture secretary, said: "Newspapers have a right to cover whatever they want in a democracy within the constraints of the law and their code of practice."

http://theenglishdefenceleagueextra.blo ... -back.html

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

In defense of Kevin: doesn't Muslim immigration to Europe dilute gentile culture, thus helping Jewry? Isn't it only a matter of time before the Palestinians are totally removed from their homeland anyways? Could Kevin be trying to salvage some good from a terrible situation?

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

Comment on Piper's podbean site:

With regard to Kevin MacDonald, not exactly true. Here is an e-mail from today from KM which clarifies his position. He would favor all non-White immigration in Europe to be reversed–not just Muslims. He did not originate the idea of a trade with the Jews and has no illusions of it ever happening. He also references his original article from 27 Dec 2010 that discusses the Nationalists alignment with the Jewish zionists–the article that got this whole confusion saying he wants to make a deal with the Jews. Regardless of what Hoffman says, MacDonald did not originate such a deal. I would urge all to read MacDonald's original article to judge for themselves if he is really getting behind the Geert Wilders of the world.

Forwarded message ———- From: Kevin MacDonald Date: Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Professor KMD Calls for "Deal" with Israeli Far Right To: Rep

This was a purely hypothetical suggestion on my part. The context was a discussion of the trip of some European nationalists to visit the settlers in Israel. Their implicit program is that the settlers and European nationalists have the same enemy—Islam and they should support each other. I have made it very clear in my writing and presumably in the interview that the organized Jewish community would never make such a deal. Not one sitting politician in Israel supported this delegation, although one Knesset member did sponsor a visit by Geert Wilders. My comments are based on this article except that I don't propose the deal there: http://www.alternativeright.com/main/th ... -syndrome/

Perhaps the Pro-Muslims in our circle are trying to blow this out of proportion in hopes of sinking a legitimate white nationalist that is not partial to Islam as many in the movement seem to be.

Sometimes Michael Collins Piper reminds me of a staunch Democrat.