MUST SEE - - > 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

[/tab]

.
.
must see - - > 9/11 Experiments: The Great Thermate Debate

[youtube:3dgzp8qr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5iIoCiI8g[/youtube]3dgzp8qr]



9/11 Experiments: Eliminate the Impossible

[youtube:3dgzp8qr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwqLu8ZXIX0[/youtube]3dgzp8qr]



9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST

[youtube:3dgzp8qr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w[/youtube]3dgzp8qr]

.
.

[Christopher Marlowe]

I'm very grateful for these experiments showing that it is possible to cut steel beams with Thermite.  

But I have done a lot of research into this topic and have yet to find a study of thermite's ability to explode or to turn concrete into dust.  Thermite is very energetic and very stable, which would make it very useful for this type of work.  The matter of being "explosive" has to do with the speed of the reaction. If the reaction is faster than the speed of sound, it is called a "detonation"; If it is slower, it is a deflagration.

Another important term is "brissance", which is a quality of detonations, and refers to the ability of the explosion to shatter.  Thermite does not have this quality, so it would be difficult to figure out how the WTC concrete was turned into dust using this material.  My research showed many examples of people testing thermite and finding that it did not have this quality of detonation or of brissance. The only exception were a couple of patents I found, one of which proposed using thermite to demolish concrete.  Unfortunately, neither patent went into great detail and there were no scientific studies that were included.  

Using plasma ARC and thermite to demolish concrete
United States Patent 5532449

A plasma arc can be employed to demolish a concrete structure at a high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust and chips, and the like. The concrete structure can be demolished by melting a surface of the concrete structure by generating a plasma arc from a plasma torch (15) of a plasma arc generator, mixing thermite powder (T) with a supply gas (Gc) for the plasma torch (15), directing the plasma arc at the surface of the concrete structure, and controlling the rate of supply of the thermite powder (T) to the plasma torch (15) in response to the operation of the plasma arc, including initiating and stopping the supply of the thermite powder (T) to the plasma torch (15) in a manner coordinated with the initiation and stoppage of the plasma arc, thereby controlling the heat generated by the thermite reaction, and melting the surface of the concrete structure. The plasma generator (1) can be provided with a feeder (20) for mixing the thermite powder (T) with the supply gas (Gc), and controller (30) for controlling the rate of supply of the thermite powder (T) or for stopping the supply of the thermite powder (T).

Rock fragmentation system using gold schmidt method
United States Patent 5773750

A rock fragmentation system using Gold Schmidt method and process for blasting using the machine are provided, wherein the blasting machine has a capacitor bank, a switch, a high voltage electric power supply, a first charge dump and a second charge dump, and an electrode assembly which is connected to capacitor bank and switch with a coxial cable and electrodes at a lower end of the electrode assembly, wherein an aluminum and metal oxide composition of a predetermined mixture ratio is inserted between electrodes in a lower end of the electrode assembly for generating an instant reaction energy by discharging the electric energy.

While these patents purport to show that thermite could be used in demolishing concrete, it is hard to relate either of these to what we witnessed on 9/11. And neither one hints at spraying on a nano-thermite paint that could dissolve an entire building into dust.  I don't think that is possible for the reasons just mentioned, but I would be willing to read a study that says otherwise.  

Another possibility is that the mossad perps used barometric bombs, which work by using two explosions: The first explosion disperses an explosive dust, like aluminum powder.  The second explosion ignites the dust.  A barometric bomb can use stable metals, and could be placed in-between the floors by means of the elevator access.  

Just speaking hypothetically: the cutter charges could have been used to slice through many of the girders, and this is witnessed by the explosions in the basement prior to the tower's collapse. Also thermite charges are placed throughout the building, like the one in the famous piece of footage where liquid metal is seen to pour out of the WTC. After most of the steel structure has been weakened or cut, the barometric bombs are exploded sequentially, and the building is reduced to dust.  The barometric bombs would also account for the exploding windows that ran ahead of the building's collapse.

[UnitedAgainstZionism]

It could have been, it might have been...

Unignited aluminothermic material (thermite) in highly-refined nano-scale state has been found in the WTC dust, at least 4 samples with verifiable chain of custody. Thus we have the murder weapon; there is no need to speculate about what other things may have been used, such as barometric bombs (not entirely unreasonable), directed energy weapons (laughable Judy Wood nuttery), micro-nukes (ridiculous Siegel/Wood/Khalezov disinfo), or even standard military high explosives (quite reasonable but we have no evidence).

Somebody loaded the buildings with nanothermite while people were working there, and somebody also created this most sophisticated murder weapon. And it wasn't Mohamed Atta in his underground lab in Hamburg or Osama bin Boogeyman in his Afghanistan bunker. Nor was it Dick Cheney in his secret lab under the White House, for that matter. I have found no evidence of CIA or US military special ops involvement, either.