Re: Anyone still researching 911 details?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

One thing I find interesting about the DEW crowd (most of them anyway) is that you'll notice how they attack other more credible theories like standard CD, and even the mini-nuke hypothesis. The space beamers are dead set that nothing other than space beams were used, and they spend a lot of their time attacking the Thermite-Thermate people like Steven Jones & Niels Harrit and trying to discredit them. This is a clear attempt to cover up the obvious evidence of explosives in the towers, planted by an Israeli demolition team. Most space beamers are also No Planers/Black Popers/Paperclip Nazi theorists who blame everything on White Gentiles. Bunch of little Chaim's and Shlomo's.

Yo Mama,

CSR has my full trust, regardless if he believes in the DEW thing or not. He knows what's up and that it's the Jews, not the German Death Cult from Mars. But I personally think DEW is disinfo, to be honest, and the hardcore pushers of it are very Jew-friendly I have seen.

I won't argue this one too hard on anyone. The results are what they are. I looked at Hutchinson's work before I ever heard of Wood's DEW theories for 9/11. Anything related to Laser's is complete B.S.  The connection of 9/11 and Hutchinson was interesting since Hutchinson's stuff went black ops back in the 1990s.  With the Anthrax attacks and the wars all geared up by the Neocon Jews... this, to me, just seemed like a different, but plausible theory.  I do think if it was just explosives... there would be a lot more burnt bodies during the collapse and spread of the dust-ashes.  There are several pictures of what happens to Steel from Thermate/Thermite, but not many involving what happens to people when a Thermate ember lands on their Plastic Fireman's hat at Ground Zero.  And fires 100s yards from the collapse?  It looks strange.  

Yeah, Architects and Engineers (Whaler's video) are basically going to slam Wood's research...it is expected. She's attacked them.  Most importantly,  both of these groups just don't focus on the J-Tribers behind it all.  They fight over "how" it was done. And like JFK, this could go on for decades.
Dr. Judy Wood did bring a lawsuit against the DEW manufacturers -- from what I've seen these are not B.S. fantasy weapons.. these companies have made and deployed materially destructive weapons and some of them are top secret. Is that true? Yeah.. it is.   Hutchinson is off the radar in terms of accepted science but there is something to his work IMHO. If these dumbasses could tap it for a "major project" I'm sure they would.  TIU favors the Thermite/Thermate... no prob.. I won't push it to cause needless divisions.  Like...was it done with a knife or handgun?
I know if  debris ( large objects) fell on to cars and trucks from the sky, some of that should have fallen on a lot of people and maybe I didn't see them "pinned"  or see the TV footage explaining it all.  
Since Judy Wood published her book, she has made the "alternative show" rounds that's why the obvious Shills have finally interviewed her -- if you think she's professional Disinfo.. no prob.  I just don't see it that way. Besides, prove she's a Jew?  If anything, people here at TIU that know the J-Tribe did it should try and get an interview with her -- just to throw that at her (and the ArchitectsEngineers for 9/11).  Try and blow her out of the water if she's all Jew B.S. disinfo... IMHO. If she's promoting bad "science" then get more info to prove her crap is all CRAP.  I learned about Hurrican Erin from her that also got my interest. The Jew Knife or Handgun, believe what you want... but Shlomo's hand is behind it.  And if there are DEW weapons of this caliber... and Shlomo's Jew hand is on the controls.... something has got to take that hand off the controls... Anthrax-Depeleted Uranium-Phosphorus Shells...this would be just another weapon for Shlomo to fire at the Gentiles.    That's why I entertain the DEW-Wood's theory more than others might.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Hey Joe,

Call her up and get her on your site. You have more than a layman's knowledge of these events it would be interesting to see some specific "leverage" brought to bear on her theories. Also, ask her if she is a Jew or what religion her family has had over the years.  My bet she has a typical Protestant or Catholic background but I would not be surprised if she was J-Tribe -- I doubt she is a Jew.. for me it is one of those 70/30 propositions (70% non-Jew/30% possibly Jew).   She doesn't dwell or point out "Jew" pet issues IMHO.   If you think she is disinfo... then try and blow her out of the water on her "insane" material. She has been on a couple of shows with John Hutchinson and that made me think she was an independent.  Like I said, he's totally off the radar of accepted science but there is something to Tesla coils and Casimir/Van Der Waal forces in static fields.  Really drill her on her trial against the weapons systems manufacturers since everybody with a "science" background pretty much dismisses her except for the companies contracted to build DEW type weapons systems. Lawsuits are difficult to ignore.

Take a look here before the interview:
http://www.seas.harvard.edu/capasso/pub ... 1_2011.pdf

http://focus.aps.org/story/v27/st1

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=7304

Bring some of this to bear on her theory:
Scattering
 By E. R. (Edward Roy) Pike, Pierre Celestin Sabatier
http://books.google.com/books?id=0gvXLwtz4QoC


Keep in mind Shlomo's finger on the button. Note all the Jews in "Skunkworks":

Boyd Bushman, a Senior Scientist of Lockheed Martin, on The Hutchison Effect
[youtube:2nmx91pj]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57ZKTA7nx8U[/youtube]2nmx91pj]

This guy points out some "fakery" possibilities with Hutchinson's postulated AG (but where's the Cannonball??    ):

[youtube:2nmx91pj]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TsaMSNwUvxM[/youtube]2nmx91pj]

--------

A lot of people who I have suspected were agents have been revealing themselves recently.

Just because MAYBE she might look a bit Jewish is no proof she is some kind of a shill, let alone Jewish.

Anyone who thinks, because someone looks ASHKENAZI that they are not to be trusted, is an idiot.

Her research asks the question HOW not WHO.

And her HOW has metamorphosed from reasonable questions to completely lunatic theories which have disproven by other 9/11 Researchers whose reponses can be understood by anyone with at least a year of university physics.

We already know WHO. But the question HOW is still important in the light of HAARP.

Just for kicks, tell us specifically WHO you know did 9/11? Was it Cheney and the ones above him? How the hell could HAARP have anything to do with bringing down WTC 1 and 2?

A lot of comments on this thread by people (not including CSR) who have not taken the trouble to actually go over her site in sufficient deatail !

Her site overflows with mental-illness, stop diverting this thread with disinformation, create a new thread specifically about Judy Wood and her nonsense.

[joeblow]

You do not appreciate how much Conspiracy-theorists (who were into conspiracy before the Talmudic Attacks in NYC) hate 9/11 Disinformation. I have already done a televized debate with the No-planers and went to their main hive forum, but I will now make it a point to read up on Judy Wood and her material (shudders) in preparation for contacting her.

[mchawe]

The title of your diverted thread Joe Blow, contains the word "Nonsense"
What part of her research do you classify as "Nonsense" ?

Why did you remove the discussion from a thread which states clearly "Anyone still researching 911 details? "
Can you state why her research is not relevant ?
Since I AM still researching it, I see YOU diverting matters to a thread whose title is perjorative. As far as I am concerned I am not interested in posting on your so-called thread which contains the word NONSENSE

Joe Blow said

Since I take being an administrator seriously, I created a separate thread just for this disinformation

What disinformation are you talking about ?

Joe Blow said

mchawe wrote:Her research asks the question HOW not WHO.



And her HOW has metamorphosed from reasonable questions to completely lunatic theories which have disproven by other 9/11 Researchers whose reponses can be understood by anyone with at least a year of university physics.

What "reasonable questions" and which "lunatic theories" are you referring to,
What other 9/11 Researchers are you talking about ?

I did purchase her book and I do not find either it or her site full of "Mental illness". Perhaps you can enlighten me where the mental illness is prevalent.
My judgment of her is that she is shy in public and has a very poor speaking voice which lacks articulation, but "mental ilness" ? I think that is quite slanderous from someone who manifestly knows nothing about her research and admits it.
Before you made serious allegations against her at least you should have gone through her material.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The title of your diverted thread Joe Blow, contains the word "Nonsense"
What part of her research do you classify as "Nonsense" ?

Why did you remove the discussion from a thread which states clearly "Anyone still researching 911 details? "
Can you state why her research is not relevant ?
Since I AM still researching it, I see YOU diverting matters to a thread whose title is perjorative. As far as I am concerned I am not interested in posting on your so-called thread which contains the word NONSENSE

Joe Blow said

Since I take being an administrator seriously, I created a separate thread just for this disinformation

What disinformation are you talking about ?

Joe Blow said

mchawe wrote:Her research asks the question HOW not WHO.



And her HOW has metamorphosed from reasonable questions to completely lunatic theories which have disproven by other 9/11 Researchers whose reponses can be understood by anyone with at least a year of university physics.

What "reasonable questions" and which "lunatic theories" are you referring to,
What other 9/11 Researchers are you talking about ?

I did purchase her book and I do not find either it or her site full of "Mental illness". Perhaps you can enlighten me where the mental illness is prevalent.
My judgment of her is that she is shy in public and has a very poor speaking voice which lacks articulation, but "mental ilness" ? I think that is quite slanderous from someone who manifestly knows nothing about her research and admits it.
Before you made serious allegations against her at least you should have gone through her material.

Couldn't agree more mchawe!

 :up: