Double-minded induction of 9/11 Revelation of the Method

[Anonymous]

Double-minded induction in the Alchemy of 9/11 Revelation of the Method







The Cryptocracy, through its mouthpiece media, is declaring two opposing realities

"Americans ran the Sept. 11 attacks" and a Pakistani Muslim was the "driving force behind the Sept. 11 attacks."


Note that the URL for a website affiliated with Brigham Young University Physics Prof. Steven E. Jones is published in the right-hand column of p. A-11 of the Sept. 2 edition of the NY Times. But in the Sept. 7 NY Times report, the official US government declaration of who is to blame, is proclaimed dogmatically, without qualification or reference to the competing "theory" elucidated in the Sept. 2 NY Times article. This indicates that, rather than entering the documentary record, the Sept. 2 NY Times article was intended chiefly as a hypnotic cue. A fleeting, dream-like scenario has been cued, in which Americans, and more specifically, "the Bush administration," (not a Pakistani), were responsible for the 9/11 terror attacks; and the administration's "motive" was "justification" for making war "in the Middle East."

If the Sept. 2 NY Times article was not a hypnotic cue, then the Sept. 7 NY Times article would have qualified the dogmatic assertion about Mohammed's culpability as follows: "The government alleges that Khalid Shaikh Mohammed was the driving force behind 9/11, but this is disputed by some investigators and researchers." Bush administration statements and press releases about the Sept. 11 attacks would be labeled as "disputed."

This is not without precedent. When the media routinely refer to the "disputed status of the occupied territories" in the Arab-Israeli conflict, they do so in order to indicate that a body of expert or influential opinion (in this case Israeli partisans and lobbyists), dispute claims that the land actually belongs to the Palestinians. Since the identity of the malefactors behind the Sept. 11 mass murder at the World Trade Center is of a much higher order of concern to the American people, given that it could reveal that our government is in the hands of traitors, to prefix official Bush administration apportionments of blame as being "disputed" is not out of line, particularly in light of the contents of the report published in the NY Times on Sept. 2.

In the liturgy of the alchemical wedding of opposites, whose patron deity is Janus, the two-faced god of schizophrenia, it is necessary that the truth be told at least once, to all present. After which, those officiating are free to lie with impunity, without fear of "sow-and-reap" repercussions, or blowback. This is a function of the alchemy that is the Revelation of the Method. This is the reason why the Times published what it did on Sept. 2 on p. A-11.

In the prescribed Kabbalistic time relation called "the End of Days," the final process of salve et coagula consists in the revelation, by the Cryptocracy itself, of certain of its own secret crimes. By this means, potential opponents and resistance cadre are paralyzed into dumbfounded awe, through exposure to a dizzying, carnivalesque dose of shadow-side psychedelia: a crypotogram decrypted by the Cryptocracy itself. This results in the induction, on a mass scale, of the double-mind, the spirit of Janus. The overwhelming majority of the leaders of the Left-wing and Right-wing "resistance" to the Bush administration, along with the American masses, exhibit chronic symptoms of a double-mind.

An additional component of this psychological warfare operation is the Truth or Consequences dare. The Cryptocracy are high-stakes, high-risk gamblers for whom success through cunning and deception in games of chance, is an iconic image of their prowess, an image which they seed among targeted populations [1]. In the case at hand, the Cryptocracy must advertise its opposition, and briefly recruit on behalf of its opposition. In this daring Truth or Consequences psy war gambit, the criminals must themselves publicly confess the truth about their crimes and act as the conduit for redress: We have told you what we are doing to you and we have given you the information necessary to form a resistance movement against us. The means for building a mass resistance movement of enraged Americans is provided by the Cryptocracy itself, in the form of the publication by the NY Times of the URL for the "Journal of 911 Studies." Strong hints are also furnished by the Cryptocracy, in the Sept. 2 report, concerning the actual identity of the 9/11 conspirators: "Americans" motivated by the desire of the Bush administration to "justify" war "in the Middle East." That is the Truth.

For having dared this truth, the Cryptocracy now must risk the Consequences: among a healthy, vigorous, fertile/virile population of fully alive, fully human beings, the Sept. 2 NY Times article would spark a groundswell of rage and disenchantment from alert citizens who would seek to bring the heads of the government to justice for the crime of mass murder of their own citizens. But almost nothing like that is happening. Instead, having fulfilled the requirements of the Revelation of the Method and the Truth or Consequences dare, the Cryptocracy now proceeds with the next step in their operation, as exhibited in the Sept. 7 NY Times article, and pretend that nothing contradicting the official narrative has ever been revealed: "What controlled demolition?...Prof. Steven E. who?...Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, Osama bin Laden and the other Muslims are undeniably the masterminds of the Sept. 11 attacks."

It is as if a bank robber were to stand in the town square and declare, "I robbed your bank." He then provides the citizens of the town with the phone number of the sheriff's office and makes himself available for arrest. Rather than call the sheriff, the people are shocked, awed, confused and deranged by the audacity of the robber. The next day dawns and finds the bank robber now an official at the bank. The people recall something peculiar and vaguely sinister about him. An eccentric schoolteacher, along with the village idiot and the town drunk proclaim the new bank official to be the crook who robbed the bank. The citizens aren't sure and the bank robber himself flatly declares that it was a dark-skinned foreigner with a large mustache who robbed the bank. The robber makes no reference whatsoever to his previous day's confession and takes up his official duties at the bank with aplomb. Gradually, as the citizens patronize the bank as usual, and the robber continues as an official of the bank and warns the citizens that if they do not support him the bank will be robbed again, the citizens of the town become slightly deranged, exhibiting characteristics of paralytic apathy, amnesia and abulia and suffering from "mysterious terrors."

When Jesus Christ said, "Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall make you free," He was referring to those persons possessed by the spirit of the one, true God, YHVH; not the spirit of Janus, the god for whom the revelation of the truth is but an arcane tool for the enslavement of mind and spirit. This is the essence of the Revelation of the Method of human alchemy.

[1] Cf. Bob Dylan's rock video, "Love and Theft," issued Sept. 11, 2003. On Sep 10, 2006, at 20:58, R.L. wrote: Michael, re: the Dylan release "Love and Theft," the album was released Sept. 11, 2001, not 2003. I've got the CD which says 2001 and Dylan's own website confirms this. Hoffman replies: Thanks for the input, R.L. If you watch the "Love and Theft" video, you'll see at the end that Sony gives the date of the Love and Theft CD release as Sept. 11, and the copyright date for the Love and Theft video as 2003. The relevant screenshots are shown below. Since Sept. 11, 2003 was a Thursday, the video gives double-mind data: that the album was released on Tuesday, Sept. 11; and in the year 2003, a year when Sept. 11 did not fall on a Tuesday. Are there Kabbalistic reasons for sowing this misapprehension, or was it a simple "misprint"? My interest in drawing attention to the Love and Theft video, is mainly in the image of game prowess and the celebration of "hip" trickery that is manifest in it; intentional numerological manipulation, if any, is secondary. It should be noted, however, that one of the persons (besides Mr. Zimmerman), shown acting in the Love and Theft video, has a close business and personal relationship with a top American Kabbalist.



The preceding information ("Double-Mind Alchemy") is the copyrighted intellectual property of Michael A. Hoffman II.*   Copyright©2006. All Rights Reserved


*Q.: Why such an emphasis on your copyright? A.: Ambitious hustlers with an itch to be the Next Big Thing on talk-radio, as well as operators of conspiracy websites eager to boost their ratings and revenue, have a documented history of stealing the research, data and insights of Michael A. Hoffman II, altering them slightly and then presenting them as their own. Aside from the obvious ethical violations implicit in this theft, we draw your attention to how it serves the Cryptocracy. The hustlers who present Hoffman's information as their own, cannot follow-up on it when they are inundated with queries and requests for more information. They must mislead their listeners and readers with fantasies and false leads because they do not possess Hoffman's knowledge and thus, are not qualified to elaborate or go deeper. Parrots can only repeat. By this ruse, extremely urgent intelligence is muddied and dumped into a dead-end where Hoffman's information is made hostage to the very process he is deconstructing. These same unscrupulous hustlers maintain an air-tight boycott against everything related to Hoffman, his books and his RevisionistHistory.org website, just as the Cryptocracy does, even as they profit handsomely from his information. Awareness of our copyright is necessary in order to protect the right of readers to access the source of the information for genuine guidance and follow-up from its originator. For purposes of legal action against plagiarists, adequate copyright notice is also required.

[Anonymous]

Revelation of the Method and the Murder of Spirit
A Page from the Cryptocracy's Psychological Warfare Manual

by Michael A. Hoffman II

No, this isn't a column about ectoplasm or the Fox Sisters; but the epistemology of mass suppression of spirit, soul and mind; in other words, a page from the Cryptocracy's own psychological warfare manual.

In the June 5, 2006 edition of the New York Times, there appeared on one-third of page A19, an illustrated report on the concept that the 9/11 terror attacks were US government-sponsored. The article was titled "For 9/11 Conspiracy Buffs, A Chance to Compare Notes." It was reported by Alan Feuer.

If we were not in the alchemical "Must Be" stage of the "Making Manifest of All that is Hidden" era, then this NY Times report would have never seen print, or the reporter would have merely poked fun, or suggested that 9/11 conspiracy investigators are fit mainly for the booby hatch, in the American tradition of what Richard Hofstadter sneeringly termed "paranoid style."

Nothing of the kind in this report, however. The New York Times graciously called the 9/11 investigators  "skeptics and scientists." Even the website of these dissenters was provided: 911Truth.org

The anomaly that is the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, which was not attacked in any discernible manner, but mysteriously fell anyway, was cited rather than avoided. Also noted by the Times are incendiary topics such as the collapse of the World Trade Center towers through "controlled demolition," and the fact that "the military command that monitors aircraft 'stood down' on the day of the attacks." This is just the sort of sensitive, hidden data that ought to make the Cryptocracy squirm, unless the Cryptocracy itself approved its release for purposes of Revelation of the Method.

Physics Prof. Steven E. Jones is recognized by the NY Times as the antidote to the National Institute of Standards and Technology Report, which claims to debunk the notion that the collapse of WTC building 7 was any kind of anomaly. A long URL is furnished for Prof. Jones' rebuttal paper.

The tenor of the New York Times report is mostly respectful. It all but affirms that there's a good case for believing the US government did this to its own citizens. That's quite an astounding concession in the nation's "newspaper of record," in an article taking up one-third of page 19 in the paper's first section, under the headline "New York Report."

The June 5 Times report is unprecedented; it should have made huge waves: Bush's press secretary should have been asked about it, Ann Coulter should have been confronted; Prof. Jones should have been on all the news networks. The New York Times should have editorialized. Instead, just a few tiny blips of reaction on the media screen and then, flatline.

I promised at the beginning of this column to take you on a foray into the control epistemology of the Cryptocracy, so here goes. The "Revelation of the Method" is a deadly weapon in the hands of the enemies of the Establishment, in those times past when the American people were possessed of an alert mind, an awakened consciousness, concentrated will-power and not too many distractions.

Today, amnesia, apathy and distractions both digital and consumer cornucopic, are all-pervasive, except when people are cued by the Establishment to become outraged, as in the outrage generated on behalf of Darfur and a few years before that, for Kosovo. This is official outrage. Unofficial, spontaneous, grassroots outrage is harder to find.

When the New York Times, an organ of the System itself, strongly hints that the US government is complicit in the murder of thousands of its own citizens - - and as a result of this revelation there are no sustained street protests, mass rallies, riots, pickets, lawsuits, televised hearings, booing and hissing of Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush and Ashcroft whenever they attend public forums; no special investigations by the newspaper and television journalists - - then murder of our spirits is taking place on a mass scale and the Cryptocracy's gamble in revealing this information, is paying off.

It is risky to reveal to the people what has been done to them by the gangster class that lords it over them. Patently, in the wake of the revelation, the risk is one of reprisal, retribution and rage by the people. But where there is little or none of that, then the Cryptocracy has tripled its hold on the minds and hearts of Americans: it has strongly hinted about the mass murder it committed on Sept. 11 and yet, there are few significant repercussions. This non-reaction tends to demonstrate that the people of the US accept, at the subliminal level of their consciousness, that their own leaders are mass murderers of their fellow citizens, and mostly what they do in return is shake it off and head to the mall.

If the Federal government succeeds in another big attack on America by means of its Islamic patsies, it could well tip our country over into military rule. Bringing the behind-the-scenes perpetrators of the first 9/11 attacks to justice, prevents the state's orchestration of a second attack, the one that most likely would lead to martial law tyranny and the eclipse of the American dream of liberty. But even after revelations in the June 5 New York Times - - replete with directions to web pages that give strong evidence of an official role in the terror attacks - - Atlas shrugs.

This is a less-than-human response, a result of the alchemical processing of humanity, the devolution from angel to beast.

There you have it, a page from the real-time psychological warfare manual of the Cryptocracy.

Copyright©2006 RevisionistHistory.org

[joeblow]

Facinating, I became a fan of Mr. Hoffman after he came on AJ and hardly gave an inch. A true academic who will probably never be recognized by his peers during his lifetime.