Superbowl commercial foreshadows upcoming 9-11 false flag

[Michael K.]

92ilxzh8]


http://duncanofinioan.wordpress.com/201 ... erbowl-ad/

What Do You Think About Clint's Superbowl Ad?

February 7, 2012 at 5:07 pm (Mind Control, MK ULTRA, News)

Perhaps some of you watched a little distraction the other day called the Superbowl.

If you did, you may have seen a commercial featuring the raspy, gravelly, manly voice of Clint Eastwood. In the ad, Eastwood states that it's "Halftime in America", and talks about this country (using Detroit car manufacturers as an example) having fallen on hard times, but staying tough and picking themselves up and getting strong again.

Click image to see the Superbowl Commercial

Quotes from the ad:

"People are out of work and they're hurting, and they're all wondering what they're gonna do to make a comeback."

"It seems that we've lost our heart at times..."

"But after those trials, we all rallied around what was right and acted as one..."

And perhaps, more ominous:

"This country can't be knocked out with one punch, and when we do the world's gonna hear the roar of our engines."

Uh ... What Was That, Mr. Eastwood?

Maybe I transcribed that wrong, but that does seem to be what he said, which actually doesn't make any sense if you really read it. Or, was that intentional doublespeak to confuse us? Can we or can't we be knocked out with one punch? When we do what, exactly? Or maybe I heard it wrong and he said this country CAN be knocked out (or down) with one punch, which is even more disturbing.

[ed. note: Actually, I did transcribe that wrong. There was a glitch in the video version I watched and it skipped.  the line actually goes: "This country can't be knocked out with one punch. We get right back up again and when we do the world's gonna hear the roar of our engines." Still a bit foreboding, though.]

"It's halftime, America, and our second half's about to begin."

I was in a room with many people watching the game. When this commercial came on, everyone got really quiet. but when it was over, the general feeling expressed was one of confusion, and people were a little uncomfortable. People weren't sure what, exactly, Eastwood was talking about. No one cheered. No one gave a patriotic "Yeah!" or anything even close.

The logos at the end showed different car companies, but people seemed to know that it was about something else, something more than cars. They just didn't know what. And no one really seemed to feel inspired by the message, but instead more like they were missing something.

The advertising company that made the ad evidently has ties to the Obama administration, and some Republicans were unhappy and thought that there was a political message there. Whatever. I am so sick of political parties. I have always thought they should be outlawed along with lobbyists, but that's another story. Eastwood disavows any political leanings for the commercial.

What Do You Think?

I want to know what you think. It's pretty clear to me the Illuminati imagery and themes throughout the game and commercials, but this one has me scratching my head just a little bit.

There does seem to be a message there, but what is it? I don't think it's just an upbeat rah-rah America one. Is it a warning? Is it ironic (as in, 'This is how you see yourselves, America, but we know that's not really true')? Is it telling us of things to come? Is it part of their little disclosure game where they have to tell us what's going to happen?

I want to know what you guys think. Come on, tell us! Give us your analysis. We have the best commenters in the world on this blog and I'm anxious to read your wisdom.....

[Michael K.]

Here's my thoughts on the subject of what lies in store after "halftime" in America:

The government intends to provoke a rebellion leading either to a possible full fledged civil war, or more likely a complete one-sided crackdown.

The next false flag attack, this time blamed on Iran, is right around the corner.  March is a favorite month for shenanigans.  

This one will drive people apart, because it will be so in-your-face obvious that it is a false flag, it will take concerted effort just to believe the government lies.

But the key wedge issue will be ISRAEL.  Many Americans fervently believe that the State of Israel has even more right to exist than their own country.  These people are very brainwashed by TV evangelist religion and Jewish make-believe.  They will agree to anything for "Israel," including hunting down and killing their own countrymen who politically oppose her in a "tahm-of-war," if sufficient provocation exists to do so.

And we have Judas goats among the Israel-skeptics who are trying to associate the criticism of Israel with anarchic violence, in order to create the reason to crack down on "enemas-of-Israel."   ANd of course there are just plain stupid people too blind to see who will do wrong all by themselves when the occasion presents itself.

So, within a short time of the next 9-11, there will be a swift polarization of pro- and anti- Israel people, and then another provocation if necessary to justify the domestic crackdown they have been fantasizing about for decades.

We are on a one way course with a choice in this country:  declare you support of Israel and live, declare your opposition to it and be the enemy.

This will sadly leave no room for nuanced positions or moderate discussions.  The majority will be in kill mode against the minority opponents of Israel, and as if that wasn't enough there may be UN troops used to "keep peace."

Sorry, but I don't see how it can come out much different at this point.

[Michael K.]

Blatant Satanic Ritual at the halftime show.

http://worldtruth.tv/satanic-ritual-per ... time-show/

Meta-message:  

Jew York Giants ('Nefilim', who arrived in business suits) beat New England Patriots (the real Americans, the Sons of Liberty) in a surprise end-of-the-game upset which may have been more about elemental spirits than athletics.

The predicted destruction of America's true sons and daughters at the hands of the Jew-British-Masonic-Opus Dei monsters with the aid of black magic.

[abduLMaria]

The next false flag attack, this time blamed on Iran, is right around the corner.  March is a favorite month for shenanigans.  

got to keep an eye on the Joo Calendar, i.e. Purim -

"Nightfall of March 7 through nightfall of March 8"

http://www.chabad.org/calendar/holidays ... lidays.htm

WARNING - that's a Lubavitcher Link.

[Michael K.]

What follows is what I submit as evidence of "doublethink"; in this case we are told that trading a regional war for a global war equals the only way to "Avoid World War III."  And it's too short.

The author doesn't say anything about the USSRussia, which has as much as threatened to get involved if Iran is struck at all.  It is the elephant in the room.  And my guess is that the author means that because of "Mutually Assured Destruction" that the Kremlin would never dare step in.

But why wouldn't they wait and see how bad the US gets, and THEN attack - and mean while the US military would have expended its last dying economic gasp on a foreign war, leaving its back and flanks exposed to fresh and ideologically motivated attacks.

But this way "Israel" ends up the regional victor and Moscow the global winner - and the US the global loser.    The sin is transmitted to the bull by the Levite priest, and then the bull is sacrificed. Remember that the USSR founded modern "Israel" by furnishing it with ground troops, air support, war materiel.  And Iran stands in the way of linking these two entities up on the map.

That's "Yahoo News."


http://news.yahoo.com/avoid-world-war-i ... IgeW91BHBr

Avoid World War III -- The U.S., Not Israel, Should Attack Iran

By Owen Rust | Yahoo! Contributor Network – Sat, Feb 4, 2012

COMMENTARY | According to the Christian Science Monitor, it is likely Israel with launch a preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities this spring.

While the strike might well be justified, Israel should not be the one to administer the blow. An Israeli-Iranian conflict could easily lead to the decimation of tiny Israel, either through a large-scale Arab retaliation or a massive surge in terrorism encouraged by Iran's ayatollahs. Additionally, Iran could successfully claim victim status, uniting its citizens in a struggle against its attacker and garnering many supporters who have, so far, been ambiguous or ambivalent about supporting the Islamic Republic.

Iran will gain support at home and abroad and, given the fact many of its suspected nuclear facilities are hardened targets with underground bunkers, maintain much of its current WMD capabilities despite textbook-perfect airstrikes. Israel could hit hard and accomplish little but bringing on a wave of retaliation, perhaps even full-scale war, forcing it to decide whether to use its own suspected nuclear arsenal. The irony would be Israel, in an attempt to prevent itself from being nuked in the future, provokes a war that forces it to become the nuclear aggressor.

If Iran's nuclear facilities must be destroyed, it is far safer for the world for the U.S. to use its Navy and Air Force to administer the strikes. Iran would have a more difficult time retaliating against an opponent separated by thousands of miles of ocean than it would against a nearby foe like Israel. Similarly, a mass uprising of Iran's new allies would cause much less harm to the U.S. than it would to Israel.

Iran's nuclear program is wrecked and World War III, complete with potential nuclear warfare, is prevented. Instead of being able to retaliate against a next-door aggressor, Iran is forced to contend with a larger, more powerful foe on the other side of the globe. It has no justification for trying to annihilate Israel, as it has oft threatened. While crisis might not be averted, it is nevertheless much less likely.

If Iran must be struck to cripple its nuclear ambitions, it should be struck by a foe against that it cannot easily retaliate and thereby begin a wide-ranging war.