Randy Maugans: Off Planet Radio - Gate Keepers and Handlers

[Michael K.]

I have discovered an internet journalist named Randy Maugans, an American researcher who says he started in Christian broadcasting.  He is a skeptic of the Rapture, takes a neutral scientific tone on all spiritual topics and is a professional in a field where that is often not the case.  Maugans takes a far-seeing view of the whole field of different claims with integrity and then he has realizations.

Examining the claims coming out of Project Camelot, David Icke, etc., this internet radio show looks at the hype and far-fetched claims which have characterized the entire direction of the media on these fringe issues this year.  He examines the ethics of an area where facts are hard to come by, and I think his approach is strikes a good balance between skeptical and curious.

No Jews mentioned as such, but they appear under the identity of, "a totally dysfunctional money system that steals from everybody."  Basically his area overlaps all conspiracy material except Jews as Jews.  Here I offer a model of rational, open-minded, and benevolently skeptical investigation that can be applied to deconstructing the whole field of Jew material.

http://www.divshare.com/direct/16556712-31c.mp3

Below is the text accompanying it:

http://exotica-radio.squarespace.com/ar ... ry14611348

Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 1
Monday, January 16, 2012 at 9:51PM

   "A point of view can be a dangerous luxury when substituted for insight and understanding." -Marshal McLuhan

As I had stated in my interview with William Henry on January 11, 2012, this will be the post (see below, as this will be multiple posts) about an overview of the "truth movement", whistleblowers, disclosers, and insider/informer-type programming, that is so popular on the web.  As I stated in my closing remarks in that interview, the criticisms leveled at various high profile media figures, on this blog and in the shows, are NOT personal; nor are they inspired by a desire to "take down" media outlets like Project Camelot (assuming I so wished, or could even do that), which have provided valuable insights into the black budget projects, elite rulers, and secret programs, from the UFO/ET cover-ups, ritual  Satanic sacrifice and pedophilia  to large-scale mind control.

In fact, almost anyone who ever works in the area of investigative reporting on these subjects is inevitably confronted with bewildering contradictions, conflicting information, deliberate distortions, as well as the lapses  of memory and judgment that attend the human witnesses. Those imperfections are part and parcel of the process of research and reporting which are unavoidable. In fact, a mark of authenticity is the highly nuanced nature of any such disclosures.

The key elements of secret projects are compartmentalization, obfuscation; deliberate misdirects within the ranks, and of course, the never-ending re-scripting of events and scrambling of data. The best researchers quickly learn that the evidential trail is rarely linear; that it is often jumbled and random; that verifiable facts can be elusive at best, and inconclusive even when revealed.

No simple blog post can do this subject justice: the readership stretches far and wide, and a context for any such article requires a bit of background to establish the premises for what must be seen as both a sociological and phenomenal subject:

    Facts and proofs are decreasing as the currency for persuasion in the new electronic environment. The new currency is the "effect" in an amalgam of ideas, preformed concepts, and a conditioned willingness to suspend critical thinking, or, as Marshal McLuhan intoned:  "precepts over concepts".
    The sheer volume of "data" now present in the environment supersedes even the most ardent researcher's ability to "pan for the gold", and locate all the critical connecting points in any given topic. Moreover, the information field is in constant flux. Information today, can be "disappeared" tomorrow.
    Finally, the shrinking attention span of the consumer is so challenged that "memory" is now measured in nanoseconds, and is only underpinned by the deep emotional connections formed between the dispenser and consumers of information...or more accurately, the group mind of the consumers---with few rare exceptions.

The Modern Age of the Whistleblower

Arguably, the model for this modern age of investigative reporting has a fairly obvious beginning in the Watergate scandal which played out in national media from 1972 to 1974, and took down the Nixon administration. The centerpiece of that epic period in American history was the reporting of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of the Washington Post, who relied heavily on an anonymous source, known cheekily as "Deep Throat" (after a popular porno flick of the day).  From this source came the leads that opened up a Pandora's Box of damning revelations which resulted in an effective coup d' etat  and the conviction of 48 public officials. The era of the whistleblower was born.

In fact, while Watergate was the most dramatic public demonstration of the whistleblower effect, it was the earlier events in Dallas on November 22, 1963, which installed the mechanisms of Machiavelli into the structures of the U.S. government. Watergate's precedent was the coup de grâce of the young JFK, as a nationally staged form of traumatic mind control---followed in rapid succession by the deaths of Malcom X, Robert F. Kennedy, and Martin Luther King; and the period of late 1960's upheavals in response to the Viet Nam war.

Age of Conspiracy

Each event holds elements common in the ongoing work of numerous "alternative media" reporting outlets working on the fringes of disclosure. The earliest template for the work of internet outlets like Alex Jones' Prison Planet, Project Camelot, Red Ice Creations, Godlike Productions and Above Top Secret (to name a few) is the work of (Milton) William Cooper, a  shortwave radio broadcaster "(Hour Of The Times") and author of the apocalyptic "Behold A Pale Horse" (1991). Cooper cited his Air Force background and exposure to secret documents about government involvement with extraterrestrials, and connected the ETs and military to the Illuminati, Bilderbergs, Masons, Skull and Bones,  and Majestic Twelve; as well as exposing the dark side of officials at high levels  with occult oaths and rituals at the Bohemian Grove. He also connected the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion to the Illuminati and installed the memes of the substituted Jews, or Khazars, as the seed bed for a Biblically-inspired global order of elite bankers known as the Rothchilds.

The Web Effect

In effect, Bill Cooper was the prima materia which spun off an entire genre of rabbithole diving that would spawn countless chat rooms on the then-developing internet. The basic elements of deep conspiracy, aliens, secret societies, black projects, and dark practices were all present in the work of William Cooper, and had both a direct and subliminal influence on the new open frontiers of an emerging media called the web.

As this new media platform took rapid strides, it also produced a heretofore not seen phenomenon: a wide-scale access to multimedia. First, as text on web pages; then, as audio compression allowed, and following the introduction of iTunes in 2001 and the the Atom and RSS feeds in 2003; distribution of what became known as podcasts. Video followed in 2005, as YouTube took form...and the common man, with the aid of inexpensive computers, was able to begin producing multimedia for public consumption. The global media village was assembled in just half a decade as the children of McLuhan took over.

No surprise then, that the overlap of a post-sixties culture of challenging authority, and this new instant access to media---and the millions plugging in---would find among its earliest adopters, those whose  leanings were decidedly NOT mainstream. The earliest forms of "online", the USENET groups, dial-up communities on BBS, CompuServ,  and AOL had been a haven for the disenfranchised and decidedly fringe groups of the disaffected. Suddenly, the arena became larger.

Was William Cooper "real"? Many have questioned his background, motivations, and his shift away from his original ET claims. Cooper was shot to death at his home in November 2001, under circumstances that many have questioned. His behavior in later years became more erratic and paranoid, his vitriol turned increasingly toward the New World Order, and his sympathies aligned more with the militia movements, along with his fascination with the esoteric.  Like any template, he stamped the alternative media with both his virtues and flaws.

Was he "taken out" for his over the top presentations...or was he a plant? Was he, himself, a mind control subject like those he reported on--- gone bad? The questions he left behind still hang in the background of the many online groups where information is the currency, and the counterfeit blends with the truth.

The internet, after all was the child of academic-military research (ARPANET) projects in packet switching for data sharing between military assets. Like all communications modalities, it was "given to us" by the same government entities which became targets of disclosure.

While the web (a subset of the internet) has been a "wild west" of sorts, lacking the censorship and controls of the mainstream media of TV, radio, and film---and with fairly unrestricted access. One needs to ask: HOW free it is, really? Are there deeply embedded intelligence controllers behind major websites? Is there a hidden strategy to use this new media platform to, in fact, establish new methods of control and to embed even wider streams of misinformation and deception?  

Are certain online media outlets, forums, and groups really part of an ensuing "hive mind" effect to aggregate and harvest various "affinity" types; and to create artificial realities? Just as standards of accepted social norms were gradually altered by the mass media of the 1960s---is it possible that the internet is a tool to now "soften" the perceptions of masses; to blunt critical thinking by substituting group values for individual judgment? Were certain social experiments of the 1950s and 1960s, by intelligence agencies, a test run for a time when humanity could be targeted and voluntarily re-programmed to BELIEVE the unbelievable?  Or to DISBELIVE the truth?

Part 2...coming soon.

http://exotica-radio.squarespace.com/ar ... ry14897037

Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 2: The Pendragon Juggernaut
Sunday, February 5, 2012 at 9:40AM


Truth is best digested S-L-O-W-L-Y. The internet culture of mass-consumption of what is called "truth", vis-à-vis the cut-and-paste mentality of proliferation is quickly producing a hyperbolic group acid reflux syndrome. After I posted my last major article, January 16, 2012, Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 1, the Bill Wood saga commenced on the internet via Project Camelot.

We discussed some of the particulars on the live OPR show with Duncan O'Finioan and Miranda Kelly, but even as we were on the air, Project Camelot was doing another show where Wood appeared---and has now done yet another show with Wood (LiveStream-Saturday, February 4), for a total, so far, of roughly 9-10 hours of  coverage. I don't think it is over any time soon...the drama is clearly too rich (and en-riching) to just stop. No one can accuse Kerry Cassidy of a lack of opportunism in milking every aspect of a story.

At this juncture, I want to leave the reader with some rather cryptic clues as to what is being played out. If you can "read between the lines", rather than being deflected by the sheer mass of the information being divulged, you will grasp where the "spin" lies in this entire saga of, not only Bill Wood/Brockbrader, but Camelot itself.

Connecting dots from a mere "factual" basis can be elusive, at best, or a preconceived path of distortion by design is scripting "new realities". It is also part of the modus operandi of any good intelligence operation to seed crucial information into the open view, while retaining plausible deniability by using encoded memes to signal the true intentions to the intitate. This seeding of memes serves the viral nature of the internet---and again, recall my closing arguments in the  Gate Keepers and Handlers –Part 1 article:

"Were certain social experiments of the 1950s and 1960s, by intelligence agencies, a test run for a time when humanity could be targeted and voluntarily re-programmed to BELIEVE the unbelievable?  Or to DISBELIVE the truth?"

 Nearly instantaneous signalling, whether positive or negative, creates maximum effect. Do not believe that Project Camelot is not served by negative reactions---it is the negative which creates the critical updraft for such stories to oscillate through cyberspace. It is the perceptions of such disclosures that serve to build a significant movement to install larger and larger memes into the collective mindspace. At the collective level, these memes, or gestures result in the evolution of a culture, to borrow from Richard Dawkins' memetic theorem.

To understand the function of a Project Camelot in this memetic universe, it is useful to consider the stated intentions of Kerry Cassidy and Bill Ryan in their own words:

"Project Camelot is based on an idea generated when we first met and spent the weekend in Tintagel, England, overlooking the sea in the home of King Arthur. We named our project in tribute to the vision behind the utopian idea of the Round Table - and have structured all our efforts in this inspiring spirit."

With all its populist shaped statements about disclosures via "whistleblowers", which are aimed at informing and empowering its universe of media consumers, understand that the concept of a "round table" is NOT a populist concept, but rather an ELITIST concept in the Arthurian mythos. Nor, is the Arthurian legend "utopian", except in the most Orwellian sense. The roundtable concept, when stripped of the mythological lore, is, in fact, an elitist construct connected to Medevial warriors ruled by a monarchial structure---the concept that the "little people" required defenders and enlighteners.

Camelot is directly linked to "Pendragon":

Pendragonor Pen Draig, meaning "head dragon" or "chief dragon" (a figurative title referring to status as a leader), is the name of several traditional Kings of the Britons: • Uther, brother of Aurelius and father of King Arthur, is called Uther Pendragon because he was inspired by a dragon-shaped comet (In the Vulgate, he took the name from his brother).

The term "Pen Dragon" also is a Fennian (Ephraimite) form meaning, Pen "child(ren) of" Ap"Son of" combined with "Dargon" or "Dragon" the symbol of the Tuatha de Dannon (Danites) who were warriors that married the Irish widows, hence the Gaullo term Welch (Ue Lach) or "woman of a warrior."

As in all mythology, there is both a "light side" and "shadow side" to the mythos that needs to be acknowledged. Karl Gustav Jung wrote of this that:

   

"shadow is instinctive and irrational and thus is prone to projection onto others: turning a personal inferiority into a perceived moral deficiency in someone else."

Truth is a personal quest---we can share our journey with others, but it is the process of integration with oneself that creates the field for enlightenment to occur. This cannot be accomplished en masse, as the promoters of a mass "ascension" have so painted. The expositors of "darkness" often employ the very same tactics as those involved with obfuscation, i.e.- the "global elites" and various intel agencies around the globe (which are, themselves, all connected to the overlords). Behind the curtain may lie cloaked agendas, intertwined intentions, and even more subtle deceptions, not even discerned by the operatives, themselves.

Gatekeepers and handlers generally think of themselves as these selfsame "lightbringers", while failing to deal with their own inner "shadows". Ulterior motives and allegiances can be masked behind the seemingly good-sounding motivations, but they will often reassert in the subtle manipualtions used by these same operatives:

   

"Learning to discern, cross-correlate and understand the complexities of right and wrong, who the good guys are etc is an intense discipline and takes years of experience, a level of detachment and discernment that few people are able to master at this time." -Kerry Cassidy, Kerry Cassidy Blog, defending Richard C. Hoagland's attacks on Gary Vierre while herself labelling Vierre as a "mind control subject"

The "few people" to which Ms. Cassidy refers as "masters", is very much the unmasking of her own "shadow". Her tactics and subliminal insertions into the very stories that she, herself, creates; her motivations in utilizing deft re-directs in interviews; and the usage of a group ("roundtable") treatment of her interview subjects (example: connecting Bill Wood/Brockbrader to David Wilcock) is the method of intense installation of memetics into a public consciousness where objective reporting melds with subjective motivations, i.e.- the evolution of a culture.

There are factions at work. There is more to this story. It is both subtle and apparent, IF one digs a bit. Truth is best digested S-L-O-W-L-Y. We will let the saga unfold and provide the backdrop at the appropriate time. Or---you, the readers may unravel it in your own manner if you are so disposed. You require no such gatekeepers.

Update on Monday, February 6, 2012 at 8:04AM by Randy Maugans

from Kerry Cassidy's blog

It seems that "we" (royal we) are under-whelmed by the Brockbrader-a/k/a Bill Woods material? Ummm...I think we said that here.

    February 5, 2012

    Evaluating Whistleblower Testimony from Bill Brockbrader aka Bill Wood:

    Thank you for all who took the time to listen and participate in the recent Livestream follow up interview with Bill Brockbrader. Unfortunately some of what was initially promised by Bill prior to the Livestream event was not delivered. If nothing else, what becomes evident is that what one person considers to be earth shattering or mind blowing can easily be seen as run of the mill to someone else. It all has to do with your frame of reference. In addition to that, as the interview progressed, what appeared to happen is that Bill Brockbrader had stretched his security oath as far as it would go. From that point on, it is evident that he is primarily talking from a personal/philosophical point of view.

    It also became obvious, at least to me, that there was a lack of familiarity with what Project Camelot is all about. And therefore Bill and Eva are not able to assess accurately what is new and what is well known to the Camelot audience and so both he and Eva Moore, although well meaning, ended up discussing concepts and experiences that are already out in the public domain and therefore not at all novel or new. You be the judge.

    Naturally, Bill's personal experiences seem unique to him. This is understandable. Unfortunately a lot of the material in this livestream had already been revealed in the first interview I did with him. The rest of the material with regard to the Las Vegas police department while interesting is hardly surprising. Actually it would be more surprising if they weren't run by the mob, on the take and corrupt as well as deeply involved in scandals of every kind... What you will see is that halfway through the interview I simply decided to take charge of the process and attempt to get some focus and answers to direct questions that some of the viewers had.

    Suffice to say, whistleblower testimony is often full of distortions, blanks and unanswered questions due to the impact that mind control has had on the person's life. In this regard, Bill Brockbrader is no exception to this rule. I suggest that rather than judging him you consider the impact that simple mass mind control has had on your own lives and then try to put yourself in the shoes of someone who has that and on top of it joins the military and becomes the focus of intense mind manipulation over long periods of time. Then you will begin to understand what it truly means to be a whistleblower, or someone who has chosen to break ranks and come forward to tell the truth about what they have experienced.