JEW Scientific Proof of God

[mgt23]

[youtube:2nf1jvbr]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LzetqYev_AI[/youtube]2nf1jvbr]

Proof of God. Go beyond Intelligent Design with the scientific case for a Creator.

Dr. Gerald Schroeder delivers a powerful scientific case proving that God's existence is real.

Dr. Schroeder's argument is so powerful that it influenced one of the worlds leading atheist, Antony Flew to accept the reality of an infinitely intelligent God.

Discuss.................

Next there will be a scientific proof of christ lol.

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

I don't know that God would allow for absolute proof of His existence, based on His high regard for human free will. If He proved Himself, it would cheapen people's love for him, wouldn't it? I mean, how much more love (and faith) does it take to believe in something you can't prove or see? As a somewhat crude analogy, if a man decides between two women who are equally appealing to him as a potential wife, who is the man likely to choose, the woman he has to convince to love him or the woman who chooses to love him of her own accord? I think God gives us enough—without absolute proof—that we may have a good idea of what is what. This also tells us that God doesn't take us for idiots—idiots (like those of the Masonic Enlightenment period) that need everything explained and proven in a scientific manner.

[Anonymous]

Energy can be converted into matter and vise versa, him saying how can light beams think, create and turn into other material giving the suggestion it is incredulous is dishonest.

The simplest type of life came into being from a mixture of chemicals bombarded by UV light. Scientists can recreate this in the laboratory. His notion that billions of monkeys typing still could not create anything of value is true, but that is not how the construction of life works. Natural Selection involves a feedback loop, a monkey would type a word, it would be tested in the real world via natural selection and either be destroyed or returned to the monkey to continue to type another word when would be tested again. That is how complex life builds apon itself. Alot of mistakes....yes, but the mistakes are thrown away (for example Timothy_Fitzpatrick), but the successes are kept.

Jews have been behind alot of religions, they want people to believe in god, a god fearing person is less threatening to a jew than someone who operates on their well honed instincts given to them through millions of years of successful natural selection successes, the jew gods take those instincts and put them in a mental straight jacket and the bumbling fool is left with notions that he has to love everyone and that god will be angry with him if he doesn't.

[Michael K.]

Natural selection is reductionist;  it removes the unsuccessful and that's all.  Destruction is not creative.

Here's a real world paradox to consider:  It takes iron implements to make iron.  SO not only is iron's earliest manufacture not a result of reduction and destruction of other alternatives, it would not have been possible without the creative boost of obtaining iron in its finished state in the first place.

So, something or someone is responsible for introducing iron as a revelation of true technical knowledge.  While this may not have been "God", it serves as an example to show how there is an organized, creative mind that reveals and invents real things.

Everything that exists has a creative mind behind it, because natural selection creates nothing.

[Anonymous]

Natural Selection is not reductionist, mutations occur, they are either positive or negative, mostly negative but a positive mutation will give a creature an advantage over the others and with the creature's reproductive success, the positive mutation then spreads throughout the population.

It does not take Iron to make Iron, it is easily found, 5% of the earth's crust is made of Iron. Iron can be smelted in a stone kin.

Everything that exists has a creative mind behind it, because natural selection creates nothing.

??

[Michael K.]

Mutations are not the work of Natural Selection.  All Natural Selection can do is kill unsuccessful life forms. Rare "positive mutations" are mysterious and no scientist seriously has tried to develop a "Law of Natural Mutation".  

In short, the success of life itself, according to the theory of Natural Selection, relies on mysterious, rare and inexplicable "positive mutations" to make it all work out in the real world.  So, in a round about way the Great Mystery is still at the center, not mundane and well understood mechanisms.

What if positive mutations occur as the result of the action of Mind?

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The show starts at about 5 minutes in --- sometimes the interviewer has a few bad questions:
[youtube:27tkpjuz]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JcVktqMjqY[/youtube]27tkpjuz]


[youtube:27tkpjuz]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_RbiSvOVNU[/youtube]27tkpjuz]