Khazzer Threory Confirmed!

Started by GermanicAmericanFox, April 16, 2013, 11:25:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

FrankDialogue

#1
Quote from: GermanicAmericanFox on April 16, 2013, 11:25:12 AM
http://www.haaretz.com/weekend/week-s-end/the-jewish-people-s-ultimate-treasure-hunt.premium-1.490539

Almost all Ashkenazim descended from Khazars.

QuoteIn the Bible, Ashkenaz (אַשְׁכְּנָז) was the first son of Gomer and brother of Riphath and Togarmah (Genesis 10:3, 1 Chronicles 1:6). Gomer was the grandson of Noah through Japheth. Accordingly, Ashkenaz was a Japhetic descendant of Noah.

Quite clearly, this Biblical lineage shows that no 'Jews' are Semites, i.e. descendents of Shem...This is why the term 'anti-semitism' has no meaning.

In fact, there is no definitive evidence that 'Jews' from Germany existed in any measurable number before the breakup of Khazaria...Some 'elders' claim that 'Ashkenaz' is Hebrew for Germany or 'Central Europe'...This is nonsense, their creation.

What we call 'Jews' are of Mongol-Turkish stock, Khazars/Kagans, intermingled with some Slavic after Khazaria vanished, since there was inter-marriage.

In fact, the word 'nazi' is a corruption of the Aramaic 'nasi', which means prince...German Nationals Socialists NEVER called themselves 'nazis'...This word was an invention of American Zionist Jews....PLEASE correct me if I am inaccurate.

Many Germans lived and traded in ancient/old Russia, and German was the lingua franca for many educated people and traders in Eastern Europe & Russia...Yiddish is a corruption of German, with some Slavic thrown in.

Therefor, there is no basis for any 'Jewish' claim on Palestine...None...Ashkenazi scholars are well aware of this.

In fact there was no word 'Jew' until the 17th/18th century...Any use of the word 'Jew' in the Bible is a corruption of Idumean, Iudean or 'Edomite'.

'Israel' means, in both Hebrew and Arabic 'one who struggles with the spirit of God', nothing more, certainly not 'Jews'.

For some unknown reason, the Roman Church has held to the idea or translation that there were 'Jews' in Christ's time, and even boldy put in their Bible that Pilate put, on the Cross of Christ', 'Jesus, King of the Jews'.

The actual words were INRI, meaning 'Iesus, Nazarene Rexus Iudea' or 'Jesus, Nazarene Ruler of Judea'.

To conclude, however, modern Jews claim to be spiritual descendents of the Pharisees...What Christ says about them is quite clear, and I paraphrase: 'You are bastard sons of the devil who say your father is Abraham'.

Quite sad, this whole mis-translation nonsense...Christ's mission and words do not have to be 'doctored' or 'spun'.



Why lie about Jesus Christ, or what Pilate wrote?


GermanicAmericanFox

QuoteWhat we call 'Jews' are of Mongol-Turkish stock, Khazars/Kagans, intermingled with some Slavic after Khazaria vanished, since there was inter-marriage.

Actually my resaerch shows them to have actaully been part of the Frank Confederation of German tribes! If they do have a home land it would be right by were they were sopposbly extermenanted!

QuoteIn fact there was no word 'Jew' until the 17th/18th century...Any use of the word 'Jew' in the Bible is a corruption of Idumean, Iudean or 'Edomite'.

'Israel' means, in both Hebrew and Arabic 'one who struggles with the spirit of God', nothing more, certainly not 'Jews'.

For some unknown reason, the Roman Church has held to the idea or translation that there were 'Jews' in Christ's time, and even boldy put in their Bible that Pilate put, on the Cross of Christ', 'Jesus, King of the Jews'.

Actually Jew is a Roman corruption of Juda which is yet a further corroption.... Romans had no Y in the alphabet and Jews no J. If we were actually to use the correct names of the cities in The Land of Israel in the Bible we would gets names close to what the Palestinian Arabs call them! The Israelits getting kicked out is a myth... They stayed there and change thier names to Palestinians at some point due it was actually what the rest of the world called them. Look at old maps fromt he BC era and you'll see it true!

Mac Seafraidh

QuoteOne of the bigger lies that exists within the massive compilation of lies that is collectively known as the "Truth Movement" is that it is morally wrong to criticize "all Jews," and thus we need to use various euphemisms to describe Jewish criminality.  The two most popular euphemisms are "Zionists" and "Khazars".  Herein I will explain why both are inaccurate descriptions of the enemy we are fighting, and why both should be abandoned in favor of honest terminology, such as "Jews," "the Jew," or "international Jewry."

http://www.totalfascism.com/its-not-zionists-its-not-khazars-its-jews/