Dubious Jew Claims of "Stolen" Art

[Idaho Kid]

The Jews paid only a very small fraction of the value of the works, yet now claim that they themselves should be compensated for the allegedly improvident prices they received when they sold the art a few years later to finance their emigration from Germany.  These wealthy "refugees" were permitted to depart with their personal property and to retain ownership of what they left behind.  Since they had access to other markets there was no reason to accept less than the market values prevailing at the time. 

December 14, 2014
Editor
NATIONAL POST
Toronto

Dear Sir,

Robert Fulford's article on "returning" valuable works of European art to their supposedly rightful Jewish owners is more than a tad ironic, given the circumstances in which the Jews' plundered most of the art in the first place from impoverished, distressed German owners during the hyper-inflation following WWI.

The Jews paid only a very small fraction of the value of the works, yet now claim that they themselves should be compensated for the allegedly improvident prices they received when they sold the art a few years later to finance their emigration from Germany.  These wealthy "refugees" were permitted to depart with their personal property and to retain ownership of what they left behind.  Since they had access to other markets there was no reason to accept less than the market values prevailing at the time.  If some of the art was acquired by senior members of the Nazi Party, probably they were simply the highest bidders.

Anecdotally, an elderly gentleman who worked as a restorer in an Amsterdam gallery through the War years told me that SS Officers were their favourite clients since they always paid "top price" (hardly the Fulford-depicted "thieves who stole every masterpiece that wasn't nailed down", an accusation applicable to American soldiers).  He told me also that the Gallery owner had kept safely a large collection belonging to a wealthy Jewess and provided her, at great personal risk and expense, with a comfortable hiding place until liberation.  Because of the high cost of buying her food on the black market he eventually had to sell one of her minor paintings – for which initiative the grateful Jewess sued him for restitution after the Occupation ended.

The hyper-inflation in Germany following WWI enabled war-enriched Jews with dollars and pounds sterling also to buy valuable real estate for pennies on the dollar which they did with avaricious gusto.  By the time the National Socialists came to power they owned about a third of German real estate including virtually all the country's commercial properties.  They were not forcibly dispossessed by the Nazis and as late of 1941 still held the major share.

It is a gross anomaly and injustice that Jews have been richly compensated for contrived "losses" resulting from the war which they themselves fomented, while the genuine German victims, who selflessly fought International Communism to a standstill at tremendous sacrifice on our behalf, far from receiving compensation, are forced to pay their traditional enemies who brought on their destruction.

As ever,

Ian V. Macdonald
Ottawa ON
http://www.radicalpress.com/