Tom DeLay: Justice Dept. Secret Memo to Legalize Bestiality, Pedophilia etc.

[rmstock]

Tom DeLay: Justice Dept. Secret Memo to Legalize Bestiality, Pedophilia, and Other Perversions
Tom DeLay: Justice Dept. Wants to Legalize 12 'Perversions'
By Chip tatum  | VTN |  Tuesday, 07 July 2015 08:14 "
http://veteranstruthnetwork.com/index.php/component/k2/item/309-the-house-of-perversion

  "Former U.S. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay claims the Justice
   Department has drafted a memo that spells out a dozen "perversions,"
   including bestiality and pedophilia, that it wants legalized.
   
   "We've... found a secret memo coming out of the Justice Department.
   They're now going to go after 12 new perversions. Things like
   bestiality, polygamy, having sex with little boys and making that
   legal," DeLay said Tuesday on "The Steve Malzberg Show" on Newsmax TV.
   
   "Not only that, but they have a whole list of strategies to go after
   the churches, the pastors and any businesses that try to assert their
   religious liberty. This is coming and it's coming like a tidal wave."
   
   The Texas Republican's bombshell claim comes four days after the
   Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage is now legal in all 50
   states — a landmark decision DeLay strongly opposes.
   
   When Steve Malzberg repeated to DeLay his assertions that the Justice
   Department seeks "to legitimatize or legalize" practices such as
   bestiality — defined as sex acts between humans and animals — DeLay
   responded:
   
   "That's correct, that's correct. They're coming down with 12 new
   perversions ... LGBT [short for lesbian gay, bisexual and transgender] is
   only the beginning. They're going to start expanding it to the other
   perversions."
   
   He did not list the other nine "perversions" he said are mentioned in
   the Justice Department's memo and did not share it with Newsmax TV.
   
   DeLay, who represented the Lone Star State's 22nd District from 1985 to
   2006 and was Republican Party House Majority Leader from 2003 to 2005,
   said that with the high court's ruling last Friday, "all hell is
   breaking loose."
   
   Just right here in Texas our Attorney General Ken Paxton has written an
   attorney generals' opinion directing our county clerks that in issuing
   marriage licenses that they don't have to issue marriage licenses if it
   conflicts with their religious beliefs. That's just the beginning,"
   DeLay said.
   
   "In just the last few days all over this country, [people] letting
   their elected officials know that they are upset with us, that the
   Supreme Court is out of control, that we are in a constitutional
   crisis. We are really in a constitutional crisis."
   
   "We have a president that totally disregards the Constitution, steps
   all over it. We have a Supreme Court that ... [believes] the Constitution
   is a living document and whatever they say goes. And we have a
   Republican Congress that doesn't even understand the Constitution and
   the fact that they have the most power and can stand up and stop the
   other two branches. We're in serious trouble."
   
   It seems we have changed the face of America
   
   From This 
   
   
   To This 
   
   
   And the world laughs at what was once a respected world leader
       
   Read 3865 times Last modified on Tuesday, 07 July 2015 08:14 "

source :
Tom DeLay: Justice Dept. Wants to Legalize 12 'Perversions'
By Bill Hoffmann   |   Tuesday, 30 Jun 2015 06:23 PM
http://www.newsmax.com/Newsmax-Tv/Tom-DeLay-Justice-Department-perversions/2015/06/30/id/652929/

[rmstock]

Here's an attempt :

Bastardize
Bastardize Bas"tard*ize, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Bastardized
(?); p. pr. & vb. n. Bastardizing.]
1. To make or prove to be a bastard; to stigmatize as a
bastard; to declare or decide legally to be illegitimate.
The law is so indulgent as not to bastardize the
child, if born, though not begotten, in lawful
wedlock. --Blackstone.
2. To beget out of wedlock. [R.] --Shak.

Bestiality
Bestiality Bes*tial"i*ty, n. [F. bestialit['e].]
1. The state or quality of being bestial.
2. Unnatural connection with a beast.

Bigamy
Bigamy Big"a*my, n. [OE. bigamie, fr. L. bigamus twice
married; bis twice + Gr. ? marriage; prob. akin to Skt.
j[=a]mis related, and L. gemini twins, the root meaning to
bind, join: cf. F. bigamie. Cf. Digamy.] (Law)
The offense of marrying one person when already legally
married to another. --Wharton.
Note: It is not strictly correct to call this offense bigamy:
it more properly denominated polygamy, i. e., having a
plurality of wives or husbands at once, and in several
statutes in the United States the offense is classed
under the head of polygamy. In the canon law bigamy was
the marrying of two virgins successively, or one after
the death of the other, or once marrying a widow. This
disqualified a man for orders, and for holding
ecclesiastical offices. Shakespeare uses the word in
the latter sense. --Blackstone. --Bouvier.
Base declension and loathed bigamy. --Shak.

Bigotry
Bigotry Big"ot*ry, n. [Cf. F. bigoterie.]
1. The state of mind of a bigot; obstinate and unreasoning
attachment of one's own belief and opinions, with
narrow-minded intolerance of beliefs opposed to them.
2. The practice or tenets of a bigot.

Cannibalism
Cannibalism Can"ni*bal*ism, n. [Cf. F. cannibalisme.]
The act or practice of eating human flesh by mankind. Hence;
Murderous cruelty; barbarity. --Berke.

Deuterogamy
Deuterogamy Deu`ter*og"a*my, n. [Gr. ?; ? second + ? wedding,
marriage.]
A second marriage, after the death of the first husband of
wife; -- in distinction from bigamy, as defined in the old
canon law. See Bigamy. --Goldsmith.

Digamy
Digamy Dig"a*my, n. [Gr. ? a second marriage; di- = di`s-
twice + ? marriage. Cf. Bigamy.]
Act, or state, of being twice married; deuterogamy. [R.]

Homosexuality
homosexuality
n : a sexual attraction to (or sexual relations with) persons of
the same sex [syn: homosexualism, homoeroticism, gayness]

Incest
Incest In"cest, n. [F. inceste, L. incestum unchastity,
incest, fr. incestus unchaste; pref. in- not + castus chaste.
See Chaste.]
The crime of cohabitation or sexual commerce between persons
related within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by
law. --Shak.

Masochism
Masochism
n : sexual pleasure obtained from receiving punishment (physical
or psychological)

Monandry
Monandry Mo*nan"dry, n. [See Monandria.]
The possession by a woman of only one husband at the same
time; -- contrasted with polyandry.[/b]

Paedophilia
paedophilia
n : sexual activity of an adult with a child [syn: pedophilia]

Polyandry
Polyandry Pol`y*an"dry, n. [Poly- + Gr. ?, ?, man, male: cf.
F. polyandrie.]
The possession by a woman of more than one husband at the
same time; -- contrasted with monandry.
Note: In law, this falls under the head of polygamy.

Polygamy
Polygamy Po*lyg"a*my, n. [Gr. ?; cf. F. polygamie.]
1. The having of a plurality of wives or husbands at the same
time; usually, the marriage of a man to more than one
woman, or the practice of having several wives, at the
same time; -- opposed to monogamy; as, the nations of the
East practiced polygamy. See the Note under Bigamy, and
cf. Polyandry.
2. (Zo["o]l.) The state or habit of having more than one
mate.
3. (Bot.) The condition or state of a plant which bears both
perfect and unisexual flowers.

Sadism
Sadism
n : sexual pleasure obtained by inflicting harm (physical or
psychological) on others

Sodomy
Sodomy Sod"om*y, n. [From Sodom. a country mentioned in the
Bible: cf. F. sodomite.]
Carnal copulation in a manner against nature; buggery. --Gen.
xix. 5.

[rmstock]

The Pandora's Box of Obergefell v. Hodges
Posted By Ted Meehan on Jun 28, 2015
http://www.thechristianreview.com/the-pandoras-box-of-obergefell-v-hodges/

  "The Supreme Court has spoken, but homosexual "marriage" is hardly
   settled law. Like the Dred Scott decision (1857) codifying slavery,
   Obergefell v. Hodges will unleash an explosion of unrest that may, I
   pray, ultimately lead not only to its overthrow but also a much-needed
   reorientation of American culture itself.
   
   The Court's decision overturns more than 30 state referenda opposing
   homosexual marriage. Those states, those voters, and their elected
   representatives are unlikely to acquiesce on an issue so fundamental to
   human life and society.
   
   The issue of homosexual "marriage" is not merely social but
   philosophical and theological — it raises the question of human nature.
   The advance of secularism has caused religious teaching to be viewed as
   an imposition of values. Advocates of gay "marriage" view the Court's
   decision as another milestone in the rejection of this so-called
   imposed view of human nature and morality.
   

opening pandora's box

   They can celebrate for the time being, but Obergefell v. Hodges will 
   eventually be shown to have damaged the most fundamental institution of
   a civilized society — marriage between a man and a woman. Marriage
   nourishes and protects each new member of society, transmitting to the
   successive generations values, language, and citizenship.
   
   Homosexual relationships offer no such benefit to the State. These
   relationships may please the partners and bring them comfort. However,
   the same could be said for non-sexual friendships, which also bring
   comfort to those joined by the relationship, but shared pleasure and
   satisfaction are not the purpose of marriage.
   
   Statistics indicate that homosexuals make up 1.5% of the population.
   Only a small minority of these seek permanent relationships. Most have
   an average of 50 or more sexual partners. Now the extraordinarily
   important institution of marriage has been redefined in order to
   accommodate a fraction of the population.
   
   The human body is not a mistake, as Pope Francis made clear in his
   encyclical, Laudato si'. We are either male or female. We are not one
   of five genders as recognized by the United Nations and the LBGT lobby.
    The union of a man and woman is elevated and codified into the exalted
   state of marriage because this union is the source of life and family,
   of society itself.
   
   The Holy Father writes: "The acceptance of our bodies as God's gift is
   vital for welcoming and accepting the entire world as a gift from the
   Father and our common home, whereas thinking that we enjoy absolute
   power over our own bodies turns, often subtly, into thinking that we
   enjoy absolute power over creation. Learning to accept our body, to
   care for it and to respect its fullest meaning, is an essential element
   of any genuine human ecology. . . . In this way we can joyfully accept
   the specific gifts of another man or woman, the work of God, the
   Creator, and find mutual enrichment. It is not a healthy attitude which
   would seek 'to cancel out sexual difference because it no longer knows
   how to confront it'." (#155)
   
   The gift of human existence, its embodiment in two sexes — Adam and Eve
   — has been swept aside to satisfy a politicized homosexual agenda,
   which will not stop at "marriage" but will demand explicit affirmation.
   With that affirmation will come an explicit demand for the rejection of
   the Judeo-Christian worldview and values, as articulated by Pope
   Francis.
   
   As it did in 1973 with Roe, the Supreme Court has again opened a
   civilizational Pandora's Box. Since Roe there have been over 50 million
   deaths by abortion. Obergefell v. Hodges will reap something far harder
   to measure — confusion, anxiety, and unhappiness.  For children,
   adolescents, teenagers, and young adults in their period of moral and
   intellectual development, this decision raises disorienting questions
   that will prove insoluble for those without a community providing
   answers and commonsense support.
   
   It's a time to pray for our nation. America will be engaged in another
   divisive social battle that was completely avoidable, had the Court
   restrained itself as the Constitution provided in the 10th Amendment.
   
   Author: Ted Meehan
   
   Ted Meehan, former co-chair of the Pennsylvania Catholics Network,
   lives in Newtown Square, Pennsylvania. Meehan has been a pro-life
   leader and activist for over 30 years"

[Michael K.]

You know, the Tom DeLay story reeks of bullshit.  There is no evidence, and if there was a secret memo, we are no closer to knowing.  Tom Delay says.