Paris the day after : Obama at G20 in Turkey

[rmstock]

Fox News Anchor Bill Hemmer Goes Off on Obama G20 Speech
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUrN21aoF54

The Fox Anchors went visibly total of the reservation  after the Obama G20 speech in  Antalya, Turkey.
Interesting there was a back-channel vis a vis between Obama and Putin, which this man
wanted to eavedrops all info on :

Full video of a man 'eavesdropping' on Putin & Obama at G20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6qJpCutWug

So how was the total security and global surveillance at the G20 in Antalya, Turkey serviced ?
Don't hold your breath :

Cats stroll G20 summit venue during live transmission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpsT12dSbMw

They were probably looking for food, rodents, mice, rats etc. But look
what these three cats dragged in : Obama giving a speech in Turkey, which
remember was hardly more than 48 hours after the Paris massacre, which
the Paris police didn't see coming, but was also rather late to
intervene in the Bataclan disco using three ladders to enter the
building :

FULL | President Obama Holds G20 Summit Press Conference In Turkey Nov.16th 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkNsb2cTY9U

For a detailed interpretation of the transcript see e.g. :

Paris Shooting Happens and BAM Obama Makes Chilling Announcement at G20! Agenda?
By Lisa Haven , Tuesday, November 17, 2015 13:51
http://beforeitsnews.com/police-state/2015/11/paris-shooting-happens-and-bam-obama-makes-major-announcement-at-g20-agenda-2538.html
  "[ ... ]
   

   [ ... ]
   For More Information See:
   White House Transcript at G20
   ISIS threatens Washington
   G20
   List of US Cities
   [ ... ]"

[MikeWB]

Obama still hasn't uttered the words "islamic terrorism". I'm sorry for the French because US failed them again... and we bear a lot of responsibility for what has happened.

[Christopher Marlowe]

Paris is another HOAX. It's ridiculous to get upset over a hoax.  Sometimes I cry at a movie, but I know that it's just a movie.  Afterward, I don't base decisions on what happened in the movie because it wasn't real. 

The HOAX in Paris is supposed to get us upset. The Hegelian dialectic being run here is:
1. Paris was bombed.
2. Holland is strong and attacking; but Obama is weak and not attacking.
3. Therefore: We need to be strong and bomb. We can do it.  USA! USA!

[yankeedoodle]

Paris is another HOAX. It's ridiculous to get upset over a hoax.  Sometimes I cry at a movie, but I know that it's just a movie. 

As you might be a movie fan, CM, was wondering if you had a flashback to those great old movies of the 1920's and 1930's.

The Hollyweird crowd that is doing this propaganda really are starting to have some fun, dragging out those always-crowd-favorites of 1) a damsel in distress and 2) an innocent man or woman hanging by their fingertips from a window ledge.  These oldie-but-goodie plot elements were somehow amusing to see, in a cynical sort of a way.

And, they were able to add another feature, with the lady shouting "I'm pregnant, I'm pregnant," which, of course, would not have been possible in the days of silent movies, and, in the talkies era might not have been allowed by the censor, although, before the opening of the Hays Office, there might have been a few years when Hollyweird might have got away with it.   But, of course, movies made in Paris in those days probably would not have had a problem with a lady shouting "I'm pregnant, I'm pregnant."

[rmstock]

Paris is another HOAX.

It could be a hoax, but if so then where are this time the bloopers ?
Like parents strolling around with ear to ear smiles whilest mourning
but also receiving Louis XVI worthy reimbursements, amends and
reparations ?

[yankeedoodle]

The problem with the "hoax" is that it isn't precise.  "Fake" is the correct word.  Just because an event is presented to us with "fake" photos and videos does not mean that the event was a "hoax."  It could be, and it could not be. 

The reason "hoax" came into use is because the criminals are putting out "fake" video and photos, which they alter and enhance to promote an image or emotion, and, it seems, sometimes they intentionally do sloppy or confusion-creating work to keep us occupied and arguing, and accusing one another.  That's part of the plot.  "Is it real, or is it Memorex?"

What they are, or might be doing, is 1) actually committing a crime (admittedly, sometimes they might not commit the crime), but 2) providing the controlled media with pre-produced photos and videos that provide a narrative they want to tell, without showing the truth.