IS SOROS THE HAMMER AND PUTIN THE ANVIL?

[Michael Kelley]

The KGB/Zionist sponsored Alt-right and so-called White Nationalist meeja is ever abuzz with shrieks of horror over the latest moves by George Soros and his Open Society operation, feeding the unenlightened and gullible masses a simplistic narrative about how this man is evil incarnate and himself the unseen hand of Nazi Capitalist Globalism, setting about to rule the world with his billions, destroying hapless nation states in the process.


Poguie bait for simps

What I am about to suggest to you is an alternative explanation for the George Soros phenomenon which puts it in the context of a much bigger criminal enteprise, another scheme to rule the world which has far more power and history behind it than this lone billionaire.  Stated succinctly, George Soros is a tool of the coming Antichrist Kingdom, a weapon in their Talmudic hands to smash the open societies of the liberal Western nation states, the seat of Christendom and individual freedom in the world, against the anvil of totalitarian militarization.  This is being accomplished under the guise of his antagonism against Jewish controlled Russia (The Soviet Union 2.0), which loudly protests Soros at every possible occasion. 

Of course we have all heard of the Mossad motto, "By Deception Shalt Thou Make War," but few will recognize when they are being deceived.  But we have an understanding of the Hegelian Dialectical process of Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis to help us understand how apparent opposites work together to form a synthetic outcome.  In this case, the Thesis is authentic Western nationalism, in which Christendom and individual freedom are enshrined; the Antithesis is George Soros, the apparent champion of mass immigration, open borders and cultural decadence; and the Synthesis is the totalitarian nationalism of Eurasianism, which is endlessly resistant to massive doses of Soros and appears to offer continued survival of national identity and traditionalism at the expense of individual rights of any kind.

(To be continued...)

[Michael Kelley]

WHAT DOES SOROS'  "OPEN SOCIETY" REALLY REFER TO?

The term as a proper name was first used by philosopher Karl Popper, and is described:

What is the Open Society? The famous philosopher of science Karl Popper, himself very much a 'man in dark times' wrote a major work entitled "The Open Society and Its Enemies" in the 1940s. Popper reasonably assumed that the threat to the ideal of the open society came from without, rather than within–from totalitarian political projects and the historicist and romanticist philosophers of history to which these 'projects' implicitly appealed when making legitimacy claims. In this work, Popper objected to such claims that relied on some version of the Hegelian 'cunning of reason.' This is the idea that truth or right, or the best of all possible worlds, was somehow 'working itself out behind our backs' in and through the great tumult of human irrational self-seeking passions and actions, according to what was an otherwise hidden grand design. The true advance of rationality, so this story went, played itself out in the progress of spirit across the parade of nations on the terrain of world history, rather than through the direct and self-conscious rationality of individually responsible actors determined to live within structures of a just society.

The attributes of closed societies are easy to discern, because we view them through a telescopic lens, for example, when we peer into the "hermit kingdom" of North Korea.

When I think of the ideal of an open society today, I generally think about a collection of attributes that exist at the intersection of democratic self-governance, the spirit of economic liberalism, and the rationality and practice of science. Included are such things as the rule of law and procedural justice, the rights of man as enshrined in the bill of rights, the structures of civil society underlying and regulating commerce in a mixed economy. Basically, those things that together give concreteness to the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in the broad sense.

https://medium.com/@indarktimes/https-medium-com-indarktimes-karl-popper-to-george-soros-open-society-and-its-frenemies-4c62e20cc6b5

Karl Popper's terminology is used by George Soros with a twist, however, described in the same article:

Whereas Popper was generally reacting against the power of the state, under both fascism and communism, to repress the freedom of the individual, Soros reflects, "I contend that an open society may also be threatened from the opposite direction — from excessive individualism." The untrammeled intensification of laissez-faire capitalism and the spread of market values into all areas of life is endangering our open and democratic society, he writes. "The main enemy of the open society, I believe, is no longer the communist, but the capitalist threat...robber capitalism, or the gangster state as the new threat to the open society."

Soros, here is portrayed with some gullibility by the author, as another philosopher the likes of Karl Popper, but even more far-reaching in his brilliance, seeing the patently obvious fact that massive accumulation of capital has a harmful effect on the open society.  This seems acutely ironic considering that Soros made his philanthropic billions by himself practicing vulture capitalism

Soros began his business career by taking various jobs at merchant banks in England and then the United States, before starting his first hedge fund, Double Eagle, in 1969. Profits from his first fund furnished the seed money to start Soros Fund Management, his second hedge fund, in 1970. Double Eagle was renamed to Quantum Fund and was the principal firm Soros advised. At its founding, Quantum Fund had $12 million in assets under management, and as of 2011 it had $25 billion, the majority of Soros's overall net worth.[12]

Soros is known as "The Man Who Broke the Bank of England" because of his short sale of US$10 billion worth of pounds sterling, which made him a profit of $1 billion during the 1992 Black Wednesday UK currency crisis.[13] Based on his early studies of philosophy, Soros formulated an application of Karl Popper's General Theory of Reflexivity to capital markets, which he claims renders him a clear picture of asset bubbles and fundamental/market value of securities, as well as value discrepancies used for shorting and swapping stocks.[14]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

This should raise a big red flag to anyone who is genuinely critically minded in the tradition of Karl Popper.  We have George Soros wrapping himself in the intellectual garb of Popper, claiming to champion the causes of the ideal Open Society, but in his actual deeds we read quite a different story.  We have here a man who deviously took Popper's work and used it as a weapon to rip off billions of dollars from investors.  Then he tells us that his great innovation on Popper is that he realizes that people like him are the greatest threat from within to an open society.  I think we should take him at his word on at least this one point.

So where does this all lead?  We have this obviously duplicitous man, George Soros, making a great deal of publicity about the issue of an open society, while he himself is obviously its greatest internal enemy -- by his own definition!  This should cause us to doubt that Soros is doing open societies any favors, no matter what his words say.  Furthermore, it should make us wonder what harm is being done to open societies by the linking of his infamy to their cause through his Open Society Foundation?

Let us consider the possibility that Soros is an enemy of the open society, working for its destruction -- since this is how he defines his actual career as a Capitalist.  Then his Open Society Foundation takes on a sinister, Orwellian double meaning.  It refers not to promotion, but exploitation of its object.  And there is very little in Soros' career, outside this vainglorious philanthropy, to indicate that he is anything but a totalitarian himself.  His background is from a youth in a totalitarian society, and then education at the rather notorious London School of Economics, and philosophy, which is the cradle  of tyrants throughout history, especially when coupled with economics.

Let's look at how the leading philosopher of totalitarian, Jewish controlled Russia --- Alexander Dugin--- looks at Karl Popper and the Open Society:

Popper starts the genealogy of the "Open Society" enemies from Plato, whom he regards as a founder of the philosophy of totalitarianism and as a father of "obscurantism". Further, he proceeds to Schlegel, Schelling, Hegel, Marx, Spengler and other modern thinkers. All of them are unified in his classification by one indication, which is the introduction of metaphysics, ethics, sociology and economy, based on the principles, denying the "open society" and individual's central role. Popper is absolutely right in this point...

The most felicitous and full definition of national-bolshevism will be as follows: "National-bolshevism is a superideology, common for all open society enemies". Not just one of the hostile to such society ideologies, but it is exactly its full conscious, total and natural antithesis. The national-bolshevism is a kind of an ideology, which is built on the full and radical denial of the individual and his central role; also, the Absolute, in which name the individual is denied, has the most extended and common sense. It could be dared to say that the national-bolshevism is for any version of the Absolute, for any "open society" rejection justification. In the national-bolshevism there is an obvious trend to universalize the Absolute at any cost, to advance such kind of an ideology and such kind of a philosophical program, which would be the embodiment of all the intellectual forms, hostile to the "open society", brought to a common denominator and integrated into the indivisible conceptual and political bloc.

http://arctogaia.com/public/eng-teor.htm

So National Bolshevism specifically identifies Open Society as its absolute enemy.  And by association with the name and idea of Open Society, George Soros is villified as the Great Satan by the KGB/Zionist Kikernet disinformation machine, and Open Society is smeared as Capitalist Globalism.  They want us to believe that George Soros is their greatest enemy and could not possibly be working in cahoots with them to bring in their totalitarian future.  But everything Soros does strikes another blow against the viability and survival of an Open Society in the West, in the name of saving it!

(To be continued...)

[Michael Kelley]

WHAT IS LENINIST LONG TERM CONVERGENCE STRATEGY, AND IS SOROS A TOOL OF IT?

Convergence: Globalists Push Russia-EU Merger
An op-ed column appearing in the November 25, 2012 Gulf News, entitled, "Need for Europe-Russia institutional integration," by former Russian Foreign Minister Igor S. Ivanov (pictured) is one of the latest globalist paeans to East-West "convergence."

"Without a fundamental reset," argues Ivanov, "relations between Russia and Europe will continue to decay, eventually becoming characterised by benign neglect." To avoid this undesirable situation, Ivanov avers, "Russia and Europe must identify where their interests converge" and work toward "partnership," "political cooperation," and "political integration."

"Convergence" is a key theme of policy elites the world over, especially those associated with the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA), the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), World Policy Conference (WPC), Trilateral Commission (TC), Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (CEIP), and Bilderberg Conferences (BC). Mr. Ivanov, who was an apparatchik in the Soviet diplomatic corps and head of the Russian Security Council under Vladimir Putin, has been associated with all of the above-named organizations. He is a member of that growing body of "former" Communists who now unabashedly wear the globalist label and hobnob with billionaire Russian oligarchs, western corporate CEOs, Wall Street bankers, heads of the giant tax exempt foundations, and denizens of the elite think tanks.

Globalists march under a number of banners and code words to identify themselves and the global political-economic transformation they desire: globalism, globalization, global governance, internationalism, and new world order. In moments of candor and/or daring, some globalists unblushingly blurt out their true goal: world government.

Convergence, in the political and economic sense, although not a term familiar to or used by the average citizen, is central to the globalist program of world government and is commonly used in their higher circles to describe their policies. Convergence is the process by which the widespread political, economic, social, and cultural differences among disparate nations are gradually diminished so that they can be more comfortably merged together, first into supranational regional groupings, and then into a global government. All of this must be done by deception, naturally, since most peoples of the world, and Americans in particular, are not keen on being amalgamated into a global gulag presided over by the United Nations or any other worldly entity.]

https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/europe/item/13785-convergence-globalists-push-russia-eu-merger

Meanwhile, the warnings of the most authoritative and prescient critic of convergence, Anatoliy Golitsyn, go unmentioned and unheeded by our elected leaders in both major parties. Mr. Golitsyn, a former top-level KGB operative in the inner circle of Kremlin convergence strategists, is arguably the most important Soviet insider ever to defect to the West. His two important books, New Lies for Old (1984) and The Perestroika Deception (1995) have proven so extraordinarily accurate and so uniquely perceptive and prophetic that they should be required reading for all of our elected federal officials and all of our military, foreign policy, and economic professionals.

"The essence of the strategy," Golitsyn wrote of perestroika (Russian for "restructuring") convergence in The Perestroika Deception (page 10), "is to introduce a calculated and controlled false democratisation and to revive a discredited regime by giving it an attractive aspect and a 'human face.'" The probable impact on the West of this Soviet "reform," the Kremlin strategists correctly reasoned, "would be equal to or greater than that of the October Revolution," a reference to the original Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. In fact, Golitsyn posited that the impact of the convergence strategy would be even "greater and deeper because it would not be alarming but disarming for the West.... It might eventually lead to the realization of the final goal of Soviet strategy, namely the convergence of the capitalist West with the Communist East on Soviet terms and the creation of a World Government as a solution to the arms race and nuclear confrontation."

https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/foreign-policy/item/1202-us-russia-reset-the-convergence-agenda

CONVERGENCE STRATEGY EXPLAINED THE SCHOLARLY WAY

CONVERGENCE STRATEGY SIMPLIFIED AND ANIMATED

KREMLIN WONK DUGIN WORKS KGB/ZIONIST ALEX JONES TO PITCH THE NAZ-BOL VERSION OF GLOBALISM

One of the topics he want to get in for is post-globalism. Make no mistake - we are post this form of corporate global government. They are in major retreat. I'll use the analogy with the 1945 Germany few months before the final fall, when you know the Nazis are going to fall, but the question is: "How long will this go on?". The globalists are very similar to Nazis. The problem is - what are they going to do to try to keep power?

Well, Soros has doubled the amount of money for riots, they are training people in universities now, that are planning something big...

Mr. Putin and I, we defend the same position, we share the same concerns, we love our people. It is the same agenda that I hope Mr. Trump shares as well. And we all are blamed. It is not because we are bad or extremists, but it is because of our values and position.

In my book The Fourth Political Theory, I criticize three political theories. I am against liberalism, against globalism, and I am against communism. I am a traditionalist and Christian. I was a dissident in Soviet times because I never shared the conventions of communism, I didn't accept this illness. I am anti-communist and at the same time I am anti-Nazi, anti-fascist. I don't share this neo-racism. I am always standing on the same thing - I belong to the fourth political theory and when the liberal media tries to present me as an extremist or communist, that is an absolute lie...

Globalism is the problem of every country and every person. Russians as well are under attack by globalism. We need to be united. I believe that great "multipolarity" can lead to cooperation of our countries and our people. But we need to fight against our common enemies. We have to deal with Mr. Soros, who tried to overthrow our governments and tries to create a color revolution in our countries.

You need to understand that Russia is no longer a communist country. We can't apply old Cold War models. Russia is a traditional, Christian country just as well as America is. And radical Islam, supported by globalists, is our common enemy. What is also important about Russia is that we are hearing the voice of the people who are dying for our freedom and our security. I think it is necessary to hear what people from the army say. We are losing our guys fighting against radical Islamists.

http://katehon.com/article/alexander-dugins-interview-alex-jones

Having viewed the above in detail, it becomes clearer how Soros probably fits in to Convergence: he is controlled opposition in collaboration with KGB moles and penetration agents within the CIA.  From this position he can play boogeyman for the Kremlin while also luring potential dissidents into entrapment, and at the same time he can hammer away at the independence of Western nation states through destabilization, driving them in to the waiting arms of National Boshevism, which offers a vision of national survival solely on the collective and racial/ethnic basis, without essential human rights, and under the control of a surpra-national empire led by the Pssudotsargod Putin.