Build back better after bombing bombing bombing

[yankeedoodle]

Winter Oak Analysis: The 10 Signs That the Ukrainian War Is Part of the Great Reset Plan!
https://ioncoja.ro/propaganda-globalista/

Winter Oak is a British organization that has been concerned with globalization issues since its inception in 2013. They have probably drawn up the most complete picture of the dramatic consequences that the war in Ukraine will have on the whole world, a text which we present below:

As the pandemic accustomed the world to lockdowns, it turned normal acceptance of experimental medical treatment into normalcy, caused the largest transfer of wealth to large corporations while decimating Small and Medium Enterprises, and preparing the workforce for a cyber future. , another vector was needed to accelerate economic collapse so that the countries of the world could "build better".

Here are some ways in which the current conflict between Russia and Ukraine is becoming the next catalyst for the World Economic Forum's Great Reset agenda.

1. The war between Russia and Ukraine is already causing an unprecedented disruption to global supply chains, exacerbating fuel shortages and bringing inflation to new levels.

As geopolitical tensions turn into a protracted conflict between NATO and the China-Russia axis, a second economic contraction (after the one caused by the pandemic - n.tr.) risks throwing the world economy into stagnation. In the years to come, the combination of below-average economic growth and rampant inflation will force the lower class around the world to accept very short-term employment contracts and low-paying jobs in an increasingly stagnant world economy.

A new recession will exacerbate global resource hunger, reduce self-consumption, and significantly increase dependence on government subsidies. The impoverishment of an important part of the world labor force, which is looming on the horizon, could be the prelude to the adoption of a universal basic income, which will lead to a neo-feudal order, strongly stratified. As a result, the World Economic Forum's worrying prediction that by 2030, "we will have nothing and we will be happy" seems to be happening at an alarming rate.

2. The economic collapse caused by the war will lead to a dramatic reduction in the world's labor force.

The architects of the Great Reset have been anticipating this trend for many years. They will exploit the economic turmoil, driving the role of disruptive technologies to meet global challenges and fundamentally change traditional business models, forcing them to keep up with rapid technological change. Like the pandemic, disaster preparedness during the conflict will be based in particular on the desire to adopt specific technological innovations, both in the private and public spheres, so that future generations can meet the work requirements of the Great Reset.

A recurring theme in Klaus Schwab's Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution is that technological and scientific innovations will no longer be limited to the physical world around us, but will become extensions of ourselves. Schwab emphasizes the crucial importance of developing technologies for the next generation of the workforce and stresses the urgent need to rapidly promote projects to digitize many aspects of the global workforce through new technological solutions.

The promoters of the Great Reset want to manage geopolitical risks by creating new markets around digital innovations, e-strategies, teleworking, Artificial Intelligence (AI), robotics, nanotechnology, the Internet of Things and the Internet of Things. The dizzying speed with which AI technologies are imposed shows that optimizing such technologies will first impact traditional industries and professions, which provide a safety net for hundreds of millions of jobs: agriculture, retail, catering, courier.

However, automation in the form of robots, smart software and machine learning will not be limited to routine, repetitive and predictable jobs. Artificial Intelligence is on the verge of widespread automation of various white-collar jobs, especially in areas involving model processing and recognition, such as accounting, human resources, and middle management positions. While anticipating future employment trends is not an easy task, we can say with certainty that under the combined threat of pandemics and wars, the workforce is on the brink of unprecedented change.

The technology that reshapes logistics potentially threatens hundreds of millions of blue-and-white-collar jobs, leading to the largest and fastest job displacement in history, foreshadowing an unimaginable labor market shift to date. Although it has long been anticipated that increased use of technology in the private sector will lead to massive job losses, pandemic lockdowns and future disruptions caused by a war will accelerate this process.

Many companies will have no choice but to lay off staff en masse and replace them with creative technology solutions, just so that their business can survive. In other words, many of the jobs that will be lost in the coming years were already about to become useless and are unlikely to be recovered when things calm down.

3. The war has significantly reduced Europe's dependence on the Russian energy sector and strengthened the UN's Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the goal of "zero-zero" carbon emissions at the heart of the Great Reset.

Political factors promoting the Great Reset are using harsh sanctions against Russia to speed up the transition to "green" energy, reiterating the importance of "decarbonisation" as part of the "fight against climate change". However, I would be short-sighted if I assumed that the ultimate goal of the Great Reset is the equitable distribution of hydrogen and carbon-neutral, "green" synthetic fuels, which will replace gasoline and diesel.

UN goals are important for post-pandemic recovery, but they are crucial for transforming shareholder capitalism into a "stakeholder capitalism" promoted by Davos. In economic terms, "stakeholder capitalism" is a system in which governments are no longer the final arbiters of state policy, as unelected private corporations become de facto rulers of society. They take direct responsibility for addressing the world's social, economic and environmental issues through macroeconomic cooperation and a multi-stakeholder model of global governance.

In such an economic and political construction, asset-owning conglomerates can redirect capital flows by aligning investments with the UN SDGs and setting them up in a compatible Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance (ESG) so that they can create new international markets based on the disaster and poverty of hundreds of millions of people severely affected by the economic collapse caused by the war.

The war therefore gives a huge boost to governments promoting the Great Reset to pursue energy independence, shape markets for "green and inclusive growth" and, finally, move people to a so-called "cap-and-reset" system. -trade "to limit emissions through government regulations, also known as the carbon credit economy. This will lead to the decentralization of power, placing it in the hands of the new "stakeholder capitalists" for some fairer and greener goals, using misleading slogans like Build Back Better without sacrificing the capitalist imperative of permanent economic growth.

4. The food shortage created by the war will decisively favor the synthetic biology industry, as the convergence of digital technologies with materials science and biology will radically transform the agricultural sector and encourage the adoption of herbal alternatives or synthetic laboratory products on a global scale. .

Russia and Ukraine are both world granaries, and severe shortages of cereals, fertilizers, vegetable oils and essential foods will lead to an explosive increase in the importance of biotechnology for food security and sustainability, giving rise to several meat imitation start-ups. , similar to "Impossible Foods", funded by Bill Gates. Thus, we can expect even greater regulation leading to a dramatic overhaul of industrial food production and cultivation, which will ultimately benefit agricultural businesses and biotech investors. Feeding systems will be redesigned using new technologies to develop "sustainable" proteins and genetically modified CRISPR patented crops.

5. The exclusion of Russia from the SWIFT (Society for World Interbank Financial Telecommunications) foreshadows an economic reset that could generate exactly the kind of setback needed to take large parts of the world's population into a technocratic control network.

According to many experts, the coalition between SWIFT, CHIPS (The Clearing House Interbank Payments System) and the US dollar against Russia will only stimulate geopolitical rivals, such as China, to accelerate the dollarization process. The main beneficiary of economic sanctions against Russia appears to be China, which can reshape the Eurasian market by encouraging Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS member states to bypass the SWIFT system and adopt cross-border payments in Digital Yuan.

While the demand for cryptocurrencies will increase massively, this phenomenon is likely to encourage many governments to increasingly regulate the system through public blockchains and impose a multilateral ban on decentralized cryptocurrencies. The transition to crypto could be the rehearsal before the adoption of the programmable money, overseen by the government regulatory body.

This will lead to an even greater accumulation of power in the hands of the very powerful world technocracy, thus sealing our enslavement by financial institutions. This war is likely to bring currencies to parity, foreshadowing a new Bretton Woods, which promises to radically transform international banking and macroeconomic cooperation by adopting the future digital currencies of central banks.

6. This war marks a major turning point in globalist dreams for a new, strictly rules-based international order anchored in Eurasia.

As the "father of geopolitics" Halford Mackinder put it, more than a century ago, the emergence of all world hegemony over the past 500 years was made possible by the domination of Eurasia. This causal link between geography and power has not gone unnoticed by the global network of "stakeholder capitalists" represented by the World Economic Forum. Many of them anticipated the transition to a multipolar era and the return to a fiercer struggle between the great powers, amid declining American political and economic influence and a pressing need for what technocrats call "smart globalization."

As America desperately tries to cling to its superpower status, China's economic rise and Russia's regional ambitions threaten to overturn Eurasia's strategic axial points (Western Europe and Asia Pacific). The region where until recently America enjoyed an indisputable hegemonic position is no longer free from cracks today and it is possible to witness a change of guard capable of dramatically changing global power relations. China's ambitious Belt and Road Initiative (BIS) already had the potential to unify Asia, Africa and Europe, shaking the world's balance of power.

The recent invasion of Ukraine will now have huge consequences for rail transport between China and Europe. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has said that Ukraine could become a BIS gateway to Europe. We cannot ignore China's huge stake in the Ukraine conflict, just as we cannot ignore NATO's ambitions to curb China's rise in the region by limiting sales of Ukrainian assets to Beijing and doing everything in its power to thwart the new Silk Road. As sanctions push Russia to strengthen bilateral ties with China and full integration with the BIS, a pan-Eurasian trade bloc could be the realignment that would force a common governance of the world community and a reset of the era of American exceptionalism.

7. As speculation about the long-term impact of the war on bilateral trade flows between China and Europe increases, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine will bring even greater international importance to Israel.

Israel is a very attractive BIS market for China, and the communist regime is aware of the importance of Israel as a strategic outpost linking the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean Sea through the Gulf of Suez. In addition, the Chinese government has for many years recognized the importance of Israel as a global technology hub and used Israel's innovation capabilities to meet its own strategic goals. Therefore, the mediation of Israeli Prime Minister Naphtali Bennett between Moscow and Kyiv is likely to take into account the role of the BIS in expanding China's and Israel's regional and global strategic influence.

Israel's position as one of the major technology centers of the future and the gateway between Europe and the Middle East is inextricably linked to the physical infrastructure network (roads, railways, ports and energy pipelines) built by China over the past decade. Already a major power in automotive technology, robotics and cybersecurity, Israel aspires to a central role in the Millennial Kingdom, and Israeli start-up technology companies are set to play a key role in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.

The sharp strengthening of its relationship with China amid the Russia-Ukraine crisis could help propel Israel as a regional leader par excellence, with Jerusalem becoming the center of much of the world's economic and technological power. Israel's intense efforts to diversify its exports and investments, emancipating itself from the United States, raise a fundamental question. Is Israel preparing to divest its security interests from the United States and bet on the China-Russia Axis?

8. It is already well known that Digital Identity is a central element of the World Economic Forum's Great Reset Agenda and that it is to be implemented in industry, supply chains and markets as a way to promote the UN SDGs. for the year 2030 and to provide individualized and integrated services in the smart cities of the future.

Many have explained how such a platform can be used to achieve a global system of control and subjugation of the population, by incorporating humanity into a corporate value chain, in which citizens are labeled as commodities for investors in ESG and Human Capital actions, and are given a social and climate score based on how they comply with the UN SDGs.

This ongoing verification of people and connected devices, in smart environments, can only take place if our biometric data, health records, finances, studies, consumption habits, carbon footprint, and the full amount of human experiences are stored in -an interoperable database to determine our compliance with the UN Objectives, thus forcibly causing a colossal change in our social contract. Vaccination passports have been adopted through public-private partnerships as an access point to Digital Identity.

Now that such a logic has begun, how can current geopolitical tensions help accelerate the application of this fundamental element in the future digital system? Ukraine has traditionally been called the granary of Europe and, together with Russia, is a major supplier of grain. That is why war has all the elements of a black swan for goods and for inflation. With a global economy on the brink of collapse due to the global supply crisis, post-war economic earthquakes will trigger emergencies around the world and people will be told to prepare for rationalization.

Once this is done, the multilateral adoption of the Digital Identity, as an interface with the digital currencies of the Central Bank, can be presented as a solution for the efficient management and distribution of rations in a state of emergency. The Bank of England has already announced the prospects of programmable ice bananas, which can only be spent on products considered essential or products that a manufacturer or the government considers reasonable, worth buying.

Once the issuer of the money is given control over how it is spent by the recipient, this system will become almost impossible to operate without a Digital Identity, which will become mandatory to receive food rations and obtain the basic means of subsistence. If food inflation continues to rise, governments will be able to introduce price controls in the form of rationalization, and rations will be able to be entered into blockchain registers on the digital ID to check our carbon footprint and consumption habits under the pretext state of emergency.

9. Europe will be at gunpoint against the background of the hybrid war between NATO and the China-Russia axis.

The danger of a cyber attack on banks and critical infrastructure, or even a limited tactical exchange of nuclear shots with intercontinental ballistic missiles, cannot be ignored. However, it is hard to believe that either side will ignore the risk of mutual destruction, so a thermonuclear apocalypse seems unlikely. However, the use of remote access technologies to erase SWIFT memory can make much of the world economy unusable, leading to the collapse of the dollar.

Should such a catastrophic event occur, it will automatically lead to the need to review the entire cybersecurity system. This would adopt a new global security protocol, according to which all citizens must have a Digital Identity as a measure of national security. It is easy to imagine how access to the Internet or public services, after a nationwide cyber attack, will force citizens to massively accept a digital identity in order to authenticate that their online activities and transactions are carried out by a legitimate source, and not the enemy.

10. The economic effects of this war will be so catastrophic that governments and the public sector will need a major injection of private capital to cover the funding gap.

This will make the traditional separation of powers between central banking institutions and governments obsolete, as the former will have an overwhelming position of influence in establishing the budgetary directions of nation states. The sovereignty of the latter will be permanently compromised by the control of governments by central banks and hedge funds.

As a result, the model of sovereign nation-states is further undermined by a global technocracy, consisting of an unelected consortium of industry leaders, central bank oligarchs, and private financial institutions, most of which are private non-state actors. which seeks to restructure global governance and participate in decision-making.

Therefore, the future of international relations and the social, economic and political transformation that the world is currently undergoing as a result of the pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian war will not be decided through multilateralism and the representatives of sovereign states. On the contrary, they will be decided through a network of multiple partnerships, motivated by opportunism, and which are not accountable to any electorate, nor have any responsibility to any state, and for which notions such as sovereignty or international law are empty words.