Günther Anders - freedom-killing jewish "philosopher"

Started by yankeedoodle, January 08, 2023, 12:50:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

yankeedoodle

QuoteMan's freedom and his central position in the world thus become obsolete (obsolete, expired), their place being taken by technology and its process of autonomy in relation to the human creator.

[...]

We will occupy the spirits with what is vain and playful. It is good with incessant chatter and music, to keep the mind from wondering, thinking, reflecting.

We will put sexuality at the forefront of human interests. As a social anesthetic, there is nothing better. We shall generally take care to drive seriousness out of existence, to make fun of everything of high value, to maintain a constant plea for levity; so that the euphoria of advertising, of consumption, becomes the standard of human happiness and the model of freedom.

[...]

Any doctrine that challenges the system must first be branded as subversive and terrorist, and those who support it must then be treated as such.

Jidanii: "We will put sexuality at the forefront of human interests"
https://www.incorectpolitic.com/jidanii-vom-pune-sexualitatea-pe-primul-plan-al-intereselor-umane/

MECHANICALLY TRANSLATED FROM ROMANIAN

Günther Anders (1902-1992) was a Jewish-German philosopher, journalist, essayist and poet, author of the concept of the "philosophy of the gap". According to his theory, the first industrial revolution in the middle of the 19th century consisted in the emergence of the technical principle by which human activity is guided: to produce, with the help of machines, other machines or technical parts. The second industrial revolution takes place when man becomes a mere means or instrument in the production of machines by machines. And the third industrial revolution, which marks the tendency of the world to become technical and of technique to become the world itself, establishes technical possibilities as imperatives of achievement: what is technically possible is automatically legitimate and must necessarily be put into practice. From this point of view, Anders' examples refer to the atomic bomb, artificial insemination, cloning, human engineering of all kinds (biological and genetic). Man's freedom and his central position in the world thus become obsolete (obsolete, expired), their place being taken by technology and its process of autonomy in relation to the human creator. Therefore, man's faculty of production exceeds, through his achievements, his imagination, his sensitivity and his ability to understand what he has produced. His main books were: his sensitivity and ability to understand what he produced. His main books were: his sensitivity and ability to understand what he produced. His main books were: "The obsolescence of man. Volume I. About the soul in the era of the second industrial revolution" ,  "Obsolescence of man. Volume II. On the Destruction of Life in the Age of the Third Industrial Revolution'  and  'Philosophical Shorthands' . They were also translated into Romanian. The text below was written by Günther Anders in 1956.

To quell any uprising in advance, it is important not to do so violently. Archaic methods like Hitler's are clearly outdated. It is enough to create a collective conditioning so strong that the very idea of ​​revolt does not exist. More to come. For people's minds. The ideal would be to train individuals from birth by limiting their innate biological aptitudes...

Then we would continue to condition by drastically reducing the level and quality of education, to bring it back to a form of professional integration. An uneducated individual has only a limited horizon of thought, and the more his thought is limited to material, mediocre concerns, the less he can revolt. We must ensure that access to knowledge becomes increasingly difficult and elitist... that the gap widens between people and science, that information intended for the general public is anesthetized by any subversive content. Especially without philosophy. Again, it is necessary to use persuasion and not direct violence: we will massively broadcast, through television, astonishing entertainment, always flattering the emotional, the instinctive.

We will occupy the spirits with what is vain and playful. It is good with incessant chatter and music, to keep the mind from wondering, thinking, reflecting.

We will put sexuality at the forefront of human interests. As a social anesthetic, there is nothing better. We shall generally take care to drive seriousness out of existence, to make fun of everything of high value, to maintain a constant plea for levity; so that the euphoria of advertising, of consumption, becomes the standard of human happiness and the model of freedom.

The conditioning will thus produce such an integration of the self that the only fear (that will have to be maintained) will be that of being excluded from the system and therefore of not being able to access the material conditions necessary for happiness. The common man, thus produced, must be treated as what he is: a product, a calf, and must be watched as a herd should be. Anything that allows his lucidity to fall asleep, his critical mind is socially good, what would risk awakening him must be fought, ridiculed, stifled...

Any doctrine that challenges the system must first be branded as subversive and terrorist, and those who support it must then be treated as such.