Eustace Mullins, the 'jew' hating liar?

[Anonymous]

OMG we have all been duped!  The Fed isn't as Eustace and others claim it to be!  We must all beg for redemption and renounce our false actualities!

http://activistnyc.wordpress.com/2007/1 ... ve-system/

http://truthaction.org/forum/viewtopic. ... c&start=30

[memory hole]

Eustase you big 'ol anti-semite, stop telling the truth man! lol xxx

[Ralph Furely]

funny that im seeing this thread.  eustace popped into my head just two days ago, i was revisiting some of daryls old interviews with him.
i wish eustace was my grandfather.

[kolnidre]

I want to have a son and name him Eustace.

The bankster research aside, his work on the medical conspiracy alone is essential. PDF files of Murder by Injection can be found online with a little work.

[Canard]

theres a video for that one too, i recommend it its about 25 years old..

[Anonymous]

Anyone know how to contact Mr. Mullins to buy his books?  I can't seem to find shit on the net for a contact... I want to buy them from him so he gets the moolah!

[Ralph Furely]

DBS probably still has his contact info.  as does Mike (prothink).  
or u could call up the fbi whos had him under surveillance for the past 25 yrs, im sure theyd have his number as well

[Anonymous]

Bill Cooper reads some Eustace and others

P.S.  Eustace is a Semite, most likely jewish, but maybe not, Although I can't confirm this. This was stated by Rick Adams to Eustace

[Anonymous]

If he is 'Jewish', AWESOME!  If not, its still ok

Do you mean instead:

"This was stated by Eustace to Rick Adams"

If not, who is Rick Adams to tell someone they are a Semite?  Logically, Eustace would be the one to tell Rick about himself... no?

[Canard]

Anyone know how to contact Mr. Mullins to buy his books?  I can't seem to find shit on the net for a contact... I want to buy them from him so he gets the moolah!

http://eustacemullins.blogspot.com/

[kolnidre]

Anyone know how to contact Mr. Mullins to buy his books?  I can't seem to find shit on the net for a contact... I want to buy them from him so he gets the moolah!

http://eustacemullins.blogspot.com/

That site hasn't been updated in a long time.

I'm looking for a copy of The Curse of Canaan. I have only found brief excerpts.

And like some other posters, I don't care a whit if Eustace is Jewish or from Venus. I judge him by his work. If not for the work of those born as "Jews" there would hardly be anything written about what the Talmudists really think and teach.

I think what Rick Adams means is that followers of Christ are the true Israelites. Based on my reading of scripture I understand that point of view, which Michael A. Hoffman II also seems to proffer.

[Anonymous]

If he is 'Jewish', AWESOME!  If not, its still ok

Do you mean instead:

"This was stated by Eustace to Rick Adams"

If not, who is Rick Adams to tell someone they are a Semite?  Logically, Eustace would be the one to tell Rick about himself... no?

Rick said the adl call you an anti-semite, but in fact you are a semite. and eustace agreed. I was trying to figure out what this was all about. But I suspect it is british-israelism which makes a whole bunch of sense.

if you have watched tv or movies from hollywood, you have been judized so in a sense we are all jewish.

I want to know exactly what was meant by that Rick Adams statement. If it is that the white race are the true Israelites, then that is British-Israelism.

just want to know where people providing so much information are coming from.

I would just say that Rick Adam's Walt Disney story makes a whole lot of sense now if indeed Rick is a British-Israelite.

I guess I am just getting the feeling that a pogrom is within our midsts, and history shows that the pogroms of the early 20th century orchestrated to get jews to migrate to the US in order to get Wilson voted into office, so the bankers could get their federal reserve act passed and income tax act passed to secure the debt. Just wondering where they will be driven to next. This is assuming that majority of Jewish criminals are an administrative class and the top dogs hide behind the jews, be they jewish or not.

currently as I see it there are two factions at work, working together, and the only contention is who will ascend to the thrown. There was a third group[The old world order] but they lost power after ww2 and were infiltrated shortly there after and will merge with the victor at the end.

[kolnidre]

I don't believe Mullins' and Adams' considering and/or referring to themselves as 'semites' (or as 'true israelites') has to do with British-israelism at all, but that they are believers and followers of Christ (or something to that effect) - although I could be wrong...

That's my take on it, too.

What's Adams' Disney story? I'm not familiar with that one. I listen to Adams mostly for infotainment because I find him charming, but not too informative.

[Anonymous]

Rick Adams on uncle walt

viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1485

[Anonymous]

Anyone know how to contact Mr. Mullins to buy his books?  I can't seem to find shit on the net for a contact... I want to buy them from him so he gets the moolah!

http://eustacemullins.blogspot.com/

There doesn't seem to be any contact info, but thanks for the effort

[Anonymous]

I don't believe Mullins' and Adams' considering and/or referring to themselves as 'semites' (or as 'true israelites') has to do with British-israelism at all, but that they are believers and followers of Christ (or something to that effect) - although I could be wrong...

Well that reasoning is still lame as hell just as much as British-Israelism... laughable.  I hope Eustace was just being nice, rather than get into a pointless debate over it, or took it as a jest towards those who consider themselves 'Jews'.

[Roy Hobs]

I wish this thread would/could get back on point.  The original Post was spotlighting an article written by someone who is challenging the popular thought regarding the Federal Reserve.  Implying such statements as the Federal Reserve is Private is just a myth and how the Federal Reserve collects interest off of private sector borrowing is also a myth.

I don't know enough about the specific details of how the Fed system works.  The Economic and Financial jargon is beyond my expertise......although I'm trying to catch up.  

I bring all of this up and encourage this thread to get back on point and handle the nature of the original argument.  I recently had a run in with a Sheep and brought up the Federal Reserve.  This particular person challenged me with some questions/facts that I wasn't able to address at the time.

So..................Could a few of you/us read the article in question and then try to rebute the statements/arguments made?


I will include the article/statement made in this Post.  I will also BOLD those questions/statements that I would like some more information on.  

Here is the article which challenges Eustace and the popular thought regarding the Federal Reserve:

"The Federal Reserve was created in attempt to solve the economic crises which had occurred in earlier years and the Rothschilds had nothing to do with this. That's a popular legend among conservatives that has no basis in reality. First of all, the US economy has always been predicated upon private interests. While there was still room for settler expansion in the West the social tensions of capitalism had a release valve. If you didn't like your boss in the east you went out west and took a calculated business risk, hoping that you wouldn't be scalped by an Indian before the build-up of new settler populations in the west caused tensions to explode in a new war which resulted in US expansion and new opportunties for economic development.

During this time-period the concept of a money system was in a total flux. Every new state that was occupied opened up territory where traditional banks were reluctant to enter initially. The result was that people would open up banks in the West using reserves that amounted to 1 in 20,000 or so of what they were asserting as credit. During this time the US Congress pretty much did nothing. A myth has evolved which portrays the US Congress as somehow supervising the money process up until 1913. If anything the reverse comes closer to the truth.

The establishment of the Federal Reserve set up a monetary system controlled by the Board of Governors which is appointed and approved by the President and the Senate. Whatever the flaws in the current system, it has much more the makings of a finance system subject to official overview than what was practiced in the Free Banking Era.

The myth of the Federal Reserve as a "private bank" stems from the varying usages of the term "shareholder." In conventional usage, "shares" refer to something which can be freely sold at anytime on the stock market. If a company whose shares are bought and sold freely on the stock exchange commits the error of upsetting one of its major shareholders then that shareholder can sell their own privately held shares on the stock exchange. When this occurs it may be taken as a signal by people watching the stock exchange that the company is going under and this can set off a chain of sellouts among all shareholders and thereby drive the company into bankruptcy. Under such circumstances the management of the company needs to make certain that none of its large shareholders becomes so upset as to do this.

None of that has any relation to the occasional misusage of the term "shareholder" as it is sometimes applied to the Federal Reserve. This term seems to be used on occasion in reference to the member banks (which by law includes all national banks) in any of the different Federal Reserve banks. No one from any of these member banks has any regulatory authority over the Board of Governors which the President and Senate appoint and approve. Even if a regional bank which was not required by law to belong to one of the Federal Reserve banks decided that it wished to withdraw from the Federal Reserve System, they do not possess any option of "selling private shares on the stock exchange" or anything else that is implied by the term "shareholder."

People who know nothing about Federal Reserve auditings might benefit from reviewing the auditing report of 2006 at:

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/rptcongres...

People may also find it useful to review some of the statistics for 2006.

http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/rptcongres...

In particular, one should note that $29,051,678 were rebated to the US Treasury by the Federal Reserve. You'll notice that the initial income for 2006 of the Federal Reserve was at $38,410,427. Then we have:

Net Expenses: $3,263,844

Net Deductions: $158,846

Board Expenditures: $301,014

Costs of Currency: $491,962

This leaves us then with a net income of about $34,194,761 of which about 85% was rebated to the Treasury. Now maybe one can charge that the costs should have been further reduced so as to return a higher percentage to the Treasury. Fine. But this is not the principal cause of the US national debt. Anyone who tries telling you that is playing a hoax.

The roaring national debt of the United States which took off to the sky with Ronald Reagan is not a consequence of the Federal Reserve charging anyone any interest. It is a consequence of the US Government going off on mad spending sprees for the Pentagon and similar agencies while the productive activity in the US economy slides and taxation on the wealthy is cut. This can only be done by taking out loans, though not in general from the Federal Reserve, and no doubt such loans do include interest charges as well. But the Federal Reserve System is not the cause of those rising debts and any other system would have to generate huge debts for a government which behaves as the US Government has for these last several decades.

The US debt has almost nothing to do with the Federal Reserve. The major portion of Federal Reserve earnings are restored to the US Treasury. The US debt has mushroomed simply because the US economy has steadily turned away from productive activity, taxes on the rich have been steadily cut, and all of this has gone on while the US Government has rung up huge expenditures on foreign intervention over several decades. Nothing can change the fact that such policies do run up enormous debt. The Federal Reserve can't change that.

The Federal Reserve System already does give back most of its interest profits to the US Treasury. It's been that way from the beginning when the Federal Reserve was first founded. It's a hokey myth which denies the fact that the Federal Reserve has always operated according to the pattern of deducting a certain portion of operating costs and then returning its major portion of profit to the public treasury. The national debt does not come from Federal Reserve interest collections, that's a fact. The wasteful expenses run up by US interventionism also have nothing to do with the Federal Reserve or any interest which it makes off of its bonds. Those expenses come from the fact that US interventionism has been carried out to protect capitalist interests based in the USA just as the arms race was also used as a way of generating business for the airplane industry. Very little of this has much bearing on banks per se and almost none of it has anything to do with the Federal Reserve.

[Canard]

Anyone know how to contact Mr. Mullins to buy his books?  I can't seem to find shit on the net for a contact... I want to buy them from him so he gets the moolah!

http://eustacemullins.blogspot.com/

That site hasn't been updated in a long time.

I'm looking for a copy of The Curse of Canaan. I have only found brief excerpts.

And like some other posters, I don't care a whit if Eustace is Jewish or from Venus. I judge him by his work. If not for the work of those born as "Jews" there would hardly be anything written about what the Talmudists really think and teach.

I think what Rick Adams means is that followers of Christ are the true Israelites. Based on my reading of scripture I understand that point of view, which Michael A. Hoffman II also seems to proffer.

True that site is old, but that guy claimed contact with EM, so I figured i'd up it just in case, looks like you can get in touch with him via myspace i've been meaning to read curse of canaan for a while myself.  good luck, let me know what you think of it,

[Anonymous]

1:

The Federal Reserve was created in attempt to solve the economic crises which had occurred in earlier years and the Rothschilds had nothing to do with this.

This person ignores how this implied 'natural' crisis occurred, and who was behind it.  They also ignore the deception in the attempt to pass the Aldrich-(other name I forget) Bill which was later modified slightly and changed to another name that was more appealing: The Federal Reserve Act (I believe), and who was behind getting this new legislation into government.  Look into the Jekyll Island secret meeting where this was brainstormed, and then follow the names to their masters.  You end up with Rothschild as an important player.

2:

The myth of the Federal Reserve as a "private bank" stems from the varying usages of the term "shareholder."

Here it is an attempt to confuse or obfuscate the true meaning of the why it is private.  It is not about it not being private or 'shareholder' based that is sold in public market that makes it private.  It is about the individual interests that own the bank that make it private.  Just because these shares do not go onto the open market and blah blah bullshit the rest of the paragraph states, does not make it any less private, and NON FEDERAL.

3:

The roaring national debt of the United States which took off to the sky with Ronald Reagan is not a consequence of the Federal Reserve charging anyone any interest

Federal Reserve System is not the cause of those rising debts

The US debt has almost nothing to do with the Federal Reserve.

These are all attempts to deceive those who do not know the arguments against the F.Reserve to accept that we base it on some delusion that the Fed causes debt... who the hell has ever stated that?  Classic deception.  The government creates debt, but the money is created via the Fed, which is owed back to it.  The interest is where the real money is made.  You create money from nothing, when it gets paid back, it goes back to nothing.  The interest is not part of the original money owed, it is new money that is made that does not disappear back into the void when the original debt is paid.  As long as their is debt, their is interest to pay, and the private owners of the Fed system bank it in their pockets.  The interest has to come from outside of the borrowed money (logically) if there is any hope of repaying the complete debt.  If you borrow to pay of the debt (borrows money) and interest, you dig a deeper hole.

Watch 'Money as Debt' to see how this system of debt+interest leads to siphoning the wealth of people and a musical chair scenario.

I had posted this as more or less or a joke to show how stupid some people are, where they use deception and character assassination techniques to attempt to discredit someones work. -->  'Eustace is anti-'Semite', so don't trust his work!'

If someone speaks truth but is a murderer (which Eustace is not, just an analogy), does their truth become lies?  The use of the term anti-Semite is a tactic to character assassinate someone which is more effective than 'racist' in our days and effectively blocks anyone who buys into the emotional appeal from accepting information from the person they now falsely perceive to be evil in some way, to dislike Eustace.

Peace.