The crimes of the Old Testament – ​​a Jewish political fantasy

[yankeedoodle]

The crimes of the Old Testament – ​​a Jewish political fantasy,
but also a motivational doctrine for future crimes .
https://www.incorectpolitic.com/crimele-vechiului-testament-o-fantasma-politica-iudaica-dar-si-o-doctrina-motivationala-pentru-crime-viitoare/

And through the " Prayer of Jacob ", he " strengthened himself " with the angel of God,
like Jesus, and did not " fight " with him, another Jewish fantasy .

Cornel-Dan NICULAE

(1. the chapter published in 2003 and then self-censored of the book

"The Invisible War of the Zionist Jews with the Romanians";

2. mea culpa and motivation: Jewish myths are lies)

—

Hate from the Old Testament - phantasms imposed as a norm:

To be a Zionist Jew, from the point of view and the experience of the majority of peoples who hosted the Children of Israel, means to belong to a selfish spiritual filiation, which metaphysically (i.e. irrationally) motivates the individuals of the group and the group as a whole, to acquire the goods the other peoples, considered inferior. Indeed, the essence of the religion of the Jews is the belief that they are so great that they defeated even God in the past, hence taking the name of Israel and thus obtaining the divine right (the "Covenant or "Testament" with which God binds to them) to rule over the whole world and over the other peoples. Pursuing this desire with perseverance, they think that today they are closer than ever to the fulfillment of Jehovah-God's covenant.

The ancient Jews came from the Mesopotamian city of Ur, from where, organized into the twelve tribes, they left driven by hunger. From Ur they arrived in the Land and then they arrived in Egypt, where they multiplied so much that they even exceeded the number of the Egyptian population. In the conditions in which famine was also affecting Egypt, thanks to the man of the Jews, Joseph, who had been placed among the Egyptians for decades and became the trusted man (banker and prime minister) of the pharaoh, the Israeli nation receives the use of the most fruitful Egyptian territory, namely the land Ramses, to take care of the shepherd.

Meanwhile, as shown in the Book of Genesis (chap. 47), the native Egyptian population was ruined and, through the intercession of the Jew Joseph, Pharaoh's man, he lost all his lands and became enslaved to Pharaoh as a slave. Although a privileged class, their last leader, Moses, being raised as a princely scion in the palace of the Pharaohs, but indulging in killing Egyptians, the biblical Jews (Semites, that is, drawing from Shem, the son of Noah) later claimed that they had were those enslaved by the Egyptians, and that, desiring freedom, they had to leave in the Exodus, wandering for 40 years in the desert. We are inclined to believe that the Semitic Jews had become an unbearable burden for the Egyptians, whom they had overwhelmed due to their good living, and who had expelled them, pushing them out of Egypt. This reality results from the Jewish sources themselves: "And the children of Israel were born in great numbers and multiplied, grew and multiplied, grew and became very, very strong, and the land was filled with them. But another king arose over Egypt, who had not known Joseph. He said to his people: Behold, the nation of the children of Israel is a great multitude and is stronger than us" (Exodus, Chap. 1, v. 7-9).

40 years after the expulsion from Egypt, the Semitic Jews occupied the territory of today's Palestine, forming the ancient Jewish state of Judea, by decimating the native population.

In the unfolding of this historical moment, the religious dogma of the original Jews (Semites) was particularly important, as the engine of their actions a few thousand years ago, motivated by Jewish prophets. They illustrate what a wild, barbaric religion means, which has managed to survive to this day all attempts at emancipation by the messengers of a luminous divinity. The significance of the coming of Jesus Christ among the Jews consists especially in calling them to a New Covenant (of love, love and spiritual light), superior to the Old Covenant (selfish, privileged and stained with blood). That is why the books of the Bible themselves are divided into two large parts: those belonging to the Old Testament and those of the New Testament. But what could be done by those who thought that through their ancestor they defeated God himself, than to kill the messenger of a New Covenant, the Son of God! They still hold to a Pact denounced as null by the luminous forces of the Divine, who through all the religions inspired by the Holy Spirit preach peace and equality between people.

We know that Jewish traditions know of a multitude of angelic and demonic beings, all generically called "angels", Jewish Kaballah developing a true "theology" in this sense. We have always wondered who Jacob, the biblical ancestor of the Jews, actually fought with, because the Bible itself proves to us the impossibility of that person being God.

Here are the facts! The First Book of the Old Testament, Genesis , shows that "Jacob was left alone, and a man fought with him until the breaking of dawn. However, seeing that he could not snatch him, the man touched the joint of his thigh and injured the joint of Jacob's thigh, while he was fighting with him. And he said to Jacob: Let me go, for the dawn has broken. Lacob answered him: I will not leave you until you bless me! And that man asked him: What is your name? And he answered: Jacob. He said to him: From now on your name will no longer be Jacob, but you will be called Israel, because you fought with God and with people and came out victorious!"; "And Jacob named that place Peniel, meaning the face of God, because he said to himself: I saw God face to face and my name was saved" (Genesis, Chapter 32, verses 24-28, 30).

On this story, we will give the floor to the monk Neophyte, who 200 years ago wrote: "So far are the words of the Holy Scripture, and by these words, I am very surprised. One that first says: that first a man fought with Jacob, and finally he says: "I saw God face to face" and let him live; since God himself says to Moses (Exodus, ch. 33, verse 20): "That man cannot see My face and live". In the same way, the Savior [Jesus Christ] says: no one has seen God, except only the Son".

We will also wonder, like Neophyte, at the angel's request not to be caught by the dawn of day, wondering what kind of angel or god can be the one who flees from the light of the sun. The Jewish exegetes commented on the "enigma" in that "god" did not want the day to come precisely so that his face would not be seen, but this is blatantly refuted by the Bible, because as we have seen, the very place of the battle was named by Jacob , Face of God (Peniel).

A series of Jewish prophets addressed the people of Israel in the name of God, making the greatest promises to them, as if from the divinity:

"For you will go to the right and to the left and your tribe will conquer the nations, and the desolate cities will be filled with people" (Old Testament, Isaiah, L1V,3);

"When you cross the Jordan into the land of Canaan, drive out from you all the inhabitants..., take possession of the land and settle there, for I am giving you this land as a possession... unless you drive out from you the inhabitants of the land ... I will do to you what I was going to do to them" (Old Testament, Numbers 33, 51-56);

"Behold, I begin to give you Sihon the Arnorite, king of Heshbon, and his land; begins to rule his land. At that time I took all his cities, men, women and children, and I did not leave anyone alive" (Old Testament, Numbers).

The boundless cruelty of the Jews and their god (of whom Goethe said that he is the mirror of the soul of the Jews), can be seen from the history of the conquests of the small kingdoms in their "promised land" and which had never belonged to them, nor to their ancestors, it can be seen especially from the episode of the destruction of the Lerihonul fortress, described in the Old Testament, "The Book of Ioșua Navi". We will note in this history the antiquity of the profession of espionage among the Jews (we could even say the beginnings of the Israeli special intelligence service, the famous and unscrupulous Mossad) which, amazingly, claims itself in this way also from God, who would have urged Moses and Joshua to send spies to the cities that were to be destroyed. However, it does not appear from anywhere in the Old Testament that these spies were used for anything, because, further on, in the same Scripture it is said that the victories would have been obtained by the Jews exclusively due to the indications given by God. Moreover, if we admit that God was talking with Joshua, did He not have the power to give the Jews the necessary vital information? There is a contradiction somewhere! The boasting of the Jews caused them to be caught lying even in their own scriptures: they are very good spies, but God provides them with information.

But let's see the cruelties the Jews indulged in since the beginning of their history, a fact for which we must recognize their "merit" (!) of inventing both the genocide and the holocaust :

"Then Joshua, the son of Navi, secretly sent two young men from Sittim to spy out the country and especially Jericho. And the two young men chose themselves and, arriving at Jericho, they entered the house of a harlot, whose name was Rahab, and they remained to rest there... All the Jewish people entered the city of Jericho, each one from his side, and they took the city. And he stabbed everything that was in the city: men and women and young and old and oxen and sheep and donkeys, all passed through the edge of the sword... And the city and everything that was in it burned with fire ; only the gold and silver and the copper and iron vessels they took..." (Old Testament, Joshua, Chap. 2, v. 1; Chap. 6, v. 20, v. 21, v. 24).

After the feat at Jericho, with the smell of spilled blood still fresh in their senses, the Jews are urged by their god, they say, to descend upon the land of Ai: "And you shall do to Ai and its king all that you did to Lerihon and with his king. Only his prey and his livestock among you. Put people in ambush behind the city... And those from the city came out to meet them, so that the Aithites were in the middle of the Israelite camp, some of whom came from one side and others from another. And they killed them so that not one of them escaped alive. And they captured the king of Ai alive and took him to the dungeon. After the children of Israel had killed all the men of Ai, the Israelites all returned to the city of Ai and struck it with the edge of the sword...And Joshua did not let down his hand, which he had stretched out with the spear, until he had destroyed all the inhabitants of Ai. Only the cattle and the spoils of the city were divided by the children of Israel among themselves..." (Old Testament, Joshua, Chapter 8, v.2, v.22-28).

The crime and robbery continued until they destroyed 31 kings and their peoples, slaughtering the population of the five cities of the Arnorean people, including the city of Jerusalem, as described in the Old Testament, "The Book of Joshua". In their obsession to motivate their crimes by the divine will, the Jews were not shy to report that in their [the Israelites'] fight with the Arnorites, God would have stopped the sun in the sky at Joshua's request, so that they would have time to kill all his enemies. "On that same day Joshua captured the city of Macheda and struck it with the sword, it and its king, and destroyed its inhabitants and all the breath that was in it; he spared no one from death...", it continues (Joshua, Ch. 10, v. 28),

And so, city after city, the OLD TESTAMENT (The Book of Losua) glorifies crime. The fortress of Libna: "Joshua put it and all the breath in it through the edge of the sword."

The fortress of Lachish: she and all her breath were put to the sword. And so on, without stopping, fortress after fortress! lar on the people of the Canaanites, Joshua, the leader, " He killed them until there was not one left..., he cut off the legs of their horses and burned their chariots with fire. Also then, returning, Joshua took Hathor and killed its king with the sword... And killed all the breath in it with the sword, giving it to destruction... All the spoils of their cities and all the cattle were taken by the children of Israel for them, and they killed the people with the sword, cursed them and did not leave a single soul among them". We cannot help but think that the population of those 31 small kingdoms, killed in the name of a cruel god, never had a chance before History to claim the genocide to which the Israelites were subjected, to claim at least the fanatical crime of which they fell victim even the infant from the mother's breast, instead today the Jews are the ones who declare themselves world victims, not accepting peace with the rest of the peoples, whom they can only see as inferior to the "people of Israel" and meant to be finally dominated by he.

*

The destruction of the others " little by little " and the Jewish Diaspora

In their actions of appropriation, the Jews have always felt motivated by their own scriptures, considered holy. Thus, in the Old Testament, "Deuteronomy", it is clearly said by "God" that he offers them this privileged status, directly addressing the people of Israel and offering them "great and beautiful cities, which you have not built , with houses full of all good things, which you did not fill, with wells hewn in stone, which you did not dig, with vines and olive trees, which you did not plant, and you will eat and you will be fed up". Or, also in the Old Testament, the Book of Exodus (chap. 23, verse 27), the same tribal god, El Yahweh, the god of Moses, addresses the children of Israel, strengthening his covenant with his chosen people:"I will send terror before you and I will terrify all the people against whom you will go, and I will put all your relatives to flight. But I will not drive them out from before you within a year, lest the land become desolate, and the wild beasts multiply upon you. But I will drive them away little by little , until you multiply and take possession of that land."

The scattering or dispersion of the Jews in the world began long before they were defeated by the Romans, who destroyed the temple in Jerusalem. This voluntary phenomenon of Jews joining other communities for parasitic purposes was called by ancient Greek and Roman historians as "diaspora". The historian Philo wrote in Lagatio ad Gaium : "The continents are full of Jewish settlements... also the islands and the whole of Babylon", a fact confirmed by the historian Strabo, who wrote before the destruction of the Jerusalem temple: "The Jews are spread in almost all the cities on face of the earth, and it is impossible to find a place in the world where, after they settled, they did not impose their authority".

Strong Jewish communities were found in Tarsus, Antioch, Ephesus, Corinth, Athens, Thessalonica and generally throughout the Mediterranean area. Although their settlement in the bosom of other populations generally represented an act of tolerance on the part of the host populations, the Jews permanently manifested an arrogant, superior spirit, as if claiming that they deserved everything. In the year 115 AD the Jews of Cyrenaica, Egypt and Cyprus revolted against the native populations, especially against the Greeks, among whom they lived. Thus, the Jews of Cyrenaica slaughtered all the Roman and Greek population that came in their way, when the Roman army in the area moved from North Africa to Parthia.The historian Dio Cassius estimated the number of people killed by the Jews at over 220,000 and described the cruelty the Jews showed and the horrors they committed. And Jewish historians only accept the idea that in Cyrenaica the Jewish population amused themselves by imprisoning the natives with wild beasts, which tore them apart (Hirsch Graetz, "History of the Jews" ).



The historian Appian recounted that, after taking control of the cities of Cyrenaica, the Jews headed for Alexandria, where they killed and destroyed without mercy. Many Jews lived on the island of Cyprus, whose community even built numerous synagogues. Dio Cassiuc reports that here too the Jews rose up against the Romans and Greeks, cruelly killing 240,000 of them..."»

(here ends the text written in 2002, published and then withdrawn in 2003)

******

MEA culpabut the state rejected them as investors in favor of "Israeli investors". They engaged the loans obtained in Israel or from various foreign banks, with the written commitment of the subsequent pledge, in favor of the banks, of the future Romanian acquisitions, I submitted to the DNA such a secret document, drawn up in Israel at the Leumi Le bank, which I obtained it with difficulty, being evaded from the Israelis, but, from a certain moment, the prosecutors no longer wanted to investigate this track (receiving an order "from above", as they whispered to me), instead of organizing a rogatory commission in Israel. Such employment with the post-privatization transfer of shares or assets in favor of banks was illegal in Romania at that time, but practically prohibited only to investors from the country. Israelis,

At that time I did not find any personal support, even a small one, moral rather than from a handful of colleagues with authentic Christian life, whom I told not to refuse the money from the Israelis, so as not to give suspected that he would be with me, the hunted challenger.

*

The text "Conclusion" ("Hate from the Old Testament", above), was published - when I was threatened - in the first printings of the first edition (from the year 2003) of the book "The Unseen War of the Zionist Jews with the Romanians" (the edition with a dragon-dragon on the cover, an image of Judeo-Talmudo-Zionism in my view at that time), still the most widespread edition in the big libraries in the country and even in some monasteries.

It now appears as a new one on the net, because I removed this chapter "Conclusion" almost immediately, also from 2003, from the following editions or editions (partly appearing on the Internet), because the book, knowing some distribution, appeared, among some readers with whom I discussed, the wrong idea, unexpected for me, that these "historical Israelite crimes" would be doctrinally approved by Christianity as well (because it has among the saints also some of the "criminals", such as Moses or Elijah, although " their "crimes" - as can be seen, by researching more carefully, as I explain below - are a heroic or parable myth, invented by the Jewish priests, Levites, perpetuated by the Jewish scholars, then by the rabbis, unrelated to real history, to the facts strictly real of the Israelites), as well as the possible dissemination of a risky, wrong opinion,looking at the angel with whom the mythical patriarch Jacob, the future "Israel", would have "fought", which I had taken over, quoting him, from Rabbi Nuham, an Orthodox Christian convert as a Neophyte (the author of the bookletConfronting the Jews , good in other respects).

The understanding that these "crimes" from the Old Testament are overwhelmingly myths or forgeries, invented by Jewish political priests, long after the events described, but some 4-6 hundred years before Christ, was clearly revealed to me for the first time (with information that proved to be true) by the Englishman Douglas Reed's book, "The Controversy of Zion", which I received as a gift from Mr. Şerban Suru, head of the Legionary Movement - Iron Guard - Archangel Michael Legion, together with other books (Israel Shahak, " The burden of three millennia of history and Jewish religion" etc.), also then, in 2003, after I I gave him my book "The Invisible War of the Zionist Jews with the Romanians", as I personally handed it to Mr. Tudor Ionescu, leader of the New Right, in the same year, and Mr. Prof. Ion Coja and others.

Mr. colonel Vasile Zărnescu, who appreciated my books, I met him, thanks to them, at a public conference held by Mr. Prof. Ion Coja, around 2005-2006. He promoted in the press, as much as he could, my materials regarding the fight that I was then leading in the courts (until 2014) with the Israeli privatizations from SC Bucuresti-Tursim SA.

I used to meet with Mr. Şerban Suru at the courts, where he was present in other files, criminally accused by you or others, of legionaryism. Each with his cross. At the Bucharest Court, around 2012, Mr. Suru found my identity card on the floor, at the archive, and looked for me on the spot in the courthouse to give it to me. I was tired. I was in court since 1998.



The rabbi's deception regarding Jacob's angel
Nuham-Neophyte, the convert from Judaism to Christianity, was not at all a good Christian theologian, nor did he know how, and he did not know how Christianity - at least in its beginnings - had recovered and corrected the primary meanings or those altered over time in the passages more important from the Old Testament, oral traditions initially devoid of Jewish political programming, from which the Jewish scholars and Levitical priests went astray.

From this alteration of the relationship between Jacob and the angel, of the meeting between them, not knowing the original meanings of the myths, the converted Jew Noah-Neophite suggested to us, as it were, that the angel could be the devil like the God of the Old Testament, which is one of the greatest temptations, because, known as Marcionism, this current ends up saying that God is evil, as well as the creation of the world by Him.

Who was the angel that Jacob had "wrestled" with, however, correctly explains to us, among other Christian saints, Saints John the Golden Mouth (347-407) and Augustine of Hippo (354-430). Saint Augustine says that the angel allowed himself to be "defeated" willingly, like a man, although he also had divine powers that he could use, thus prefiguring Christ, whom the Jews would seem to defeat later. "This angel clearly presents a type of Christ" said Saint Augustine, or "Jacob foresaw Jesus on earth", as Saint Ambrose (374-397, bishop of Mediolan / the later city of Milan) also said.

Even though God is named in the Book of Genesis, the later biblical tradition shows the one with whom Jacob fought as "Malakh", angel "messenger" in Hebrew. The angel of battle was also a man, but also more than that, like Jesus Christ later.



Archaeological research has proven the falsity of the abominations
      military exploits of the Old Testament Israelites
The oldest surviving manuscript that contains the Torah, the basis and beginning of the Jewish religion, is not in Hebrew, but its translation into Greek, the Septuagint , dated as an achievement between 300 and 100 before Christ. Next chronologically, written between 200 and 100 BC, is the Samaritan Pentateuch ("Samaritan Torah" or "Samaritan Pentateuch"), although the historical consensus is that the Torah was conceived 3 centuries before these manuscripts were made, "during Middle Persian" (5th century before Christ), and the mythical events related in them are placed in history at least 1000 years before the existence of the above manuscripts, as is the case with the alleged warlike entry - with God before and above – of the Irsaelites in the Promised Land, Canaan, mythically placed in the 13th century BC.

From the time of the creation of the Torah, only some fragments have been preserved, such as the amulets from Ketef Hinnom, with a fragmentary text from the Book of Numbers ("the fourth book of Moses", the fourth of the Torah that is), dated as being from the year 600 before Christ. Among the scrolls from the Dead Sea, only the Great Scroll of Isaiah (1Qisa) has some age, being the oldest complete copy of the book of Isaiah, dated by the radiometric method with carbon-14 as having been written between 356 and 100 BC. Hr.

Science, however, is increasingly asserting what the British Douglas Reed had said in "The Zion Controversy", taking arguments even from the studies of Jewish scholars, that, in reality, the children of Israel never knew of any "understanding" between God and Israel as it was drafted by the Jewish Levites in the Torah and in the immediately following books of the Old Testament, known as the "Deuteronomistic History", respectively of domination by crimes over other peoples, committed in the past with divine support.

The names of the Israelites and the name of Moses were taken over by the Jewish Levites - Douglas Reed pointed out - who "transformed the idea of ​​a single God of all mankind into a doctrine of segregation, race hatred, massacres in the name of religion and "revenge » pushed to infinity. By reading the Old Testament carefully, one can see how the Levites rewrote earlier legends. Although Moses first comes and gives the ten commandments of honor and kindness and respect for one's neighbor, then, however, his story continues with genocide and large-scale massacres of innocent people whom the Jews met in their migrations, dictated massacres the faces, claimed the Levites of the Jews, even by God.

The Deuteronomistic History (The Deuteronomistic History) is the field in which scientists prove - as unostentatious as possible - that it is a false, uchronic history, the one promoted in the books of the Old Testament, and in the Torah with the Book of Deuteronomy (the last of the 5 books of the Torah or the Pentateuch ), but also, mainly quantitatively, in the ones after this, respectively the books of Joshua, of the Judges, the book of Ruth (of Samuel) and the books of Kings.

The German Hebrew bibliologist Martin Noth, who introduced the term in 1943, shows that these books were the work of a single author/compiler in the 6th century BC, who sought to provide a motivational or moralizing, ultimately encouraging explanation of recent tragic events of the Jews since then - the fall of Jerusalem and the Babylonian exile - using theology, so that the mythical Joshua appears as a grand conqueror led by divinity, while the disasters of the Jews are presented as punishments caused by disobedience to God (disobedience to the religious leaders who represent him , better said).

The bloody conquests of Moses and Joshua, the leaders of the Israelites, over Canaan, the "Promised Land", are dismantled by archaeologists, who argue the opposite, because between the years 1500-1380 before Christ the Canaanite territories were included in the Egyptian state, the capital of the Egyptian province of of Canaan being in Gaza, according to some ceramic tablets from the middle of the 14th century BC ("The Amarna Letters", discovered in 1885, in Egypt), and after 1380 the northern parts of Canaan entered at one time within the sphere of Hittite authority.

So the Israelites were not out of Egypt, from where they would have fled (another story), but they were in Egypt right when they were in Cannan, an Egyptian province for the most part. Where Jerusalem is, at the end of the Bronze Age (1550-1200 years) was the Egyptian empire (the Egyptian New Kingdom, the most flourishing era in the history of Ancient Egypt, with the most famous rulers.), and further north was the Hittite empire. Too big and too strong for the Israelites who the Jewish story says would have slaughtered everything there. In 1274 BC the Egyptians defeated the Hittites in the Battle of Kadesh, but in the imaginary stories of the Jewish Torah, the Israelites were installed in Kadesh at that time, which was their military expeditionary base.

The Old Testament claims that the children of Israel would have destroyed the Canaanites in the 13th century BC, but, according to archaeologists, they only settled among them, after which, towards the middle of the 12th century, after the year 1177 before Christ, the Canaan of the Israelites was invaded by the "peoples of the sea", the Philistines, who pushed the older and newer Canaanites, the Israelites, to the north and east, also occupying their fortified settlements, now included in Palestine.

~

According to these scientific historical data, the ancient Canaanites disappeared because they "became Jews" or, in other words, "the descendants of the Canaanites were the Israelites", the fact that the Israelites did not conquer Canaan in antiquity, as even the Israeli publication Haaretz said, through the 1999 article " Deconstructing the walls of Jericho" by Israeli archaeologist Professor Ze'ev Herzog .



He, Herzog, begins by saying that " After 70 years of intensive excavations in the Land of Israel, archaeologists have learned: the acts of the patriarchs are legendary, the Israelites did not live in Egypt proper and did not make an exodus, nor they conquered the country. Neither the empire of David and Solomon nor the source of belief in the God of Israel is given. These facts have been known for years, but Israel is a stubborn people and no one wants to hear about it... Perhaps even harder to swallow is the fact that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power , was at most a small tribal kingdom.And it will come as an unpleasant shock to many that the God of Israel, Jehovah, had a female consort and that the early Israelite religion adopted monotheism only during the period of the decay of the monarchy and not at Mount Sinai..." (where they would have been dictated to to Moses the 5 books of the Torah).

Looking at Yahweh's wife, Herzog refers to the image of a goddess beside him on 3,000-year-old pottery found in the Sinai desert at Kuntillet Ajrud, with the inscription "Berakhti etkhem l'YHVH Shomron ul'Asherato," YHVH being Yahweh or Jehovah, and Asherah being in fact the "mother goddess" of the ancient Semitic mythology of the Levant, also called the "Queen of Heaven" in the book of the prophet Jeremiah).

That is why, and about the Book of Joshua, which mythically narrates about the campaigns of the Israelites in Canaan and about the destruction of their enemies at the command of God, who would have ordered them to conquer the land that he had promised them, as well as about the division of the country between the twelve tribes, the researchers say that they are fairy tales, fabrications, but they are contradicted by the Jewish religious fanatics or even by the Christian neo-Protestants.

However, Professor Michael David Coogan, from Harvard Divinity School, also an experienced archaeologist in Israel and head of Oxford Biblical Studies Online, showed that if Israel had engaged in the total destruction invoked by Genesis, Deuteronomy and the following biblical books, then it would have been reasonable for archaeologists to discover evidence of violent invasions from the late 15th century BC. But on the contrary, they do not exist. Therefore, the information provided by archeology conflicts with the biblical accounts of a hostile conquest of Canaan by the Israelites (MD Coogan, "Archaeology and Biblical Studies: The Book of Joshua" 1990).

The general consensus among scholars is that these books, like the Book of Joshua, with the conquest of Canaan to the Babylonian exile, have no value for the real history of early Israel, the Israelites, and the Jews. Among them is cited the American archaeologist Ann E. Killebrew, with her work "Biblical Peoples and Ethnicity: An Archaeological Study of Egyptians, Canaanites, and Early Israel, 1300-1100 BCE" (Society of Biblical Literature, 2005), who said that "most scholars today accept that most of the conquest stories in the Book of Joshua are devoid of historical reality."

It was also confirmed by the dating made by another famous archaeologist, the British Kathleen Kenyon, according to which Jericho was not inhabited during its alleged invasion by Ioșua Navi, a fact accepted by all archaeologists (not even the fanatical sects). "Of course, this, for some, made the Bible stories even more miraculous than they were: Joshua destroyed a city that didn't even exist!", added archaeologist William G. Dever amusedly in his work "Recent Archaeological Discoveries and Biblical Research". since 1990.

Also starting from archaeological studies, the American professor John J. Collins confirms that "There are few things that we can save from Joshua's stories about the rapid, total destruction of the Canaanite cities and the annihilation of the local population. It just didn't happen. The archaeological evidence is indisputable...Most biblical scholars have come to terms with the fact that much (not all!) of the biblical narrative is only loosely connected to history and does not verify as true". ("Old Testament in a New Climate", Yale Divinity School, 2008).

The French archaeologist Pierre de Miroschedji , from the Université Paris Nanterre, also said that "In general, no serious archaeologist believes today that the events narrated in the Book of Joshua have any real historical basis. Archaeological surveys, especially since the beginning of the 1990s, revealed how the culture of the Israelites appeared in the hills of the center of the country as a continuation of the Canaanite culture of the previous era", not as an eradication and replacement of pre-existing populations ("Les archéologues réécrivent la Bible", in La Recherche no. 391 of 2005).

As Jews, Israel Finkelstein, archaeologist and professor at Tel Aviv University, and American archaeologist Neil Asher Silberman, tried in their 2001 book, The Bible Unearthed: Archeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts ") to defend as much as possible the narratives of the Torah and the Deuteronomistic History, possibly trying to place some events in another time, in the 9th-7th centuries BC, but they also support, in general, "the new consensus of historians and archaeologists on the historical validity of the Hebrew Bible", arguing that "The conclusion that the Exodus did not take place at the time and in the manner described in the Bible seems indisputable...repeated excavations and surveys throughout the area have not provided even the slightest evidence".

This independence gained by the scholarly world in recent decades from global Jewish authority is expressed by the emeritus professor of Hebrew Bible and early Judaism at the University of Hull, England, Lester L. Grabbe, who said that when he was studying for his Ph.D. 1970s), the "substantial historicity" of the Bible's stories of the patriarchs and the conquest of Canaan was widely accepted, but nowadays one can hardly find a historian who believes in it.

~

But why did the Jews invent a false history? Of "satanics", as they say?

The objective of these biblical books from the Torah and after Deuteronomy from the Tanakh (the Jewish Bible, called the Old Testament by Christians), which rewrote, transforming them, the old "mosaic" religious beliefs (the laws of Moses), even the one regarding God's covenant with Jacob-Israel, turning God into a kind of military ally of the "people of Israel" - which appears to be also false, as it is associated with the false expeditions and criminal victories of the Israelites in Canaan -, was - historians generally believe—that of providing a theological explanation for Babylon's destruction of the Jewish kingdom in 586 BC. and the basis for their return from exile, by instilling a military-religious pride. Even the holy prophet Elijah, the one who rose to Heaven,

"The "law" was the law of Moses, which formed the so-called mosaic cult. This is Law I. The Levites completely falsified Mosaicism into its opposite, called Judaism, which constitutes the Second Law. The essential falsification resides in the introduction of the dogma that the Jews constitute the "chosen people", and the others, the goyim, must be made slaves of the Jews and the surplus goyim must be killed, and their wealth appropriated by the Jews." (Colonel r. Vasile Zărnescu, in "The Avatar of Judaism " , December 2016).



Israel meant, in the beginning, only "Who Saw God"

We have also seen that Israel meant something else than the leaders of the Jews wanted to understand. It did not mean "The One Who Fights With God", as the Zionists say even now. It meant "A Man Who Sees God", from ʾyš / man + rʾh / to see + ʾHe / God (cf. "The Old Testament pseudepigraph", editor James H Charlesworth).

This is how the Christian tradition was recorded at its beginnings, through the holy fathers, who, like Jesus, probably respected the original tradition, unaltered (after 700 before Christ) by the Levite priests and Jewish scholars, alteration and falsely perpetuated by sects such as the Pharisees.

Thus, Saint John Chrysostom said that "Israel means seeing God..."Since you have the privilege of seeing God, as far as it is possible for a human being to see him, that is why I give you this name , so that in the future it will be clear to everyone that you have been granted a vision." Likewise, the great Saint Augustine said: "The giving of the name was the blessing, because Israel means "to see God", and the vision of God will be the reward of all the saints at the end of the world..." ( Israel did not mean "The One Who Struggles With God" , on incorrectpolitic.com/ )



Misinterpretation of "Israel" as a warrior who "overcomes"

The most classic texts of the Torah, which when they were written could not deviate too much from the oral tradition well known to the Semitic world, nor did they have the aberrant meaning later explained by the Levites and Rabbis, as they are altered and translated to us today .

The central episode in the Jacob-Israel saga is in chapter 32 of the book of Creation (Genesis), which is therefore called "Jacob's Prayer", and not Jacob's fight with the angel, because the "fight" did not exist, but a " strengthening' or 'raising' received by Jacob from the angel.

The classical Hebrew text actually says word for word that:

"From now on your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel (יִשְׂרָאֵל / Ys'rael / "who saw God"), for you have ennobled yourself [served nobly] ( שָׂרַה / sarah ) with God with men and will succeeded " (the Hebrew text is also here: https://mechon-mamre.org/p/pt/pt0132.htm ).

Sarah ( שָׂרַה ) has several meanings and, as a noun, was not usually understood or translated as " fight " - or "you have overcome", "you will overcome", as a verb - as transmitted by the Jewish priests and scholars of the Torah until today's rabbis and Zionists, than in a distant sense, but rather it was understood or translated, as " ennobled " ("you are ennobled", "elevated" in rank), for sar means prince, noble, lord. And Golda Meir, as Minister of Foreign Affairs of the State of Israel, was therefore called Sarah-Hahhutz (שרת-החשוף, Foreign Minister in English).

We see that this was the correct tradition (not the translation of the Levitical scribes and rabbis) and from the meaning of the Semitic female name Sarah (spelled absolutely identically in the old Hebrew: שָׂרָה), which no one denies, but recognizes as "nobles," " princess", "lady" or "happiness" (especially among the Muslim Semites, where it also means "purity"), this being also the name of the patriarch Abraham's wife, famous as very pious.

As a proof, anyone who makes a simple translation of the final part of the Hebrew verse no. 29 of chapter 32 of Genesis, will result for this text ( כִּֽי־שָׂרִ֧יתָ עִם־אֱלֹהִ֛ים וְעִם־אֲנָשִׁ֖ים וַתּוּכָֽל ) the translation "For you served with God and with the people and you will be able " ( you will succeed ), the translation וַתּוּכָֽל being "you can", "you will be able", "and you can", not being "you will win".

And the automatic translation (with the strict meaning of the words) from Hebrew to English of the same verse is "You serve with God and with people, and you will be able" (then giving from English to Romanian "You served with God and with people and you will be able"), does not translate, as it appears in the widespread and classic English text of the Bible, "and have prevailed", i.e. "and you have overcome" (God and people).

Incredibly, in order to validate the impossible, rabbinical scholars explain to us this total difference in meaning between the current speech of the word sarah, as a noun or adjective, compared to the verb in the biblical text, as being something mysterious: "The mysterious verb שרה (sara) is used only to describe what Jacob did with the Angel (Genesis 32:29 and Hosea 12:4). Traditionally, it has been translated as "to fight," but it clearly metaphorizes the formation of Israel into a political unity based on the preservation of knowledge and skill" ("The New Open Bible", New King James Version 1990; as Alfred Jones , "Dictionary of Old Testament Proper Names" 1990, this second work being first published in 1856 by Samuel Bagster and hardly perpetuating his "enthusiastic" and fanciful explanationsWilhelm Gesenius (1786-1842) "German orientalist, lexicographer and Christian Hebrew").

~

Even in the Hebrew text of the book of the "minor prophet" Hosea (ch. 12; v. 4-5) it is not said that Jacob defeated God in battle, although this is how it is translated to us and this is how we are taught, but it is said, in the translation simple, that Jacob: "He sang to the Angel and, when he had finished, wept and prayed to him", or "And he sang to the Angel and was fed up and wept and prayed to Him", this being the exact translation of the Hebrew words the book of Hosea (Hosea), not dogmatized, respectively "- וַיָּשַׂר אֶל-מַלְאָךְ וַיֻּכָל, בָּכָה וַיִּתְחַנֶּן-לוֹ; בֵּית-אֵל, יִמְצָאֶנּוּ, – ", and the separate translation of "שהוא שר" meaning "he sings", "he sang", and not "he fought", as it appears, Judaized, even in our Bible, edited by BOR : "He fought with the angel and won".



Jacob "strengthened" ( eníschyse ) with the angel, like Jesus, he did not "struggle".

Not even in the text of the Septuagint, which is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Scriptures from the third century before Christ, being the oldest existing manuscript containing the Torah, does the Greek word appear that means that Jacob "wrestled" with the angel. In the Septuagint - which is therefore the canonical Old Testament in Greek that the Orthodox Christian Church knew at its beginnings -, the passage from Hosea was translated as "he became strong" (ἐνιχώσε, éníschyse), because Jacob "was weak" (ἠδυνάσθη) " and he strengthened himself with an angel" (καὶ ἐνύχώσε μετὰ ἀγγέλου, here: https://www.septuagint.bible/-/-osee-kephalaio-12 ). If it had been that Jacob "wrestled" with the angel, instead of eníschyse ("strengthened") we should have pálepse(πάλεψε, fight, fought), but this word is not in the Septuagint.

In the Septuagint, including the text of Genesis, chapter 32, concerning the angel's renaming of Jacob as Israel, it says that he "strengthened himself with God", "strengthened himself with God" (ἐνιχώσας μετὰ Θεοῦ, "eníschysas metá Theoú " ) , which what is the cause of his blessing, not that he "wrestled" with Him (here: https://www.septuagint.bible/-/genesis-32 , where it is verse 28, not 29 as in the later known Hebrew text).

The same Greek word for "strengthening" - eníschyse, ἐνιχύσε -, we find it - in the form enischuōn , ἐνισχύων - characterizing the meeting between Jesus Christ and the angel, just before Jesus was sold by Judas, in the Gospel of Luke, chapter 22 (verses 42-43): "Jesus: "Father, if you are willing, let this cup pass from Me. But not My will, but Your will be done.", And an angel came to Him from heaven, strengthening Him "(ὤφθη δὲ αὐτῷ ἄγγελος ἀπ᾽ οὐρανοῦ ἐνισχύων αὐτόν). The Gospel of Luke in its old form in Greek can also be found and researched at: https://bibletranslation.ws/trans/lukewgrk.pdf .

"Strengthened him" and "gave him strength", not that "they fought", so it means ἐνισχύσε / ἐνισχύων, eníschyse / enischýon, and in the Greek text of Luke's Gospel, being the same Greek word that describes in the Septuagint the interaction between Jacob and the Angel . And so that we have no doubt about its correct meaning, the same Greek word, enischuōn (strengthening), is used once more in the New Testament, in the Acts of the Apostles, chapter 8, verse 19: "After he had eaten, he caught again strength " ( enischuōn , "he became strong").

Jesus: "I am not of your race,
for you are the children of the father of lies!'

This is what Jesus Christ said to the Jewish scribes and Pharisees, placing them at the drift of Judaism in relation to the true "covenant" with God, the Jews in this category moving away for centuries from the original religious truths, still persistent but then among the people, more chosen among the Essenes, who are believed to have been close to Jesus.

The original Christianity was found in Christian orthodoxy, to the greatest extent, but the efforts to accuse the Christian Church of being a form of Judaism are tireless, even if the reasons are not objective and sincere.

"The "law" was the law of Moses, which formed the so-called mosaic cult. This is Law I. The Levites completely falsified Mosaicism into its opposite, called Judaism, which constitutes the Second Law. The essential falsification resides in the introduction of the dogma that the Jews constitute the "chosen people", and the rest, the goyim, must be made slaves of the Jews, and the surplus goyim must be killed, and their property appropriated by the Jews."

This form was distorted even more by the Levite rabbis - called in the Gospels "hypocritical teachers" -, establishing Talmudism, which represents the Third Law; this happened about 900 years before Jesus Christ...

"The expression "Judeo-Christianity", which underpins the idea that the origin of Christianity is Judaism, is absolutely false: Christianity - in fact, more precisely - Orthodoxy is diametrically opposed to Judaism! Within Christianity, Catholicism began to make great concessions to Judaism / Talmudism - which constitutes a great betrayal of Orthodoxy and a great breach favorable to Talmudism." (Colonel r. Vasile Zărnescu in "The Avatar of Judaism - The Truth about Judaism, about the Khazars , about Zionism..." on https://ioncoja.ro)

~

"Judeo-Christianity", Jewish anti-Christian purpose and work

The Jewish hatred towards Christianity, extremely strong especially among the rabbis, was what led some Jewish-Jews to insist, at the same time divertingly and mockingly, about Christianity, that it would be a tool of and an extension of Judaism. At other times, the Zionists have pursued this very thing, by creating those movements of "Christian Zionists", to use the Christians for their purposes, Judaizing their faith, succeeding this especially with the neo-Protestants, through an exaggerated importance given to the letter of the Old Testament by them.

The "Christian Zionists" created in the West, especially in the USA, serve the political Zionism of Jewish nationalism, and no longer see Zion as the place of God's meeting with humanity, the only correct, original representation of Heaven's holy place on earth. Thus, the Jewish Zionists speculate on the confusion that can be created between the multiple meanings of the word Zion, trying to impose the one convenient for them (as if God would prefer the Judeo-Israelites and territorially and, in general, as a "nation").

Zion, however, was the representation on earth of Salem (the equivalent of Shambhala, the "Unseen Land" of Eastern religions), the almost transcendent city (more in Heaven than on earth, where it can even be found, now it is, now it is not) the city of the "priesthood forever", much higher than that of the Jewish priests. The Christian Scriptures told us that Jesus was "a priest of the Most High God... after the order of Melchizedek", the king of Salem, a priest and "king of justice", "without father, without mother, without genealogy", also known by the Chaldeans and other peoples, not according to the Levitical priesthood of Aaron, the brother of Moses, from whom the priesthood in Judea was claimed, and Melchizedek and Jesus Christ being presented as priest-kings of righteousness and peace.



The most eloquent diversionist case mocking the hijacking of Christianity is that of Marcus Eli Ravage, who lived between 1884 and 1965, being originally from Romania (from Bârlad, where he was born as Marcu Revici, but emigrated as a young man, in 1900 , in America, with his Jewish family), and who published in 1928 the famous articles "A real case against the Jews" and "Commissary to the Gentiles" (also translated here as "Testimony of a Jew - the devastating implications of Paul of Tarsus and Christianity in the destruction of Roman civilization"), in Century Magazine from New York.

Thus, Eli Ravage provocatively addressed the "anti-Semitic Christian" who was averse to the behavior of the Jews "money hoarders, misers and materialistic merchants", the Christian who said that "no profession is safe against the Jewish invasion" led by some "exclusive tribalists and unassimilable" (Eli Ravage's words):

" You accuse us of fomenting the revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit this charge. But what? Compared to what Paul, the Jew from Tarsus, achieved in Rome, the uprising in Russia is a simple street fight...

I conquered you... And I did it all without bullets, without blood or turmoil, without any kind of force. We did it only by the irresistible power of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda. Our tribal customs have become the core of your moral code... Our national history has become an indispensable part of the teaching of your pastors and priests or scholars. Our tribal laws provided the fundamental basis of all constitutions and legal systems of empires.

Our kings, statesmen, prophets, warriors are your heroes. Our ancient land is Your Holy Land. Our national literature is your Holy Bible. What our people have thought and taught has become the peculiar fabric of your discourse and tradition, to the point that none of you can be called educated unless he is familiar with our racial heritage.

We have taken down your idols and your racial heritage and replaced them with our God and our traditions. No conquest in history can even remotely compare to this conquest of ours over you.

We have made you the willing and unconscious bearers of our mission throughout the world... Without fully understanding what we were doing to you, you have become the agents of our racial tradition, carrying our gospel to the unexplored ends of the earth...

A Jewish patriot named Paul or Saul conceived the idea of ​​humiliating the Roman power by destroying the morale of his soldiery with the doctrines of love and non-resistance preached by the little sect of Jewish Christians. He became the apostle to the Gentiles, the one who until then had been one of the most active persecutors of the band. And so well did Paul do his work, that in four centuries the great empire which subjugated Palestine together with half the world, was a heap of ruins. And the law that came out of Zion became the official religion of Rome. This was the beginning of our dominance in your world."

*

Presenting it, Professor Ion Coja called this subversive propaganda against right Christianity: "Ravage's diversion - a subtle and ingenious trap. He cites accepted facts, and further, he fables on behalf of St. Paul. In fact, by and large, Christian teaching totally contradicted Jewish traditions and rabbinic thinking. Christianity caught on to ethnic groups that, through traditions and popular culture, were prepared and able to understand the Christian message. It is almost exclusively about ethnic groups of Indo-European origin. Nota bene: Jews have harbored a hatred of Indo-Europeans since before the advent of Christianity. See Rome's conflict with Carthage."

Cornel-Dan NICULAE

[abduLMaria]

Abraham Lied - that was one of the biggest crimes.

Abraham said that "God Told Him" the Jews are "the chosen people".

So What ?

The Jews spent the next 4000 years lying, as described by Martin Luther in his book, "On the Jews and their Lies".

Did their history start out with one true statement, followed by billions of Jew-lies ?

Or one lie, followed by billions of more Jew-lies ?

We can't go back to ask Abraham, and even if we could, it's logical to expect that - he would lie.

[yankeedoodle]

Abraham Lied - that was one of the biggest crimes.

Abraham said that "God Told Him" the Jews are "the chosen people".

So What ?

The Jews spent the next 4000 years lying, as described by Martin Luther in his book, "On the Jews and their Lies".

Did their history start out with one true statement, followed by billions of Jew-lies ?

Or one lie, followed by billions of more Jew-lies ?

We can't go back to ask Abraham, and even if we could, it's logical to expect that - he would lie.

LOL.

I've often thought about going up to a jew, and tapping him on the shoulder, and asking him "Do you know who I am?'  After which I would proceed to tell him that I am, in fact, God, and that I changed my mind, and he's not "chosen" anymore.

Then, if he would say "You're not God," I would say "How do you know, do you deny the existence of God?" and then i would smite him. 

Then, in the future, when he thought he was "chosen," he would have something to think about.