The Inevitable Triumph of "Anti-Semitism"

[yankeedoodle]

MECHANICALLY TRANSLATED FROM ROMANIAN
The Inevitable Triumph of "Anti-Semitism" 
an editorial from Sterie Ciumetti   
https://www.incorectpolitic.com/inevitabilul-triumf-al-antisemitismului/

Considering the phenomena taking place in contemporary society, both in Romania and abroad, an objective observer of them will conclude that in the absence of major changes, "anti-Semitism" will have an inevitable triumph.

Why do we put it in quotation marks and what is this "anti-Semitism"?

Most often, "anti-Semitism" is a label used to publicly disqualify people who express certain ideas.

Anti-Semitism is pro-Romanianism for Romania, pro-Bulgarianism for Bulgaria, pro-Serbism for Serbia and so on. That is, any manifestation, idea or expression that supports the ethnic group of which the one who expresses it is "anti-Semitism" in the eyes of organized Judeo-globalist groups, which aim for countries to be as diverse, multicultural and ethnically fragmented as possible. In this context, to support a nationalist, sovereignist, anti-globalist point of view is considered anti-Semitism. Saying "Romania for Romanians" can be labeled as xenophobic, anti-Semitic and racist speech.

Anti-Semitism is a label that is most often used dishonestly with the aim of shutting down a conversation, of not responding to the topic of a discussion. It represents an ad hominem attack designed to distract attention from the point being made and make the uncomfortable speaker startle, recoil, self-censor.

Because of the quasi-total control that Jewry exercises over public opinion through its monopoly over the means of communication and through the establishment of organizations that act as word police or thought police (example: ADL, Elie Wiesel Institute), the charge of anti-Semitism it becomes a weapon not just meant to shut down a discussion, but one that can have devastating financial effects and can endanger the freedom of uncomfortable speakers, especially in countries that have passed legislation criminalizing "anti-Semitism". See the Vasile Zărnescu case.

Einstein said that " anti-Semitism is the natural social reaction to the antagonism of organized Jewish groups."

It is a clear enough definition, but insufficient. Without going into other details regarding the nature of those who adopted the Semito-Biblical identity (Khazars), but are not Semites, taking into account what was written above and the way the Jews perceive anti-Semitism, we can define it as follows: " both expressions or manifestations favoring your ethnic and national group over other groups, as well as uncomfortable truths about Judaism and Jews."

The constant feeding of "anti-Semitism"
Censorship of those who express "anti-Semitic" ideas is not limited to people who have Hitler sympathies. We saw how Elon Musk lost several billion dollars in ad money to the ADL's boycott campaign against Twitter, how Vincent Reynouard was arrested in Scotland for making documentaries, and how other teachers were arrested in Europe for their books and written studies, we saw how local authorities in Romania were forced by the Elie Wiesel Terrorist Institute to change the names of some streets and we see daily how simple people are blocked for 30 days on Facebook, removed from Instagram, Tik Tok, etc. These actions have consequences, and the consequences are beginning to be seen.

What is the result of these draconian measures? Their reports say it, "anti-Semitism" grows from year to year. Why? Because you will not convince a man that what he says is wrong if you take away his right to say that thing . On the contrary, you push him harder and confirm that what he says is important.

The refusal to dialogue, the use of censorship, labeling done in bad faith, all these reactions only increase "anti-Semitism" and make people more sure of what they say. If I go on Facebook and make a non-violent post, without threats and without swearing, a post where I say "Jews rule the world" or "Jews rule the press", then Facebook deletes my post and blocks my account for 30 days, it becomes clearly I was right. It's confirmation that they're telling an inconvenient truth, no matter how they justify censorship using legalistic wording about some terms and conditions that can change at any time, arbitrarily.

But the matter goes beyond Facebook, not even billionaires like Elon Musk or Kanye West are immune to pressure from organized Jewish groups.

When an organization like the ADL uses their power to put their fist in the mouth of billionaires, all their followers see what's going on, their attention is focused on the abuse being committed and they start asking questions, there are clips, edits, all kinds of things of chain reactions. Books such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Martin Luther's On the Jews and their Lies, Henry Ford's The International Jew are posted, works are studied and commentators complement each other, the world learns that many personalities of past ages have spoken about the Jewish question and they faced events similar to those of our days.

Videos taken down for being "anti-Semitic", documentaries like Europa The Last Battle or Adolf Hitler The Greatest Story Never Told do not become unavailable if they are removed from YouTube. They can be found on Odysee, BitChute and more obscure platforms. Their removal from mainstream platforms prompts a more intense search from the curious who want to see them. The forbidden fruit is tempting. The Streissand effect works. You're either treating a book you're paying for versus one you're getting for free, or you're watching a hard-earned video that you know has a stake in being censored.

Self-censorship of the uncomfortable = Losing Bet
Things accelerate significantly when it comes to individual freedom in countries where there is democracy. In Romania, the trial of Colonel Vasile Zărnescu received more attention than the Elie Wiesel Institute expected, and in the end they could not afford to convict him on appeal. A final conviction would have attracted even more sympathy towards Vasile Zărnescu, would have generated discussions about the authenticity of Romanian democracy and would have made the colonel a model martyr for the youth, more than enough already. They failed to either imprison him or make him stop telling the truth. So the failure of the institute was twofold.

Likewise in Florida, USA, where Governor DeSantis signed the anti-Semitism law HB269 (he signed it during a visit to Israel), which provides for jail time for anti-Semitic expressions and demonstrations.

The law arose out of awareness campaigns by some Florida activists who were handing out leaflets about Jewish influence in certain areas such as the Covid-19 agenda, Hollywood, the media, the Federal Reserve and others.

They carried out a peaceful and non-violent activity, simply distributing leaflets. Through HB269, pressured by the ADL, the authorities believed they were discouraging activists and causing them to self-censor. This was not the case, the leaflets multiplied even as four arrests took place on the basis of this repressive law.

It is clear that the Jews are between a rock and a hard place; on the one hand they use the tool of censorship to shut down public dialogue, generating antipathy and arousing interest in the censored ideas, on the other hand, even if they participated in the dialogue, they would not have arguments sufficiently anchored in truth to deal with, of that avoids him.

The remnant put forward by organized Jewish groups was that under pressure and liberticidal laws, people would sit back and self-censor. Both Florida and Romania have proven that the gamble is a losing one. Their next move can only be to arrest the inconvenient. But such a move cannot be done quietly, it will make waves in the internet age, it will generate complications, it will spark discussions, it will make martyrs whose deeds will attract supporters.

We have passed the stage when "anti-Semitic" voices were few, ignored and considered the musings of madmen. Today including taxi drivers, a barometer of public opinion, talk about how the Jews control key segments of the world. The development of repressive laws is a desperate attempt to slow down the speed at which the world awakening takes place, to postpone the inevitable triumph of "anti-Semitism".

All ages, all professions, all social classes, all become anti-Semites
The implementation of a compulsory subject in schools to impose holocaust dogma among students is another failure in the making. The rebellious nature of teenagers will cause them to approach the opposite pole with phenomenal speed, discovering legionnaires, National Socialism, Internet ultrabase communities, groups of other young people with common interests and a wider knowledge of the Jewish question.

Things don't look good for the world's censors. Boys and girls in more and more countries are becoming immune to holocaust propaganda from an earlier age and developing antipathy to Jewish influence. Antipathy is often justified, triggered precisely by the repressive measures taken by the censors.

From politicians to taxi drivers, from the elderly to children, more and more professional and social categories come into contact with "anti-Semitism" and they don't feel that bad. On the contrary, in the face of globalist-homosexual expansion, political correctness, ethnic genocide disguised under the mask of diversity, people instinctively approach "anti-Semitism" and stop caring about the label.

Lovers of truth cannot ignore the Jewish presence in so many affairs. The repeated use of the anti-Semitic label does not help the Jews either, the expression becoming devalued as it is used more and more. The label no longer means much, it has even become a medal.

"If being anti-Semitic means loving my country and wanting to preserve my people, then I'm anti-Semitic!" – is an increasingly widespread reaction among middle-aged people, and among the youth to be racist and anti-Semitic is not an insult but a compliment.

We have a perfect storm. Senseless provocations, liberticidal laws, but above all repressive censorship constitute the optimal conditions for the INEVITABLE TRIUMPH OF "ANTISEMITISM".

It's not a matter of if, but when.

The effort of each of you to properly inform your fellow man is paying off, awakening is growing exponentially, collective consciousness is rising and we are approaching critical mass.

The truth cannot be stopped by labels.

[abduLMaria]

Jews are usually only criticized when they commit crimes against Gentiles.

To call that criticism, "anti-Semitism", would be comical if the moron Jews didn't make it part of their gutter religion.