Jewish Law the Basis of Western Law

[kolnidre]

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/cp-jw-01-08-03/index.html

As you read this please recall that Nathan Lewin is the lawyer for the Agriprocessors kosher meth lab and illegal alien exploitation racket in Postville, Iowa. We sure need more "constitutional lawyers" like him!

Jewish Law Comes to D.C.
James D. Besser

What does the Talmud have to say about legal and moral controversies in modern America?

Plenty, according to the creators of the new Washington-based National Institute for Judaic Law, which opened with a lavish Supreme Court dinner last month.

Some Orthodox activists say they can't figure out exactly the point of the whole thing. But Noson Gurary, a Lubavitch rabbi who came up with the idea and won backing from some top Jewish legal experts, harbors no doubts.

"It will be an eye opener for judges, scholars and law students," he told The Jewish Week. "Before you know where you're going, you have to know where you came from. And Jewish law is the basis of our legal system in America."

Gurary said that the idea for the institute came in an exchange of letters in which Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the most conservative Justices, expressed his "fascination with Jewish law."

"And as a teacher of Judaic studies, I began to see the excitement of students who were being exposed to Jewish law for the first time, who now had a better understanding of where Western law come from," Gurary said.

Gurary, who teaches at the University of Buffalo law school, said his target audience includes judges around the country and law students, not politicians and lawmakers.

According to Gurary, the group, which has hired two researchers to compile reports, will focus initially on the issue of business ethics. Eventually, the goal is to compile a library and database in Washington that will offer Jewish law insights into a host of contemporary issues and to help create courses on the subject at law schools nationwide. The institute will also inaugurate a monthly lunch series for legal machers in Washington.

The Buffalo rabbi is a relative unknown in the Jewish world. Not so some of the participants in the new project, including Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. Solicitor General Seth Waxman and top constitutional lawyer Nathan Lewin and his law-partner/daughter, Alyza.

Alyza Lewin noted that "the idea is to make Jewish law accessible to the public — to jurists, legal scholars, the press, anybody."

Also do a scroogle.org search for "The Shetar's Effect on English Law" by a legal expert from Harvard named Shapiro.

[veritasvincit]

True

We have come so far away from the basic laws and fundamental obligations to God and have enabled the 60,000 man made laws based on Jewish Law to creep into our lives that this is our true enslavement.  We have been serving the wrong laws and god(s) all along and not the one True God and his laws.

Do we really think God would have created so many complex and convoluted laws to keep us in order, to confuse us....NO........we are not children and the only laws I enforce to my children are the laws of God.  If we abide by these basic laws there is always justice and benevolence toward our fellow man.  There is no confusion.

From The New Advent
"The Supreme Law-Giver begins by proclaiming His Name and His Titles to the obedience of the creature man: "I am the Lord, thy God. . ." The laws which follow have regard to God and His representatives on earth (first four) and to our fellow-man (last six).

    * Being the one true God, He alone is to be adored, and all rendering to creatures of the worship which belongs to Him falls under the ban of His displeasure; the making of "graven things" is condemned: not all pictures, images, and works of art, but such as are intended to be adored and served (First).
    * Associated with God in the minds of men and representing Him, is His Holy Name, which by the Second Commandment is declared worthy of all veneration and respect and its profanation reprobated.
    * And He claims one day out of the seven as a memorial to Himself, and this must be kept holy (Third).
    * Finally, parents being the natural providence of their offspring, invested with authority for their guidance and correction, and holding the place of God before them, the child is bidden to honour and respect them as His lawful representatives (Fourth).

The precepts which follow are meant to protect man in his natural rights against the injustice of his fellows.

    * His life is the object of the Fifth;
    * the honour of his body as well as the source of life, of the Sixth;
    * his lawful possessions, of the Seventh;
    * his good name, of the Eighth;
    * And in order to make him still more secure in the enjoyment of his rights, it is declared an offense against God to desire to wrong him, in his family rights by the Ninth;
    * and in his property rights by the Tenth.

This legislation expresses not only the Maker's positive will, but the voice of nature as well--the laws which govern our being and are written more or less clearly in every human heart. The necessity of the written law is explained by the obscuring of the unwritten in men's souls by sin. These Divine mandates are regarded as binding on every man, and their violation, with sufficient reflection and consent of the will, if the matter be grave, is considered a grievous or mortal offense against God. They have always been esteemed as the most precious rules of life and are the basis of all Christian legislation.

[Anonymous]

All the law can be printed on both sides of a 3x5 card

1. A workman is worthy of his hire
(Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II
Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: "It is against equity for freemen
not to have the free disposal of their own property.").
2. All are equal under the Law
(God's Law--Ethical and Natural Law). (Exodus 21:23-25;
Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke
10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: "No one is above the
law."; "Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be
common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the
private gain of a few.").
3. In Commerce truth is sovereign
(Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; Matt. 6:33, John 8:32; II Cor.
13:8. Legal maxim: "To lie is to go against the mind."
4. Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit
(Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt.
5:33; James 5:12).
5. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in
Commerce (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: "He
who does not deny, admits.").
6. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment
in Commerce (Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court,
tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or
"duel," of commercial affidavits wherein the points
remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the
matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.).
7. A matter must be expressed to be resolved
(Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: "He
who fails to assert his rights has none.").
8. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by
default (Book of Job; Matt. 10:22. Legal maxim: "He who
does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.").
9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility
(One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear
an oath that he consents to claim against his commercial
liability in the event that any of his statements or actions is
groundless or unlawful, has no basis to assert claims or
charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim
authority.) (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen, maxim: "He who
bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.").
10. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through
rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point, resolution by
jury, or payment (Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelation. Legal
maxim: "If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the
defendant is absolved.").

[Anonymous]

Here is the rest of the story...

The Commercial Maxims
For many people it might come as a surprise (in
many cases a pleasant one) if they were informed that
essentially all of the law of the world is founded on,
derived from, and is a function of ten simple,
essential, and fundamental Commercial Maxims seven
(7) basic ones plus three (3) corollaries. These
foundational principles/axioms underlie all of man's
law. Notwithstanding the vastness and complexity of
the law today, it is safe to say that all of the world's
law is fundamentally a function of the ten
Commercial Maxims. Although the dazzling
complexity and ever-changing forms, parameters, and
labels obfuscate this fact, the essence of the matter
remains intact.
The Commercial Maxims constitute the basic
rules involved in preventing and resolving disputes,
including relating in life and commercial affairs as if
disputes might arise and written proof of one's
position, in time and content, must be securely
established. Although commerce is usually thought of
as "buying, selling, and trading," all of man's
interactions with his fellow man are considered as
being "commerce." Commerce encompasses all
relationships between people.
Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, for
instance, defines "commerce" as follows:
Commerce. "The exchange of goods, productions, or
property of any kind; the buying, selling, and
exchanging of articles.... Intercourse by way of trade
and traffic between different peoples or
states...including not only the purchase, sale, and
exchange of commodities, but also the
instrumentalities and agencies by which it is
promoted and the means and appliances by which it
is carried on, and transportation of persons as well as
of goods, both by land and sea.... Also interchange of
ideas, sentiments, etc., as between man and man."

The Commercial Maxims codify the
fundamental principles/maxims of law and commerce
upon which man's law and governments have
operated on this planet for at least the past 4-6
thousand years. They constitute, as it were, the rules
of the game. Part of the grief of mankind today is that
the vast, overwhelming percentage of the populace
does not know the basic rules of the game they are
playing and are hence incapable of playing it. If one
who does not know the rules of a game is playing that
game with others who are masters of the rules, the
outcome is a foregone conclusion: the one who
knows the rules wins the game while the one who
does not know the rules necessarily loses. Such is the
state of the world.
Elucidating the underlying, fundamental rules
so that one understands what is going on helps
greatly in "leveling the playing field." These rules,
therefore, are set forth below with the understanding
that they operate within the context and setting of the
universal Underlying Principles. The Commercial
Maxims are the most basic, enduring, and minimalist
codification of universal, real law extant on earth.
They are very simple, largely self-evident, and based
on common sense. The Jews, for instance, have
studied, analyzed, practiced, and refined Commercial
Law, founded on these Maxims, for thousands of
years. This continuous, relentless, single-minded
absorption in the law over millennia has "worked the
bugs out." Every angle, facet, ramification,
application, and nuance of practice of Commercial
Law has been seasoned over time, and is deeply and
thoroughly known by those who "own, run, and rule
the world."
Indeed, the "Elite" are precisely where they
are because they do know this fundamental law,
because it is real, that it must work, always works,
and it is impossible for it not to work, since it is
grounded in natural law. Those who do not know and
use the law by which everything functions
necessarily and always lose. This esoteric truth must
be obscured and concealed from the "masses" by
every means possible. Otherwise, those who would
rule mankind would have no way of obtaining their
positions of power, privilege, and plunder (all of
which are frauds). By knowing and using the law
themselves and keeping the knowledge of such law
from the masses, the people are deliberately rendered
defenceless, confused, emasculated, dependent,
helpless "sheeple," considered as existing for the
purpose of being exploited, herded, sheered, gelded,
and slaughtered at will.
The Powers That Be thus achieve and operate
their monopoly on "law" (the very thought is absurd,
like stating one has a monopoly on light or life), by
propagandizing the lie that law is so complex,
esoteric, obtuse, vast, and confusing that only they
and their hatchet men called "attorneys" and "judges"
can administer it. The law is "mystified," made into
some kind of quasi-religious cult, operated by a high
priesthood that alone has the knowledge and
authority for operating the resulting "legal system"
that rules the life of man. Law must be transformed
into a "closed union shop" such as the Bar
Association, into whose hands the people must
entrust their "lives, fortunes, and sacred honour"
without availability of alternative sources of remedy
and redress of grievances. Where can one go for
relief when the fox guards the henhouse?
If the so-called "Rulers of the World" did not
withhold from general understanding the knowledge
that the foundational principles of real law are few in
number and easily mastered by everyone, and that all
of the documents and instruments used in all law and
commerce are likewise few in number and
comprehensible to laymen, such con men would have
to abandon their aristocratic "titles of nobility" and
find real jobs based on genuine productivity,

contribution, and "win-win" interactions with their
fellow man. It is empowering and exhilarating to
understand that the ever-changing, monstrous
vastness of "law" can be distilled into a handful of
universal principles that can be contained on a 3" X
5" card, and that all of the legal documents and
instruments functioning today can be mastered by
nearly anyone.
Attorneys and Judges deliberately conceal the
fact that the only significance inhering in court cases
and statutes consists of the simple and universal
principles of commercial law codified by the
Maxims. All legal documents, proceedings, and
processes are obscured by re-naming and
mislabelling said documents and processes in
accordance with whatever degrees of multiplicity and
complexity are needed for preserving its inaccessible
aloofness. Law is made diffuse, enormously complex,
and allegedly far beyond the ken of regular folks.
With knowledge of the truth underlying all of that
misdirection and deception, i.e. seeing through the
Wizard's Light Show, you can understand what is
happening and place yourself in a position of mastery
of the situation instead of being relegated to the status
of a confused, helpless victim forever in the dark and
at the mercy of those who exploit your ignorance of
the rules and processes by which law (i.e. organized,
deadly force) operates. In short, "Know the truth and
the truth shall make you free."
As mentioned above, the word "commerce"
encompasses all interactions and interchanges
between people, including exchanges of such "noncommercial"
things as "ideas, sentiments, etc." The
fundamental principles and precepts of universal
commercial law that have for millennia formed the
underpinnings of civilized law on this planet are both
biblical and non-biblical, i.e. their truth and validity
is a function of themselves and the long-accepted
usage and practice by many cultures and peoples, in
diverse forms, throughout the world for thousands of
years. These fundamental Maxims of Commerce,
which underlie all commercial documents,
instruments, and processes, are enumerated herewith
(with biblical references in parenthesis):
1. A workman is worthy of his hire
(Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Matt. 10:10; Luke 10:7; II
Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: "It is against equity for freemen
not to have the free disposal of their own property.").
2. All are equal under the Law
(God's Law--Ethical and Natural Law). (Exodus 21:23-25;
Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke
10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: "No one is above the
law."; "Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be
common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the
private gain of a few.").
3. In Commerce truth is sovereign
(Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; Matt. 6:33, John 8:32; II Cor.
13:8. Legal maxim: "To lie is to go against the mind."
4. Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit
(Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt.
5:33; James 5:12).
5. An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in
Commerce (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: "He
who does not deny, admits.").
6. An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment
in Commerce (Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court,
tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or
"duel," of commercial affidavits wherein the points
remaining unrebutted in the end stand as the truth and the
matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.).
7. A matter must be expressed to be resolved
(Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: "He
who fails to assert his rights has none.").
8. He who leaves the field of battle first loses by
default (Book of Job; Matt. 10:22. Legal maxim: "He who
does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it.").
9. Sacrifice is the measure of credibility
(One who is not damaged, put at risk, or willing to swear
an oath that he consents to claim against his commercial
liability in the event that any of his statements or actions is
groundless or unlawful, has no basis to assert claims or
charges and forfeits all credibility and right to claim
authority.) (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen, maxim: "He who
bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit.").
10. A lien or claim can be satisfied only through
rebuttal by Counter-affidavit point-for-point, resolution by
jury, or payment (Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelation. Legal
maxim: "If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the
defendant is absolved.").

[targa2]

Also, by following these precepts properly in the administrative realm, one stays in HONOR before the court.  Once you fall in to DISHONOR you lose.

Most people go in to courts to argue.  This puts one in dishonor.  Unless the opposing side falls into a deeper dishonor , you are the loser.A lawyer will put you in, and keep you in dishonor, throughout an entire proceeding.  The arguing was supposed to be done PRIOR to seeking judicial remedy.  A judge will view arguing parties in his presence as mere children, who cannot behave and play nice with each other.

Res Judicata

[Anonymous]

targa2, you nailed it square on the head!

All crime is "commercial crime" and the only crime is "breach of contract"
If one does not rebut their offer then one is seen to be assenting to what ever they lay on you as a claim.
One either honors the offer by returning the honor or.....goes into dishonor.
Thats why Christ stated "Agree with thine adversary along the way lest he deliver you to the magistrate and the magistrate turn you over to the baliff."

Now seeing that all crime is commercial then we should concentrate on the law governing commercial activity....RIGHT?
Here in Canada that would be the Bills of Exchange Act.
There is where they spell out "presentment, honor, dis-honor, value, valuable consideration, non-acceptance, default,etc."
The Personal Property Security Act also comes into play and that is where they claim ones signature is an asset of considerable value.
It also strates in the aforementioned act that if any other act should conflict with the PPSA then the PPSA shall prevail.

Speaking of bills....I carry a bill book wherever I go should the need arise to give someone (i.e. cops, dog catcher, tax collectors etc.) a bill for unauthorized services.
It is the only way to achieve justice in todays world....believe me when I tell this.
Here in Canada failure to "pay, dispute, thereby discharging the bill will result in dishonor and when one enters the Court of Queens Bench with your notice of dishonor (quilty verdict) in ones hand then, where does that leave the judge?
He has nothing to adjudicate.....absolutely "ZIP"!
His jurisdiction is now limited to issuing the order to pay or collect.
Equity is brutal....is it not?
Go back and re-read my post "their trying to use contract law"

Example:

BILL # 09005

February 15, 2009

To;
Sask Justice Traffic Safety Court Prosecutor Larry Danylyshen
Traffic Safety Court
220 19th, Street East, Saskatoon, Sask., S7K 2H6

Accounts payable,

RE: SOT/Info number 44654345
Unauthorized services provided under protest on September 10, 2008 9:40 am court room # 5 by the Traffic Safety Court prosecutor in an application to a Justice of the Peace thereby causing incarceration for a total of 1.5 hours calculated at the agreed upon rate of $2000.00 per hour as per FEE SCHEDULE in violation of the claimant/claimants agent's perfected contract "Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right", for a sum certain of $3000.00 (three thousand dollars) payable upon demand.

Confirmation of the aforementioned contract in full force and effect may be viewed at the holders in due course at: The Mayors office at city of Saskatoon, office of Saskatoon City Counsellor for Ward 2 Pat Lorje, office of MLA for Riversdale Lorne Calvert, the office of Carol Skelton M.P. for Saskatoon-Rosetown-Biggar or Saskatoon Police Chief Clive Weighills office.

Payment is to be made to the claimant:

Harper, Jackie G.
1040B 20th Street West, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
S7M 0Y7.

Failure to pay or dispute/protest this bill within (10) days will result in a notary action via a statement of claim to ensure collection in full [plus costs], to be registered at Court of Queens Bench.
Please register all disputes and counter claims in the notaries office by the day assigned.

Failure to honour this offer will be deemed to mean you have waived your right to a Notice of Protest and consent to an immediate Administrative Judgment.


Interest on any outstanding balance to be calculated at; 18% per annum from date of service.


Signature of billing agent for the claimant:



X___________________________________________________________________________________agent
with power of attorney in fact


Witness __________________________________________


Address ______________________________________________________



Jackie-Grant-Vel'oice: Harper
c/o 1040-B 20th Street West,  
Saskatoon city, Saskatchewan province.
                                                                                                                                                                         

cc; Sask Justice

[Anonymous]

Example of blank bills I carry:

Notice of Intent to BILL under protest # __________

Date: _________________


To: _______________________________________________________
     
      _______________________________________________________  

Officer/agent providing unauthorized services;

TO WIT: ________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________

All billing is pursuant to the claimant's perfected "Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of Right".

A copy of which may be viewed at the office of SPS Chief Clive Weighill.

Drawn in the city of Saskatoon, province of Saskatchewan pursuant to the Bills of Exchange Act.

Billing is at the rate of $200.00/$2000.00 per hour under protest as agreed per FEE SCHEDULE in the Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right.
Bills are payable upon presentment and demand.

Noticed served by _______________________________________agent

for accused debtor with general power of attorney in fact.                                                                                  


                                   
Administrator and agent with general power of attorney in fact for accounts pertaining to "HARPER, Jackie G." and/or "JACKIE GRANT HARPER"

Appointed administrator:

Jackie-Grant-Vel'oice: Harper
c/o 1040-B 20th Street West,                                                                                                                                                                               Saskatoon city, Saskatchewan province.
Free-man-on-the-Land, Non-consenting and ungoverned
All Rights Reserved, Exercised at Will and Fully Defended, By the Grace of God, The Rule of Law and the Law of the Land.

Another....

Bill #_______

DATE: ____________________

PAYEE:______________________________________


DRAWER: X_________________________________



Pay to the order of bearer the sum certain, "VALUE" $_____.___

Memo:  "comsumer purchase"


Accepted for value recieved and returned for full settlement
pursuant to the B of E Act 152 (3), (4), (5)


Drawn in the city of Saskatoon, province of Saskatchewan.




Settlement  made by:

X__________________________________________

Name:____________________________________

Adress______________________________________

[targa2]

If one does end up in a courtroom setting, the only way to stay in HONOR is to make use of conditional acceptances, stated with a negative averment .
Eg.  " I conditionally accept your offer to remove myself from the farm  , if you can prove that  by doing so, the endangered species in question ,would live and flourish in my absense ! "

This is a difficult skill to acquire.

[Anonymous]

targa2,
Yes.. its called "word art"
Its a game of chess usually conducted on paper.
Her is an example of something I just sent to a fellow free man in B.C. who is charged with practicing law without a license...

How to kill a lawyer....
0[/youtube]
Notice Seeking Clarification from the Law Society of British Columbia

RE: Carmel Wiseman's Supreme Court Order #____________________

Dear Madam,
In order that I maintain an honourable position I wish to go along with your notional order that I should refrain from practicing law until such time as I become a member in good standing holding a subsisting certificate.

However...would you please help me along here, as I am aware that it's a long journey to that end which you seek....should I wish to go there.

So...without any further a due, in order that I may come to an equitable understanding of your offer,

I wish to clarify the issue of "lawyers", being members, [holding subsisting certificates] of the "Law Society of British Columbia" while involved in the "administration of justice".

Is it true, as to their claimed position of participating solely "in the administration of justice" for the benefit of the people?

or,
in the alternative,

Is it true, that they only involve themselves solely in the act of "trade and commerce" for their own private gain?

Is a 'lawyer' while involved in "law practice", in the "administration of justice" in the Province of British Columbia, a taxable event subject to 6% GST?

If I was to benefit from being $charged$ while involved in "the administration of justice", would I be subject to being recharged under section 15 (3) (unlicensed practice for a fee) of The Legal Professions Act?

Does this hinge entirely on the direction of the flow of the currency?

Are members of the Law Society of B.C. who involve themselves in "law practice", in the "administration of justice", while claiming a legal money making monopoly thereby, charging people for legal advice, then,....are they not making that advice a commodity, a product, a service subject to 6% GST?

Yes?....No?

Who else is in bed with them?

Are these so called members also servicing federal judges and politicians?

Are these "members in good standing" charging a fee to service federal judges?

Is pimping lawyers out to the public a federal crime?

Or, is soliciting.... the crime?

If I employ a lawyer (solicitor) and he/she is fucking (servicing) me for a fee, am I now subject to 6% GST?

Or, in the alternative, is both of these aforementioned pair of cock suckers guilty of criminal activity?

What 'word art' are these 'species' of Pharisee's criminals hiding behind?

LAW IS WAR....Isn't it?

Please advise on point.

Your fellow member in waiting,


X____________________________________________ agent for the accused


p.s. billing info:
please feel free to $charge$ me as much as you wish for your legal advice and send me your bill pursuant to the Bills of Exchange Act section 16 (1) along with your BAR card number attached