US CODE: Title 28,3002. Definitions: “United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation;

[joeblow]

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/ ... -000-.html

TITLE 28 > PART VI > CHAPTER 176 > SUBCHAPTER A > § 3002

§ 3002. Definitions

(15) "United States" means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

[jai_mann]

Very nice! That goes in my research folder on legal code/definitions which are deceitful. I'll paste some here for others to examine.

First some snippits from the "hunting laws" (ie: ASK THE KING FOR PERMISSION LANDLESS PEASANT FUCKS!)

CALIFORNIA CODES
FISH AND GAME CODE
SECTION 1-89.1

83.  "State" means the State of California, unless applied to the
different parts of the United States.  In the latter case, it
includes the District of Columbia and the territories.


CALIFORNIA CODES
FISH AND GAME CODE
SECTION 716.3

(j) "License" means any license, permit, entitlement to use, or
other public document that conveys to the person to whom it is issued
the privilege of sport fishing, hunting, or trapping, that is
regulated by statute, ordinance, or administrative rule or regulation
of a participating state.

n) "State" means any state, territory, or possession of the
United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico, the Provinces of Canada, and other countries.
********************************
COMMENTARY: Pay close attention to #83 and  the qualifier about diff. parts of the United States. Since when does California law apply to other States? It doesn't so why would they even MENTION other "states". Look at what the "License" for "...the privilege of sport fishing, hunting, or trapping..." is issued for and who "rules" or "administrates it": "...a participating state".
State is a custom defined term which self-references itself to confuse the reader into thinking it means one of the 50 States. They would spell out the "50 states" if that's what they meant.

Here is an example from http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscod ... -000-.html
of United States Code TITLE 49 > SUBTITLE IV > PART B > CHAPTER 131 > § 13102
********************************
(9)  Highway.— The term "highway" means a road, highway, street, and way in a State.

(21)  State.— The term "State" means the 50 States of the United States and the District of Columbia.

********************************


Cal Code definitions:

"motor vehicle" descriptions
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisg ... n=retrieve

******************************************
CALIFORNIA CODES
VEHICLE CODE
SECTION 100-680

260.  (a) A "commercial vehicle" is a motor vehicle of a type
required to be registered under this code used or maintained for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit or
designed, used, or maintained primarily for the transportation of
property.
   (b) Passenger vehicles and house cars that are not used for the
transportation of persons for hire, compensation, or profit are not
commercial vehicles.  This subdivision shall not apply to Chapter 4
(commencing with Section 6700) of Division 3.
   (c) Any vanpool vehicle is not a commercial vehicle.
   (d) The definition of a commercial vehicle in this section does
not apply to Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 15200) of Division 6.

305.  A "driver" is a person who drives or is in actual physical
control of a vehicle.  The term "driver" does not include the
tillerman or other person who, in an auxiliary capacity, assists the
driver in the steering or operation of any articulated firefighting
apparatus.

310.  A "driver's license" is a valid license to drive the type of
motor vehicle or combination of vehicles for which a person is
licensed under this code or by a foreign jurisdiction.

415.  (a) A "motor vehicle" is a vehicle that is self-propelled.
   (b) "Motor vehicle" does not include a self-propelled wheelchair,
motorized tricycle, or motorized quadricycle, if operated by a person
who, by reason of physical disability, is otherwise unable to move
about as a pedestrian.
   (c) For purposes of Chapter 6 (commencing with Section 3000) of
Division 2, "motor vehicle" includes a recreational vehicle as that
term is defined in subdivision (a) of Section 18010 of the Health and
Safety Code, but does not include a truck camper.

670.  A "vehicle" is a device by which any person or property may be
propelled, moved, or drawn upon a highway, excepting a device moved
exclusively by human power or used exclusively upon stationary rails
or tracks.

470.  "Person" includes a natural person, firm, copartnership,
association, limited liability company, or corporation.


VEHICLE CODE 12500. (a) A person may not drive a motor vehicle upon a
highway, unless the person then holds a valid driver's license issued under this
code, except those persons who are expressly exempted under this code.(rest
omitted)
*********************************************

The pigs and the courts are revenuing from the ignorant masses by ticketing them if they do not have a "license", "license plate", or "registration". Many of the driving laws and laws in general spreading across the USA come out of communist California and New York where the Jews are attempting to implement (and have successfully so far) the Soviet style system. So many of the laws are similar. I've also examined the transportation code for Colorado (only required licenses of commercial drivers just like CA) and Maryland (appears to do exactly the same but I can not confirm because the term "transport" is not defined in the online code. It may not have been defined, but CA, Federal, and other states define it as meaning "for hire" moving of "property or passengers". It is possible it was defined in earlier versions of the code and then later omitted from print to convey the wrong application of the law. Unless definitions are redefined or retracted from law THEY ARE ALWAYS IN EFFECT FOR LAW and the way .gov works, they treat it as if YOU should know this.)

So if you wind up in court and you haven't read the code, you have no way of pointing out that the law doesn't apply to you or your actions (not that it should unless you consent but these fuckers don't care about that so you can either argue it on their terms, bend over and take it with no vaseline, or fight them guerilla warfare style because they are parasites that need to be put down). Personally I choose the last option and prep for it while at the same time examine their code just to see how they work through deceit and deception. The code is simply more proof that they need to be put down.

Joe blowman, if you come across other definitions please post them!
People should check out www.losthorizons.com for more info specifically on the IRS code. That site and Pete Hendrickson's book, Cracking the Code, are what got me into looking at the exact law and knowing to look for Nouns, Verbs, and Phrases which may be redefined to only mean specific groups in any code.

[sullivan]

Many of the driving laws and laws in general spreading across the USA come out of communist California

LOL. What is it with you guys? Everything you don't like is "Communist". California is no more communist than my cat.  California is decadent, materialist and vacuous, but it is not by any means Communist. Do serious think Arnie is a commie?

What you are identifying about is tyranny. Tyranny comes in lots of flavours, including the Soviet variety and your own peculiar brand... let's call that "blind, misguided patriotism" for those who might wince at the label "fascism".

and New York where the Jews are attempting to implement (and have successfully so far) the Soviet style system.

How much do you know about the Soviet system? Did you live there?  Have you ANY experience of living in any former Eastern Bloc country?  I have, and I can say that as far as car registrations and insurance are concerned, Russia is and always has been far more lax than any Western nation. Insurance only became mandatory about five years ago.

[targa2]

If you are using any mode of transport on the roads to move "persons" you are engaged in commerce and therefore are subject to the codes.

Get OUT of commerce and you get out of their jurisdiction.

You are in their box ,arguing that you are not in their box.  Just showing up in a court to do battle about the subject presumes that you are the "person " they are looking for and therefore, they have total jurisdiction over you.  Anything you say or do after this is irrelevant.  You lose.  I agree that it seems unfair, but if we are going to have any success in the legal realm we must first understand the game.

What matters most here is this.  If you are accepting ANY benefit in ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM  from a governmental body of ANY DESCRIPTION, you are deemed to be involved in commerce and are one of their slaves.  This includes something as simple as receiving postal delivery to your address.

A contract exists and it WILL be enforced under equity / admiralty.    " Equity is brutal, but we are merely enforcing agreements "

                                                                                                                                                      Judge Felix Frankfurter

PS read the first 5 pages or so of this document

http://www.hiscovenantministries.org/ma ... _condo.htm