Main Menu

Society??

Started by Anonymous, February 12, 2009, 08:56:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Anonymous

Society??

Just precisely where is this society which the public officials speak of??
When the government says, "we institute this statute to protect society."
Just exactly what society are they referring to??
What is this referenced society's name that they seek to protect???
Could someone in government please write it down on a piece of paper and slide it across the counter to me??
The only society that I am aware of in reference to any act, statute, rule or regulation is the Law Society.
Are you a member??
If you're not a member of the Law Society or any other named society then you must be subject to the members of the Law Society.
You can't name your society and they can point to theirs then, that must mean what????
We are all under the rule of the "separated out" ones, who claim immunity under some oath of office.
They use "word art" to capture us and hold us liable to their bull-shit they created.
The Jews have made an art of this for over 4000 years and no one seems to catch on.
Is that because people are just plain stupid or is it something else??
Listen up.....and I mean ALL OF YOU!!
Take a real good look around you as to how anyone in a position of power and influence uses as to the means of gaining control over you and then notice the "word art" comes into play.
Every single time, they propose an offer either verbal or written and you agree or disagree because you don't have an iota of an idea above the level of a snake's ass as to what they really stated, legally speaking and you just found yourself "FUCKED!!"
And you haven't the foggiest notion as to how that came to be!
It is all written in code and the code breaking books are lying around everywhere.
You just have to take the time to pick them up and take a look....that's it.
Here are a few examples in order to get the point across......

Free-man-on-the-Land claimed Interpretations  2006

The following interpretations are for the benefit of the reader, respondent, and/or accused including, but not limited to any and all who may read this or any other correspondence from a certain Free-man-on-the-Land:-Jackie-Grant-Vel'oice: Harper

Pharisees: one of an ancient Jewish sect who believed in the validity of the oral law and in the free interpretation of the written law, a self righteous or hypocritical PERSON.                                                                              
In reference to today, this person could be a: "Premier, a.k.a (Territorial Pharisees), or a Justice Minister (Federal or Provincial) or a Mayor of a City (municipal Pharisees).

Zionism is a direct descendent of Pharisiam.  

Scribe: an interpreter of law. A lawyer, mercenaries, mouthpieces,  without a mind of their own. A paid-for-profit-prophet.                                   A dramatist, able to assume another persons persona. (for a fee)                
Para-scribe: a unqualified and therefore, unscrupulous scribe.

LAWYER: A known purveyor of chaos.
Generally leads the way to the gallows or firing squad in any revolution.

Contract.  (for illustrative purposes) Lawyers hired by The State... argued, stated their "client's" position, made submissions... did everything they could to make sure The Court did what The State wanted...  Lawyers contracted to The State.  Mercenaries.  Mouthpieces.  Without a mind of their own.  For "lawyers" are trained "to follow their client's instructions"... to do what their clients want them to do...  to go where their clients want them to go... like in the story of Ruth and Naomi... whither thou goest, I will go... whither thou lodgest, I will lodge... thy people shall be my people... and thy God, my God...
 
What a wonderful illustration of "the blind leading the blind"... contracted to each other, shackled to each other, bound to each other, hand-cuffed to each other... saddled with mutual dutiful freedoms to act in certain ways, according to certain principles... following certain rules and procedures and regulations and legislation and statutes and codes...
 The State pays for knowledge of law.  The State does not know "the law"... It needs "legal advice", the State needs a "contract".

JACKIE GRANT VELOICE HARPER:                                              
A legal entity created by the PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN and later transferred to the Federal government upon registration and receipt of a SIN (social insurance number)                                                                
HARPER, Jackie G.:  A nom-deguerre, meaning "name of war, usually used by terrorists and enemies of the state."                                                                                                      Jackie HARPER: Same as above, with the exception of certain rights and/or privileges removed.                                                                                     Jackie Grant Veloice: Harper: A human being. A free will man without person (unseen, unheard, to which the government cannot legally act, for or against.) (check all of your government issued "plastic, statements, checks and any other demands or benefits it bestows on its subjects, i.e. slaves).                                            
Agent: Not a lawyer, unless claimed as such. Not legally responsible for the PERSON the agent represents, unless stipulated otherwise by express written consent.

PERSON:                                                                                                                  
A fraud.                                                                                                            
 A masked player on stage.                                                                                  
A legal fiction creation to coincide with a human being.                                                                                                                      
One that is assigned certain revocable rights, privileges and duties.                      
Not a human being.                                                                                            
Ones persona that a lawyer re-presents to the court.                                                                  
 A person cannot read, walk, talk, fart or soil their diaper and is therefore deemed totally incompetent and thus needs a "legal trustee" to represent the incompetent one to all other parent (crown) corporate persons.

All property reverts to the crown for want of a competent heir.(escheats Act)
                                                     
All acts and statutes apply only to PERSONS and not human beings.            
"PERSON", a legal entity assigned to a human being.                                                              
One human being may have many 'persons.'                                                      
 A Police Officer, Lawyer, Mayor and Doctor would be deemed a "titled legal fiction person" for all intents and purposes.                                                                  
The government or society cannot act for or against  a human being, but only for or against the 'Person' as a government or society is a Corporate Body Politic; it lacks a living soul and is thus deemed legally dead, thereby existing only on paper or in your mind.                                              Only by your submit ion can they claim power over you.                                                                              
 Most, if not all, titled legal fiction person's operate under limited liability and as such, cannot be held fully accountable for their actions.                                        
All persons are deemed to be; "Corporations" in Canada by Federal, Provincial and Municipal governments.                                                            All Corporations fall under the "Corporations Act" (all registered churches are corporations with Christ removed) and are thus bound to obey all the 60,000,000 by-laws, statutes, regulations, etc. in existence as they see fit on any given day.                                                                                                          PERSON
- [from the Latin persona; per (through or by) and sonus (sound), a latin word signifying primarily a mask used by actors on a stage; a pretender; a disguise; a fiction; a fake; a fraud]
- a TRADE NAME or ?mask? for the sentient, living being who uses it and assigns themselves as various forms of CHATTEL such as a VOTER, a TAXPAYER, a CITIZEN, an OFFICER, a PUBLIC VESSEL, a FLAG, etc.
- a LEGAL entity with LEGAL rights and existence including the ability to sue and be sued, to sign contracts, to receive gifts, to appear in court either by themselves or by lawyer and, generally, other powers incidental to the full expression of the entity in law. Individuals are "PERSONS" in law unless they are minors or under some kind of other incapacity such as a court finding of mental incapacity. Many laws give certain powers to "persons" which, in almost all instances, includes business organizations that have been formally registered such as PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS or ASSOCIATIONS. - from DUHAIME'S LEGAL DICTIONARY
 
Note: In order to truly be a faithful Christian, Jew, Muslim, Buddist, Rastafarian, etc. you must obey your faith and declare yourself in a condition of faithful incapacity of serving the devil (or the Black Robe JUDGE devil) and the Creator at the same time. Your true self is also in a condition of true incapacity of being a PERSON, since you are a live, living man or woman and a PERSON is a DEAD LEGAL FICTION (one is truly existant, one is an abstraction).
All human beings in Canada are assigned, by contract, a 'PERSON", upon completion and submission of the "Registration of Live Birth." PERSONS are requested to reaffirm their status as chattel security on a regular basis with the government. (i.e. renewal of licences, permits etc.)                                                                
Corporations may take on the same rights, privileges and duties as a person.                                                                                                            All persons are bonded and insured at birth.                                          
According to the "Canadian Ownership Control and Determination Act", corporations are valued, bought and sold according to the Acts mandate, inclusive of 'Persons.'                                                                                    
All PERSONS are "owned slaves of someone."

The word "person" appears 139 times in the KJV Bible and nowhere does it imply or infer that its good to be a "person", on the contrary
Lev.19
1.[15] Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.


Caesar: You guessed it! A leader, a self proclaimed God. i.e. President George Walker Bush or Tony Blair.

"NiHIL DICIT", [Latin, He says nothing. It is the failing of the defendant to put in a plea or answer to the plaintiff's declaration by the day assigned; and in this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane's Ab. Index, h. t.]

FREE-MAN. One who is in the enjoyment of the right to do whatever he pleases, not forbidden by law. One in the possession of the civil rights enjoyed by, the people generally. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 164. See 6 Watts, 556:

Free-man-on-the-Land: A sovereign, under control of no man, not a slave.                                                                                                                  Does not recognize, honour or accept defacto (illegitimate) authority.
Does not recognize "statutes" (society's rules) unless they are in complete harmony with the Law.
Does not recognize Law Enforcement Officers who, upon, not having observed a breach of the peace, impersonate Peace Officers and operate under 'colour of law', which gives statutes the 'force of law' against a Freeman-on-the-Land.
Operates in a common law jurisdiction and no-where else.                       
A Freeman-on-the-Land retains the right and knowledge to fire any  representative claiming to act as, his: M.P., MLA, Mayor, Alderman, Reeve, counsellor etc.                                                                                                        
A Freeman-on-the-Land does not vote (to do so, you lose your sovereignty).
"A Free-man-on-the-Land is a human being in a common law
jurisdiction who lawfully revokes or denies consent to be represented and governed and exists
completely free of all statutory restraints, obligations and restrictions.                        
A Free-man-on-the-Land recognizes that a license is permission to engage
in a lawful activity and realizing we are all equal, refuses to seek permission from anyone,
preferring instead to rely on claims. Anything you can do with a license within the legislative
framework you must be able to do lawfully without license outside that framework. You cannot
get a license to engage in unlawful activities, and to ask permission to engage in a lawful activity is
to be seen as a child by the one who grants that permission. Are you a child?"

Legal Trustee: The flesh and blood human being who has taken on responsibility for the dead legal fiction 'PERSON', or,                                            your lawyer representing your "person" to another legal fiction i.e. (the court or government).

Bankruptcy:                                                                                                      
The act of handing back your financially incapable 'PERSON' to the government via a third party.                                                                                            

Discharge from bankruptcy: Something no Free-man should do.
It is deemed to be good move to leave you're financially incapable person in the possession of the governments trustee......FOREVER!                                                                                                                                                                

Chattel: Old English for cattle, a mindless beast.
A stupefied mindless corporate slave, who may be bought and sold under the mandate of the "Canadian Ownership Determination and Control Act."

"CORPORATION"
A corporation = a psychotic entity.  A corporation does not and can not experience emotional reactions to words.  The sign of psychosis.  According to a recent study at the University of Cardiff, Wales. 
 
Assumption/presumption:                                                                                                      
The slayer of all governments.
What bottom feeders thrive on.
Cannot think outside the box.
A square heads creed.
When found in excessive use, usually results in self destruction (madness).
Has NEVER resulted in anything, but chaos.
Persons who excessively rely on assumptions almost always suffer from a lack of a sense of smell, whereas they may be found standing in shit up to their upper lip and not even remotely realize it.

province: A territory. A geographical area defined by borders and held by military might.                                           

Province: A corporation with no borders. A legal fiction entity existing only on paper or in your mind, where no human can exist, where only legal entities shuffle paper to and from other legal fictions.                                                                                                  

PROVINCE: a non-word. A 100% corporate fiction currently posing as a fraud.  (Translation Bureau of Canada: "Canadian Style").                                                                                                          

"PEACE OFFICER": Same as above.                                                                  

"HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN THE PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN": Same as above.                                                                    

Peace Officer:  obligated to distinguish between law and statutes, abide by and obey common law jurisdiction                                                          

Canada:   A British colony                                                            

Presumption:
It is presumed that you are a member and employee of the government and therefore, you have agreed to not dispute the employer/government's acts, statutes, rules and regulations as seen by the government's agents and employees in any way they deem fit in applying them to you.

CANADA:  A corporation, headed up by the Bank of England through its subsidiary, The Bank of Canada.                                                                                                                

Free-man-on-the-Land's creedo:                                                  
And God said; I will provide all that you ask for: Think!                      
I will fulfil all of your needs: Think!
Imagine, dream and think are three different words with three different definitions.
You can imagine a billion dollars.
You can dream about a billion dollars.
But, if you thought about it, spent a little time thinking about it, you wouldn't know what to do with a billion dollars. Whereas,
what you can think about is a good roof over your head, your family clothed and fed.........and not have to worry about your horse and cart being stolen everyday by the crown.
                                                                                                                                                     
by  Free-man-on-the-Land:- Jackie-G

Therefore, I claim as of a right that;                                                                                  

"The reason we have definite written rules, is to combat the arguments of stupid and opinionated men."


Here is how the Zionist Jew has you by the balls in...or out of court.........

On the subject of courts and the prospect that "He who does not deny....admits"
 
"They are trying to use contract law...."

Now let's get back to this court scenario...."if the defendant does not rebut the unproved assumptions and presumptions."
 
Then, according to the laws of procedure in an equity court their failure to rebut them....must mean what???
 
THEY MUST BE TRUE!!...BECAUSE YOU DIDN'T REBUT THEM!!
 
Which under the terms of contract law, you, have accepted the proposition.
 
You didn't rebut them right?....which is acceptance...
 
So, when you have offer and acceptance...isn't that a contract??
 
Doesn't that supersede any provisions required by formal law and procedure?
 
YES!!.....Because the parties are in agreement!!
 
And they can agree to waive remedies and provisions of law anytime they want.
 
Now I said to these people that I knew that are confused as to why in the world the judge found the defendant guilty when the judge knew there was no evidence for the plaintiff in the case.
 
I said he found the defendant guilty because he allowed and agreed that he should be found guilty.....you volunteered.
 
After all...haven't you heard before that everybody in prison is there because they volunteered.....of their own free will?
 
If you volunteered....doesn't that mean you had a contract??
 
Then....WHAT'S THAT GOT TO DO WITH LAW???
 
The end result was there was no evidence to rebut the presumptions.
 
So... the defense rested.
 
If the defense didn't rebut the presumptions.....did the plaintiff have a duty to bring evidence into the case???
 
OF COURSE NOT!!!
 
Because, they only have to bring evidence if, the defendant rebuts the presumptions.
 
ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!
 
Okay?...so here is what's going through the judges mind....he's going... "okay, there was charges of wrong doing...there was no evidence by the state, but the defendant's came on and didn't  rebut any of the charges...because they didn't rebut the charges....I, as the judge must weigh...well then, are the charges true as far as this case is concerned...or are the charges wrong?...as far as this case is concerned."
 
It has to do with what's the intent of the parties here...if there's no evidence...we can't rule on evidence...so it's not a law case.
 
It's a case in equity....we want to know what the intent of the parties are....isn't everybody out to gain all the news serviture?.....because the news never gets to the facts....they just want to know how you feel about the news all the time.
 
There's no facts before the court....there's no evidence before the court...we just want to know how everybody feels about it.....do they want to be found guilty or not??
 
And if they want to be found guilty...then we will go ahead and because we have their agreement ....we'll find them guilty!
 
The judge will sit back and he says, "well look... the charges, even though there not proved.... must be true!"
 
ALL RISE FOR THE JUDGE!!
 
Regards,

Free-man Jack
 
author, freelance journalist and entrepreneur (INGENUI) at large
- the masterful use of a lawful word, is a mighty sword – Harper

targa2

Well said Jack.  Most people think they have to prove something.  It's already decided res judicata

You showed up.......... it must be a you !
You answered to your name.......must be a fiction !
You accepted the benefit.........must want to bear the burden !
You didn't reserve your rights....must have waived them !
The paperwork went to your address....must be one of ours cause he lives there !

And so on and soon and so on.

Quite a freekin spiders web eh.

Anonymous

You bet!
All done with ones own consent.
They can have most sheeple literally standing knee deep in contracts expressed, implied and/or presumed.
Where the sheep has agreed to accept some benefits in exchange for his rights.
On and on it goes....up and up....till the circle must be squared.
And that day has arrived.