Mike Delaney of Prothink Denounces Ernst Zundel and Kevin Ma

[joeblow]

Mike Delaney of Prothink Denounces Ernst Zundel and Kevin Macdonald; Shills For Eric Hufschmidt

http://curtmaynardsnewestblog.blogspot. ... unces.html



Above, the cadaverous profile of Eric Hufschmidt, looks a bit like Michaell Chertoff huh?



Mike Delaney above

Talk about some nerve - this asshole Mike Delaney actually states that he knows more about the holocaust than Ernst Zundel! He then proceeds to shill for the known Zionist Jew disinformationist Eric Hufschmidt whose sister is actually married to Rupert Murdoch's son [I shit you not]. HERE is Hufschmidt, in his own words, on his own website stating the same. If you believe that's a coincidence, you're one dumb sumbitch.


Delaney is also connected to another asshole Jew that goes by the name of Quest [Real name Evren Hun Welshons-Kaplan (His mother's last name is Kaplan, as common a Jewish name as Goldfarb or Weinstein)]. Just last night this imbecile wrote a comment on my blog stating that he had read all of Ernst Zundel's books on the holocaust. [Comment at bottom under his pseudonym "Quest."] When I chastized him for being a liar and moron as Zundel has never written a book on the holocaust, he was a publisher, not an author, Evren Kaplan shot back that he [Zundel] had written "Did Six Million Really Die." As any revisionist knows, Richard Verrall, AKA Richard E. Harwood wrote that book and Zundel's publishing company Samisdat published it. This would be the kind of statement one might expect from a Jew shill, they don't bother to actually read revisionist works, they read excerpts and then expound on them with their superficial understanding. When caught they resort to name calling etc... it's as predictable as finding Jew involvement in economic crime.

In any case, with the stroke of a pen, Mike Delaney has completely exposed himself and Prothink; he denounces Ernst Zundel and Kevin Macdonald as agents of Zion and at the same time attempts to rehabilitate a known Zionist shill, Eric Hufschmidt. Delaney pals around with a known Khazar Jew, Evren Kaplan, what is one to think? Hufschmidt was once associated with another informant named Daryl Bradford Smith, but when Smith was exposed for what he was, they split up hoping that Hufschmidt might maiintain a modicum of credibility, which never really happened.

Read Delaney's words below; my commentary in blue.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Defense of Eric Hufschmidt

By Mike Delaney

This is in response to this recent article: http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/200 ... posed.html

The label Jew, crypto Jew, agent, cointelpro, etc, etc gets thrown around these days as does cheese burgers get eaten by obese Americans at McDonalds. In this recent slander attack on Eric Hufschmid to call him a Jew, Grimm makes the case strictly of the biases that Eric states Zundel is working on the wrong side of the fence. Ah, come on Mike, the fact that Hufschmidt's sister is married to Super-Zionist Rupert Murdoch's son is a pretty big fucking clue. You don't mention this absolute, empirical fact, in your article either, how come? I have to say that I find from my own experience that Eric usually calls out someone for a number of reasons but simplifies for his audience by calling them Jews/Zionists/working for Jews.

One reason for Eric calling people a Jew when they are probably not is the fact that some people are put up on pedestals for no apparent reasons or their actions are very Jew-like. Take the Zundel case for instance. The holocaust is clearly just obvious case of a Jew crime/hoax and Zundel does a good job stating this but so does many other people including Eric Hufschmid.

Why would Zundel limit himself to one issue and not highlight issues clearly provable like 9/11? I don't personally take a stance on what I think Zundel is because quite frankly I don't even look to him for information because he seems to know less then I do.Now THAT my friends is called Chutzpah!

The same goes for many others, Kevin Macdonald for instance doesn't speak about 9/11 and the Holohoax. Why is that? Because he's a tenured professor that would be fired if he were to say anything publicly about the way he privately feels on the matter I am sure I could hear a thousand excuses and I do understand he does have some excellent work otherwise, LOL at "I understand" he ,Professor Kevin Macdonald, does have "some" excellent work otherwise - this guy is almost too much. Reminds me of a cretin critiquing the work of a genius but people lets face it, we need to expose these Jews on all fronts and as efficient as possible. The BIGGEST crime these people could go down for is not the kosher tax, Holohoax, etc, but 9/11. We clearly have the evidence to prove the Jews did 9/11! Why not speak about that? Ernst Zundel is on record speaking about it you fucking bastard, he's on record stating that he knew before the second building collapsed that it was a mossad/CIA operation, and this is almost certainly why ZOG bent over backwards to illegally arrest Zundel on trumped up charges, to illegally deport him to Kanada where ZOG knew he'd be rendered to Germany and spend a decade behind prison walls. If ZOG fears anyone it's Ernst Zundel, there is no wayy in hell the governmennt was going to allow Ernst Zundel to exert 1/10th as much attention and energy on investigating 9-11, as he did on the holocaust. Ernst Zundel is a martyr and hero, you ignorant fool! You don't deserve to even utter his name

A slight problem I have, if I were to nitpick here, I have with both Grimm and Hufschmid is that both are still labeling this as a 'Zionist' problem. Obviously this dipshit hasn't even bothered to read anything Grimm's written, Patrick has no problem with the word Jew. I find it funny that people are still pigeonholed on saying the term Zionist, instead of Jew. This starts a whole new debate about when and were to 'comprimise' speeling challenged itz your message, which I wont do at all, a topic for another article. The one thing I can say about Hufschmid I know for sure is that he never ceases in pushing the biggest issues that would take down the Jew unlike many others. It's a shame to see others who put 9/11 being a Jew job on the back burner for far less important issues.

Hufschmid has also been thee litmus test in the 9/11 movement to expose the real perps of 9/11. ROTFLMWAO It is certainly suspicious that people like Zundel and Grimm don't harp on this 9/11 topic which I believe to be the biggest smoking gun that would bring these people down. Again, this guyy blows more smoke out of his ass, proving he hasn't read anything Grimm's written Between Hufschmid's scientific debunking film, 9/11 Painful Deceptions, and my film showing WHO did it, Missing Links, it is easy to show this to people. Instead we get caught up in overwhelming people with numerous and far less important topics that makes the audience catatonic when it comes to action.

I am sure Hufschmid has called out people out inaccurately but everyone makes mistakes and the good he does far out ways the mistakes. That's "outweighs" you goddamn moron! It's just a mistake really, anyone could denounce Ernst Zundel, a man that's devoted his entire life to exposing the Jew and who has spent that last six years rotting away in a German prison for an opinion that doesn't coincide with that of Jewry. Fuck You! Ask yourself this, where we be right now if it hadn't been for Hufschmid's work? Maybe I would still be listening to Alex Jones. DBS of Iamthewitness.com wouldn't have even been heard of like he is now DBS AKA Daryl Bradford Smith is also a known informant. Missing Links would never have been made. 9/11 and the controlling dissenting Jews would not have been exposed like they have been. Lets not forget it was of NO help from the pro-white movements to embrace or expose the truth about 9/11. For many years they were completely happen blaming 'towelheads' That's because people like Alex Linder of VNN, a so-called White nationalist site are informants and running false fronts for the feds and even today don't exploit this crime against their number 1 enemy like they cold. So ask yourself, before you step on toes to defame someone, make sure you have the story straight or that you have done better to even privilege yourself with the right to criticize. Delaney should have kept the old adage, "It's better to be silent and thought a fool, than to speak up and remove all doubt," in mind before writing this hit piece.


http://www.prothink.org/2009/05/20/in-d ... hufschmid/

[Ognir]

Shit between these 2 clowns, how many names did they shit on?

Anyone that says Zundel is an agent (EH) is a complete fuckin moron in my books.
People seem to forget the long trials he went thru, wearing his hard hat everyday to court and the battles he won against world Jewry.

Maynard seems to be completely fuckin nuts since his divorce. Besides posting photos of his large mexican wife's ASS
and admitting he has herpes........

More time wasting

[BXL]

This was also more or less the position of Daryl, until his split-up with Eric & Bollyn. Then he obviously stopped dwelling on this matter of "investigating all truth seekers" and left this issue entirely for Eric (doesn't necessarily mean that Daryl changed his opinion on all of these same "truthseekers" though (except some of them like Zundel & Mike Piper and so on...

[sirbadman]

Has DBS clarified his view on Zundel since 2008? I'm a fan of DBS but I would have question marks on him if he is against Zundel.

[Anonymous]

For your answer listen to Smiths last show with Dr. Day.

[BXL]

Has DBS clarified his view on Zundel since 2008? I'm a fan of DBS but I would have question marks on him if he is against Zundel.

It is illegal to "clarify" certain things if you are located in certain countries, lest ye forget. But even discounting that, I don't think that someone like DBS needs to clarify all of his opinions that he shared with someone in the past "only" because he isn't cooperating with that person any longer. He has already done that to an extent - to the amount he thought is necessary. These things happen naturally so there is no need to make demands on someone that has talked, discussed and written about lots and lots of subjects. Otherwise there would be no end is sight. Next minute someone is gonna demand for DBS to "clarify" his position on the Apollo moon landing issue :mrgreen:

[Free Truth]

:lol:   :lol:   :lol:

Why would Zundel limit himself to one issue and not highlight issues clearly provable like 9/11? ...The BIGGEST crime these people could go down for is not the kosher tax, Holohoax, etc, but 9/11. We clearly have the evidence to prove the Jews did 9/11! Why not speak about that?

From Bollyn interview/EH correspondence thread:

Bollyn:

Eric...
Your recently-stated lack of interest in 9-11 is nothing new, as you and I both know. Years ago you encouraged me to give up my research on 9-11. You never expressed any interest in the thermite evidence. You wouldn't even come to Utah, from California, to meet with Dr. Steven E. Jones when I invited you to meet him in March 2006. Now that Dr. Jones has produced scientific proof of super-thermite in the dust of the WTC -- you don't show the slightest interest. You have not even presented this crucial discovery on your website. First you claimed to be a 9-11 activist for the truth, with family ties to Rupert Murdoch and all of that -- and now that we have solid scientific proof of an inside conspiracy to pulverize the twin towers, you avoid it.

Eric, your interest in 9-11 has always been rather superficial. I recall a comment that you wrote in your book, when you talk about the molten metal falling from the tower. Because you could not accept that it was molten metal, you wrote something about it being liquified human remains. Utter nonsense, of course, but it did not stop you from putting it in your book. As twisted and ridiculous as it sounds, you went ahead and published it.

Now, regarding your last email to me on Friday, May 8:

ERIC HUFSCHMID wrote: My lack of interest in 9/11 is NOT like [Michael] Rupert or [Gregory] Zeigler. I don't have any interest in 9/11 because nobody has been asking me for details about 9/11 for many years.

Seems that partners Mike and Eric need to have a chat about thermate evidence and the admitted lack of interest in "The BIGGEST crime these people could go down for."

Hufschmid has also been thee litmus test in the 9/11 movement to expose the real perps of 9/11.

ROFL indeed.

I find it funny that people are still pigeonholed on saying the term Zionist, instead of Jew.

Right, keep on referring to the criminals by what they want us to call them...keep on calling fake jews jews (to get the trained goy reaction); a word that can't be properly defined and shouldn't even exist.
Keep on making the truth tellers look irrational... Haven't ya'll given AJ enough ammo yet? (It may be time to just shut up)

DBS AKA Daryl Bradford Smith is also a known informant.

An informant?
Yeah, Daryl is an informant all right. A good one too... He's informed me of many askenazi and zionist crimes!

And finally, Mike still isn't proof reading...  :roll:    :lol:

[Ognir]

It's not even the lack of "proof reading...", these guys aren't even on the same page :lol:

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

I find all this "shill" calling to be getting lamer and lamer. each and every one of them has accused each other of being a shill at some point in time. DBS called Piper a shill and likewise. DBS calls everybody a shill except for himself, and ognir. Hufschmid calls everybody a shill. Bollyn seems to be the most level headed of them all, not constantly calling people shills. DBS, however, was the one who tried to get Eric to "smash and attack" Bollyn.

I'm not vouching for any one in particular but who's not a shill? The term gets thrown around as often as Jews throw around the term "anti-semite". It's worthless now.

[BXL]

I find all this "shill" calling to be getting lamer and lamer. each and every one of them has accused each other of being a shill at some point in time...

You have a point. Some of the time the namecalling is more of an indication of bitter/jealous personal quarrel among otherwise like-minded folks rather than "shilling" on one or the other side. However some of the time it is no doubt the case of "subversion" by Judaic elements.

DBS calls everybody a shill except for himself, and ognir. Hufschmid calls everybody a shill. Bollyn seems to be the most level headed of them all, not constantly calling people shills...

lol - wrong

Even Bollyn is in on the namecalling action. Check out one his very latest diatribes. He slams Hufschmid in a long extensive article full of "tabloid" photographs, but also accuses Daryl of all kind of foulplay. I fact Daryl turned against Bollyn only after Bollyn made private photos public if my memory serves me right. Bollyn is repeating that action in his latest hitpiece.

[joeblow]

[Chargeemquick]

DeLaney has fecked up now.You don`t drag Zundel`s name through the dirt or belittle what Kevin Macdonald has done for the cause if you want popularity or respect in this truth-telling coalition.He`d get laughed off of Stormfront if he tried that kind of see-through disinfo on there(See,D.B.S ?).
Can everyone just put Mike Delaney in the "soiled" pile from now on.

[AK3N470N]

He soiled himself long ago but seems to be going lower and lower. The soap opera doesn't seem to have an end in site, and the editor for that website is still MIA. How I see it, if you are pushing this master race rhetoric, and you know how to build a website, you should know how to enable the auto spell check function for the programs you wish to use. This is 2009 ffs.

I can't understand why he is calling out so many different people over the internet anyways. I'm sure it isn't gaining him new viewers. Unless they are coming from some white nationalist site, and those guys usually have grammar and spelling issues as well.

The website looks nice (copy of John's but whatever) but the quality of info went way down.

[Travis]

Who said 'Kaplan' is a Jewish surname? It is a Turkish surname meaning Lion.

[Chargeemquick]

Unless they are coming from some white nationalist site, and those guys usually have grammar and spelling issues as well.

Ha,ha.The black and Mexican nationalists are such scholars of course.

[Rockclimber]

For the most part I think people are finally ignoring Queerst, Prostink, and Hufshit. They're basically irrelevant and are a shit stain to the anti zionist movement.

I say ignore them, their drama queens.

[rmstock]

Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:39:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Robert M. Stockmann" <stock@stokkie.net>
To: Michael Hoffman
Subject: Ernst Zündel's Candian Lawcases
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0906082123110.1628-100000@hubble.stokkie.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Micheal,


The fact that Ernst Zündel won his Canadian Lawcases in the 1980s
and 1990s has dire consequences for our Zionist run Empire which
is based in part on the Holocaust .... Texe Marrs did a interesting
broadcast mentioning an investigative journalist from the
other camp John Sack ... read below.

Best Regards,

Robert
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org  stewwebb@sierranv.net, tom2@tomflocco.com,
     timrifat@rvscience.com, prophecy@texemarrs.com, one_ibl@yahoo.com,
     sam@libertyroundtable.com,
     henry@savethemales.ca, rick458@cox.net, mike@radioactivetalk.com,
     eric@iamthewitness.com, prothink@yahoo.com, tarpley@tarpley.net,
     eirns@larouchepub.com, freeworldalliance@yahoo.com, articles@davidicke.com,
     michaelcollinspiper1960@yahoo.com,
     Tillawi@currentissues.tv, wmreditor@waynemadsenreport.com, lennybloom@gmail.com, email@spirituallysmart.com, vyzygoth@hotmail.com,
     http://judicial-inc.biz/Auschwitz.htm for
   conditions at Auschwitz.)
   (3) Strict orders to the SS not to rape. ("At Auschwitz, the Jews
   weren't raped (The SS men could be hanged for it)" 87), (On the
   other hand, at the Jewish prison, "At night, the guards went to the
   woman's barracks, chose half a dozen women, took them to their
   quarters outside the barbed wire, and gang-raped them." 202; also
   107). Nor could the German guards beat the prisoners: "Himmler
   ordered on August 16, 1935, `Any independent individual action
   against the Jews by any member of the SS is strictly forbidden.' "
   (201). A Jewish boxer hit a German guard at Auschwitz, knocking him
   down, yet was not even disciplined. (36-37).
   (4) The use of prison labor in factories. (2, 13)
   (5) Shaving hair, showering, swabbing with disinfectant (22), and
   using lice powder (123) to kill lice and thereby prevent typhus.
   (22, 123).
   (6) Tattooing numbers on arms, presumably to be able to account for
   each prisoner. (22).
   (7) To escape the oncoming Russians (when the Russians took over,
   they "lined up to rape even eight-year-old and eighty-year-old
   nuns." (48-49), and people were indiscriminately shot.), the
   Auschwitz inmates were marched back to Germany, slowing down the
   Germans. "What worse impediment to any hell-bent retreat than the
   slow, stumbling feet of its sixty thousand slaves?" (2).
   ( The Polish governor who, after the war, said, "I'd thought the
   Germans killed all the Jews. But the Jews are taking over." (60).
   (9) "In time, three-fourths of the Germans at Shlomo's camp [Shlomo
   Morel, the head of the Office of State Security] were dead and
   Shlomo announced, `What the Germans couldn't do in five years at
   Auschwitz, I've done in five months at Schwientochlowitz'." (107)
   (10) "At various times, all but one SS man at Auschwitz had gone to
   Hoss, the commandant, distressed by the last dying cries of Jews."
   (124). An SS officer actually helped the Jews. (116; also, 125).
   
   The author apparently does not realize that these acts imply
   keeping the Jews alive and make no sense if the Jews were to be
   killed.
   
   The author is uncomfortable with using German wrongs to justify
   Jewish wrongs, however, and he tells us that the Torah does not
   sanction revenge (171) and even requires Jews to report the sins of
   others. (xi). This suggests that the behavior of these Jews is not
   typical of Jews. Yet every time that Jews have had absolute power
   over non-Jews they have tortured and killed them. This was true in
   the early Soviet Union, where Jews headed the secret police and ran
   the Gulags (e.g., "Jewish-Run Concentration Camps in the Soviet
   Union," by Dr. Hermann Greife). It was true of the Jewish Soviets
   during WWII, and even today we see this behavior by Jews against
   the Palestinians.
   
   In the American camps for Germans after WWII, the Americans also
   mistreated and killed Germans and, again, Jews both did it and were
   behind the orders to do it. "George Orwell saw a Jewish
   interrogator at an American camp for Germans kicking an SS general,
   shouting `Get up, you swine!' " (190). Eisenhower and Truman,
   implementing the Jewish Morgenthau plan to starve the entire German
   people, killed at least nine million Germans by exposure and
   starvation (see James Bacque's "Other Losses"); American soldiers
   burned their leftover food to keep starving Germans from eating it
   from the garbage and American soldiers were punished if they gave
   food to the starving Germans, even to children. Americans were not
   as brutal and senseless in their torture, but they killed far more
   Germans than did the Jews in their camps and prisons. (Wikipedia,
   "Eisenhower and German POWs" and "Gruesome Harvest" by Ralph
   Franklin Keeling). Jews were also involved in seeking revenge at
   the Nuremburg trials. (David Irving's "Nuremburg," 61).
   
   Even though the author cites German wrongs to justify Jewish
   revenge, he mentions a few items that reduce the criminality of the
   Germans:
   (1) "[T]he Jews in the Office had acted willfully, but the Germans
   mostly followed orders," (198).
   (2) "The Jews - who had studied the Torah - had known they were
   doing wrong, but the Germans had mostly thought that they were
   doing right." (198).
   
   To that list I would add a few more items:
   (3) The Jews put Germans into camps not because they believed those
   Germans were a threat to them, but to exact revenge upon them. The
   Germans put the Jews in camps for the same reason that the
   Americans put the Japanese in camps - they believed that the Jews
   would fight against them. This belief was based on, among other
   things, the betrayal by some German Jews in WWI (the 1917 Balfour
   Declaration, which obligated Great Britain to support a Jewish
   homeland in Palestine in return for the Jews getting the U.S. into
   the war against Germany), the heavy Jewish involvement in the
   efforts of Communists to overthrow the German government, and the
   1933 Jewish boycott of German goods, which constituted a
   declaration of war against Germany. The Germans tortured and killed
   during the war, when they were in grave danger of being killed
   themselves; the Jews tortured and killed after the war, when they
   were in no danger from the Germans.
   (4) The Jews tortured and killed for revenge. (6). Lola says, "I
   want revenge" (45). "[The Jews] killed German men, women, children,
   babies, whose `crime' was just to be Germans." (x). Catholic
   priests (98-100, 202) and blond Germans (102) were particularly
   targeted. Revenge satisfies an intense need to win. Taking revenge
   is proof that, in the end, the Jews did not lose. Revenge is not a
   rational emotion because it can have great costs, such as
   punishment and retaliation later, while the only benefit is the
   perverse psychological satisfaction it provides. (130). By placing
   such a high value on revenge, the Jews planted the seeds for
   anti-Semitism in the future. The only information the Jews obtained
   from torture was a confession that a prisoner was in the Nazi
   Party, that he was SS, at the camps, or whatever they wanted him to
   say. That information, the author admits, was mostly false. (80).
   It was of no use except to justify their lust for revenge. The
   Germans, on the other hand, tortured to obtain militarily-useful
   information.
   (5) The Germans tortured and killed partisans; the Jews tortured
   and killed mostly innocent non-combatants. After the war, the Jews
   were in no danger from German partisans, as there weren't any.
   "Partisans" are people in occupied territory who attack troops and
   commit acts of sabotage without wearing uniforms, then vanish into
   the civilian population. To protect civilians, the Paris Convention
   did not give rights to partisans. It is therefore accepted practice
   to kill partisans and to torture them to obtain information on who
   they are, where they are, and what their plans are. And the author
   himself notes that many of the Jews in his book were partisans.
   (41, 44, 45, 70, 84-85, 100, 200-201, 215, 223). Even when Lola and
   her friends worked at Auschwitz, they sabotaged the armaments they
   were making so that they would detonate prematurely, killing
   Germans instead of the enemy. (26, 27, 29, 30).
   (6) The Jews starved and died of typhus at the German camps, mostly
   near the end of the war, not because the Germans refused to feed
   them or treat them, but because they could not do so as the Allies
   had bombed the railroad lines, roads, and pharmaceutical factories,
   and had blockaded Germany to starve the Germans into surrendering.
   The German prisoners starved not because there was no food, but
   because the Jews would not feed them. (88). German mothers in the
   prison who gave birth were not permitted to nurse their babies
   because a Jewish doctor from Auschwitz wouldn't let them; the
   babies were given only a weak soup and, "Of the fifty babies there,
   forty-eight died." (128). The doctor was tried for murder but was
   sentenced to only two years in prison, though the author does not
   say how long he was actually in prison; meanwhile, innocent Germans
   were shot or hanged. (217, also 164, 167, 217)
   
   Lola supervised and participated in the torture, starvation, and
   killing of Germans. German "volunteers" were given $200 for each
   "Nazi" they identified, (74, also 78), which amounted to a bounty
   on every German. Even a 14 year old boy was imprisoned and tortured
   because his Boy Scout uniform was the same color as some Nazi
   uniforms. (87-88). "The beater-to-death [a lead ball on a 2 foot
   spring] was the favorite tool at Lola's prison." (67). Lola even
   hit a German for making her feel guilty for hitting him! (85).
   
   Shlomo Morel, Lola's boss, was the worst, beating Germans to death
   every night. (p. 103-106). "[The guards] trained their dogs to bite
   off the German men's genitals" (p. 107; also 108-111, 130). Outside
   the prison, Lola and other Jews ordered German families out of
   their homes and helped themselves to their possessions. (70, 72)
   
   Tortured Germans usually confessed to anything they needed to in
   order to stop the torture. Adam, whose conscience bothers him for
   torturing the Germans, has an epiphany of sorts on how he can
   continue to torture and still sleep at night: he tells the
   prisoners that he has to torture them, but can stop the torture and
   send them off for a fair trail if they confess. (67-69). Of course,
   this is just "confess or we will continue to torture you until you
   do" and the trial, with the only evidence being a confession
   obtained by torture and possibly testimony of the guards, was
   hardly fair. The sentence was often death (99, 116), and "about
   99.2% were presumably innocent." (212, also 135, 137). Even just
   being a member of the Nazi party, without ever doing anything
   illegal or immoral, was punishable.
   
   Lola finally seeks "redemption" and starts treating her prisoners
   better. (119-121). But even then Lola does not have remorse or
   guilt. Instead, she says, "We must show that we are better than the
   Germans." This is the same as the motive for revenge - to win, to
   be superior. For 2¼ years Lola provides the author with help
   writing this book (156), though her memory is often faulty (155,
   221) but, in the end, she changes her mind, decides she wants to
   conceal her crimes, orders the author not to publish the book, and
   threatens him if he does. (156-157).
   
   The Jewish prison system eventually collapsed, as Jews targeted
   other Jews they suspected of sympathizing with the suffering
   Germans, and guards and Lola flee for their lives. Strangely,
   however, many of the Jews who so hated Germans and tortured and
   killed them, went to Germany (146) to escape Jewish-run Poland and
   the takeover of the country by Poles. "I was surprised, but I found
   lots of Jews from the Office living in Germany." (146; also, 207).
   Even Lola lived there for a while. (147). But after all that, the
   suffering still was not over for the Germans. The President of
   Poland ordered all ten million Germans out of Poland (138), the
   largest ethnic cleansing ever; 1½ million of them died, most by
   starvation. (139). Ethnic cleansing, by the way, is a war crime,
   but only losers are charged with war crimes.
   
   Unlike the Nazis, who are hunted the world over and are dragged
   before courts even in their 80's, no one hunts for these Jews, and
   few have ever been prosecuted. (145). For thirty years, the German
   government knew of the crimes of Shlomo Morel, but never said a
   word about it. (146). A Polish prosecutor trying to charge Morel
   sent documents to a German to translate them into Polish. (167).
   The documents incriminated Morel but, to stop the cycle of revenge,
   the German told the prosecutor, "There's nothing important here,"
   and told 235 survivors of Morel's prison to say nothing. (167,
   173). Today, Morel lives safely in Israel, which kidnaps suspected
   Nazi war criminals from other countries and tries them in Israel;
   Israel does not, however, extradite its own war criminals. The
   Polish government even owes Morel a pension, but he has to go back
   to Poland to get it. (166).
   
   There are no memorial museums for the German victims of this
   holocaust and no Jewish school children are taught what these Jews
   did. As I write this, there are historians sitting in European
   prisons for questioning the Jewish Holocaust, but no one is sitting
   in prison for denying the genocidal torture and murder of Germans
   by Jews after the war was over.
   
   There are several lessons to be learned from this book. The most
   obvious one is, "Don't get caught in any territory controlled by
   Jews." Since "Most Jews from the Office went to America" (150) and
   Jews now occupy many important positions in our government, I
   frankly worry about my safety here, especially with Michael
   Chertoff, the grandson of Russian Jews, running Homeland Security.
   Russian Jews brutally tortured and killed millions of Russians,
   mostly peasants (Solzhenitsyn, "Two Hundred Years Together"), even
   using exhaust-fed gas chambers mounted on trucks.
   All in all, despite how distressing it is to read this book, it is
   a book that should be read.
   
   Despite my criticisms in this review, I nevertheless highly
   recommend it. It is about a subject that is historically important,
   but known to almost no one, and it is a compelling story that grips
   the reader from the beginning to the end."
[/color][/list]
A highly interesting quote from the above review, which mentions
page numbers from the reviewed first edition :

  "Before telling us of the horrible atrocities that the Jews
   committed against the Germans after the war, the author wants the
   reader to understand why the Jews did these things, so that the
   reader would think, "If I had been that Jew, I'd have done it
   myself." (xi). The Jews did it to avenge the Holocaust, of course,
   particularly the gassings at Auschwitz. Indeed, there is no
   justification for the vengeance of the Jews after the war if the
   Germans had not done worse to the Jews during the war, as the
   author believes they did. (198)."
[/list]

Now we begin to understand why todays Zionist controlled leadership are
so vehemently opposed to a renewed Holocaust investigation, in particular,
the gassings at Auschwitz. If Bishop Williamson is indeed right in his
observations that the Auschwitz gassings could never have happened as
described, Zionist leadership has a problem, and we may have arrived at
a "delayed loss for Black after the much admired draw" as written down
by John Sack.

Best Regards,

Robert
PS.
[1] "Color Me Evil", May 22, 2009
   Streaming Audio 24/7: 2109.mp3
   http://www.texemarrs.com/make.m3u
   
[2] "An Eye For An Eye"
   by John Cusack,
   http://www.texemarrs.com/Merchant2/merc ... for_an_eye

[3] John Sack
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sack

[4] John Sack (1930 - 2004)
   Esquire,Feature Story, March 30, 2004
   http://www.esquire.com/features/article ... _obit.html
http://web.archive.org/web/200609051026 ... _obit.html

[5] "An Eye for an Eye:
     The Untold Story of Jewish Revenge Against Germans in 1945"
   by John Sack,
   Hardcover: 272 pages
   Publisher: Basic Books (October 1993)
   Language: English
   ISBN-10: 0465042147
   ISBN-13: 978-0465042142
   http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0465042147
--
Robert M. Stockmann - RHCE
Network Engineer - UNIX/Linux Specialist
crashrecovery.org  mailto:stock@stokkie.net">stock@stokkie.net