WEBSTER TARPLEY: "ROTHSCHILDS ARE LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIR

[joeblow]

RENSE 2009-10-12, HOUR 2, 35:00 WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO!"

http://rapidshare.com/files/292457916/2 ... ley_2_.mp3

[Ognir]

At least he's out in the open now, SHILL

[Rockclimber]

Who endorses him and who does he endorse?

Alex Jones...I rest my case. I knew this guy was a diversion ALL along.

[AntiPharisee]

WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO!"

Does Webster Tarpley also say that that Rothschild's are given their marching orders by
homeless people and bottle-pickers, and it is these people
that are seeking world control and domination? That it's a hiding-in-plain-sight strategy.

When you think about it though it's very clever, like the Israeli shopping mall vendors,
only in this case of the homeless bottle pickers they do not use shopping mall kiosks
as a prop but SHOPPING CARTS.

LOL!!!

[scorpio]

Yeah - The Rothschilds take their marching orders from the Jesuit Nazi Germanic Death Cult Sith Lord.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Having control over trillions of dollars and living in enormous mansions is just their 'cover'
I knew it all along.

[brandon dean]

Yeah - The Rothschilds take their marching orders from the Jesuit Nazi Germanic Death Cult Sith Lord.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
Having control over trillions of dollars and living in enormous mansions is just their 'cover'
I knew it all along.

tarpley also agrees with everything lyndon larouche says.  and one of the things lyndon larouche loves to jaw about is how great the zio-commie saboteur franklin d roosevelt was.  yeah, he was great at selling this country down the river... larouche will tell you roosevelt knew nothing about pearl harbor, even though his cabinet was infested with genocidal zionists. but noooo, roosevelt was a GOOD guy, just like obongo...

tarpley is a wingnut.  he should have given up with that whole operation gladio thing.

"it's a death cult, bubba! oi vey! dey's Goiman, I tells ya!  just have a glass o' shevitz n fuhget about it..."

[scorpio]

tarpley also agrees with everything lyndon larouche says.  and one of the things lyndon larouche loves to jaw about is how great the zio-commie saboteur franklin d roosevelt was.  yeah, he was great at selling this country down the river... larouche will tell you roosevelt knew nothing about pearl harbor, even though his cabinet was infested with genocidal zionists. but noooo, roosevelt was a GOOD guy, just like obongo...

Tarpley's early books were published through larouche, but I heard somewhere along the line there was a falling out.
Is that correct?
I was in DC one time, and these college age kids came up to me and my wife. They were handing out Larouche booklets.
They had that glazed over look to their eyes, similar to the Moonies or Hari Krishnas. A cult of personality.

It's funny you should mention Roosevelt. I just started reading the book Roosevelt's Red Record by Elizabeth Dilling.
It was published in 1936 and gives a lot of insight about the zio-commie forces running FDR.
Well worth the read. It's available for cheap on several online book sites.
Obama is working from the same playbook, only with much more dire consequences.

Obongo....that's good.  :lol:

[brandon dean]

tarpley also agrees with everything lyndon larouche says.  and one of the things lyndon larouche loves to jaw about is how great the zio-commie saboteur franklin d roosevelt was.  yeah, he was great at selling this country down the river... larouche will tell you roosevelt knew nothing about pearl harbor, even though his cabinet was infested with genocidal zionists. but noooo, roosevelt was a GOOD guy, just like obongo...

Tarpley's early books were published through larouche, but I heard somewhere along the line there was a falling out.
Is that correct?
I was in DC one time, and these college age kids came up to me and my wife. They were handing out Larouche booklets.
They had that glazed over look to their eyes, similar to the Moonies or Hari Krishnas. A cult of personality.

It's funny you should mention Roosevelt. I just started reading the book Roosevelt's Red Record by Elizabeth Dilling.
It was published in 1936 and gives a lot of insight about the zio-commie forces running FDR.
Well worth the read. It's available for cheap on several online book sites.
Obama is working from the same playbook, only with much more dire consequences.

Obongo....that's good.  :lol:

that sounds like a good book.  I'm gonna have to put that on my to-buy list.  the book I would recommend concerning roosevelt's cabinet more than roosevelt himself is Nuremburg, by David Irving.  he goes really into the wheeling and dealing behind the scenes towards the end of the war.  

michael badnarik said in his Constitution Class videos that one day, before he dies, he's going to visit Hyde Park in new york, and piss on FDR's grave.  and god bless him for that...

[MikeWB]

Low level.. hahahaahh... oh my. I wonder what his high-levels are.  Probably "germanic death cults" and "vatican assassins" :lol:

[brandon dean]

Low level.. hahahaahh... oh my. I wonder what his high-levels are.  Probably "germanic death cults" and "vatican assassins" :lol:

no! not the:



 :lol:

[MikeWB]

Tarpley got the biggest amount of time in Obama Deception. Looks like Alan Watt will get the same treatment in AJ's new movie. It's a deception after deception.

[kolnidre]

This is also interesting in light of David Icke's assertions on both AJ and Jack Blood's recent shows that the Rothschilds are the sickos at the top. He got a cold reception from AJ, but Jack Clayton Blood let him go back to his statement and note that two Rothschild agents, namely Rahm the Terrible and David Axelrod, sit to both sides of their puppet O'bomber. He also said the Rockefellers are Rothschild agents in the U.S., which is patently obvious but rarely articulated.

I don't get how Tarpley can be so good at analysis and so dreadful about solutions, always pushing his FDR and New Deal shite.

[kolnidre]

I just listened.

Tarpley not only dismissed the Rothschilds as mid-level minions, first he tried to finger puppet tools like Gordon Brown and Allistair Darling. When Rense prodded further about the City of London and mentioned the Waterloo Caper, Tarpley got really annoyed and said, "Eh, dime a dozen." He followed with a remark that they're the ones getting held out there so they can get caught out in the open, which is why we're aware of them, the implication being that there are many higher lords over the Rothschilds.

Oh, and of course the IMF's head Heeb, Strauss-Khan, is "French."

Bwahahahaha.

Like some Leo ZOGami character, maybe?

[thirdeyewise]

michael badnarik said in his Constitution Class videos that one day, before he dies, he's going to visit Hyde Park in new york, and piss on FDR's grave.  and god bless him for that...

somebody should get in touch with Mr. Badnarik and see about setting up a group tour.

[Wimpy]

Someone over at Rumor Mill News called Seawitch definitely thinks otherwise.  The Black Pope and the Newly installed Black Pope at that!  You guys got nothin', in fact someone posted that a Jesuit University actually handles Top Secret NASA information and we all know this University is controlled by a Foreign Power.  The implications are frightening and the Black Pope's reach is beyond all others and he's behind it all.................

Obviously disinfo and it appears to be damage control.  So, I wonder what's really going on with all this diversionary 'low-level', 'black pope' meme goin' round the net?  Are we really making a dent in their armor?



****************************************************************
THE BLACK POPE: THE MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD?

BY Rick Martin

The Most Powerful Man In The World?
The "Black" Pope
Count Hans Kolvenbach--The Jesuit's General

So, you thought you were pretty well informed by now about all of the main players on the "conspiracy" playing field? You've maybe been hearing for years about (or bumped into on your own) the various elements of society who control our world from behind the scenes.

You've gotten familiar with the role played by, for instance, the Khazarian Zionists (who invented the word "Jew" to disguise their adopted heritage, as distinguished from the biblical Judeans), or the role played by the Banksters (banking gangsters) controlling the economies of the world, by the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderbergers, the Committee of 300 (the 17 wealthiest so-called "elite" families)--the Rothschilds in England and Rockefellers in America and Bronfmans in Canada, and on and on, comprising the physical power structure of the New World Order puppets under the direction of darkly motivated, other-dimensional "master deceivers" commonly known as Lucifer or Satan and their "fallen angel" cohorts.

While all of those details contribute to understanding the Larger Picture, what you are about to read fills in a most important Missing Link in this entire structure. And I don't mean a little side issue; I mean a link so central--yet so well hidden from general public view, and for so long--that even the most studied of "conspiracy theory" scholars probably have not put together much of the information that is going to be presented here.

To call the following outlay "controversial" and "sensitive" is about as mild an understatement of the truth of the matter as can be made! This missing link changes the entire slant of the entire playing field!

After months of anticipation and weeks of preparation, I was finally able to speak with Vatican Assassins author Eric Jon Phelps on Tuesday, March 14. There was simply no other way to cover Eric's historic masterpiece spanning, literally, five centuries, than to just ask questions covering huge spans of time and major historical events. It took us almost four hours to accomplish the task, yet we could easily have gone on for another forty.

We here at The SPECTRUM are simply unwilling to reduce the importance of this work by presenting it in a too distilled fashion. In fact, in order to share this material with at least some of the pertinent backup, Eric has granted us permission to print (directly after the interview) several excerpts from his soon-to-be-published book which will help you in understanding certain aspects of this magnificently important and broad-sweeping story. The missing link is surely a central link.

Let's call this story the "Jesuit-Vatican connection" to the unfolding New World Order agenda. You make up your own mind just how absolutely central, yet well hidden, has been this link! There's a good reason the secret Vatican library is so extensive and yet remains so intact from outside intrusion, despite the many others who would like to possess such a collection of information detailing much "censored" data about our true, otherworldly cultural heritage.

When one reads a work like Vatican Assassins, one can't help but reflect back on the purposely "adjusted" and watered down and boring moments in high school history class. Meanwhile, the true history of what has gone on is dynamic and full of calculated intrigue.

READ THE FULL ARTICLE AT THIS LINK:
http://www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data ... 0682b2f176

[Data Beast]

People in the conspiracy community need to learn how to divorce the research from the researcher and his conclusions. Are you going to throw that juicy cheeseburger away just because the chef put an onion on it? No, you're going to throw the onion away and enjoy your meal.

Tarpley's a political operative from '60s. The man is a liberal baby boomer and his conclusions and solutions are going to be colored by his political and social views. His regular comments about 'black ghetto victims' and his constant dismissal of illegal immigration should have clued everyone into his multicultural perspective. That he continues to ignore the Jewish angle of the conspiracy should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ above room temperature.
 
'Agent' and 'shill' are two words that we need to stop hurling at people we don't agree with. I don't agree with Tarpley's dismissal of the Rothschilds, but I can still agree with much of his analysis. He points the finger at people that the average guy can see on television and he puts forth solutions. At the very least, he doesn't just go around scaring people into passivity like Alex Jones.

Remember, these researchers aren't gurus. You aren't supposed to be hanging on their every word. Absorb the good information, throw away what doesn't work for you and move on.

[abduLMaria]

Tarpley not only dismissed the Rothschilds as mid-level minions, first he tried to finger puppet tools like Gordon Brown and Allistair Darling. When Rense prodded further about the City of London and mentioned the Waterloo Caper, Tarpley got really annoyed and said, "Eh, dime a dozen." He followed with a remark that they're the ones getting held out there so they can get caught out in the open, which is why we're aware of them, the implication being that there are many higher lords over the Rothschilds.

Oh, and of course the IMF's head Heeb, Strauss-Khan, is "French."

Bwahahahaha.

Like some Leo ZOGami character, maybe?

in this case, i think what Tarpley is saying is intended to mislead.

in the case where he tells part of the truth, i think then his work is useful, although he does not lead people to a true understanding.  e.g. George Bush, the Un-Authorized Biography
http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm

it's very well-researched - it just says very little about Israel.  the index at the end is 25 pages and IsraHeLL is not even mentioned.

in Bush's career as a prominent & powerful Zionist (i'm talking about Bush 41), he had strong connections with 3 factions of the Zionist world -
*  oil Zionists
*  Wall Street Zionists
*  CIA/Mossad/MI6 Zionists

so here's a tell-all book that says NOTHING about Israel ?  that's a very useful piece of mis-direction.

not to mention, Bush 41's son was chosen as the bubble Chimp to be in office for 9-11.  Bush's connections with Saudi Arabia - e.g. Bandar Bush - are also useful tools for the Zionists.

i'm noticing i haven't said a word yet about the Rothschild's.

i think at this point the Rothschild's are not indispensable to world Zionism.  they could all get hit by a meteorite at their next family gathering and, aside from a big gaudy funeral, world Zionism would continue.

if you look at influential Zionist families in the US, e.g. the Emanuel's & the Pritzker's in Chicago, the Cheney Family, Kissinger, the Silverstein Mafia in NYC - it's a long list - they could all get by without the Rothschild's - they could continue the Zionist mission.

though from the history's we have access to, it does look like the Rothschild's were very active in shaping 20th century world history, e.g. extending their influence into Soviet Russia.

in that social club, however many active participants they have in different roles (useful servants like Bill Clinton, old money like the Rothschild's), i think they are pretty much singing from one sheet of music.

[MikeWB]

People in the conspiracy community need to learn how to divorce the research from the researcher and his conclusions. Are you going to throw that juicy cheeseburger away just because the chef put an onion on it? No, you're going to throw the onion away and enjoy your meal.

Tarpley's a political operative from '60s. The man is a liberal baby boomer and his conclusions and solutions are going to be colored by his political and social views. His regular comments about 'black ghetto victims' and his constant dismissal of illegal immigration should have clued everyone into his multicultural perspective. That he continues to ignore the Jewish angle of the conspiracy should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ above room temperature.
 
'Agent' and 'shill' are two words that we need to stop hurling at people we don't agree with. I don't agree with Tarpley's dismissal of the Rothschilds, but I can still agree with much of his analysis. He points the finger at people that the average guy can see on television and he puts forth solutions. At the very least, he doesn't just go around scaring people into passivity like Alex Jones.

Remember, these researchers aren't gurus. You aren't supposed to be hanging on their every word. Absorb the good information, throw away what doesn't work for you and move on.

Good post! Indeed, we need to move away from name calling.

Does anyone have a way to contact Rense? I'd like to send him an email about Tarpley. PM me if you don't want to post it in the open.

[kolnidre]

I've never called Tarpley any names because he strikes me as a true believer in FDR blind to important aspects of what FDR was all about and how he was cultivated as a change agent. And I've found Tarpley's analysis quite useful at times. No one can expect to get it all, or for that matter to be fearless on all subjects, so take the message for what it's worth and don't take any one source as beyond reproach. The intellect is activated and accessed via the emotions, making humans highly succeptible to intellectual conduct reflecting emotional attachments. Tarpley certainly does come off as a 60s political operative married to that particular era's perspectives and missions.

His analysis of Obama has been impeccable so I'm not going to cast him aside. It's just that unless a new subject comes along calling for new analysis he easily gets stuck blowing the same riffs endlessly.

Miles's advice to him would be, Take the horn out of your mouth, Webster, and put it back in when you have a new tune to wail on.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Tarpley ? Isn't he that fattie half-baldy that's in bed with Alex Jones? Why does his opinion even matter to you guys? From what I hear he is a communist.

[Ognir]

People in the conspiracy community need to learn how to divorce the research from the researcher and his conclusions. Are you going to throw that juicy cheeseburger away just because the chef put an onion on it? No, you're going to throw the onion away and enjoy your meal.

Tarpley's a political operative from '60s. The man is a liberal baby boomer and his conclusions and solutions are going to be colored by his political and social views. His regular comments about 'black ghetto victims' and his constant dismissal of illegal immigration should have clued everyone into his multicultural perspective. That he continues to ignore the Jewish angle of the conspiracy should come as no surprise to anyone with an IQ above room temperature.
 
'Agent' and 'shill' are two words that we need to stop hurling at people we don't agree with. I don't agree with Tarpley's dismissal of the Rothschilds, but I can still agree with much of his analysis. He points the finger at people that the average guy can see on television and he puts forth solutions. At the very least, he doesn't just go around scaring people into passivity like Alex Jones.

Remember, these researchers aren't gurus. You aren't supposed to be hanging on their every word. Absorb the good information, throw away what doesn't work for you and move on.

Let me disagree with you very strongly. you are giving this shit for brains a PASS, not likely.  This guy is bed with Jones, Alan Twat, Rivero, and the guy with the new teeth, all of them are lying and are liars.

Rense could have done more and basically gave him a PASS as well.

From Rense.com

Rense.com - Worlds #1 Alternative News Service
Your First Source For Reality & Honest Journalism

Allowing Tarpley to say that rothschilds are low level isn't

Honest Journalism

Og

[Ognir]

So let's listen to the cut I just made, actually 2 versions

Part 1 - 49 seconds
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archi ... Part-1.mp3

Slightly longer segment
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archi ... Part-3.mp3

From an email from dick Eastman this morning

Dick Eastman <oldickeastman@q.com> wrote:

After listening to this I conclude Tarpley is definitly working for the
other side  -- a gatekeeper  -- a seller of red herring -- he states the
obvious but diverts every time from the important conclusions   -- he is as
phony as Ron Paul  in my opinion.  Protecting the Rothschild, calling the
New Deal  and progressivism  "real populism" while dismissing true real
populism as "cultural populism" which deems very bad for America.  He seems
to be on our side -- but then every time he fails to draw the obvious conclusion.

This interview confirms once and for all an impression built up on years of
observation -- he is a Ron Paul and a Jim Fetzer all in one.

Dick Eastman

[joeblow]

WEBSTER TARPLEY: "ROTHSCHILDS ARE LOW-LEVEL", WTF?!

by Ognir http://theinfounderground.com

RENSE 2009-10-12, HOUR 2, 35:00 WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO!"

So let's listen to the cut I just made, actually 2 versions

Part 1 - 49 seconds
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-1.mp3

Slightly longer segment
http://www.theinfounderground.com/archives/etc/disinfo/Shill_Tarpley_Part-3.mp3

From an email from Dick Eastman this morning

    Dick Eastman <oldickeastman@q.com> wrote:

    After listening to this I conclude Tarpley is definitly working for the
    other side -- a gatekeeper -- a seller of red herring -- he states the
    obvious but diverts every time from the important conclusions -- he is as
    phony as Ron Paul in my opinion. Protecting the Rothschild, calling the
    New Deal and progressivism "real populism" while dismissing true real
    populism as "cultural populism" which deems very bad for America. He seems
    to be on our side -- but then every time he fails to draw the obvious conclusion.

    This interview confirms once and for all an impression built up on years of
    observation -- he is a Ron Paul and a Jim Fetzer all in one.

    Dick Eastman

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA, SPREAD THIS AROUND, EXPOSE THE IDIOTS/AGENTS/JEWS!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php ... #msg847131

Tarpley is absolutely right. The Rothschild were trained to drive the modern banking scam on the behalf of the upper echelons like the black nobilities.
When Nathan Rothschild who was a German Jewish banker,
 pulled the waterloo " banking coup " He took over the bank of england. At that time, that central bank belonged to the high nobility of england and the royal family. So he tricked the British empire itself. What happenned to him? Nothing and quiet the opposite! The Rothschild dynasty inter married with the nobility. When you know the name of a globalist, it is not the top level.

I advise you to read " the world order " of the great eustace Mllins.
It is a must!

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5989 ... Parasitism

Here is a good video , not complete of course but still a good introduction.

http://videos.publimetro.com.mx/player/ ... yROoaftCnL

[Ognir]

Sane must have changed your user name joe

[sullivan]

Tarpley ? Isn't he that fattie half-baldy that's in bed with Alex Jones? Why does his opinion even matter to you guys? From what I hear he is a communist.

He isn't a communist. He is a fan of big-government though and has nothing but disparaging things to say of libertarians of any political leaning - left or right.

[sullivan]

I've never called Tarpley any names because he strikes me as a true believer in FDR blind to important aspects of what FDR was all about and how he was cultivated as a change agent. And I've found Tarpley's analysis quite useful at times. No one can expect to get it all, or for that matter to be fearless on all subjects, so take the message for what it's worth and don't take any one source as beyond reproach. The intellect is activated and accessed via the emotions, making humans highly succeptible to intellectual conduct reflecting emotional attachments. Tarpley certainly does come off as a 60s political operative married to that particular era's perspectives and missions.

I've always picked the bits that make sense and left the rest.  What bugs me about Tarpley is that he seems to be wedded to the idea that a big, anonymous government is the solution to all problems.  This latest gaffe that the Rothschilds are some low-level minions is also stretching his credibility to breaking point.

His analysis of Obama has been impeccable so I'm not going to cast him aside. It's just that unless a new subject comes along calling for new analysis he easily gets stuck blowing the same riffs endlessly.

That's a great way of summing him up. Listening to one Tarpley show these days is very much like listening to any other Tarpley show. The guy is a needle stuck in a groove and repeats the same stuff endlessly - in between plugs for his books.

[Free Truth]

Tarpley ? Isn't he that fattie half-baldy...

Do you have any overweight and/or balding friends or family?
Are you either overweight or balding?
Are you perfect?