Why New Currency and Why Treasury Issued?

Started by AntiPharisee, October 18, 2009, 05:53:47 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

AntiPharisee

I posted this at another forum but I'll
post it here also, because many people I believe are
being "Psy-oped" into wanting a Treasury Issued Currency.
-------------------------------------------------------------

AntiPharisee

Apollonian writes:
"Honest elections and replace the Fed with the US Treasury."

Apollonian you old sea dog. Have you not read my "The Money Meisters"
http://sites.google.com/site/themoneymeisters

If you have Clinton, Bush or Obama run the Money/Currency industry instead of Rothschild, then money will be issued at no interest, but it will be replaced with an added 10% currency inflation each year. Also,without competition there will be all kinds of fraud and corruption.

There's nothing mystical about money it's just a product or service like any other.

An anology would be the clothing business.

If 200 years ago the only family in the USA allowed to make and sell clothes was the ordinary Smith family then today the Smith family would be trillionaires and we would have high priced low quality clothes.

Now take a time travel machine back to 200 years ago where we started before and have the State ("the government") be the only one allowed to make and sell clothes.

If I recall correctly that is something called State Communism. At best, after 200 years, today, you would have again high-priced, poor quality clothes, shortages (remember $500 for smuggled jeans in USSR?), and worse, the few at the top in the clothing bureacracy would be billionaires not as a result of merit but because of their coercive monopoly.

Now we take the time travel machine back again to 200 years ago, and we find ourselves inside a stadium where a conference on clothing economics is being given. There are 20,001 people there, 20,000 clothing economics PhD's and one retarded 12 year old boy. After 6 of the "smartest" PhD's give their 60 minute each presentations, the 12 year old boy gives his presentation in 36 seconds being 1/100th of the time of each the others.

He says, "Ladies and Gentlemen, here is the best and most moral way to run the clothing industry: Anyone should be able to start their own clothes manufacturing and retailing business tomorrow morning. But the clothes must be made using ulta thin gold wafer-leafs...no, no, no, sorry I made a mistake, I meant USING ANY MATERIALS AND DESIGN ONE WISHES TO USE."

The last time I looked that was something called real laissez-faire capitalism. In this scenario the little retarded boy is the most intelligent person in the whole stadium (the PhD's in the crowd were learning something new from the boy), because 200 years later we have the selection and prices of clothes that you see now. To me it is not some kind of joke that I say the PhD's are dumber than the retarded boy, I REALLY DO MEAN THIS.

With regard to the Money/Currency industry, I think the "Rothschilds" also want the US Treasury (the State) to take over now, it's time for them to "reverse skating".

Their private banks have issued so much currency for State Debt that the State is now gagging on too much debt, so the new Currency State Communism system somehow will allow all their bonds held to be repaid in full, and probably even better, like government assets/land at 10 cents on the dollar, who knows, but the popularity on the internet of the idea of Treasury Issued Currency smells fishy, smells like a rat.

I think, therefore it would be correct, if you agree Apollonian, to change your motto to, "Honest elections and replace the Fed with free-market money/currency competition." (That's accepting that we need elections at all, which is another topic).

Just so there's no misunderstanding, your writings are very interesting Apollonian, they're mostly very good.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AntiPharisee

Here is why I think the Deceiver Power Elite
wants to have a new currency and in this phase preferrably one issued by the State.

I will use the analogy of a stock exchange listed company called XYZ.

It has 10,000,000 shares issued and outstanding, and they are trading at $1.00 per share. The company has $2,000,000 in debt it owes.

For the sake of simplicity let's assume that the company is "perfectly" valued at
$10,000,000 i.e. it has real assets and is not a hyped up stock.

Say you, the reader, hold the debt and now want to convert the debt into shares of the company.

Scenario 1: So if a shares-for-debt transaction is done you get 2 million shares and now own 17% of the company.

Scenario 2: You manipulate/collapse the stock price to 10 cents per share, do a shares-for-debt transaction and end up owning 67% of the company.

Scenario 3: Manipulate/collapse stock price to 10 cents per share, have company issue 1 new share for 10 old shares (therefore new stock will trade at $1.00 per share).

Since people have seen their stock trade at 10 cents per share and it's now "back" to a dollar (but they only have 1/10th the amount of shares held previously)they have a psychological tendency to be sellers, and because of this confusion, and a little help down in price from "the syndicate" running the show the stock trades down to 50 cents per share fairly quickly. Now a shares-for-debt transaction is done and you, the debt certificate holder, own 80% of the company.

Would you rather own 17%, 67% or 80% of a company?

So to apply this to the USA debt/currency situation, just substitute the words USA Corporation for XYZ, substitute Currency for Shares, substitute 20 trillion dollars in debt instead of 2 million.

But what about the company, what if they want to convert the debt at $1.00 and the Debt Certificate holder wants to convert at 10 cents? No problem if you control "the company"(the State) - 10 cents per share wins.

So I get the feeling that a new currency regime whereby the State issues currency "interest free", is a neccessary legal requirement of some sort, also helps create confusion because there's "change" underway, and if you have your people in control of the Treasury when the awesome sized 80% looting is about to take place you want to make damn sure it gets done,
least of all because they have suckered the public into wanting this new currency system.

So going by the above the first step is to create a crisis of some sort that would collapse the US dollar as low as possible.