Hmm ... Denninger comparing Robber Barons & Money Changers

[abduLMaria]

I'm beginning to think Denninger is not as naive about the Zionists as his silence on the subject sometimes implies.

from a column today calling for heads to roll, naming names but not mentioning criminal Jews or Zionism - but, pretty close -

"To both State and Federal Government Officials: I know I have said this before, but I will repeat it - The lawless actions of the past 20 years must not be allowed to stand - you must not allow The People to discern that you are a felon rather than a cop.

To Father Jones: While I cannot square your advice with The Ten Commandments, I am reminded that The Bible tells us that even Jesus had his limits when it came to those Commandments, and the one time he exceeded those limits was with THE MONEYCHANGERS in The Temple.  The very same robber barons - of the time - who were cheating the people.  My, how similar the situation seems to be.

To The People: Wake the hell up.  Demand prosecution. Back that demand up with your vote, and while you're at it, pray that this is enough, for if it is not, where your neighbor or countryman who has lost everything may turn is a dark place neither you or I wish to see our nation descend to."

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/cate ... -Editorial

oh yeah - his caps, italic, and bold formatting, not mine.

the essay is much longer.

i think he knows exactly what's going on, he just doesn't want to talk about criminal Judaism or Zionism because he doesn't want to get tagged by the ADL.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Good observation MariaAbdul,

Lately I've been seeing a "dawning" of sorts from Denninger too.  I guess it has gotten to the point for him where it crosses over into "ridiculousness".  I guess he kind of realized that "Nobody" in the US system is going to set "right" the wrongs at this point.  His latest post about the debt levels, that he did in Excel is pretty somber news.  I guess he has also done a little soul searching and is probably thinking about the future of his kids instead of his daily trades.  Maybe guilt too since he has made good money off of the Jew Fed reflation trade.  I hope it is anger and guilt, he'll do a full 180' if he realizes the scope of the Protocols corrupt Temple Masters. Why let your kids bailout a Talmudic Jew Created Mess? Maybe he paged through DBS's site?    

BTW, I posted several links of Populist Cartoons against the Rothschilds over the last two weeks on ZeroHedge.  Maybe Denninger followed one of the cartoons and read how JP Morgan was basically created by threatening the bankruptcy of the United States in 1893 and that the Populists (like Charles Lindbergh's father) wanted to light up the Jewish bankers the world over.  In not a nice way either.

  I guess he also may have gotten around to thinking why giving Billions of US tax dollars to a crappy little country in the Middle East is going to bring anything good but more Jew Wars and more Jew Bankruptcies to the USA?  

Ahh... to dream that he can actually drop the "Zio" prefix and join the dark side against the NY Jew Fed Freakshow... and the whole corrupt Jew Run System from NY... but in the end... reason always wins...and getting "Jew-Wise" happens in the strangest ways...IMHO  

Quoted:

A Short Treatise On The USeless Economy

I feel like being particularly irascible today, so here you have our future in just a few short moments...

Why?  This:

Click that image and follow along.  You've seen this graph before, but I have taken the liberty of moving the Federal Government's debt to the top for reasons that will shortly become apparent.

In the latter part of 2007, continuing into 2008, credit outstanding in the broad economy began to contract.  This has not happened before - indeed, it had not happened on a broad basis since The Depression.

It is this that made this recession different from the other recessions - and market movers - that we have experienced during our lifetimes.

Ben Bernanke is claimed to be the world's "best-learned" scholar on The Depression.  He knows full well that in all modern monetary systems all money is in fact debt.  Therefore, the actual money in the system - not the "Ms", but that which does and can circulate - is represented in the above chart.

Now remember: The definition of  "inflation" in the monetary sense is the growth of money beyond the growth in goods and services.  Deflation is the opposite.

Bernanke wrote a famous speech in which he opined that The Federal Reserve was capable of preventing "it" from happening here (Deflation.)  This, by the way, was during the depths of the 2000-2003 Nasdaq Market Implosion - when many people were worried about "deflation."

Bernanke asserted:

     Like gold, U.S. dollars have value only to the extent that they are strictly limited in supply. But the U.S. government has a technology, called a printing press (or, today, its electronic equivalent), that allows it to produce as many U.S. dollars as it wishes at essentially no cost. By increasing the number of U.S. dollars in circulation, or even by credibly threatening to do so, the U.S. government can also reduce the value of a dollar in terms of goods and services, which is equivalent to raising the prices in dollars of those goods and services. We conclude that, under a paper-money system, a determined government can always generate higher spending and hence positive inflation.

Really?

Certainly Ben didn't forget that very few paper dollars are actually in circulation, did he?  Indeed, virtually all "money" in circulation is nothing more or less than credit - blind promises to pay from future production the principal and interest that has been borrowed!

Realize this folks: The dollar bills in your wallet were borrowed into existence.  Treasury sold debt (Bonds) against which The Fed issued paper currency!

So do we have inflation or deflation here?

Well Ben certainly asserted in 2002 that he could prevent "it", and prevent "it" he did.  Credit outstanding went from some $30 trillion when he gave that speech to $53 trillion at its peak (!)  That ain't deflation folks - indeed, it is massive, pernicious and ridiculous inflation.

But the other assertion that Bernanke made - that The Fed has control over this - is only indirectly true.  That is, The Fed can "credibly threaten" to print money like a madman and shower it from Helicopters, hopefully (for them) stimulating borrowing in the private sector.  Since all money is in fact debt this is indeed the creation of inflation!

http://market-ticker.org/