Holocaust victims seek compensation from German death camp r

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

My gut feeling at this time is that the Jew B.S. is getting sniffed by more "active" individuals in the Zio-Occupied countries...
Funny that my "ancient" German Relatives came from "Lippe-Detmold", uncanny actually...      --The CSR

-----
January 14, 2010
Holocaust victims seek compensation from German death camp railways
The first deportation transport leaves Bielefeld railway station in Germany, December 1941

The first deportation from Minden, Lippe-Detmold and Schaumburg-Lippe leaves Germany in December 1941
David Charter, Europe Correspondent

The last remaining Polish victims of the transport trains that took millions to Nazi death camps have mounted a claim for compensation after learning that Germany's state rail company is planning to run again on Polish rails.

Some 7,000 survivors, all pensioners, are calling for Deutsche Bahn to help to pay their medicine and care bills from the profits of the company's expansion, which was made possible by the deregulation of rail competition across Europe from January 1.

Deutsche Bahn, which is owned by the German Government, is the successor to the wartime Reichsbahn, which charged its coerced passengers for their journeys to concentration camps — including Auschwitz.

The claim is a last effort by the dwindling number of Holocaust survivors to win payments from Germany after the Polish Government formally closed the issue of seeking compensation from Berlin in 2004.
Related Links

    * Britain must help to preserve Auschwitz

    * Crumbling Auschwitz death camp asks for help

"Deutsche Bahn wants to profit in our country," said Stanislaw Zalewski, 85, head of the Polish Association of Former Political Prisoners of Hitler's Prisons and Concentration Camps.

"We want them to hand over a sum for humanitarian aid for former prisoners and forced labourers," the former inmate of Auschwitz added.

The call for compensation is being supported by Train of Commemoration, a German organisation dedicated to preserving the memory of the three million victims of Nazi deportations.

It estimates that Deutsche Reichsbahn made at least €445 million (£396 million) at today's value by charging transportees from all over Europe. It said that its research showed that the price was raised for a trip to death camps such Auschwitz: "Deutsche Reichsbahn was a state-owned logistical system of the Nazi regime so every deportation was carried out by them. This is Deutsche Bahn's heritage and its obligation."

Deutsche Bahn's website does not shy away from its predecessor company's grim history. It states: "Deutsche Reichsbahn was involved directly in the Holocaust because it handled the deportation of numerous people. Without the railway, the systematic murder of the European Jews, Sinti and Roma would not have been possible. Some three million people from almost the whole of Europe were transported to the Nazi extermination camps."It has so far refused to answer calls for compensation for the deportees, although it said it had supported a foundation set up by German industry to help forced labour victims.

A spokesman said: "Deutsche Bahn AG is not the legal successor of the Deutsche Reichsbahn. Nevertheless, Deutsche Bahn AG is fully aware of its historical responsibility. For that reason, it supports various projects within the 'Remembrance, Responsibility and Future' foundation and is also involved in other projects".

Margot Kleinberger was deported in 1942, at 11, to the Theresienstadt concentration camp. "Without the railway it would not have been possible," she said. Herbert Shenkman, who was deported as a teenager, added: "This is not just about material compensation, but also the assumption of moral responsibility."

----------------------------------
Patrick Sullivan wrote:

May be we could join together and file a class action suit first against the central bankers, then sue the railroad companies.

The central bankers were behind the first and second world wars, and have plotted to do the third world war.
The central bankers are the owners and operators of the war crimes cartel and they are the ones who have exterminated us with the use of nuclear weapons that they bought and paid for with our money, that they wrongfully still control.
You may ask yourself; well, if you are writing this then you have not been destroyed already with the use of nuclear weapons, so what is your complaint? What is your cause of action?
My answer is to let the jury decide that. Here is the legal question:
"Are we or are we not the Living dead?"
Intent is the necessary element that determines whether or not a crime has been committed.
Did the central bankers intend to exterminate us all in an all out general nuclear war when they gave the go ahead for the build up of tens of thousands of nuclear weapons in 1946?
What is at the root of the continuing threats against the human race?
If this train company was not in business would others have transported people? Obviously, yes.
If the central bankers had not been in business would there ever even have been a war that would have called upon the use of trains to transport people?

Obviously no.

Let's get to the root of the problem and sue the central bankers and take away their power to issue money.
Let the jury decide if we are the Living Dead.
Did the central bankers comitt the supreme crime against us when they gave the go ahead for the build up of nuclear weapons
Was their "intent" to destroy us?

Should we Let the jury decide?
January 15, 2010 7:47 PM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk
Recommend? (1)
   
mark Gilbert wrote:
Jayil london wrote:
Mark Gilbert,

"I'm very busy and therefore not able to comment. This is just a quick message, so keep your hair on."

Just like your MO, Jayill, having taken a "scalping", to tell me to keep MY hair on.

I can't wait for you to be "less" busy...dear, oh dear...

January 14, 2010 5:38 PM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk
   
mark Gilbert wrote:
Malcolm Rigg wrote:
"Mark Gilbert seems to me to be hoist by his own petard. I am anti Zionist but cannot see what Mark is contributing other than a diatribe against others. I agree that ALL living victims should be compensated be they victims of a winner in a war, or a loser in a war. Thus German railways do have a case to answer, but so does the Israeli state."

What petard? Twit. As Zen would say: stay on topic. This article has nothing to with Zionism and Zionism is only relevant in that, as always, it masks so many views, like Jayil's - which - as his post regarding this article clearly indicate - are little but jew-hating, plain and simple.

If you're trying to hoist me with your petard, think again..

January 14, 2010 5:33 PM GMT on community.timesonline.co.uk

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w ... 987045.ece