Context of Battle

Started by Ahmed, January 26, 2010, 12:19:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Ahmed

622 CE The Prophet Muhammed (pbuh) was invited to the city of Yathrib to propose a peace settlement to a war between the Aws and Khazraj: 71 members from each house had accepted Islam, hence sought to end the mutually devastating war of attrition that'd raged for generations (the Battle of Bu'ath had been the most destructive of all their conflicts).

Once peace was established, the now reconciled Aws & Khazraj renamed Yathrib: Medina 'n-Nabiy (meaning 'City Of The Prophet') in honour of Muhammed (pbuh).

As well as ending the war, peace also put an end to the Jewish usurers monopoly in arming both sides and living off their conflict; The Jews of Banu Nadir and Banu Qurayza, from there on in, sought to violate the terms of 'The Charter Of Medina' and begin hostilities by stealth. In all fairness; not all the Jews were involved, but nor did they openly oppose these machinations either.

Initially the Jews had recognised Muahmmed as messiah, but because Islam honoured the prophet Isa (pbuh) and forbade usury; a schism was soon apparent. And Rabbis who valued the Talmudic Kahal above the Torah; soon excised prophecies in the Old Testament relating to the arrival of Muahmmed.

The moneylenders of Banu Qurayza etc were eventually defeated, exiled or sentenced around the time of 'The Battle Of The Trench', 627 CE.

Going even further back in time; we see mass migration from Nubia to Egypt and Kabbalah established as the religion of Pharaohs, governed of course, by the corrupt Cohen (priesthood) whose familiars and offspring would someday incorporate their paganism into the Mischa/ Gemera, Babylonian Talmud, Sepher Yetzirah and the Zohar.

Its' worth mentioning that 'Suhuf Ibrahim'(pbuh)  a.k.a. 'Sepher Yetzirah' a.k.a. 'Book of Ibrahim' is a valid text, though its corruptions at the hands of Zoharite Jews using it in conjunction with the Kabbalah; makes their interpretation a falsehood.

Another one of their mirrors in the East were the Karmathites, who followed in the footsteps of Cohens and Zohar enthusiasts. Karmathites were outwardly Muslims, albeit of the heretical Ismaili sect. It was from the cunning of Talmudic Pharisees, Kabaalist controlled Vatican, Knights Templar (who founded the Freemasons), Zoharites and Karmathites that Mayer Amschel Rothschild (Bauer), Adam Weishaupt et all began the Illuminati cult in 1776.

Albert Pike, practising Satanist & grand master mason of the 33rd degree, makes the intention quite clear in his revered Masonic text 'Dogma & Morals':  "Thus the Order of Knights of the Temple was at its very origin devoted to the cause of opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crowns of Kings, and the Apostolate of Kabalistic Gnosticism was vested in its chiefs: To acquire influence and wealth, then to intrigue and fight, to establish Kabalistic dogma"

"...all that is scientific and grand in the religious dreams of all the Illuminati is borrowed from the Kabbalah; all the Masonic associations owe to it their Secrets and their Symbols".

These doctrines, under the umbrella of Kaabalah, constitute the ultimate satanic ideology.

For the complex Divine image in Kabbalistic exegesis is Adam Kadmon: That is to say, they believe the highest initiate of the mysteries (i.e. mumbo jumbo, human sacrifice and prancing around in the Forrest) can become a powerful god of some kind.

A monumental delusion, of course; but when inbred, moronic sadists with time and stolen wealth at their disposal try to attain the unattainable; well, we can see the bloody results of their psychopathy everyday.
 
Provocateurs and agents of chaos have manifested themselves in a variety of different guises thoughout history, but the goal has always been the Talmudic world government, which is the Kaabalah, which is Satanism.

From 1783 onwards, Alexander Carrington Hitchcock's work, Nestor Webster's 'Secret Societies and Subversive Movements' are excellently researched and worth reading. Both works are up on The French Connection site.

"If this hostility, even aversion, had only been shown towards the Jews at one period and in one country, it would be easy to unravel the limited causes of this anger, but this race has been hated by all peoples among whom it has established itself. It must be therefore, since the enemies of the Jews belonged to the most diverse races, lived in countries very distant from each other that the general cause of anti-Semitism has always resided in Israel itself and not in those who have fought against Israel."

Bernard Lazare, \'L'antisémitisme son histoire et ses causes\'.