Introduction to the Book of Zohar

[mgt23]

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... g&q=zohar#

[Timothy_Fitzpatrick]

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=2349704121654375286&ei=-t1tS9q4LZDO-AaY8N3aBg&q=zohar#

and?

[mgt23]

At the 1:04 - 1:09min mark he talks about envisioning end of time(human and universal time) and spiritual desires. In Judaism for example this culminates in the rise in the new king of the Israel. I wanted to separate my view on the singularity argument. Now if the most evil spiritual desire is to destroy the creators creation (and within Saturnism that is the primary goal)how would one do it short of a universal singularity? Given that we see severe efforts in science to develop maths theory on creation and application of singularities(energy production and interstellar travel), where is this present in the Tanakh?

The Kabbalah of Money
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... 9166048614
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?doc ... 2198531017

Now Ive listened to Hoffman's audiobooks on The Talmud version on how they treat money which seems to be merely a strategic moral value of cheating the gentile; where is this mysticism of money present in any books other than the  Zohar(being......
    * The Book of Beresheet: Beresheet, Noach, Lech Lecha, Vayera, Chaiey Sarah, Toldot, Vayetze, Vayishlach, Vayeshev, Miketz, Vayigash, Vayichi.
    * The Book of Shemot: Shemot, Vayera, Bo, Bashalach, Yitro, Mishpatim, Terumah (Safra de Tzniuta), Tetzaveh, Ki Tissa, Veyikahel, Pekudey.
    * The Book of Vayikra: Vayikra, Tzav, Shmini, Tazria, Metzura, Acharey, Kedushim, Emor, Ba Har, Vechukotay.
    * The Book of Bamidbar: Bamidbar, Naso (Idra Raba), Baalotcha, Shlach Lecha, Korach, Chukat, Balak, Pinchas, Matot.
    * The Book of Devarim: Ve Etchanen, Ekev, Shoftim, Titze, Vayelech, Ha'azinu (Idra Zuta))?

This issue is important because it establishes the lengths these people will go to and just how evil they are in a long term vision. By the way : Ziopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zohar

The authenticity of the Zohar was accepted by such 16th century Jewish luminaries as R' Yosef Karo (d.1575), R' Moses Isserles (d. 1572), R' Solomon Luria (d.1574), and R' Solomon Luria (d.1574), who wrote that Jewish law (Halacha) follows the Zohar, except where the Zohar is contradicted by the Babylonian Talmud.[7]

It is my contension that Modern Zionism follows Halacha and that is a synthesis of Zohar and Babylonian Talmud. You previously made the claim Zionism = Talmud = Judiasm. This is strictly not true as indicated by the above rabbi's who in your twisted definition furfill your definition of JOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSS. In their view Zohar + Talmud= Judaic Law therefore ipso facto your view is incomplete.