ACORN Pimp Story was a TOTAL FAKE!

Started by Christopher Marlowe, February 23, 2010, 05:45:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Christopher Marlowe

Remember James O'Keefe who "caught" ACORN representatives red handed on video? The video purported to show ACORN reps aiding O'Keefe, who was passing himself off as a pimp, to avoid taxes on prostitution, including underage girls from Guatamala?

Many already know that O'Keefe was recently arrested and charged with plotting to tamper with the telephone system in the New Orleans office of Senator Mary Landrieu, Democrat of Louisiana:  
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/po ... drieu.html

But now it turns out that the whole ACORN expose was a phony piece of crap:
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7708
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7710

It seems that O'Keefe edited the videos to present a false picture of what transpired in the ACORN offices. I must admit that I was roped in. I believed my own lying eyes and didn't notice the editing.

O'Keefe won't release the unedited videos, but the transcripts he did release reveal that he did not present the true story.
Quote1. Transcripts reveal that O'Keefe and Giles said they needed ACORN's help to protect Giles from a
violent pimp—but they carefully edited this out of their videos
...
2. While their press releases claim they were posing as a "prostitute and a pimp," the transcripts show
that O'Keefe consistently introduced himself as Giles' boyfriend trying to protect her.
....
3. In each of the cases, the ACORN staff advised the prostitute to pay taxes, not to evade them.....
4. The San Diego office reported the duo to the police. In the San Diego office, where O'Keefe/Giles raised
the topic of smuggling underage prostitutes across the border, the ACORN worker called the police,as did
Acorn workers in Philadelphia.
....
5. The San Bernardino video was a scam on the duo. In the San Bernardino office, the ACORN worker,
finding their stories ridiculous, met them with her own outrageous tales. The ACORN worker spins tales of a
sordid past, including murdering her husband. While Giles and O'Keefe had the tapes for a month before
releasing them, they never conducted any kind of check of the claims. Within 24 hours of the videos' release,
the police had confirmed that no such murder had taken place, and that the worker's two ex-husbands were
alive and well. San Bernardino resident Jim Miller, who lives near ACORN's office and is also featured in the
video giving business advice, said he thought the "whole thing was a preposterous production."
6. Child prostitution claims are applied to several of the videos, with no evidence in the transcripts.
While the New York and Washington DC videos are each given the title by O'Keefe of "ACORN Child
Prostitution Investigation," in fact, in neither of these cases do the duo claim they are planning to engage in
child prostitution, and no advice is given. In New York, Giles states that her abusive pimp is bringing girls over
and she wants to protect them and give them a home to escape from the pimp. Of course as mentioned above,
in San Diego, the police were notified, and in San Bernardino, the whole video was seen by the employee for
the farce that it was.
NOTE: Because O'Keefe has refused to release the actual complete videotapes, we don't know for sure that
even the transcripts he has released (via his website) are complete. But the differences noted above between the transcripts and the videos – unnoted by media who simply accepted the heavily edited tapes at face value – profoundly affect the instinctive reaction that we all have in watching these tapes
, just as they affected the response and tone of the ACORN employees whose instinct was to help protect a 20-year old woman from violence.....
Taken from a link on 2/19 story the Brad blog: "What the Transcripts Show About the Doctored ACORN Video Tapes"
---------------
I like the Brad Blog. He is the only one covering the Sibel Edmonds story, and the electronic voting scams.

I take back everything I said about ACORN. The problems with voting in this country are caused by ELECTION FRAUD rather than VOTING FRAUD. If you don't know what the difference is, think of ELECTION FRAUD votes as a stack of $100 dollar bills. VOTING FRAUD would be a stack of pennies. It is statistically insignificant.

While ACORN may have helped Obama get elected, what was the alternative? McCain? So really the problem here is that both major parties are CONTROLLED by the same puppeteer.

(In the 2008 election, I wanted either Kucinich or Ron Paul.  At the debate, Ron Paul, who previously had questioned the 9/11 official story, showed himself to be either a pussy or a lying shill when he stated that he accepted the official story. Ron Paul could have been a hero and given an eloquent 2 minute speech on the 9/11 bullsh*t story.  DBS says Ron Paul is a shill, but I will be give him the benefit of the doubt because he might just be a pussy.  
Kucinich, as you might remember, was ignored in the debates except to ask about whether he had seen a UFO. The questioner couldn't decide whether to ask that, or if Kucinich had stopped beating his wife.  I wish they asked Kucinich about 9/11, because I think HE would have spoken up.
This is all a little off topic, so I stuck it in parenthesis........)
And, as their wealth increaseth, so inclose
    Infinite riches in a little room

scorpio

Sorry....sounds like BS to me.
I heard the black lady say "Quit calling yourself a prostitute....Call yourself an adult entertainer"....

Those 2 women at the ACORN office seemed corrupt to me.....The whole operation is a scam!!!
Give me a break. Are you saying ACORN is a legit. operation??  :lol:

Who cares anyway? Just another special interest group taking $$$$ from the Federal Govt!

BTW Ron Paul is a 33rd Degree Mason!!....I know that for a fact.

Christopher Marlowe

QuoteSorry....sounds like BS to me.
I heard the black lady say "Quit calling yourself a prostitute....Call yourself an adult entertainer"....

Those 2 women at the ACORN office seemed corrupt to me.....The whole operation is a scam!!!
Give me a break. Are you saying ACORN is a legit. operation??
Uhm...Did you even bother to read any of the post?

Quote5. The San Bernardino video was a scam on the duo. In the San Bernardino office, the ACORN worker,
finding their stories ridiculous, met them with her own outrageous tales. The ACORN worker spins tales of a
sordid past, including murdering her husband.

Here are the facts:
1. O'Keefe, the guy who made the video just got busted for trying to hack onto a phone line of the Senator from Louisiana.
2.  He refuses to release the unedited video.
3. The video he has released doesn't match up with the transcript he has released.
4. The video shows the ACORN workers helping him to accomplish a CHILD PROSTITUTION RING, but in reality the ACORN workers called the police.

Obviously the VIDEO is not representing REALITY.  It is FAKE. That's why I titled this "ACORN PIMP STORY WAS A TOTAL FAKE". If you think this story is BS, explain why. I'm just using facts.

And don't get me wrong: Obama can take a flying f*ck at the moon.
But I saw that video and I thought ACORN was a fraud. Now I don't have any evidence that ACORN is a fraud. I don't have any FACTS to back that up.

I see the FOX noise machine slamming ACORN and VOTER FRAUD, which is total garbage. The numbers of VOTER FRAUD are insignificant. The real enemy is ELECTION FRAUD. Making noise about ACORN is a distraction. Bush lost in 2000 and in 2004. Total Fraud. The press was completely silent.

So a bunch of black people voted for Obama? As opposed to McCain? Or Lieberman? Or Dodd? Or Hilary Clinton?
ACORN is not the problem. No matter who these people vote for, we get sh*t.

QuoteWho cares anyway? Just another special interest group taking $$$$ from the Federal Govt!
I have to agree with you there. Too many mouths on the teet. Waste of money. People can vote or not vote. We don't need to waste money telling people to vote.
Personally, I think I'm going to stop voting on account of voting being a complete waste of my time.
And, as their wealth increaseth, so inclose
    Infinite riches in a little room

scorpio

Good response. I think we agree for the most part. However, Bradblog is not a source that I would believe 100%.
Those 2 women on the vid seemed well versed in scamming - I doubt they really called the police.
Sounds like damage control to me.  I doubt the whole vid is fake.
It is well known that ACORN will register anyone to vote, including illegal aliens.

My wife walked into a WIC office (Women with Infant Children). She pretended to be married to a mexican.
She told the workers that her husband had family that were illegal aliens. She then asked if they could get benefits.
The worker told her no problem, and then proceeded to give a long list of benefits they could receive.
She told my wife not to worry because no one checks your citizen status.
No wonder our country is going broke.
I wish I had got that on tape  ;)

Christopher Marlowe

QuoteBradblog is not a source that I would believe 100%.
I have never found Bradblog to be inaccurate. And, as I pointed out earlier, he covers the substantive stories IN DEPTH, that the MSM ignores: election fraud and Sibel Edmonds. I would be harder pressed to find stories that reveal the hidden control of this country. Both of these situations could be EASILY addressed: 1) through election reform, e.g., eliminating any electronic storage of voting information; 2) Letting Sibel Edmonds testify publicly, and then using her testimony to hunt down the zionist criminals in our government.

The Bradblog is virtually the only one giving space to the Edmonds story. I wrote to Truthout and asked why they were applauding Congressman Henry Waxman, when Waxman had renegged on his promise to give Edmonds the opportunity to testify openly in Congress when the Dems got control. Truthout wrote back that Waxman was fighting the good fight, and that he wasn't part of the problem. But Truthout did not provide any EVIDENCE for their pro-Waxman stance. Waxman promised to let Edmonds testify about the zionist criminals, and then brushed it under the rug. Truthout's blind support couldn't have anything to do with the fact that the Editorial staff of Truthout is Jewish, Waxman is Jewish, and the criminals implicated by Edmonds are Jewish. That is pure coincidence.  

I mention all this because Truthout is supposed to be alternative media, but they don't cover the IMPORTANT STORIES because of blind loyalty. It happens like this:
1) The PUPPET MASTER has puppet A and puppet B.
2) The Puppet Master makes Puppet A do all sorts of vile things.
3) The people get riled up against Puppet A and demand a change.
4) Then the Puppet Master puts up Puppet B.
5) Puppet B does MOST OF THE SAME THINGS as Puppet A.
6) Now the people who liked Puppet A won't say anything bad about the things puppet B does, because Puppet A did the same things. And the people who hated Puppet B won't say anything bad about Puppet B because they don't want to get Puppet A back.
7) So the people who hate Puppet B don't attack B on anything substantive, but rather on nit-picky crap. And the people who wanted B because they hated A will continue to defend B, even though he is substantively EXACTLY THE SAME AS A.

QuoteThe worker told her no problem, and then proceeded to give a long list of benefits they could receive.
She told my wife not to worry because no one checks your citizen status.
Our country is overrun with illegal aliens. Obviously the government is not trying to do anything about the problem. There is a concerted effort to drive down the wages of the workers in the United States. Cesar Chavez, who led the Farmworker's Union, fought AGAINST illegal immigration.

Personally, I am not against helping the poor. Nor do I support aiding people in need, regardless of their status.  And when you get down to it, State Governments ability to discriminate on the basis of alienage or nationality is subject to STRICT SCRUTINY and likely to fail.  (e.g. Nyquist v. Mauclet, which involved "a statute that restricted the receipt of scholarships and similar financial support to citizens or to aliens who were applying for citizenship or who filed a statement affirming their intent to apply as soon as they became eligible. Therefore, since any alien could escape the limitation by a voluntary act, the disqualification was not aimed at aliens as a class, nor was it based on an immutable characteristic possessed by a "discrete and insular minority"—the classification that had been the basis for declaring alienage a suspect category in the first place. But the Court voided the statute. "The important points are that is directed at aliens and that only aliens are harmed by it. The fact that the statute is not an absolute bar does not mean that it does not discriminate against the class." Two proffered justifications were held insufficient to meet the high burden imposed by the strict scrutiny doctrine.
I note that the WIC is a federal agency, and therefore not held to the same standard as a state agency. The wrong-headed attitude toward illegal immigration emanates from the federal government and can only be solved at that level.)

BUT allowing illegal immigration from an impoverished nation is akin to providing welfare to the nation of Mexico through the back door. If the US and Mexico were united and the US could control Mexico's resources and importation of goods, that would be fine. Instead the people of Mexico are repressed by corrupt their government, and this is supplemented by the people of the United States, who are being impoverished by their corrupt government. All of this is working to drive all the wealth into fewer hands. Most of us will be poor before long.
And, as their wealth increaseth, so inclose
    Infinite riches in a little room