Jewish Threat of Race-Mixing & Culture Sabotage?

[Anonymous]

This post is a copy of a reply I made in the comment section for the article The Race Card, which appears on http://www.WakeUpFromYourSlumber.com


What is the Real Threat?

"That may be true of the modern day 'culture'. However, The Blues were not engineered by leaders and rulers, the Native American traditions were not engineered by the elite. Often the most profound cultures grow from the struggle of so-called 'ordinary people'.""

The very statement I made that you replied to is in agreement with your above words. My words revisited: Cultures aren't created by the commoner--only insofar as necessity limits or demands particulars--rather, they are largely (i.e., not always but vastly) engineered by leaders and rulers.

With some additional clarification my statement should suggest that indeed common folk create culture out of what they have in their possession and what is presently demanded (perhaps in terms of survival or even in terms of a community's need for entertainment).

The replies to my initial comment are greatly appreciated. A few points:

Every culture is not worth protecting. You have to look at what it produces; who created it, and for what purpose. What is presently considered American culture [for instance] is hardly worth keeping. It was primarily engineered to produce a docile consumer drone just sharp enough to wage war for the Crown and Israel. Furthermore, there are and have been cultures that are ultimately stupid and destructive to its fellows and to outsiders. A culture of cannibals or thieves could be two very simple examples. Interestingly enough, such vile minor cultures end up quickly taking command of larger ones to insure their survival.

Lastly, tactically speaking, using race mixing as a means to exact "genocide" on a people is utterly ridiculous. From a position of waging war--which is a mathematical thing--it makes little sense. It would take centuries to dissolve any large nation into a pish-posh of mixed people. This is largely due to the human instinct to be attracted toward things of similarity. Even if you flood America with Mexicans (which is going on now), they will largely breed with their own people. An even more absurd example would be to think of China. How many Arabs, Whites or Blacks would it take to dissolve China into a nation of mixed people who can no longer be said to be "Chinese"?

The "threat" of race mixing is a distraction little different than the "threat" of Africanized Bees or the "threat" of terrorism [in America]. It is a distraction, as only an incompetent buffoon would attempt to use it to overtake a society. One thing our Owners aren't is incompetent (but they do excel at getting people to worry over imaginary threats). Therefore, race mixing should be taken completely off the table as a threat, because it is mathematically stupid and tactically inferior to any number of methods of decimating the strength of a people.

The illusion that race-mxing on a massive scale is going to be a huge threat to our ability to retain cultural strengths is counter-intelligence. Certainly a crafty method of getting people to worry about whether or not they are separated enough. As a side note: Interestingly enough, the closer we come together--even so far as the closer we all get to the level of paupers--the easier it is to see our lords.

It would be easier for both whites and blacks to see who controls both races if they were closer together insofar as interaction and closeness of ecomonic status.

It may take many a white person to realize that it isn't blacks who ruined society and that blacks are not in any way inferior when the entire lot of white people is reduced to a nation of beggars, criminals, paupers and food stamp users. Therefore, I prepare for another Great Depression and welcome it. You can be assured that the white race will not be reduced to the level of the black majority until the prison is complete. Then with National ID Cards in hand the blacks and whites will--although too late--finally come together and realize that all races are subject to being reduced to a garbage dump of bad education, drug use, criminal activity and the men turning their backs on the women and children.

The true threat is an attack on culture, but not cultures. A force that merely mutates or otherwise changes a culture should not be called the threat, as some cultures are counter-productive not only to the species but to the planet (and back around to a species threat). Any number of counter-cultures or sub-cultures could be stated here as minor examples of that which should be disposed of, but there is little reason to waste such an illustration when the real threat is the present so-called American culture, among others. A threat to American culture is not a problem, as that culture is a threat to itself!

Going back, the true threat is an attack on the foundational culture of America, which most Americans hardly now exemplify. I speak of Constitutionalism, Patriotism and Christian virtues (not Bible thumping fundie nonsense, but the higher virtues of man which Christianity can, in its best incarnations, personify). For the record, "Christian virtues" is merely used herein because America is largely a Christian nation. The higher virtues of Islam, Buddhism or any number of religions are in line with such virtues (i.e., do your best to be a good person). The average American is so far removed from these foundational characteristics that one should begin to refrain from speaking in terms of threats to our present culture. Unless such a person feels we urgently need to protect foppish cowards, women infected by the ideas of Jewish feminists, Homer Simpsons, dumbfounded stooges swilling beer at pubs that once served as meeting places for revolutionaries and now serve as an extension of the living room (with a television blaring distractions in every corner).

An influx of Mexicans is honestly and simply, more of the same. If black and white lower class neighborhoods were expanding at the same rate as low class Mexicans running over the border, which is the greater threat? I say that they are both garbage. They are human beings and can be forgiven or elevated if they choose; they are human--given to mostly being sheep--and thus a product of the incompetence and lack of virtue within their rulers, but in such a present condition as their leaders mold them, they are an equal threat to the kind of society I would want for my children and probably yours. So now imagine that the black and white ghettos are growing at the same rate as the flood of Mexicans, but envision that our new Spanish speaking neighbors are all upper middle class and no illegal aliens are anywhere below that class. What is the greater threat? It should be noted that I speak of class and not economic status. I would sooner encourage a daughter or sister to marry into any upper middle class family of any race or nation if they exemplify class and virtue, well before I would have her marry a low class "American" simpleton.

The points are simple: To fear race mixing is to fear a phantom. To fear the collapse of American culture is to hold fast to a tumour. Our threat is against our foundation, which is rapidly being eaten away by Jewish termites.

[joeblow]

Mr. WW3N, I would like to point out something that I have discussed with a couple of other guys here privately. First, I must say that I have a B.S. in Biochemistry and recently took a few Pharmacy courses. My theory, based on a number of facts including Cheney's declaration in the PNAC documents that "we must legitimize the use of race-based genetic warfare", is that the elites want and actively encourage "race-mixing" in anticipation of the next World War. The two great enemies of the Jew, Russia and China, will never "race-mix" with brown people (such as myself) and thus have no defense against this Final Solution.

P.S.
I love the way you express yourself in speech and script. I feel that within the "conspiracy community" there is only I, LatinAmericanView, and you who are of higher intelligence and think logically.

[Anonymous]

I agree with you on most of it.  I will try to clarify what I mean when I say cultures and races should all be preserved with respect to your comments.

What is presently considered American culture [for instance] is hardly worth keeping.

I agree.  Clearly the way it has been manipulated and subverted (all Western culture for that matter) is not something we should hold onto in its present form.  The basis of Western culture - as you mentioned - is based on Christianity.  Although I am not religious, I have stated in a few posts on TIU forums that I respect and value the Christian philosophy and hold many of the ethical codes myself.  The Christian basis of Western culture would be a good cultural system to revert back to, a more altruistic system, that I think could further be made better.

Clearly a culture or race that would be hell-bound on destroying others or that engages in decadent degenerate behavior is not one that is worth preserving.

I still see the right of all ethnicities to preserve their language, race, culture as they choose to have it as long as it is not harming any one else, even if I do not agree with certain aspects of it.  They have the right to choose.  The problem now is that people are not even aware of how destructive their behavior and attitudes are, so their choices are not even truly their own, even though they seem to make them.  The choices are influenced my the many socially conditioned ideas they have been manipulated into adhering to.  Bad is good, up is down, it's warped.  It is quite a task to wake them up to this fact.

Lastly, tactically speaking, using race mixing as a means to exact "genocide" on a people is utterly ridiculous. From a position of waging war--which is a mathematical thing--it makes little sense. It would take centuries to dissolve any large nation into a pish-posh of mixed people. This is largely due to the human instinct to be attracted toward things of similarity.

I will assume that "genocide" is directed at me saying "subtle ethnic cleansing".  For many the term genocide is an outright systematic program that can plainly been seen, whereas a subtle "genocide" would not be directly visible.  As you would agree (I hope), the plan for world domination is not a recent development.  It has been worked on for many centuries.  And indeed it has been subtle.  For if it were not subtle/covert - meaning it were not difficult to detect or perceive - I would think the clarity of the agenda would have faced much greater opposition and we would not be exactly where we are now.  So to dismiss the ingenuity to again progressively implement another grand scheme to further assist them in their plans is not beyond their scope.  I hope you can agree on that.  They have been implementing stages for centuries, to add another stage to effectively eliminate  the common ground for people to unite on it very much possible.  As for "the human instinct to be attracted toward things of similarity", this can be subverted as well through social indoctrination (education, "PC") as each generation goes by (which I made reference to in my last comment on WUFYS).  They have already dumbed us down with each passing generation (froggy boiling..).  I do not see why this is so "ridiculous" as you put it.  Please point out the flaw in my thinking and I will be glad to change my views on this.  Otherwise, we are just seeing things from a different perspective and we just can't agree on this issue, which is fine by me.  I just need to see where the flaw in the logic is before I abandon the conclusions I have come to.

Furthermore, when I said "subtle ethnic cleansing", it refers to ethnicity, that being race and culture combined, also including language and any other additional characteristics that can be added to form an ethnicity.  To destroy an ethnicity would only require the removal of one of the those components that create that unique ethnicity.  As you mention the flood of illegals, this would eventually overpopulate the existing white and black populations that have been living in the USA over decades.  Apart from the racial diminishing that would result from the greater sized population of these illegals - if they would not adopt English, as many of them refuse to do, that aspect of ethnicity which is one part of defining the American culture (language, which is a part of the black and white ethnicity that makes up America) would be gone as well from being a defining characteristic of the culture that once existed.  This is not only happening in the US, or Canada, but also in other Western Christian based (or at least originally-based) societies.

The "threat" of race mixing is a distraction little different than the "threat" of Africanized Bees or the "threat" of terrorism [in America]....  One thing our Owners aren't is incompetent (but they do excel at getting people to worry over imaginary threats)

I can see that you perceive the threat to mix all races into one big amalgamation as being imaginary, but I think you are missing some key points that I mentioned above.  It is not so imaginary or ridiculous to serve as a mere distraction.  These things are taking place.  I hope after my elaboration these things become more clear to you.

It is a distraction, as only an incompetent buffoon would attempt to use it to overtake a society.

I think I made some decent points above as to why these guys are not merely buffoons to attempt to use this mechanism.

Therefore, race mixing should be taken completely off the table as a threat, because it is mathematically stupid and tactically inferior to any number of methods of decimating the strength of a people.

That's where I see you as being wrong.  It is quite genius, for the simple reason that it is subtle and covert, and therefore not stupid at all.  As they have done over the years and generation already, they have decimated the "strength of a people", this is another mechanism to do so, again over time.  The only reason to consider dismissing the concept of ethnic dilution - by which race mixing on a grand scale is one component - and subversion would be if we knew they were going to succeed in their plans now.  But we cannot know they will succeed.  And even if they would succeed in the next few years, there is no reason to doubt - with their further grip on controlling aspects of society - that they would use such a mechanism to further control humans by means of eugenics.  To learn more about prominent figures espousing concepts of eugenics, please read LatinAmericanView's blog on people like Aldous Huxley, Bertrand Russell and Charles Galton Darwin.

Additionally, the covert subtle methods are the only sure ways to maintain the docility of the people being affected.  For if another more overt mechanism, for example you say "From a position of waging war--which is a mathematical thing--it makes little sense", to use a physical method of waging war would be to destroy the docility in those affected because they would have an obvious right-in-their-face target they could clearly see and respond too.  Clearly this method is smarter and makes more sense when think about maintaining the existing docility.

The illusion that race-mxing on a massive scale is going to be a huge threat to our ability to retain cultural strengths is counter-intelligence. Certainly a crafty method of getting people to worry about whether or not they are separated enough. As a side note: Interestingly enough, the closer we come together--even so far as the closer we all get to the level of paupers--the easier it is to see our lords.

I believe this is where some confusion is arising, the view that this "imaginary" mechanism is only useful as a means to create further separation.  It is not about separation, although some do indeed use this concept to further their racial segregation, or racist or supremacist ideals.  Race-mixing in itself is perfectly OK, but above you state "that race-mxing on a massive scale is going to be a huge threat to our ability to retain cultural strengths is counter-intelligence" as being a mere illusion, is wrong.  The social conditioning tools at their disposal over generations will easily further reduce any careful analysis and concern over the agenda to compound all of humanity into what they want, while they remain excluded.  And indeed, yes we do need to become closer as a human species and get along as brothers and sisters to more easily see these bastards who want to be all of our masters and rise up against them as a united force (which will be simple to do if we can get enough people aware of what is going on).

It would be easier for both whites and blacks to see who controls both races if they were closer together insofar as interaction and closeness of ecomonic status.

I completely agree.

I agree with everything else you say, apart from that last line which reiterates your points on how it is all imaginary... I am trying to see things from your perspective with the arguments you are making, but from the info I have gathered, I cannot abandon my perception of the world as I see it.  I am glad you elaborated on things.  And now I have elaborated.  As it is quite easy to perceive something someone says in a different manner than was intended, such are the limitations of speech and typing in a interval manner where every single detail cannot be expounded upon to specifically clarify every possible interpretation the receiver gets from the person who is giving the message.  There are always things you should have said, things you should have explained in more detail, etc.  But it is only when someone does not receive the message as you intended that it is needed to clarify the message.  I hope you can further grasp my understanding of how the the multicultural and intermixing push is indeed part of their plan and is happening.  I can also understand the possibility of you never accepting it as you are indeed a person of mixed race and may have some aversions to accepting it.

I want to make one final point:  My post initially dealt with how using race as an identity is turbulent ground to stand on (but if you want to use it, use it logically, for if there is no logic in it then how can I affirm your choice to use it), and how it fits directly into the change from using the color descriptive to the geographic epithet as being illogical and even more pointless for the majority of people it is used upon as they never lived on that land (Let's just call Jews in the USA Israeli-Americans or Palestinian-Americans if we throw logic out the window...).  Then I segwayed into the purpose of this as "PC" conditioning tool to further remove the idea that race even exists in the first place.  And this is where the whole "problem" arose...  As I had mentioned in the initial post as to how they are achieving this: "The frog in the water that slowly boils to death".  If someone has never heard this, it refers to slowly turning up the water so that the frog boils to death, rather than throw the frog into hot water and he jumps right back out.  This is how the mechanism is run, as has the overall conspiracy been done and implemented over the centuries.  I do not see why this concept was not grasped in the initial post to explain why this is not a "mathematically stupid and tactically inferior" concept to grasp.

Peace.

[Anonymous]

I feel that within the "conspiracy community" there is only I, LatinAmericanView, and you who are of higher intelligence and think logically.

Thanks joeblow for the disrespectful comments you are making about everyone here.  I'll be sure to keep it in mind in the future.  I see your true colors now, friend.  Maybe the concept of a PM will serve you best in the future before making such degrading comments public.

[Anonymous]

Allow me to further inform you, jowblow, of other intelligent and logical people on the TIU forum ALONE, that I can recall from memory as having made very good posts here:
kolnidre
blueocean
sullivan
&c.
og
arctic.warfare
Canard
segment
mastermg
whitewraithe
mikewb
johnsavage
clark-kent

We do not need people here with superiority complexes who gloat about their perceived higher intelligence or logical analysis over others.  Please take that into consideration.

[Anonymous]

It seems that your argument rests on the idea that if bits and pieces of a culture are chipped away then the Jews win, at least continue to win or achieve more power. My argument is both that it doesn't matter and that race mixing would take too long to dissolve a society into a majority of mixed people. Moreover, that racial purity will not insure that a culture will last or that it will be an effective force against Jewish domination. Racial purity or similarity is only effective in war and politics insofar as you can quickly rally people together.

   It doesn't matter if Mexicans refuse to assimilate. It doesn't matter if the Mexicans end up somehow outnumbering us or if one day America becomes nothing more than an extension of Mexico. What matters is how awake we are. If we all start wearing sombreros, if all of our sons and daughters run out and breed with Mexicans, if Spanish becomes the dominate language and if our diets take a drastic change, this will have absolutely no bearing whatsoever on our ability to conduct war. Therefore, an attack on American culture, Irish, German, Japanese or any other culture is just a distraction.

   A threat to cultural principles is the real threat. But are they American principles or human principles? Is Mexico a cesspool because of its people or because of its rulers and that the nation's people have been driven away from the higher principles of their ancestors and spiritual masters? It is no more permissible to take a brick to a baby in Mexico than it is in Germany or America. In other words, we are all human and reject certain behaviors until our flocks are slowly led to embrace them. All nations have had leaders--religious and otherwise--who have set forth principles that exemplify the highest in human excellence. You could then by and large replace the foundational culture of America with the foundation of Ireland or that of the Native Americans and come up with an end product that is equally worthy of praise as America once was or could have been. In the face of so much propaganda against the Muslim nations I dare say that indeed an America founded on the principles of Islam would be praise worthy.

   The war is against humanity. It is against our prophets and praise worthy leaders and their teachings. It is against our highest principles and virtues. Our exterior; our bodies, our homes, clothing, language, musical preferences, diets or pass-times have little to do with our enemy's target. Only insofar as such things can be manipulated to demoralize, separate or take power away from us. Younger and younger girls wearing skimpier and skimpier clothing is a factor, but the clothing isn't the target. It is our principles and humanity. It is not the Bible, Christianity or even Christ--neither is it Islam or Buddha that our enemy targets--but the principles behind them.

   Think in terms of an immortal. The shape of things will always change and continue to do so. You may prefer the aesthetics of 16th century French culture, you may prefer the two-hundred years you spent in ancient Tibet over the fifty years you wandered across Canada, but as the centuries pass the shape of things changes. The language may change. The music sounds different. What is lasting? The humans and their humanity. As one century turns to the next you see great humans rise to form religions or spiritual teachings that will keep people on track toward their heart; their center. When we are at our center, all nations move in the same general direction. We trade and visit with each other; we breed, love, laugh and cry together.

If you want to take control of the humans, what lasting thing must you take control of?

    You must cause people to fear and hate one another. You must give them endless distractions (fear is an important one often overlooked) and keep them poisoned and asleep to your real plans. . .and even your very existence. In the insignificant lifespan of humans, the thing they dread most is rapid change and chaos. Lacking an immortal body, they hold onto their children (their DNA) as a means to symbolically attain ever-lasting life. If they do not have children they will project the survival of their DNA on friends and family. If they have no friends or family they will place it upon those who seem most similar to them. Yet humans are surface creatures so they will opt for visual similarity above all. If you want to scare the humans, threaten their DNA and the purity of it. You could even go so far as to threaten their very nature. Call them simpletons and make it known that you intend to wipe them out and replace them with a superior model. But as a ruler why would anyone want a real Aryan (the Arya; Aries), god-man, super human (ecce homo)? Such a being would be a threat to the deceptive little cowards that run the show. You must give the intelligent people a thing to fear and those of average intelligence as well. So send in the darkies and threaten the DNA of the Europeans or do quite the opposite by spreading Western filth to the Middle East. Convince them that it's a piss in the gene pool when the Mexicans or Arabs come knocking and that what they now possess insofar as material things and cultural particulars is under great threat as well. Since they can't see beyond their meager years they'll be hard pressed to understand that such things are illusory.

   An influx of Mexicans is no different than if we were to set up Antarctica as a breeding ground for low class white people. Make Antarctica resemble in every way possible American white low class life. Then when you've bred five million of the little buggers, and when nobody's looking, dump them on America. Same effect: chaos and a quick means to dumb down society as people of less principles and education further dissolve the foundation of American culture.

On the other hand, start applying principles of Force Multiplication. See all humans as your potential allies. As Mexicans move in, you're no longer wasting time railing against them or speaking in terms of how their existence here threatens your culture. You're educating them about who controls the game and how they can stop them. You multiply your forces. Would Mexicans be running across the border if they knew what to fight, how to fight and how they could quickly elevate the lot of their loved ones. . .and went on to win and secure a better future for their people! Mexican men and women who are awake would be a terrible threat to their masters and the Mexico they could create would be a place more desirable than a sleeping America!

Consider this: What if guys like Latin were in charge of Mexican airwaves? Imagine thousands--millions--of Mexicans flooding into America who are aware of the Jewish problem. Imagine if Latin pointed them to simple methods to get the word out to Americans. "Here's a DVD. This is what they did to my country and it talks about what they're trying to do to America." It is not multi-culturalism. Cultures come and go. It is sleeping people creating chaos because they do not understand who is pulling the strings. It is sleeping people walking off the very short pier of our highest principles and virtues. It is sleeping people running from place to place because they don't know who to fight or how to.

No other culture or race can be said to be a greater threat to our foundation than Jewish domination itself (and the criminal Gentiles that cooperate with them); than the war against our humanity; our principles.

The shape of things will change.

Bring forth awareness and multiply your forces; attack the Owners headlong and then and only then will you control the shape and secure the foundation for your people.

[sullivan]

I love the way you express yourself in speech and script. I feel that within the "conspiracy community" there is only I, LatinAmericanView, and you who are of higher intelligence and think logically.

Is the publishing in public of such an ego-ridden, pompous, self-agrandising and discourteous comment a sign of your supposed 'higher intelligence'? Thanks for giving me a chuckle.

[joeblow]

I shouldn't really reply, but in all honesty, I don't take blogs/forums/chat seriously at all. I consider most people that I meet in the "Virtual World" to be little more text on a computer screen. The reason I say this is because of the pyschological schitzopherenia that produces the "Internet Tough Guy". Though I'm extremely rude and agressive in real life, I try to be as pleasent and forgiving as possible when directly interacting with others online.

Don't take this stuff too seriously.

[Anonymous]

Thanks for the reply John, I see your point, and I agree with it.  Insofar as the debate over the illusion or actuality of this agenda, I will not argue further.  I will agree to disagree on those finer points with you.  Thanks for the interesting read once again.  Let's move onto waking more people up and making them aware that we need to band together to stop the evil buggers.

Peace.

[Roy Hobs]

Perhaps not directly related to this Post, but I was wondering if you were a student of the American Civil War?  

My questions are:

How did our Owners pull that one off?

All of their Wars have been terrible, but the Civil War to me seems like the ultimate victory for them in that they were able to pit supposed "allies"(Americans) against each other.  And thus severly reducing the population of males in the late 1800's.  

If they wanted to create "another Civil War", what will it look like leading up to the fighting?

Could what we are seeing with the open borders and the race baiting be small steps to this goal?

Thanks to anyone who has insights into that awful war.  Roy.

[Anonymous]

Thanks for the reply John, I see your point, and I agree with it. Insofar as the debate over the illusion or actuality of this agenda, I will not argue further. I will agree to disagree on those finer points with you. Thanks for the interesting read once again. Let's move onto waking more people up and making them aware that we need to band together to stop the evil buggers.

     I find your points completely valid for the microcosm of the average person's experience, and therein is our agreement amongst other places. I find the immortal perspective particularly useful in determining the plans and moves of the Owners. Certain conspiracy gurus will say that there are immortal or non-human creatures behind the scenes, but that is irrelevant to me largely. An organization that forms plans with an immortal mind is what we're dealing with. Anne Rice's vampires can be compared not only to the perspective of the Jew but also to the numerous Jewish and criminal Gentile organizations which operate with them or are ultimately commanded by them.

The Jewish supremacist has no loyalty to culture, religion or nation much like a vampire such as Lestat. Erupting a clash between cultures would be useful to a vampire overlord as the short-lived humans fight over something ultimately trivial. The humans descend into chaos while the vampire reaps the end rewards and has no problem taking up the language and cultural characteristics of the winning side. When the dust clears the vampire may choose to emerge from the shadows dressed in the likeness of local royalty and proclaim himself ruler. Any cultural particulars such as American handshakes, Japanese bowing, praying to Mecca or other details are unimportant to the vampire. He will do these things in the face of the humans but they will either evolve or fade away and thus they are of no consequence to him. Only the vampire is timeless. Yet the humans are also timeless in that through their children they continue to exist. Centrally their humanity is also timeless, and through it they can be timelessly manipulated.

    The Jewish supremacists already exist with an immortal mind and move over the Earth as one would move as a chess master of the New World Order. One world, one people, one religion, one ruler. They do not see borders for themselves, or nations to be loyal to. No religious belief matters but their own. There aren't many armies but one single army that they command or wish to command. When two armies are sent against each other, make no mistake that it is one total group that is being commanded. There are not two armies. There is one! The army of humans fighting amongst themselves like easily led sheep to the slaughter.

   If we are seen as one total and separate entity from our Owners, why shouldn't we view each other as such? A singular army. The survival of one race, nation or culture is infinitisimally insignificant in the face of our complete loss and subsequent eternal enslavement or utter annihilation. If America in the future is dominated by Muslim Mexicans, it is of no concern to me. The existence of humans and our humanity will still be with us. For me then, I find clashes between cultures or races hardly worth speaking about but only insomuch as the dialog can be used to show an example as to who is pulling the strings. When the flock has been significantly educated we will command the shape and secure our foundation. All other goals must bend to that single objective.

  As for the Civil War, I hope to contribute to an understanding of how the Owners engineered it, and I believe it calls for a new thread.

  Stay strong!

[Anonymous]

Mr. WW3N, I would like to point out something that I have discussed with a couple of other guys here privately. First, I must say that I have a B.S. in Biochemistry and recently took a few Pharmacy courses. My theory, based on a number of facts including Cheney's declaration in the PNAC documents that "we must legitimize the use of race-based genetic warfare", is that the elites want and actively encourage "race-mixing" in anticipation of the next World War. The two great enemies of the Jew, Russia and China, will never "race-mix" with brown people (such as myself) and thus have no defense against this Final Solution.

P.S.
I love the way you express yourself in speech and script. I feel that within the "conspiracy community" there is only I, LatinAmericanView, and you who are of higher intelligence and think logically.

Oh no....there are more of us out there, but we are indeed few and far between.

Well stated FM.  I think you made a good point in our conversation also.  It won't grow food or buy bullets, so it is of lesser concern.  I feel what's most important is focusing the energy of all the races onto the jews who control us.  If those of us who know can't get this information to those who don't we can't unite everyone against the right cause, which is exposing the jewish control and dismantling it.