Only White People Can Be Racist Right?

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

If a white person is pro-white he/she is a racist. If a black person is pro-black he/she is a "race advocate". If a Jewish person is pro-Jewish he/she is a "race advocate". If a Latino person is pro-Latino he/she is a "race advocate". White people are made to feel guilty for being white.  :down:

[youtube:1h77zoh1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDeNBsD8iRc[/youtube]1h77zoh1]

[Christopher Marlowe]

Some of Duke's points are well taken. But to claim any cohesion to that tea party movement is a stretch.  There is too much media money and promotion put in and made out. Who is paying for the buses? Who pays for the speaking fees for PALIN? Palin, the rebel.
It's funny to see that Palin, a true-blue israhell supporter is a keynote speaker to the movement.  And Duke feels comfortable with insinuating that these people are rebelling against the yoke of Jewish oppression.  
Tea Partiers: They're whatever we want them to be.  

I remember first seeing them protesting on tax day 2009. Because now that Obama was President, suddenly taxes were bad. Cause taxes were so f*cking deliciously good under Bush? WTF? I drove by those people at around 11pm, timely filing my return....Looking at the crowd and seeing if there were any honeys....I am not a Republican, but they tend to have hotter girls. Thinking: Where have these people been for the last eight years? Billions wasted on illegal wars, but now they're mad about taxes? Are their heads completely up their...Oooh.  Check her out!  She's pretty hot.

[brandon dean]

Some of Duke's points are well taken. But to claim any cohesion to that tea party movement is a stretch.  There is too much media money and promotion put in and made out. Who is paying for the buses? Who pays for the speaking fees for PALIN? Palin, the rebel.
It's funny to see that Palin, a true-blue israhell supporter is a keynote speaker to the movement.  And Duke feels comfortable with insinuating that these people are rebelling against the yoke of Jewish oppression.  
Tea Partiers: They're whatever we want them to be.  

I remember first seeing them protesting on tax day 2009. Because now that Obama was President, suddenly taxes were bad. Cause taxes were so f*cking deliciously good under Bush? WTF? I drove by those people at around 11pm, timely filing my return....Looking at the crowd and seeing if there were any honeys....I am not a Republican, but they tend to have hotter girls. Thinking: Where have these people been for the last eight years? Billions wasted on illegal wars, but now they're mad about taxes? Are their heads completely up their...Oooh.  Check her out!  She's pretty hot.

haha that was funny...

duke did say in the video that jews were attempting to take over the leadership of the tea party, just like with everything else.  that would explain the "rebel" palin and the buses.

I'm with you though.  where the hell were these people since 911 and the iraq war?  for that matter, where were they during the first persian gulf war, or waco, or the OKC bombing?  oh yes, they were bitching about bill clinton and janet reno.

liberals and conservatives make me laugh, but I have to say that's mostly because there is no such a thing it seems as a true conservative anymore.  I am not one, and don't wish to be, but I would respect someone with actual conservative values more than these pissant crybabies.  the liberals had a REASON to be pissed when bush stole both of those elections, but obongo clearly stuttered his way to actual popular and electoral victory.  they do need something to bitch about, though.

"end the fed."  these people don't even know what they're talking about.  they all just watched "freedom to fascism" and figured they understood economics, let alone cutthroat politics.  but all they understand is that the fed is bad, and GOLD IS GOOD.  to me, THAT is the giveaway.  the zionist jews will desert the fed for higher ground in a split second if they have to, and please believe they have an escape plan, which, like ognir and DBS were talking about a week or two ago on the DBS show, that could be the explanation for them backing ron paul and the "tea party."

but seriously, I could have avoided typing this whole thing about the tea party with the following: "sarah palin?  sarah palin!?!  are you FUCKING KIDDING me!? the one with the cute little israeli flag on her desk?"

[Christopher Marlowe]

there is no such a thing it seems as a true conservative anymore.

Amen to that, brother.

these people don't even know what they're talking about.

Yes. People watch TV and are treated to shouting matches instead of substantive debate.  Talking points are a way of framing the debate without resorting to logic.  Most people watch the TV news that supports their party. The 2 party system is a way of tricking people into thinking they are free because they always get to choose between two loser propositions.  Democrat? Watch MSNBC (owned by general electric). Republican? Watch Fox News.  

A thousand people in the street
Singing songs and carrying signs
Mostly say, hooray for our side

I felt bad that I didn't comment on Duke's comments concerning race.  I think he is right that white people have a right to get together and form white clubs, and talk about the wonderfullness of whiteness.  

And I think that our society feels comfortable with saying negative things about "Christians" but the same comments would get attacked if the word "Christian" was replaced by "Jew".

I also think that the protocols and plans call for making society less homogeneous in an effort to weaken our collective strength.  The idea behind this is that people are more likely to stand together if they look like each other.

But from my own experience, I like seeing all kinds of people living and working together. The church where I go to mass has a very diverse group of races. After mass today I went to a street fair where there was also much diversity.  I can't imagine that I would pull together stronger with some of them than with others, except perhaps the ones I know personally.  But I know some people who are from Africa. Blacks. And they know me and we are friends. Am I supposed to bond with a stranger who is white rather than with my black friends?  

I don't think that protocol is all that it is cracked up to be.  

When the Jehovah's Witnesses come around with their literature, I look at the pictures that are supposed to represent heaven and this is what it shows: People of all races walking around beautiful nature scenes.  That looks nice to me.  

I don't know what heaven looks like, but if I got the choice between an All-White heaven and the one depicted on the Jehovah's witness booklet, I think I would choose one on the Jehovah's Witness booklet.  

And the angel said to them: Fear not; for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, that shall be to all the people:

[brandon dean]

you certainly laid out a good argument against racial separatism.  I tend to agree with most of what you said.  but I also would not fault someone for a) being proud of who they are, or b)wishing to only congregate with people who look like themselves.  apparently you wouldn't either, and that's good...

the issue to deal with in this country, in my opinion, is "multiculturalism," not multi-racialism. a culturally unified country is a strong country, regardless of race or religion.  a culturally diverse country is a separated country.  cultural diversity does nothing but weaken a country.  that has been proven over and over again throughout history.  the roman empire is one glaring example.  as long as they maintained their roman culture, even forced it on others, they maintained their empire.  after julius caesar and over a hundred years of almost constant war, the roman workforce was depleted, so millions more workers and slaves were imported to italy.  these diverse cultures did not add to roman culture at all, but rather destroyed it through not assimilating, and thus gaining power in isolated niches of roman society.  it wasn't their fault, but nonetheless that's what happened...