chris bollyn expose himself and many others

[superzebra]

taken from bollyn website:

Most Recent Question:  We met in the summer of 2005 when you brought William Rodriquez [9-11 survivor from the World Trade Center] to speak at the Schaumburg Library [Illinois]. You mention in your notice to Eric Hufschmid that you categorize him with Mike Piper and Darrel Bradford Smith – why?  You also referred to Victor Thorn who seems to have lifted some of your ideas about Zionist involvement in 9/11.  Are Piper and Smith disinformation agents?  

I have Piper's Final Judgment.  I think your research is impeccable and felt badly when you "left" AFP. Your online 9/11 book is amazing. I hope that you and your family are happy and secure. I have noted that people who divulge too much truth, like Sterling, Peggy Seagrave, and yourself receive similar treatment and have to flee.

  --  Bollyn Responds: This is a good question about a subject that I don't usually delve into, but which certainly deserves to be discussed because it concerns the role of the Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) as the source of much of the deception and evil that afflicts our world today.

The people you ask about:  Hufschmid, Piper, Smith, and Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn), are four detractors who have spent years attacking me and waging a vicious campaign of slander and libel against me and my family.   What these agents of deception have done is spread lies and calumnies about me, my wife and children in an effort to discredit me and damage my credibility and reputation. Smith revealed how this vicious slander campaign works in a taped telephone conversation with Eric Hufschmid. I have written about this in an article entitled "Slam Bollyn Every Way You Can", which is exactly what Smith told Hufschmid to do. Why would Smith want to "slam" me, an honest journalist and leading 9-11 researcher?

 

While Hufschmid has not attacked me as maliciously as the others, he has made the ridiculous claim since the summer of 2007 that I have been kidnapped by the Mossad. Using this bizarre claim (which he stubbornly maintains despite abundant proof to the contrary) he says that my writing is "bait" approved by Israeli intelligence. Although he employs a different method, Hufschmid's slander against me has achieved the same result. He has successfully sown suspicion about my credibility and drawn attention to me as a person while completely marginalizing my 9-11 research, which he has ignored since 2007.    

To understand what this slander campaign is really all about, and who is behind it, we need to employ some Socratic dialectic. We will start by asking a simple question: Are these people attacking me as a defensive tactic because I have attacked them or treated them badly?  

No. I have not wronged any of these people and not even discussed them until after they began attacking me. As a matter of fact, I have helped all of them a great deal. I helped Piper, for example, with his RBN radio show when I filled in for him for several weeks in a row, while on the road with my family in the West during the summer of 2006. This required a great deal of time and effort on my part - with absolutely no compensation. Does Piper do his daily show from free?    

I also helped Piper by appearing several times as a guest on his show, as I did for Hufschmid and Smith's "French Connection" show. Piper always introduced me with fulsome praise, calling me "America's best journalist, bar none." Piper, Hufschmid, and Smith have, as a matter of fact, all greatly relied on and gained from the original 9-11 research I have done. None of them can say that they have suffered because of knowing me. So why do they attack me?
Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) wrote a book about Israel's role in the 9-11 attacks (that I have not read), which must contain a great deal of my research. Thorn's book was published by American Free Press, where I worked from 2000 until October 2006.


Scott Makufka (a.k.a. Victor Thorn)

Although I was the first journalist to write about the Israeli role in the 9-11 attacks and have done far more research (for eight years) than any other writer on the subject, AFP was never interested in doing a book about 9-11 with me. This is an intelligence tactic called "stealing the thunder." If AFP were truly interested in exposing the Israeli role in 9-11, why have they not asked to publish my ground-breaking book, Solving 9-11 – The Deception that Changed the World?  

So, what have I done to deserve being subjected to the vicious and concerted campaign of calumny, slander, and libel? What is it that I have done that bothers them so much that they spend time attacking me?  

This is easy. Apart from raising my family, for the past eight years my only vocation has been to research and write about the false-flag terrorism of 9-11. As an investigative journalist I have led the way in investigating the role of Israeli intelligence and Zionist agents in the United States in the terror attacks of 9-11.  

If my 9-11 research and writing is the reason these detractors are attacking me with slander and libel, who are they doing it for?    

It stands to reason that these four are working as agents of an agency that is interested in my research being discredited and marginalized. Because my thesis is that the state of Israel and Zionists in the U.S. are behind 9-11, these must be the same entities behind the anti-Bollyn slander campaign. This makes sense because well-known Zionist entities such as Rupert Murdoch's FOX News, CNN, and the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz have all tried to smear me as an anti-Semite  

Are these four detractors connected with a Zionist agency or the state of Israel?  

Eric Hufschmid's father, with whom he works closely, is the father of the wife of Rupert Murdoch's son James, heir apparent of the Murdoch media empire. Smith is a former narcotics user who has several felony convictions that were suddenly cleared up immediately before he began his career with "The French Connection" in early 2005.  

Piper and Makufka (a.k.a. Thorn) work for a newspaper called American Free Press, where I worked as an independent contractor (since the fall of 2001) after being hired in the spring of 2000. AFP claims to be an employee-owned newspaper, which is a deception meant to fool readers. AFP has no assets to own. Everything of value associated with the Liberty Lobby and American Free Press is held by a host of shell companies with names like "The Committee to Expose Bunk", which issued my paychecks, for example. Michael Piper is one of the people allowed to sign checks from these entities.    

The person who is the mastermind of the shell game involving the assets of the Liberty Lobby is Mark Lane, the Jewish lawyer who played a crucial role in the massacre at Jonestown, Guyana.

Lane has been the lawyer of the Liberty Lobby since the mid-1980s and received some $5 million in legal fees, according to a veteran Liberty Lobby insider. Lane, who served in U.S. Army Intelligence in Germany at the end of the war, acquired the assets of the Liberty Lobby in 1993 or 1994, according to L.T. Patterson (owner of Criminal Politics), who discovered this fact during a court process in which Lane was suing Patterson.  

Who does Lane work for?    

Lane must work for the C.I.A. Having worked for Army Intelligence in the mid-1940s, it stands to reason that Lane became one of the head honchos in the Jewish intelligence cabal in Army Intelligence that became the C.I.A. in 1949. This would explain Lane's role in his writings on the Warren Report, the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War, Jonestown, and the so-called patriot movement at the Liberty Lobby.  

But isn't the C.I.A. working to protect the nation and the people of the United States?  

Obviously not. The C.I.A. was criticized for being asleep at the switch on 9-11, but it is really much worse than that. The C.I.A. actually works against the interests of the republic and the American people. The C.I.A. is obviously deeply involved in the commission of the terrorism crime of 9-11. Rather than preventing 9-11 or finding the culprits of the atrocity, the C.I.A. has been exploiting the 9-11 deception to wage war using drone warfare in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Asked about the C.I.A. attacks in Pakistan, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton responded as if she had no legal authority or control over the C.I.A., which was a remarkably candid response from a U.S. Secretary of State. Her response indicated that the C.I.A. is a rogue agency that acts outside the control of the U.S. administration. How can that be?  

What is the C.I.A.'s interest in Afghanistan and Pakistan?    

The C.I.A. is clearly not interested in solving 9-11 or finding the culprits. We know that the Twin Towers were demolished using an advanced form of super-thermite (produced using nano-technology) and that the official version that Osama Bin Laden carried out 9-11 from a cave in Afghanistan is nothing but a pack of lies. The C.I.A. is involved in Afghanistan because that's where most of the world's opium is produced. George H.W. Bush, the former director of the C.I.A., was also a director of the Eli Lilly Company, the pharmaceutical giant that manufactures Prozac. Bush was also one of the first students at Israel's Yonatan [Netanyahu] Institute of terrorism in 1979. Since the production of opium has skyrocketed since the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, we can assume that opium production is one of the purposes of the war and occupation. Prior to the invasion of 2001, the Taliban regime, which the U.S. is fighting against, had succeeded in eradicating nearly all opium production in Afghanistan.  

This explains why American Free Press was so strongly opposed to my articles about the dangerous effects of Prozac and similar drugs. When Ellen Mariani, a 9-11 widow, told me that the grieving relatives had been sent to Red Cross doctors who had prescribed Prozac – the editor at AFP cut it out of the story. My subsequent articles about serotonin-affecting drugs and school shootings were rejected out-of-hand. This was clearly a subject that the American Free Press did not want to take up.    

One has to remember what Andreas von Bülow said about intelligence agencies in December 2001: "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation." The first target of the deception and disinformation of the C.I.A. is the people of the United States. This is a rogue agency that must be disbanded if the American republic is to survive. The C.I.A. is no sacred cow, some sacrosanct institution that can be allowed to carry out its own agenda, wage war, and maintain secret prisons, all in the name of our democratic American republic. The C.I.A. is a rogue agency that is obviously an enemy of American democracy. The United States of America cannot survive as a democratic republic with the C.I.A. operating as the shadow government. The C.I.A. is nothing but a band of organized criminals operating under the guise of the United States. By dissolving the C.I.A. we would obtain answers to many of the crimes committed in the past 60 years.

    Question:  I am making an appeal that you repost the following important articles on your website or link to them somewhere. They are increasingly getting harder to find on the Internet. Many sites just link back to your site and yet they are no longer available at Bollyn.com Some people are just beginning to wake up - they really need to hear what happened and understand the nature and character of Eric Hufschmid and Daryl Bradford Smith. I hope to see this information on your site again soon.
--Bollyn Responds:  I have recently received quite a few questions about my detractors, namely Michael Piper, Daryl B. Smith, and Eric Hufschmid.  I have reposted these articles under the section entitled The Cure for Disinfo.  As the former German intelligence chief Andreas von Buelow told me in December 2001, "Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is deception and disinformation."  Marion Fulk, the retired scientist of the Manhattan Project and Livermore Lab, used to tell me that the government "has buildings full of agents" to do their dirty work.  When we would go to a restaurant in Livermore after a day spent studying the effects of depleted uranium, there would be several agents tailing us and listening to our conversation.  My detractors and those who slander and libel me are working for such people.  The truth is coming out and we can all see who has been working for the truth and who has not.  The functions of Michael Piper and sticky fly-paper operations like American Free Press are a bit more complicated and something I will take up in the next question.

this guy bollyn says that daryl is zionist agent....... :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

[Wimpy]

DBS' slam of Bollyn was a combination of things and I think the first blood was drawn by Bollyn if memory serves.  Perhaps the tipping point was the ungrateful house guests that the Bollyn's made of themselves.  I can personally state that had I been in the Smith's shoes I would have felt the same about their (Bollyn's) lazy spoiled children and the drunken display by Christopher.  I too would have been quite annoyed if someone violated my privacy and published my picture on the internet particularly being the high visibility target of DBS.  If Bollyn flaunts his appearance on the internet that's his business but exposing another against their wishes is a vicious betrayal, reckless and dangerous.