The Anti-"Jew Scams" Canard

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Curtis points out that this catalogue of contradictory accusations cannot possibly be true and no single people could feasibly have such a total monopoly on evil.

--- They shouldn't be too sure of it since Jews are Contradictory, Lying and Scam oriented by nature, which is after all, reinforced by Idiot Jew Talmudicism....   The CSR

The Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canard


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism
Judenstern
History · Timeline · Resources
Manifestations
Anti-globalization related · Arab
Christian · Islamic · Nation of Islam
New · Racial · Religious
Secondary · Academic · Worldwide
Incidents 2008–2009
Allegations
Deicide · Blood libel · Ritual murder
Well poisoning · Host desecration
Jewish lobby · Jewish Bolshevism
Kosher tax · Dreyfus affair
Zionist Occupation Government
Holocaust denial
Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic publications
On the Jews and Their Lies
Protocols of the Elders of Zion
The International Jew
Mein Kampf
The Culture of Critique series
Persecutions
Expulsions · Ghettos · Pogroms
Jewish hat · Judensau
Yellow badge · Spanish Inquisition
Segregation · The Holocaust
Nazism · Neo-Nazism
Opposition
UN Watch
Anti-Defamation League
Community Security Trust
EUMC · Stephen Roth Institute
Wiener Library · SPLC · SWC
UCSJ · SCAA · Yad Vashem
Categories
Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism · Jewish history

An Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canard (evoking a French-derived English catchword for "hoax") is a false story inciting Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism. Despite being thoroughly disproved, Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canards are often part of broader theories of Jewish conspiracies. According to Kenneth S. Stern,

    Historically, Jews have not fared well around conspiracy theories. Such ideas fuel anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism. The myths that Jews killed Christ, or poisoned wells, or killed Christian children to bake matzo, or "made up" the Holocaust, or plot to control the world, do not succeed each other; rather, the list of anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canards gets longer.[1]

Contents
[hide]

    * 1 Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canards
          o 1.1 Accusations of deicide
          o 1.2 Accusations of host desecration
          o 1.3 Accusations of ritual murder and blood libel
          o 1.4 Accusation of anti-Christian bias
          o 1.5 Demonization, accusations of impurity
          o 1.6 Accusations of well poisoning
          o 1.7 Accusations of plotting to control the world
          o 1.8 Accusations of causing wars, revolutions, and calamities
          o 1.9 Accusations of causing Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism
          o 1.10 Accusations of usury and profiteering
          o 1.11 "Kosher Tax"
          o 1.12 Accusations of cowardice and lack of patriotism
          o 1.13 "Nile to Euphrates" flag controversy
          o 1.14 Accusations of racism
          o 1.15 Holocaust denial
          o 1.16 Accusations of controlling the media
                + 1.16.1 Accusations of controlling Hollywood
          o 1.17 Accusations of controlling the world financial system
          o 1.18 Accusations of organ harvesting
                + 1.18.1 Haiti
                + 1.18.2 Palestinians
    * 2 Contradictory accusations
    * 3 See also
    * 4 References
    * 5 External links

Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canards

 Accusations of deicide


According to Jeremy Cohen, "[e]ven before the Gospels appeared, the apostle Paul portrayed the Jews as Christ's killers[2] ... But though the New Testament clearly looks to the Jews as responsible for the death of Jesus, Paul and the evangelists did not yet condemn all Jews, by the very fact of their Jewishness, as murderers of God and his messiah. That condemnation, however, was soon to come."[3]

According to the New Testament accounts, the Jewish authorities in Judea charged Jesus with blasphemy and sought his execution, see Sanhedrin Trial of Jesus. However, the Jewish authorities lacked the authority to have Jesus put to death, according to John 18:31 yet Acts 6:12 records them ordering the stoning of Saint Stephen and also James the Just according to Antiquities of the Jews 20.9.1. The Jesus Seminar's Scholars Version translation notes for John 18:31: "it's illegal for us: The accuracy of this claim is doubtful." They brought Jesus to Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Iudaea Province, who "consented" to Jesus' execution.

Pilate is portrayed in the Gospel accounts as a reluctant accomplice to Jesus' death. Some modern scholars have questioned the historical accuracy of such a portrayal. These historians suggest that a Roman Governor such as Pilate would not have hesitated to execute any leader whose followers posed a potential threat to Roman rule. However, the Gospel accounts indicate that there could be hesitation on the part of both Jewish and Roman authorities to act immediately or needlessly in the face of potential popular opposition (Matt 26:4-5; Mk 15:12-15; Lk 22:1-2). These scholars also suggest that the Gospel accounts may have downplayed the role of the Romans in Jesus' death during a time when Christianity was struggling to gain acceptance in the Roman world. Yet the four Gospel accounts uniformly portray the Roman Governor Pilate as partly responsible for Jesus' execution, rather than exonerating him, and it is not clear that blaming Pilate completely, decades after his reign, would have diminished Christian acceptance.

As a part of Second Vatican Council, the Roman Catholic Church under Pope Paul VI issued the document Nostra Aetate, repudiating the traditional belief in the collective Jewish guilt for the Crucifixion.

Accusations of host desecration


During the Middle Ages in Europe, it was claimed that Jews stole consecrated Hosts, or communion wafers, and desecrated them to reenact the crucifixion of Jesus by stabbing or burning the host or otherwise misusing it. The accusations were often supported only by the testimony of the accuser.[4]

The first recorded accusation of host desecration by Jews was made in 1243 at Berlitz, near Berlin, and in consequence of it all the Jews of Berlitz were burned on the spot, subsequently called Judenberg.[5] Jeremy Cohen states that the first host desecration accusation occurred in 1290 in Paris[6] and continues:

    "The story exerted its influence even in the absence of Jews... Edward I of England expelled the Jews from his kingdom in 1290, and they would not reappear in Britain until the late 1650s. Yet the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries saw the proliferation of the Host-desecration story in England: in collections of miracle stories, many of them dedicated to the miracles of the Virgin Mary; in the art of illuminated manuscripts used for Christian prayer and meditation; and on stage, as in popular Croxton Play of the Sacrament, which itself evoked memories of an alleged ritual murder committed by Jews in East Anglia in 1191."[6]

In the following centuries, similar accusations circulated throughout Europe, usually accompanied by massacres. The accusation of host desecration gradually ceased after the Reformation when first Martin Luther in 1523 and then Sigismund August of Poland in 1558 were among those who repudiated the accusation.[7] However, sporadic instances of host desecration libel occurred even in the 18th and 19th century. In 1761 in Nancy, several Jews from Alsace were executed on a charge of host desecration. The last recorded accusation was brought up in Bislad, Romania, in 1836.[8]

Accusations of ritual murder and blood libel

"The blood libel accusation, another famous anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canard, is also a twelfth-century creation."[9] The first recorded ritual murder accusation against Jews was that of William of Norwich, reported by a monk Thomas of Monmouth.[10]

The descriptions of torture and human sacrifice in the Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic blood libels run contrary to many of the teachings of Judaism. The Ten Commandments forbid murder. The use of blood (human or otherwise) in cooking is prohibited by Kashrut and blood and other discharges from the human body are considered ritually unclean.(Lev 15) The Tanakh (Old Testament) and Jewish teaching portray human sacrifice as one of the evils that separated the pagans of Canaan from the Hebrews.(Deut 12:31, 2 Kings 16:3) Jews were prohibited from engaging in these rituals and were punished for doing so (Ex 34:15, Lev 20:2, Deut 18:12, Jer 7:31). Ritual cleanliness for priests prohibited even being in the same room as a human corpse (Lev 21:11).

When "Church and secular leaders sharply denounced these defamations,... people refused to abandon this myth. ... Popes, kings and emperors declared that Jews, if for no other reason than their strict dietary laws banning even the smallest drop of blood in meat or poultry, were incapable of the crime. The Christian populace was not impressed. In 1385, Geoffrey Chaucer published his Canterbury Tales which included an account of Jews murdering a deeply pious and innocent Christian boy. This blood libel become a part of English literary tradition."[11]

Among those who refuted blood libel against Jews were Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II in 1236: "...we pronounce the Jews of the aforementioned place [Fulda] and the rest of the Jews in Germany completely absolved of this imputed crime,"[12] Pope Gregory IX in Papal Bull dated October 7, 1272: "We decree... that Christians need not be obeyed against Jews in a case or situation of this type, and we order that Jews seized upon such as silly pretext be freed from impisonment, and that they shall not be arrested henceforth on such a miserable pretext, unless - which we do not believe - they be caught in the commission of the crime,"[13] Pope Clement VI on September 26, 1348: "Jews are not responsible for the Plague."[14]

Blood libel stories have appeared a number of times in the state-sponsored media of a number of Arab and Muslim nations, their television shows and websites, and books alleging occurrences of Jewish blood libel are not uncommon.[15]

Some Arab writers have condemned blood libel. The Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram published a series of articles by Osam Al-Baz, a senior advisor to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak. He explained the origins of the anti-Jewish blood libel and said that Arabs and Muslims have never been anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism as a group and urged people not to succumb to "myths" such as the blood libel.[16]

Accusation of anti-Christian bias

Throughout the years, some anti-Semitism within the Christian community has focused on the claim that Jews dislike Christianity or are trying to destroy it. On the Jews and their Lies, written by Martin Luther, is an example of this claim. The claim has continued into the present day, with radio host James Edwards claiming that Jews "hate Christianity" and "the WASP establishment" and "are using pornography as a subversive tool against us". [17]

Demonization, accusations of impurity - Judensau and Der Stürmer

Jeremy Cohen writes:

    Yet the very impulse that propelled the Christian imagination from the Jew as a deliberate killer of Christ to the Jew as perpetrator of the most heinous crimes against humanity also led to the portrayal of the Jew as inhuman, satanic, animal-like, and monstrous. ... Popular traditions of the later Middle Ages, for example, characterize Jews as having a distinctive foul odor. ... By all accounts, the bestiality of the Jew climaxed in the image of the Judensau...[18]

"a well-dressed, very contemporary-looking Jew has mounted the sow backward and holds her tail, while a second Jew sucks at her milk and a third eats her feces. The horned devil, himself wearing a Jewish badge, looks on and the butchered Simon, splayed as if on a cross, appears on a panel above."

Judensau (German for "Jew-sow"), was a derogatory and dehumanizing image of Jews that appeared around the 13th century. Its popularity lasted for over 600 years and was revived by the Nazis. The Jews, typically portrayed in obscene contact with unclean animals such as pigs or owls or representing a devil, appeared on cathedral or church ceilings, pillars, utensils, etchings, etc.

Often, the images combined several Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic motifs and included derisive prose or poetry. Cohen continues:

    "Dozens of Judensaus... intersect with the portrayal of the Jew as a Christ killer. Various illustrations of the murder of Simon of Trent blended images of Judensau, the devil, the murder of little Simon himself, and the Crucifixion. In the seventeenth-century engraving from Frankfurt[19] ... a well-dressed, very contemporary-looking Jew has mounted the sow backward and holds her tail, while a second Jew sucks at her milk and a third eats her feces. The horned devil, himself wearing a Jewish badge, looks on and the butchered Simon, splayed as if on a cross, appears on a panel above."[20]

In the Spanish language, the word marrano means "Christianized Jew", "pig" and "dirty".

More recently, "[t]he main recurrent motif in Arab cartoons concerning Israel is "the devilish Jew"[21] and "[t]he core anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism motif of the Jew as the paradigm of absolute evil has a set of submotifs. These, in turn, recur over the centuries but are differently cloaked according to the predominant narrative of the period."[22]

Accusations of Well poisoning and Black Death

During the Black Death (often identified as bubonic plague epidemic) throughout the late Middle Ages, crowded cities were especially hard hit by the disease, with death tolls as high as 50% of the population. In their distress, emotionally distraught survivors searched for something, or someone, to blame. The Jews proved to be a convenient scapegoat.

    There were no mass attacks against "Jewish poisoners" after the period of the Black Death, but the accusation became part and parcel of Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic dogma and language. It appeared again in early 1953 in the form of the "doctors' plot" in Stalin's last days, when hundreds of Jewish physicians in the Soviet Union were arrested and some of them killed on the charge of having caused the death of prominent Communist leaders... Similar charges were made in the 1980s and 1990s in radical Arab nationalist and Muslim fundamentalist propaganda that accused the Jews of spreading AIDS and other infectious diseases.[23]


Accusations of plotting to control the world
Further information: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, Zionist Occupation Government, Jewish conspiracy, Anti-globalization and Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism, Serpent (Bible), Rabbi Emmanuel Rabinovich
A Nazi German cartoon circa 1938 depicts Churchill as a Jewish octopus encircling the globe.
The same imagery revived on the cover of the 2001 Egyptian edition of The International Jew.

The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is widely considered to be the beginning of contemporary conspiracy theory literature.[24]

Included in this canard is not only written text that seeks to accuse Jews of trying to control the world, but also graphic imagery depicting Jews, or their supporters, as trying to control the world. Examples of this imagery include Nazi cartoons that depict Jews as octopuses, encircling the globe.[25] A more recent example is the 2001 re-printing of Henry Ford's anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism text, The International Jew in Egypt, with the same octopus imagery on the front cover.[26]

Among the most notable early refutations of the Protocols as a forgery were a series of articles printed in The Times of London in 1921. This series revealed that much of the material in the Protocols was plagiarized from earlier political satire that did not have an Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic theme. Since 1903, when the Protocols appeared in print, its earliest publishers have offered vague and often contradictory testimony detailing how they obtained their copy of the rumored original manuscript.[27]

The text was popularized by those opposed to Russian revolutionary movement, and was disseminated further after the revolution of 1905, becoming known worldwide after the 1917 October Revolution. It was widely circulated in the West in 1920 and thereafter. The Great Depression and the rise of Nazism were important developments in the history of the Protocols, and the hoax continued to be published and circulated despite its debunking. Despite the fact that numerous independent investigations have repeatedly proven the Protocols to be a plagiarism and a literary forgery, the hoax is still frequently quoted and reprinted by antisemites, and is sometimes used as evidence of an alleged Jewish cabal, especially in the Middle East.[28]

According to Rabbi Sidney Schwarz,

    "One of the most widely distributed anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism tracts in history is The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a book of canards authored in the nineteenth century that portrays Jews as conspiring to seek global dominance. Similarly, American-based racist groups in this last century have frequently leveled accusations against Jews for controlling both banks and public officials." [29]


Accusations of causing wars, revolutions, and calamities
Further information: Wandering Jew, Jewish Bolshevism, The Cause of World Unrest, The Franklin Prophecy, Judea Declares War on Germany

As many European localities and entire countries expelled their Jewish populations after robbing them, and others denied them entrance, the legend of the Wandering Jew, a condemned harbinger of calamity, gained popularity.

German politician Heinrich von Treitschke in the 19th century coined a phrase "Die Juden sind unser Unglück!" ("The Jews are our misfortune!") adopted as a motto by Der Stürmer several decades later.[30]

The term "Judeo-Bolshevism" was adopted and used in Nazi Germany to refer to Jews and communists together, implying that the communist movement served Jewish interests.[31]

The Franklin Prophecy was unknown before its appearance in 1934 in the pages of William Dudley Pelley's pro-Nazi weekly magazine Liberation. According to the 2004 US Congress report, Anti-Semitism in Europe: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on European Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations:

    "The Franklin "Prophecy" is a classic anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canard that falsely claims that American statesman Benjamin Franklin made anti-Jewish statements during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It has found widening acceptance in Muslim and Arab media, where it has been used to criticize Israel and Jews..."[32]

Some recent conspiracy theories hold that Jews or Israel played a key role in carrying out the September 11, 2001 attacks. According to the paper published by the Anti-Defamation League, "anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism conspiracy theories have not been accepted in mainstream circles in the U.S.," but "this is not the case in the Arab and Muslim world."[33] A claim that 4,000 Jewish employees skipped work at the WTC on September 11 has been widely reported and widely debunked. The number of Jews who died in the attacks - typically estimated at around 400[34][35][36] - tracks closely with the proportion of Jews living in the New York area. Five Israelis died in the attack.[37]

In search of a scapegoat for the Iraq War, one commentator noted that "[f]rom left to right, anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism claims abound in U.S. press."[38]

On October 16, 2003, the Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohammed drew a standing ovation at the 57-member Organisation of the Islamic Conference for his speech, in which he said: "...today the Jews rule this world by proxy. They get others to fight and die for them... They invented socialism, communism, human rights and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so that they can enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have gained control of the most powerful countries and they, this tiny community, have become a world power." [39] He further urged Muslims to emulate Jews in this regard in order to achieve similar results.

Actor Mel Gibson caused controversy in 2006 after being arrested for drunken driving; during the arrest, he claimed that "Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world". [40]

Accusations of causing Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism

In January 2005, a group of Russian State Duma deputies demanded that Judaism and Jewish organizations be banned from Russia. "Their seven-page letter... accused Jews of carrying out ritual killings, controlling Russian and international capital, inciting ethnic strife in Russia, and staging hate crimes against themselves. "The majority of Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic actions in the whole world are constantly carried out by Jews themselves with a goal of provocation," the letter claimed." After sharp protests by Russian Jewish leaders, human rights activists, and the Foreign Ministry, Duma members retracted their appeal.[41]

Accusations of usury and profiteering - Usury and Dolchstosslegende

In the Middle Ages, Jews were ostracized from most professions by the Christian Church and the guilds and were pushed into marginal occupations considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and moneylending. This was said to show Jews were insolent, greedy usurers. Natural tensions between creditors and debtors were added to social, political, religious, and economic strains.

    ... financial oppression of Jews tended to occur in areas where they were most disliked, and if Jews reacted by concentrating on moneylending to gentiles, the unpopularity - and so, of course, the pressure - would increase. Thus the Jews became an element in a vicious circle. The Christians, on the basis of the Biblical rulings, condemned interest-taking absolutely, and from 1179 those who practised it were excommunicated. But the Christians also imposed the harshest financial burdens on the Jews. The Jews reacted by engaging in the one business where Christian laws actually discriminated in their favour, and so became identified with the hated trade of moneylending.[42]

Peasants who were forced to pay their taxes to Jews could personify them as the people taking their earnings while remaining loyal to the lords on whose behalf the Jews worked. Gentile debtors may have been quick to lay charges of usury against Jewish moneylenders charging even nominal interest or fees. Thus, historically attacks on usury have often been linked to Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism.

In England, the departing Crusaders were joined by crowds of debtors in the massacres of Jews at London and York in 1189-1190. In 1275, Edward I of England passed the Statute of Jewry which made usury illegal and linked it to blasphemy, in order to seize the assets of the violators. Scores of English Jews were arrested, 300 hanged and their property went to the Crown. In 1290, all Jews were expelled from England, allowed to take only what they could carry, the rest of their property became the Crown's. The usury was cited as the official reason for the Edict of Expulsion. According to Walter Laqueur,

    "The issue at stake was not really whether the Jews had entered it out of greed (as antisemites claimed) or because most other professions were barred to them... In countries where other professions were open to them, such as Al-Andalus and the Ottoman Empire, one finds more Jewish blacksmiths than Jewish money lenders. The high tide of Jewish usury was before the fifteenth century; as cities grew in power and affluence, the Jews were squeezed out from money lending with the development of banking."[43]


"Kosher Tax"

The "Kosher tax" (or "Jewish tax") is a canard or urban legend spread by Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic, white supremacist and other extremist organizations.[44][45] It refers to the claim that food producers are forced to pay an exorbitant amount to obtain the right to display a symbol on their products that indicates it is kosher, and that this cost is secretly passed on to consumers through higher prices which constitute a "kosher tax."[45][46][47]

Dispellers of this canard state that if it were not profitable to obtain such certification, then food producers would not engage in the certification process, and that the increased sales resulting from kosher certification actually lower the overall cost per item.[48][49] Obtaining certification that an item is kosher is a voluntary business decision made by companies desiring additional sales from consumers (both Jewish and non-Jewish) who look for kosher certification when shopping,[50] and is actually specifically sought by marketing organizations within food production companies.[48]

Accusations of cowardice and lack of patriotism -- Dreyfus affair, Dolchstosslegende, and Rootless cosmopolitan

As Jewish Emancipation progressed, new Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic accusations appeared. Often Jews were accused of insufficient patriotism. In the late 19th century France, a political scandal known as the Dreyfus affair involved the wrongful conviction for treason of a young Jewish French officer. The political and judicial scandal ended with his full rehabilitation.
"12,000 Jewish soldiers died on the field of honor for the fatherland." A leaflet published in 1920 by German Jewish veterans in response to Dolchstosslegende.

During World War I, the German Military High Command administered Judenzählung (German for "Jewish Census"). It was designed to confirm allegations of the lack of patriotism among German Jews, but the results of the census disproved the accusations and were not made public.[51][52]

Another variation of this notion is an accusation that Jews are cowards who evade military service. With the rise of racist theories in the 19th century, "[a]nother old anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canard served to underline the putative 'femininity' of the Jewish race. Like women, Jews lacked an 'essence'."[53] In their book Genocide and Gross Human Rights Violations, Kurt Jonassohn and Karin S. Björnson wrote:

    "Historically, Jews were not allowed to bear arms in the most of the countries of the diaspora. Therefore, when they were attacked, they were not able to defend themselves. In some situations, their protector would defend them. If not, they only had a choice between hiding and fleeing. This is the origin of the anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canard that Jews are cowards."[54]

In Stalin's Soviet Union, the state-wide campaign against "rootless cosmopolitans" - a euphemism for Jews - was set out on January 28, 1949 with an article in the newspaper Pravda:

    "... unbridled, evil-minded cosmopolitans, profiteers with no roots and no conscience... Grown on rotten yeast of bourgeois cosmopolitanism, decadence and formalism... non-indigenous nationals without a motherland, who poison with stench... our proletarian culture."[55]


"Nile to Euphrates" flag controversy

It has been alleged by some groups that the blue stripes on the Israeli flag actually represent the rivers Nile and Euphrates as the boundaries of Eretz Yisrael, the land promised to the Jews by God. Those making this allegation insist that the flag "secretly" represents the desire of Jews to conquer all of the land between the Nile and Euphrates rivers, which would involve conquering and ruling over much of Egypt, all of Jordan, and some of Syria and Iraq. Yasser Arafat, Iran and Hamas also made the allegation,[56] and repeatedly tied this notion to the stripes on the Israeli flag.[57][58]

Both Zionist and anti-Zionist authors have debunked the claim that the stripes on the flag represent territorial ambitions. Daniel Pipes notes "In fact, the blue lines derive from the design on the traditional Jewish prayer shawl",[59] and Danny Rubinstein points out that "...Arafat... added, in interviews that he gave in the past, that the two blue stripes on the Israeli flag represent the Nile and the Euphrates... No Israeli, even those who demonstrate understanding for Palestinian distress, will accept the... nonsense about the blue stripes on the flag, which was designed according to the colors of the traditional tallit (prayer shawl)..."[58] Persistent critic of Israel and Zionism Israel Shahak is equally explicit. In his The Zionist Plan for the Middle East he states

    A good example is the very persistent belief in the non-existent writing on the wall of the Knesset of the Biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates. Another example is the persistent, and completely false declarations, which were made by some of the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the stripes of the Jewish praying shawl (Talit).

Saqr Abu Fakhr, an Arab writer, has also spoken out against this idea. He demonstrates that the "Nile to Euphrates" claim regarding the flag is one of seven popular misconceptions and/or myths about Jews which, despite being unfounded and having abundant evidence refuting them, continue to circulate in the Arab world.[60]

Nevertheless, the Hamas Covenant states "After Palestine, the Zionists aspire to expand from the Nile to the Euphrates," and as recently as January 29, 2006, Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Zahar issued a demand for Israel to change its flag, citing the "Nile to Euphrates" argument.[61]

Accusations of racism  - Jews as a chosen people - Charges of racism

A number of books and websites run by neo-Nazis, White supremacy advocates, Christian Identity adherents, and radical Islamist groups offer what they claim are authoritative quotes from rabbinic literature, all attempting to prove that Judaism is racist, Jews hate non-Jews and perceive them as non-human.

According to Joseph Soloveitchik: "Even as the Jew is moved by his private Sinaitic Covenant with God to embody and preserve the teachings of the Torah, he is committed to the belief that all mankind, of whatever color or creed, is "in His image" and is possessed of an inherent human dignity and worthiness. Man's singularity is derived from the breath "He [God] breathed into his nostrils at the moment of creation" (Genesis 2:7). Thus, we do share in the universal historical experience, and God's providential concern does embrace all of humanity." [62]

According to a 1984 hearing record before the Subcommittee on Human Rights and International Organizations in the US Congress concerning the Soviet Jewry,

    "This vicious anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism canard, frequently repeated by other Soviet writers and officials, is based upon the malicious notion that the "Chosen People" of the Torah and Talmud preaches "superiority over other peoples," as well as exclusivity. This was, of course, the principal theme of the notorious Tsarist Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[63]

The word "Goy" literally means "nation" but has come to be the standard term for anyone who is not Jewish. There are claims by some groups that "Goy" translates to "Animal". These claims are designed to make people believe Jews see them as inferior.[64] -- (KolNidres right here at Jew'Pikia)

Holocaust denial


Holocaust denial consists of claims that the genocide of Jews during World War II—usually referred to as the Holocaust[65]—did not occur at all, or that it did not happen in the manner or to the extent historically recognized. Key elements of these claims are the rejection of any of the following: that the German Nazi government had a policy of deliberately targeting Jews for extermination as a people; that more than five million Jews[65] were systematically killed by the Nazis and their allies; and that genocide was carried out at extermination camps using tools of mass murder, such as gas chambers.[66][67]

Most Holocaust denial claims imply, or openly state, that the Holocaust is a hoax arising out of a deliberate Jewish conspiracy to advance the interest of Jews at the expense of other peoples.[68] For this reason, Holocaust denial is generally considered to be an Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic[69] conspiracy theory.[70] The methodologies of Holocaust deniers are criticized as based on a predetermined conclusion that ignores extensive historical evidence to the contrary.[71]

Accusations of controlling the media

The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting documented the Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic canard that the "Jews control the media",[72] and they trace its origins to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (protocol twelve) and to Henry Ford's Dearborn Independent. J. J. Goldberg, Editorial Director of the newspaper The Forward, analyzed this myth[73] and concludes that, although Jews do hold many prominent positions in the U.S. media industry, they "do not make a high priority of Jewish concerns" and that Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel.[74] Variants on this theme have focused on Hollywood, the press,[75][76][77][78] and the music industry.[79][80][81][82][83]

Accusations of controlling Hollywood

A specific variant of the "Jews control the media" canard is that Jews have engaged in a conspiracy to control Hollywood's motion picture industry and subvert American values, and have a disproportionate influence on American culture,[84] a view which Henry Ford promoted in the early twentieth century.[85][86] Additional claims are that Hollywood's Jews deny employment to non-Jews,[84] and portray Christianity and African-Americans in a negative manner.[87] Many commentators point out that, although Jews hold many leadership positions in the film industry, there is no evidence that the positions are used inappropriately.[88][89] In addition, Jews in Hollywood do not act as a cohesive force promoting any specific agenda. According to Neil Sandberg of the American Jewish Committee, "Jews function here [in Hollywood] not as an ethnic or cultural group, but as individuals answerable to banks and foreign and corporate sponsorship. These are business people, like anywhere else, trying to make a profit. They're not defending ethnic or cultural interests."[86]

Accusations of controlling the world financial system -- Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism in Europe (Middle Ages)

The Anti Defamation League documented various antisemtic canards concerning Jews and banking,[90] including the myth that world banking is dominated by the Rothschild family,[91] that Jews control Wall Street,[91] and that Jews control the United States Federal Reserve.[92] The ADL notes that the canard can be traced back to the prevalence of Jews in the money-lending profession in Europe during the Middle Ages, due to a prohibition against Christians in that profession. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion repeated this canard.

Accusations of organ harvesting

Haiti

In the immediate aftermath of the 2010 Haiti earthquake, Israel sent 120 staff, doctors and troops of the Israel Defense Forces to Port-au-Prince.[93][94] The IDF set up a field hospital that performed 316 surgeries and delivered 16 babies.[95][96]

However on January 18, an American activist, known only as T. West, posted a video on YouTube in which he called for Haitians to be wary of "personalities who are out for money" and of the Israeli Defense Forces in particular.[97][98][99] To explain his concern, West stated that "the IDF [had] participated in the past in stealing organ transplants of Palestinians and others", thus echoing the Israeli admission of organ harvesting that had, two months earlier, followed the Aftonbladet Israel controversy. West, who claimed to speak for a black-empowerment group called AfriSynergy Productions, stopped short of more explicit accusations against the IDF's behaviour in Haiti but noted that there was "little monitoring" in the quake's aftermath, insinuating that organ theft was at the very least a strong possibility. The Iranian state television Press TV reported on the allegations[100][98] and in a speech on January 22, Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami said "There have been news reports that the Zionist regime, in the case of the catastrophe of Haiti, and under the pretext of providing relief to the people of Haiti, is stealing the organs of these wretched people.",[101] again citing no evidence. On January 27th, a Syrian TV reporter described T. West's video as "document[ing] this heinous crime and [...] show[ing] Israelis engaged in stealing organs from the earthquake victims" (despite the fact that the video quite evidently does no such thing).[102] The original accusations were also relayed by a number of organizations often criticized for their Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism or anti-Israel positions, such as the websites of Al-Manar and former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.[103][98][100][104] Stephen Lendman, a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization, stated that "the publicity about [Israel] providing humanitarian aid [in Haiti] is cover" for Israeli medical teams "exploiting fresh corpses and the living." [105]

Israeli media and Jewish groups immediately fought back against the claims.[99][106] In an interview with Ynetnews, West re-iterated his accusation about past incidents of organ theft by the IDF and cited Operation Bid Rig as further evidence of Jewish involvement in organ trafficking.[99] The Anti-Defamation League responded, labeling West's allegations as Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic and as a "Big Lie", while an author for the Jewish Ledger referred to the rumors as a "blood libel".[106]

Palestinians -- see 2009 Aftonbladet Israel controversy

The ADL have alleged a anti"Talmudic" canard, that Israel Defence Force soldiers harvested organs from Palestinians that died in their custody. The "canard" was first published in 2009 by the Swedish daily newspaper Aftonbladet.[107][108][109][110] In December 2009, Israel's Channel 2 published an interview with Yehuda Hiss, the former chief pathologist at L. Greenberg Institute of Forensic Medicine, where he readily admitted that corneas, skin and other organs had been taken from Palestinians. IDF spokespersons emphasized that organs had taken indiscriminately, including from Israelis and foreign workers until the late 1990s when the practice was stopped.[111][112]

Contradictory accusations

AntiTalmudism has been called "the longest hatred."[113] A number of researchers noted contradictions and irrationality across Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudic myths. Leon Pinsker noted as early as 1882:

    Friend and foe alike have tried to explain or to justify this hatred of the Jews by bringing all sorts of charges against them. They are said to have crucified Jesus, to have drunk the blood of Christians, to have poisoned wells, to have taken usury, to have exploited the peasant, and so on. These and a thousand and one other charges against an entire people have been proved groundless. They showed their own weakness in that they had to be trumped up wholesale in order to quiet the evil conscience of the Jew-baiters, to justify the condemnation of an entire nation, to demonstrate the necessity of burning the Jew, or rather the Jewish ghost, at the stake. He who tries to prove too much proves nothing at all. Though the Jews may justly be charged with many shortcomings, those shortcomings are, at all events, not such great vices, not such capital crimes, as to justify the condemnation of the entire people.[114]

Jocelyn Hellig writes in her 2003 book The Holocaust and Anti-idiot-Jew-Talmudism: A Short History:

    Michael Curtis has pointed out that no other group of people in the world has been charged simultaneously with:

        * alienation from society and cosmopolitanism;
        * being capitalist exploiters and agents of international finance, and also revolutionary agitators;
        * having a materialist mentality and being people of the Book;
        * acting as militant aggressors, yet being cowardly pacifists;
        * adhering to a superstitious religion and being agents of modernism;
        * upholding a rigid law while also being morally decadent;
        * being a chosen people, yet having an inferior human nature;
        * being both arrogant and timid;
        * emphasizing individualism and yet upholding communal adherence.
        * being guilty of the crucifixion of Christ, yet blamed for the invention of Christianity.

    Curtis points out that this catalogue of contradictory accusations cannot possibly be true and no single people could feasibly have such a total monopoly on evil.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitic_canard

[VoltaXebec]

Jewish Americans generally perceive the media as anti-Israel

What fucking planet do these monkeys live on?!?!?

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Well Jews are liars who deny everything. They claimed their attack on the USS Liberty was an accident, when caught up in the Lavon Affair they claimed the Egyptians made up the incident as an "anti-semitic conspiracy theory," etc, etc. They've not admitted to one act they've ever done even when they are CAUGHT red-handed. It's just sickening. No word that comes out of a Jew's mouth should be trusted, ever.

[VoltaXebec]

No word that comes out of a Jew's mouth should be trusted, ever.

That's for sure.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

No word that comes out of a Jew's mouth should be trusted, ever.

That's for sure.

In fact everything they say should be automatically considered a lie until proven otherwise. It would be foolish not to assume that they're constantly lying about everything, all the time, 24/7. Elie Wiesel -- that rascal lying holohoaxing liar -- said that he was a "bearer of truth" once..  :lol:

Just look at the liar in action. They don't even flinch when they are telling us the exact opposite of what's real. They are professional liars, the best there is.  :clap:
[youtube:13zdruy5]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RtV-kDc5YQ[/youtube]13zdruy5]