The Spiritual Roots of NASA's Big Bang Premise (kabbalah)

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

The Spiritual Roots of NASA's Big Bang Premise    :shock:

We have taken some notice of NASA's goal of certifying evolution thru its "Origins Program". We have also seen how that goal is being achieved thru a modus operandi involving high-tech computer programmed telescope and camera simulations. What needs to be made perfectly clear now are two factors which blow NASA's masquerade as "science" and reveal its true identity as an agent of a religion dedicated to the destruction of New Testament Christianity. Those two factors are: 1) NASA's entire rationale rests on the acceptance of the infinitely squirrelly Big Bang Expanding Universe hypothesis; and 2) That Big Bang hypothesis comes straight out of the Kabbala (Cabala) which is found in the anti-Christian "holy book" Zohar.

The Big Bang hypothesis--which is now the keystone of virtually all modern astronomical musings-- incorporates at least these four features (in addition to the Copernican Model) which cannot be altered lest NASA's plans (along with all of modern academic astronomy and physics) fall flat. These four features are:

    A tiny bit of exploding energy, not God, created the universe and all that is in it.

    That exploded energy and all it allegedly created is still receding from the blast at great speed and provides a central plank in modern cosmology referred to as the expanding universe.

    The Big Blast occurred 15-20 billion years ago.  Some of this gas/matter formed the Earth 4.6 billion years ago (give or take a couple of months). All the points of light called stars which we can see with our eyes and with normal telescopes are said to be many light years away. The invisible but technology-manufactured galaxies of stars are said to be hundreds, and thousands, and millions, and billions of light years away...and on and on and on and on and on....

    Einstein (named "Person of the Century" before '99 ended) still dictates the parameters of cosmology from the grave. The speed limit he put on light travel, the ether he removed so his calculations would work, the elasticity of time in space travel, the dogma that all motion is relative (the train and the train station nonsense), etc., is all cosmological gospel in the textbooks.

Since the Big Bang is the capstone of this gargantuan edifice of evidence-free hypotheses, discovering its roots should be of particular interest not only to those who hotly maintain that "Real Science" must be free of any kind of religious contamination or manipulation, but also to all folks anywhere who prefer Truth to deception regardless of any severe jolts to their personal beliefs and training which might result....

So, the long and the short of it is this: The whole ball of wax--from the Big Bang thru Einsteinian Relativity and NASA's Virtual Reality-based, Bible-bashing evolutionism--stems not from one single scientific fact, but rather, HAS ITS TAPROOT IN MYSTICAL KABBALISM.

Nuclear physicist, Dr. Gerald Schroeder, lets this cat out of the bag in his 17 page Web article entitled: "The Age of the Universe". Schroeder--formerly on the MIT staff, a member of the Atomic Energy Commission, author, lecturer in Jerusalem, etc., does not challenge the Big Bang cosmology and all that rests upon it in this revealing article. He supports all of it. Indeed, the thrust of his article is to demonstrate that hundreds of years ago the Kabbala set forth a clear description of what is now called the Big Bang explanation for the origin of the universe. In other words: Big Bang cosmology has its roots in the Kabbala. (New on Schroeder: HERE)

The evidence Schroeder presents is two-fold: A) That the Jewish Torah word for "the first day" in Genesis is really "day one", and the Hebrew meaning of that allows not only for the Big Bang's 15 billion year odyssey, but that it also accommodates Einstein's Relativity in all of its space, matter, and time hypotheses. B) Along with the Bible, however, even the anti-Christian Talmud refuses to agree with the Big Bang paradigm, and thus neither supplies a Scriptural, Spiritual foundation for the Big Bang hypothesis. But, not to worry, the Kabbalist (Cabalist) Nachmanides (Rabbi ben Nachman: 1194-1270) does provide Dr. Schroeder (and all of modern physics and astronomy!) with the "Scriptural", Spiritual foundation that he (and how many others?!) are using to justify and establish Big Bangism and all that goes with it...all the while presenting Big Bangism as a purely secular "scientific" concept....

So, let's see what we've got here.... Our search engine brings up "The Jewish Student Online Research Center" to tell us about Nachmanides & the Kabbala (in case you don't already know...). We read:

"Nachmanides was the foremost halakist [rabbinical discussions of purely legal matters in the Talmud] of his age. Like Maimonides before him, Nachmanides was a Spaniard who was both a physician and a great Torah scholar. However, unlike the rationalist Maimonides, Nachmanides had a strong mystical bent. His biblical commentaries are the first ones to incorporate the mystical teachings of kabala."

Then, these two interesting sidelights are mentioned: "He (Nachmanides) was well-known for HIS AGGRESSIVE REFUTATIONS OF CHRISTIANITY... and could be described AS ONE OF HISTORY'S FIRST ZIONISTS, because he declared that it is a mitzvah to take possession of Israel and to live in it...."

Hmmm... I can't let those two nuggets go by without at least parenthetically underscoring: 1) The "aggressive" anti-Christian nature of Kabbalism (which is spelled out in the most malicious terms also in the Talmud); and 2) The fact that Kabbalism not only originated and endorses Big Bangism, but also provides the Spiritual heartbeat of the whole "back to Israel" Zionist movement which culminated with the establishment of Israel in 1948; and 3) That the controlling doctrine of "end time" Christian TV evangelism (HERE) is squarely based on the same heartbeat....

The origin of this doctrine is Kabbalist "scripture", not the Bible, and all the grunting and sweating to make it Biblical is not only false teaching but actually promotes a mystical religion sworn to eradicate the Bible's teachings! There are several books that show  why this Kabbalist-Zionist doctrine is not possible if the New Testament of Jesus Christ is true. Kabbalists--along with Talmudists--hate Jesus and His followers. They have tricked Christians not only into making Zionist Machiavelianism the most visible "Christian" thing on the Telly (HERE), they have also allowed Kabbalism to torpedo Bible credibility amidships with the crazy Big Bang cosmology. That cosmology demands a moving earth when the Bible says it isn't moving. That cosmology provides the billions of years for an old earth and gradual evolutionism when the Bible declares it was created ex nihilo in six days some 6000 years ago. Christians must wake up and see that the Kabbala and not the Bible is the source of many of their doctrines!) [Click HERE for info about short books on The Rapture...Millennialism.... Also, links that declare Millennialism Scripturally impossible can be evaluated: HERE - HERE - HERE - HERE. Christians are going to have to make a choice as to which "holy book" they are going to follow: The Bible with its New Testament of Jesus Christ, or Kabbala/Talmudism ,the sworn destroyers of that New Testament and of the Christ it presents.]

That parenthesis aside, the dictionary definition of Cabala (Kabbala) is appropriate here too. It says: "Cabala: a system of esoteric theosophy [claims of mystical insight into the divine nature] and theurgy [ancient magic] developed by rabbis from the 7th to 18th centuries...based on a mythical method of interpreting the scriptures to penetrate sacred mysteries and foretell the future."

Also, under the heading "Kabbalah" put out by the Jewish Center mentioned above, these additional definitions and descriptions are given:

"Kabbalah is the name applied to the whole range of Jewish mystical activity...."

"The rabbis of the Talmud regarded the mystical study of God as important yet dangerous...." [They were right on that!]

"The most famous work of Kabbalah, the Zohar, was revealed to the Jewish world in the thirteenth century by Moses De Leon, who claimed that the book contained the mystical writings of the second-century rabbi Simeon bar Yochai...."

"Orthodox mystics are apt to see Bar Yochai not so much as the Zohar's author as the recorder of mystical traditions dating back to the time of Moses...."

"Whereas most commentaries interpret the Torah as a narrative and legal work, mystics are as likely to interpret it `AS A SYSTEM OF SYMBOLS WHICH REVEAL THE SECRET LAWS OF THE UNIVERSE AND EVEN THE SECRETS OF GOD'."

Given that it is the Kabbalah's rendering of the Genesis Scripture which allows for modern cosmology's Big Bang paradigm (and NASA's "Origins Program"!), it is instructive to include another Jewish scholar's assessment of the Kabbala:

"A precisely opposite view on the value of kabbalah was taken by the late Professor Saul Lieberman, the great Talmud scholar of the Jewish Theology Seminary. In an introduction to a lecture [where several students wanted to study kabbalistic texts] he told them that...it is forbidden to have a course in nonsense...."

There is mention also that the kabbalah teaches a "belief in reincarnation"; that "kabbalah was widely considered to be the true Jewish theology between 1500 and 1800, and almost no one attacked it"; that "in recent years, there has been an upsurge of interest in kabbalah, and today it is commonly studied among Hasidic Jews, and among many non-Orthodox Jews WHO ARE PART OF THE COUNTERCULTURE." (Could this be part of the same counterculture we saw (HERE) which turned into the now highly perfumed Cyberpunks who passionately embrace the Virtual Reality technology?? Was Carl Hallucinate Sagan's real mission at NASA to use the Space Program as a Kabbalistic tool to destroy Bible Creationism once and for all with its Big Bang-dependent, Virtual Reality fueled "Origins Program"?? It walks and talks like a Duck.... Yikes! It is a Duck, Donald!

Quoting Big Banger, physicist Schroeder:

"Nachmanides the kabbalist...says that although the days [of Genesis One] are 24 hours each, they contain 'kol yemot ha olam'--all the ages and all the secrets of the world.... Nachmanides says: There's only one physical creation, and that creation was a tiny speck.... In that speck was all the raw material that should be used for making everything else.... As this speck expanded out, this substance--so thin that it has no essence--turned into matter as we know it.... The moment that matter formed from this substanceless substance, time grabs hold.... Einstein's...E=MC2, tells us that energy can change into matter. And once it changes into matter, time grabs hold.... This moment of time before the clock begins for the Bible lasted about 1/100,000 of a second. A miniscule time. But in that time, the universe expanded from a tiny speck to about the size of the solar system. From that moment on we have matter, and time flows outward."

[c.3pp. further along...] "Let's look at the development of time, day by day, based on the expansion factor [1 million times 1 million from start till now].... The calculations come out to be as follows:

    The first Biblical day lasted 24 hours...But...from our perspective it was 8 billion years.

    The second day of 24 hours...was 4 billion years.

    The third day...was 2 billion years.

    The fourth day...1 billion years.

    The fifth day...1/2 billion years.

    The sixth day...1/4 billion years.

"Then you add it up [Schroeder continues] and you get 15 3/4 billion years... the same as modern cosmology allows...."

Well, in sanforized form there you have the Kabbalist basis for the Big Bang, the expanding universe, the Einsteinian clock, and key aspects of modern textbook cosmology. That foundation is Kabbalistic black magic using invented mathematics to make the rabbit come out of the hat. Prof. Lieberman says it is nonsense. Several big time physicists quoted in THE EARTH IS NOT MOVING declare that--as a result of such nonsense--the whole field of modern physics is a science that doesn't have both oars in the water, to put it mildly.

And yet, modern man's knowledge generally, and NASA's Bible-bashing agenda particularly, rests on this "nonsense". (HERE)

For Christians (and the great number of Jews not fooled by Kabbalistic Zionism and evolutionism)--and for anybody else who can receive a love of the Truth (II Thess. 2:10)--it is time to understand that the source of all those billions of years that uphold Satan's kingdom of Babylon today derives from an ancient mystic spiritual force determind to smash Bible Christianity and bring about the triumph of Kabbalism, Zoharism, and Talmudism.

NASA'S role in all this is the proof in the pudding.

(Go back to "NASA's Agenda: Promoting Copernicanism and Evolutionism"  - HERE)

(Go back to "NASA's Hanky-Panky: Virtual Reality Technology" - HERE)

The Real Universe?!

What's left but: A Small, Young Universe After All?!

(Also: "...Flagrant Deceptions in the Measurement of Star Distances" - HERE)

http://www.fixedearth.com/nasas_spiritual_roots.ht

[rusix]

Not sure if it is the 'origins' of the concept of the big bang and its durations, but interesting claims.  Also, this site is pretty damn religious and seems wacky to me.

Here is Schrodinger's original article:  http://www.geraldschroeder.com/AgeUniverse.aspx

His four books deal with 'God'.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

Keep in mind:
Rens Van Der Suljis

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DbVgApSg2g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DK5Z_vXO ... re=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DbVgApS ... re=related

[MikeWB]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître

Georges Lemaître
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Georges Lemaître

Monsignor Georges Lemaître, priest and scientist
Born   July 17, 1894
Charleroi, Belgium
Died   June 20, 1966 (aged 71)
Leuven, Belgium
Nationality   Belgian
Fields   Cosmology, Astrophysics
Institutions   Catholic University of Louvain
Known for   Big Bang

Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître ( lemaitre.ogg (help·info) July 17, 1894 – June 20, 1966) was a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, honorary prelate, professor of physics and astronomer at the Catholic University of Louvain. He sometimes used the title Abbé or Monseigneur.

Lemaître proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his 'hypothesis of the primeval atom'.

[CrackSmokeRepublican]

There are a few "no-big-bangers"
------

Big Bang Bung

Ray Tomes

26-May-2005
One of the fundamental tenets of the big bang theory is that galaxy and quasar redshifts measure velocity or "space expansion". Of course gravitation and local velocities are accepted as causes of variation in the redshift, but the bulk of all redshifts are to be interpreted as the Hubble expansion. If it were shown that even some significant component of some redshifts were due to new physics, or could not possibly be related to the Hubble expansion, then the entire structure would be based on a premise that was false and the Big Bang would be accepted as being Bung.

It is claimed that there are no rival theories. That is not true, but they are not seriously investigated except by a small minority. Ideas that explain the redshift as not being expansion but being actually a change in mass of particles over time have been put forward by Narlikar, Hoyle, Arp, Burbidge and others. I arrived at the idea of mass change in particles independently and via a very different route than these other gentleman. That is always a good sign. These ideas have the possibility to explain many observations that have been swept under the carpet until now. Such as Tifft's and others observations of periodicities in redshifts. Although the word "quantised" is often used regarding redshift, it is a wrong choice of word. There are many different periods and so no compulsion to be quantised, just a tendency.

Those that believe in the big bang say that no other theory accounts for the observations such as CMBR and the redshift. Actually, the CMBR is expected on the grounds of thermalisation of starlight. The whole meaning of a black body is that matter at some temperature gives off a characteristic spectrum. If you compute the average temperature of Hydrogen gas between the galaxies from the radiation of star light falling on it then the correct answer is as close as we can tell to 2.7 K. Such gas will bring all radiation gradually to that black body temperature. No big bang is required to do that. Furthermore, the temperature of space was deduced as 3 K before the big bang was invented, and the original big bang predictions was 50 K, so we can see that other alternatives are actually to be preferred.

However all these things are not necessary to prove. All that needs to be proved to show that the big bang is bung, is to show that:

some quasars or galaxies are not at the cosmological distance implied by their redshift

http://ray.tomes.biz/bigbangbung.html

--------

No Big Bang

Although the Harmonics theory was described above in terms of the non-linearity of standard physics wave equations, that is not how it was discovered. That was the result of trying connect an already successful theory with the prevailing scientific view. In that prevailing view there was one thing that was entirely unacceptable to the Harmonics theory reconciling with accepted physics, and that was the Big Bang theory. The Harmonics theory logically follows from Maxwell's equations and General Relativity but requires that the universe must be much older than Big Bang cosmology and have continuous wave communication between its parts to gradually develop harmonics over many cycles of oscillation of even large scales such as the Hubble scale. That is, the Harmonics theory is an oscillating universe theory, a view that has been flirted with by cosmologists at times. Also, the Harmonics theory is very clear in the order of formation from the top down and not the bottom up. This easily explains the large scale structure in the universe such as the very clear galactic supercluster scale which, although very clearly observed, is largely swept under the carpet in Big Bang circles because it just does not fit with the theory.

"Experiment and observation are the judges in science, the only problem is that not everyone understands the verdict"

Here is one of a number of cosmological studies that show that galactic superclusters exist at regularly spaced intervals. The quote from New Scientist in the graphic is no longer correct, there is a theory that expected not only that such structures existed but correctly predicted the spacings. That theory is the Harmonics theory, and it links these large structures with huge waves in the universe and the period of waves of just this size are found as one of the strongest geological cycles periods. Because that cycles period is known accurately it allows the accurate determination of the Hubble constant, something not yet achieved by "existing theories".



http://ray.tomes.biz/maths.html