wikileaks promote cia\mossad propganda

[superzebra]

wikileaks has today release 91000 documents about war in afghan.

the documents shows the americanallied forces war crimes in afghan.
but the mainstream media like the new york times and der spiegel has ignored that issue and put all the spot light on few documents that claims that iran and pakistan support the taliban.

that shows that wikileaks exposed the documents to promote mossad propganda about iran and pakistan.

here RUSSIA TODAY SUPPORTING MY CLAIM:
go to 3:30min

[youtube:31o1rcac]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AvywJQ3m4Ps[/youtube]31o1rcac]

here the head of ISI POKISTANI :
[youtube:31o1rcac]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2OvMhxkQZo[/youtube]31o1rcac]

THIS MAN WROTE TO veteranstoday.com and friend of gordon duff

[ahaze]

Yes, based on the pin-the-tail-on-the-terrorist games the Mossad/CIA play it would appear Wikileaks ("weakee-leaks"?) now well represent Mossad/CIA interests.  

Leaked docs say Pakistan, Iran train Taliban
OTTAWA - Pakistan is denying reports it supports "extremist forces."

Among the thousands of pages of documents released by the left-wing anti-war site Wikileaks.org are claims Pakistan's intelligence community supports the Taliban. There are also claims Iranian officials train and supply the rebel forces that fight against the Afghan government and coalition soldiers including Canadian troops.

In a statement emailed to QMI Agency the Pakistan High Commission in Ottawa reacted to the Wikileaks story by saying, "Drawing any conclusions of this sort from the release would be contrary to the present realities and Pakistan's own war against terrorism and extremism.

"Pakistan's democratically elected government was following a clearly laid out strategy to reverse terrorism in the region and that Pakistan's military and intelligence services were fully and earnestly behind that policy," the statement said.

The high commission calls the allegations baseless but officials in the Obama administration have described Pakistan as a safe haven for the Taliban.

In June Canada's former ambassador to Afghanistan and Conservative Party candidate Christopher Alexander told a Senate committee it is well-known and documented that Pakistan's intelligence service supports the Taliban.

Portions of the leaked documents also claim Iran has helped train, fund and arm the Taliban. Field notes cite movements back and forth across the Iran-Afghan border, foreign fighters being smuggled into Afghanistan through Iran and payments made to Taliban warlords.

In March the Times of London detailed training regimes in Iran including how the Taliban recruits were from Afghanistan, through Pakistan to training camps in Iran. The paper, citing in-person interviews with Taliban members, reported training carried out under the watch of Iranian officials.

Calls to the Iranian Embassy for comment were not returned.

_http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2010/07/26/14834926.html

[superzebra]

the second video was removed from youtube so it is new link:

[youtube:n2gdfc98]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqkQKk9S_8E[/youtube]n2gdfc98]

screw the jdl

[superzebra]

more video expose zionist jewish controll wikileaks.

[youtube:2u37kono]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OXYlk9543Z4[/youtube]2u37kono]

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

The military dictatorship of Pakistan is a US-puppet regime. The ISI is simply a proxy of the CIA and is now a scapegoat for CIA operations in the region. The CIA tell the ISI what to do and then cover up their connection to it and the ISI is left to take the blame. The CIA has certain assets in the Taliban which they use to prolong the war so they can secure the resources of the country, continue plundering, and continue the opium (heroin) trade which is run by the Americans. But this is retarded anyway, even if the ISI was helping the Taliban, so what? The Taliban are simply trying to repel foreign unwanted invaders and purge the American terrorist forces from their soil. These media whores are mentally ill when they talk about this as if the Taliban are some sort of evil entity.

[MonkeySeeMonkeyDo]

Here is a good article.

CIA funds ISI – ISI funds Taliban, Al Qaeda
Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, Jul 26th, 2010
The Wikileaks Afghanistan War Logs, publicly released today, highlight and corroborate what we already know about the "war on terror" – it is a vast and decompartmentalised intelligence operation.
The London Guardian reports:
"A stream of U.S. military intelligence reports accuse Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) spy agency of arming, training and financing the Taliban insurgency since 2004, the war logs reveal, bringing fresh scrutiny on one of the war's most contentious issues."
The reports are said to have been mostly collated by junior officers relying on informants and Afghan officials, prompting one senior U.S. intelligence officer to describe them as a mixture of "rumours, bullshit and second-hand information".
However, it has been common knowledge for years that the ISI created the Taliban and Al Qaeda as we now know them, acting in its capacity as a direct front for U.S. intelligence.
Before 9/11, Pakistan worked directly with the CIA to create the Taliban in Afghanistan. Selig Harrison from the Woodrow Wilson International Centre for Scholars stated:
"The CIA made a historic mistake in encouraging Islamic groups from all over the world to come to Afghanistan. The U.S. provided $3 billion for building up these Islamic groups, and it accepted Pakistan's demand that they should decide how this money should be spent.
The old associations between the intelligence agencies continue. The CIA still has close links with the ISI (Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence).
Today that money and those weapons have helped build up the Taliban, Harrison said. The Taliban are not just recruits from 'madrassas' (Muslim theological schools) but are on the payroll of the ISI. The Taliban are now "making a living out of terrorism."
Harrison confirmed that the creation of the Taliban had been "actively encouraged by the ISI and the CIA and that Pakistan had been building up Afghan collaborators who would "sustain Pakistan".
Al Qaeda was a joint CIA/ISI intelligence database of mujahudeen fighters they had recruited in the late 70s and eighties to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
It was later revealed via de-classified Defence Intelligence Agency documents of 2001 that the DIA was aware that the ISI was sponsoring the Taliban and Al Qaeda, but the Bush Administration chose to ignore its findings.
B Raman, former additional secretary in the Cabinet Secretariat, analysed three recently de-classified DIA documents of 2001 relating to the Taliban and Al Qaeda and said, "From these documents, it is clear that the DIA knew of the ISI's role in sponsoring not only the Taliban, but also the Al Qaeda."

No surprise then that in 2003 two senior members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana, and Joseph R. Biden Jr., Democrat of Delaware (now vice president), went on record to state that Pakistan's ISI was sheltering Taliban fighters along the border, thus undermining the stability of Afghanistan.
The Senators told the New York Times that there was evidence that ISI might be helping the Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives along the border infiltrate into Afghanistan.
Then in 2005 CIA officer Gary Schroen, who spearheaded U.S.' search for Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan, stated that ISI officials are very well aware of the whereabouts of the leadership of Al Qaeda, including Bin Laden himself.
The veteran CIA officer said that regardless of how much reward money America offers, "Bin Laden would not be captured and handed in" because the leadership of Pakistan, including Musharraf, are afraid of the internal political consequences.
Two days before 9/11, the leader of the Afghan Northern Alliance, Commander Ahmad Shah Masood, was assassinated. The Northern Alliance informed the Bush Administration that the ISI was allegedly implicated in the assassination, stating:
"A `Pakistani ISI-Osama-Taliban axis' [was responsible] of plotting the assassination by two Arab suicide bombers.... `We believe that this is a triangle between Osama bin Laden, ISI, which is the intelligence section of the Pakistani army, and the Taliban,"
Thus the Afghans that would be fighting on the side of the U.S. in the upcoming war after 9/11 are on record with their belief that the ISI and Al Qaeda are intimately connected. Yet the Bush administration began operating with Pakistan and the ISI as an ally.
Not even the corporate media could whitewash these facts and so explained it away by alleging that U.S. officials had sought cooperation from Pakistan because it was the original backer of the Taliban, the hard-line Islamic leadership of Afghanistan accused by Washington of harboring Bin Laden.
Then the so called "missing link" came when it was revealed that the head of the ISI was the principal financier of the 9/11 hijackers.
In various terror attacks, alerts and foiled plots since 9/11, further links between Al Qaeda, the ISI and U.S. and British Intelligence have emerged.
As Professor Michel Chossudovsky has pointed out in his excellent expose, all these links are even corroborated by the House of Representatives International Relations Committee. A Statement in 2000 by Rep. Dana Rohrbacher, Hearing of The House International Relations Committee on "Global Terrorism And South Asia" highlighted that U.S. support funneled through the ISI to the Taliban and Osama bin Laden has been a consistent policy of the U.S. Administration since the end of the Cold War:
...[T]he United States has been part and parcel to supporting the Taliban all along, and still is let me add... You have a military government [of President Musharraf] in Pakistan now that is arming the Taliban to the teeth....Let me note; that [U.S.] aid has always gone to Taliban areas... We have been supporting the Taliban, because all our aid goes to the Taliban areas. And when people from the outside try to put aid into areas not controlled by the Taliban, they are thwarted by our own State Department... At that same moment, Pakistan initiated a major resupply effort, which eventually saw the defeat, and caused the defeat, of almost all of the anti-Taliban forces in Afghanistan.
In July 2007, Tom Fingar of the office of the Director of National Intelligence told a Congressional hearing that he believed the Bush administration was allowing the leadership of Al Qaeda to operate freely in Pakistan and had chosen not to disrupt its activities.
"It's not that we lack the ability to go into that space, but we have chosen not to do so without the permission of the Pakistani government." Fingar said.
Fingar's claims were supported by the revelation that a secret military operation in early 2005 to capture senior members of Al Qaeda in Pakistan's tribal areas was aborted at the last minute after top Bush administration officials decided it was too risky and could jeopardize relations with Pakistan.
"The U.S. has provided $5.6 billion in coalition support funds to Pakistan over the past five years, with zero accountability," said Congressman Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., at the hearing.
"Why is Pakistan still being paid these large sums of money, even after publicly declaring that it is significantly cutting back patrols in the most important border area?" he asked.
Pakistan and the ISI is the go between of the global terror explosion. Pakistan's military-intelligence apparatus, which literally created and sponsored the Taliban and Al Qaeda, is directly upheld and funded by the CIA. These facts are not even in dispute, neither in the media nor in government.
These facts were also recently highlighted by Pakistan President Asif Ali Zardari, who admitted that the CIA and his country's ISI together created the Taliban and are still providing support.
The Taliban's spread into Pakistan has also been connected to intelligence driven plots to Balkanize the middle East.
When a whistleblower, Qari Zainuddin, a tribal leader of the South Waziristan, who defected from the Pakistani Taliban claimed that the group was working with U.S. intelligence to destabilize the country, he was assassinated just days later.
Last November, the LA Times, citing current and former U.S. officials, reported that the CIA has paid millions of dollars to the ISI since 9/11, accounting for as much as one-third of the foreign spy agency's annual budget, and that the funding, initiated covertly under Bush, has continued under Obama.
A major London School of Economics study, released last year, also highlighted the ongoing relationship between the ISI and the Taliban.
The Pakistani ISI is a CIA front and controls terror cells at the discretion of the highest levels of the U.S. military-industrial complex.
There is a great need to perpetuate the mythical war on terror in order to maintain the pretext for the geopolitical genocide currently being undertaken by globalist advances into the middle east "rogue" (independent) nations.
As our governments assert that they are doing everything in their power to dismantle the global terror network, the reality is the exact opposite. The criminal intelligence networks assembled it, they sponsored it and they continue to fund it using our tax dollars. As any good criminal should, they have a middleman to provide plausible deniability. That middleman is the ISI and the military dictatorship of Pakistan.

-http://www.infowars.com/wikileaks%E2%80%99-war-logs-highlight-global-intelligence-facade-of-%E2%80%98war-on-terror%E2%80%99/

[Ognir]

Just look on their site, feck all about the biggest criminal gang of them all
There are just another Jewish front group and AJ will continue to support them  

[MikeWB]

There's no doubt in my mind that Wikileaks is some kind of a government op.

Assange is some kind of a fame/media hound and everything about him just stinks to high heaven. It's all about him and promoting him. They're now saying on Cryptome that he's misusing donations given to Wikileaks.

How come Wikileaks has never released anything that implicates any Jew or Zionist or Israel?

Why doesn't Wikileaks release everything they receive?

Why doesn't Wikileaks release things in unaltered form?

Why aren't their financial books transparent?

Who donated to them?

Cryptome's the place to check for real releases and also a place to fid out what's going with Wikileaks behind the scenes: http://cryptome.org/

[Negentropic]

http://cryptogon.com/?p=16641

WikiLeaks Founder, "Constantly Annoyed that People Are Distracted by False Conspiracies Such as 9/11″

July 26th, 2010


People often ask me if I think this source or that source is disinfo...

My response is always: TREAT EVERY SOURCE AS DISINFO.

You'll avoid disappointment when the thing starts serving up rat poison—which, unfortunately, happens a lot.

I haven't shared this before, but in early 2008, someone from WikiLeaks wrote to me. This person wondered why I hadn't mentioned WikiLeaks on Cryptogon. He wondered if maybe I hadn't heard of it, or had concerns that it was a front of some sort.

I simply wrote back that I was aware of WikiLeaks, and that I was hopeful and skeptical at the same time.

That remains my stance today; on WikiLeaks and every other source.

So, who knows... I've read interesting things on WikiLeaks, many of which I have linked to from here. Does that mean that I'm sure it's not some kind of front or honeypot? Not at all. How could I know for sure, given what's knowable in the public domain about WikiLeaks?

Julian Assange's recent comment in the Belfast Telegraph about 9/11, however, may be a more tangible source of concern for me. I know Assange isn't an idiot, so I see three other possibilities:

1. He is profoundly ignorant of the vast body of material that demonstrates that the 9/11 spectacle was a false flag operation.

2. He's "picking his battles" and not wanting to have to deal with the inevitable conspiracy theory stigma that could threaten his media access

3. He's running a limited hangout/honeypot

Of these three options, I doubt that it's number two.

Also, I'm aware of all the stuff John Young has up over at Cryptome from some anonymous mole on a private WikiLeaks list. Again, who knows.

Vet the data as you would anything else from any source. Use your skills of discernment. For me, the most worrying thing about WikiLeaks is the promotion it receives from the corporate media. Even the trash talking Wired is promoting Wikileaks by constantly mentioning it.

In the end, though, obsessing about disinfo this and disinfo that is generally a waste of time. It's safe to assume that damn near everything we come across contains disinfo.

There is the issue of stench, however. Sources that say, categorically, that there's nothing to see here on 9/11 smell really bad to me. As bad as anything can smell. (See my maggot bucket if you think that I don't know what smells bad.)

We just saw the WikiLeaks release of the Afghanistan information, does Assange forget the pretext that was used for the invasion?

9/11 remains the elephant in the room.




Via: Belfast Telegraph:

His obsession with secrecy, both in others and maintaining his own, lends him the air of a conspiracy theorist. Is he one? "I believe in facts about conspiracies," he says, choosing his words slowly. "Any time people with power plan in secret, they are conducting a conspiracy. So there are conspiracies everywhere. There are also crazed conspiracy theories. It's important not to confuse these two. Generally, when there's enough facts about a conspiracy we simply call this news." What about 9/11? "I'm constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud." What about the Bilderberg conference? "That is vaguely conspiratorial, in a networking sense. We have published their meeting notes."

[superzebra]

why hamid gul under attack?

on this video he said israel 9/11.
go to 1:25 min

[youtube:3sc2j9r2]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mSLgC4cTKcs[/youtube]3sc2j9r2]

[superzebra]

the real reasons behind wikileaks:

1.the release is false flag ops in order target iran and pakistan as the main enemy of the american people.

2.supporting the taliban will be used in order to get the sheeple to support war on iran and pakistan.

3.to distract people from economy probloms.

4.to distract people from oil spill at the gulf of maxico

afteramth;

in the next up coming mounths will see the media spinning talles on the documents..in order to get public to support more wars.

the wikileaks false flag is prepering the people for upcoming nuclearchimcal attacks on usa or uk cities.
why usa or uk?

uk has 3 miillions pakistani muslims and it is to drop the blame on them.
usa has also big irnian refugges and easy to drop on them the blame.

[MikeWB]

superzebra, or could it be that the real reason for Wikileaks is to give the government the power to shut down web sites, blogs and portions of the Internet in the name of "security"? I think this is the real reason for WIkileaks... give ammo to censors.

[superzebra]

superzebra, or could it be that the real reason for Wikileaks is to give the government the power to shut down web sites, blogs and portions of the Internet in the name of "security"? I think this is the real reason for WIkileaks... give ammo to censors.

yes mike very good reason. but in order to make the goverment use wikileaks leak to shut the internet,the goverment must staga an event and blame it on wikileaks.

[superzebra]

1nqe3bcn]