Ventura talks 9/11, makes Fox idiot leave stage

Started by Negentropic, August 02, 2010, 10:49:02 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Christopher Marlowe

This same thing happened to me recently when I was talking to a Fox watcher.  Someone was complaining about the amount of security hassles encountered when entering the US versus the lower amount of hassles by Canadian security.

FW: Well, no one is trying to blow up Canada.
Me: (1-10) Truth be told, no one is trying to blow up the United States either.
FW: What do you call 9/11?
Me: israel did 9/11.
FW: I have to get more pancakes. (He leaves and gets pancakes and doesn't return.)
And, as their wealth increaseth, so inclose
    Infinite riches in a little room

Negentropic

You might want to ease pancake boy into the real dope by first smacking some sense into him using this simple 5 step program for self-made irrational retards:

1-Footprint collapse of 100 story buidlings at free-fall speed proves pre-planned controllled demolition. If retards believe laws of physics were suspended on 9-11 and still have the preposterous notion that jet fuel did all that, how do they explain the collapse of building 7 later in the day, announced beforehand by the BBC reporter, that never even experienced a drop of Jet-fuel?  
2-Controlled demolition on huge buildings like these means someone had to allow fully-protected access to the super-high-security buildings to the demolition people for months
3-Muslims could not have had access to those buildings, impossible, out-of-the-question, only the Mossad and the CIA could have allowed access. ; so even if someone believes the nonsense that Muslims with box-cutters flew the planes, they sure as shit didn't rig the buildings meaning CIA & Mossad are still guilty.
4- Wide open borders and no other major attacks since 9-11 prove that no one is out to blow anything up in the U.S. except the CIA & Mossad.
5-No more proof than that is even necesssary to prove 9-11 an inside & outside job, but volumes are available analyzing every detail of of it.