kevin barret expose webster tarpley as MOSSAD AGENT

[superzebra]

http://noliesradio.org/archives/20296


kevin asked tarpley about that necons are jews and webters start to spinn talles...

webster    tarpley ...an agent

[Christopher Marlowe]

Listening right now.
At @ 14:00 KB asks WT to speak to the israeli interests in 9/11 starting a war with Iran. (WT had earlier spoken to wikileaks being a US/British Intelligence front.)
WT starts by talking about the military dictatorship in Iran.
Then WT says that the "needs of israel are not ranked so highly in the Anglo-American universe."

WT says the US is motivated by the world-wide economic depression; the US is trying to push its losses off on the world; the US tried to kill the euro, but that China and Germany prevented that....

WT goes into great detail on the political and tactical issues of an impending attack on Iran.

WT says that the Pentagon Papers was the same as wikileaks. And WT says that Assange is the same as Zin/Chomsky.

WT says that the Pentagon Papers was used to slander Kennedy and also drive Nixon batty; Ellsberg worked for Kissenger; Nixon asked Kissenger to create the plumbers (to stop the leaks), and they were all CIA guys; then along comes Woodward of Naval Intelligence.  

Conclusion: This is worth listening to even though WT soft-peddles the israeli control of the US government. [Another example is where WT brings up the Internet kill switch; KB says that Lieberman is behind the switch; WT insists it is Obama.] WT is very knowledgeable in world affairs.  

I don't think WT is mossad, but that he suffers from the Jewish reluctance to point to Jewish crimes. WT was saying that Chomsky, Zin, and Elsberg were fakes. And I didn't hear any disinfo. Just a little misdirection away from israel's control of the US.

[§N9sh2bj]

but that he suffers from the Jewish reluctance to point to Jewish crimes. WT was saying that Chomsky, Zin, and Elsberg were fakes. And I didn't hear any disinfo. Just a little misdirection away from israel's control of the US.

At least, he hasn't changed his M.O. Predictable as ever.

[Negentropic]

I don't think he's a Mossad agent, just a shill, a useful idiot disinfo shill. The smarter you are, and no one will argue that Tarpley isn't a smart guy, the easier it can often be to become a self-made shill. That's becaues your own ego won't admit that you have less-than-brave reasons for doing what you did but rather 'intellectual' reasons. It's always a lot easier to have shills than to have paid agents, on all levels of intelligence. You define the unspoken parameters for a shill and they're smart enough to know what these are without you having to tell them.  You just step back and let their self interest, ego and rationalizations do the work for you. It's better that way anyway since the shill can always justify to himself his actions as motivated by good and not have to look at himself as a 'sell-out' the way an actual directly bribed or hired agent would have to if he had a conscience. It's a lot easier to get useful idiot shills to volunteer when you have either them or their family members infiltrated or under your direct or indirect financial control.  Tarpley knows exactly how far he cn go and he justifies it to himself as his 'humanity,' his 'goodness' and 'lack of prejudice and bigotry.'  Barrett is now exposing Tarpley?  Didn't Christopher Bollyn already nail Tarpley's ass to the wall back in January?  Bollyn did some real research and found out that both Tarpley's wife and his daughter work at a firm called Cresa Partners under a Jew named Gene S. Sachs whose biggest client is BAE systems the world's third largest defense contractor and Britain's leading aerospace/defense company.  So if onion-head Tarpley wants to keep the women in his family in well-paying jobs he better learn, in fact, he has automatically and instinctively learned, to censor himself in the unspoken ways of the shill just like AJ.
.

http://www.bollyn.com/webster-tarpleys-disinfo

Webster Tarpley's Disinfo

January 20, 2010

A reader sent me a link to a YouTube video of Webster Tarpley being interviewed on Russia Today (RT) television on December 29 about the false-flag "attempted terror" attack that occurred on Christmas Day on Delta's Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport to Detroit.  The video is interesting because it shows how Tarpley lies to protect Israel and the Mossad by putting the blame for the attempted bombing on the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which is currently headed by Leon E. Panetta, a man I have met on several occasions when he was my Congressman for the Monterey Bay area of California.

[youtube:2iu9ljs9]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQY6brH5OPE[/youtube]2iu9ljs9]
Webster Tarpley spews his usual disinformation when he says that Al Qaida in Yemen is "a creation wholly of the U.S. intelligence agencies."  Who exactly is Tarpley protecting with these lies and who is he really serving?

I happen to know something about Webster Tarpley, having been part of the same four-man panel during Jimmy Walter's 9-11 Truth Tour in Europe in the summer of 2005.  During the tour Tarpley put the blame for 9-11 on a nebulous group that he never actually identified but one would infer was tied to NATO and the CIA.  Tarpley, like all the other panelists on the tour, never mentioned any Israeli or Zionist role in 9-11.  My speech, on the other hand, focused on the real evidence that 9-11 was an Israeli false-flag terror atrocity designed to start the "War on Terror" and change the face of America.  Finally, in Rome, in the presence of journalist Maurizio Blondet and others, I asked Mr. Tarpley why he insisted on blaming nebulous U.S. entities, without providing any evidence, while avoiding the real evidence of Israeli/Mossad involvement in the terror attacks of 9-11?  


Tarpley blames the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11 on U.S. intelligence, as can be seen from the cover of his book.  He carefully avoids the abundant evidence of Israeli involvement in 9-11 and the "War on Terror", which is a Zionist-designed conflict pushed by the current Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu since the mid-1980s.


In the RT video about Al Qaida in Yemen, Mr. Tarpley provides the same faulty logic and avoids any mention of Israeli intelligence, which has carried out large-scale operations in Yemen since 1949.

Here are the relevant quotes from Tarpley on RT television:

"Al Qaida, of course, is functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion."
(Note the use of affirmative phrases to bolster his lie.)

"Al Qaida in the Arab Peninsula is a creation wholly of the U.S. intelligence agencies."

[The Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab] is a "protected patsy", according to Tarpley, "an asset controlled by U.S. intelligence."

Webster Tarpley and his wife, the former Leah J. Peltier, live in the Washington, D.C. area.  Leah is 17 years younger than Webster and reportedly a high school drop-out who only obtained a college degree in 2009.  She has been with Tarpley since his days with the Lyndon LaRouche movement in the early 1990s.  Her lack of real estate expertise or education notwithstanding, Leah is the Executive Vice President of Operations at the Washington D.C. office for the privately-owned Cresa Partners LLC, where she has worked only since 2007.  



Leah Tarpley works under Gene S. Sachs, a "managing principal" and member of the board of directors of the Boston-based company.  Leah is not the only Tarpley working for Mr. Sachs.  Chloe Tarpley is also listed as an administrator in his firm.  Chloe, who has only worked for Cresa Partners since May of 2008, is Webster Tarpley's daughter.  Her biological father is Joseph Peltier, who said that her mother was a high school drop-out who got involved with Tarpley through the Larouche movement.

Chloe Peltier (Tarpley)


(Source: Facebook)

It is interesting to note that the Tarpley women work for the preferred agent of one of the world's largest defense contractors.  Mr. Sachs' biggest client is BAE Systems North America.  Sachs has completed more than 275 assignments for BAE in twenty states of the United States in the past five years.  BAE Systems is the world's third largest defense contractor and Britain's leading aerospace/defense company.  

In the company's own words:  

BAE Systems Inc. is the U.S. subsidiary of BAE Systems plc, an international company engaged in the development, delivery and support of advanced defense and aerospace systems in the air, on land, at sea and in space. Headquartered in Rockville, Maryland, BAE Systems, Inc. employs some 45,000 employees in the US, UK, Sweden, Israel and South Africa generating annual sales in excess of $10 billion. BAE Systems Inc. consists of three operating groups that provide support and service solutions for current and future defense, intelligence, and civilian systems; design, develop and manufacture a wide range of electronic systems and subsystems for both military and commercial applications; and design, develop, produce, and provide service support of armored combat vehicles, artillery systems and intelligent munitions.


BAE's "Typhoon" is just one of the many war-fighting systems made by the British weapons giant.

Sachs has been the preferred real estate provider for BAE Systems NA since 2000 and manages some 18.5 million square feet of property for the sprawling British defense contractor.  He is also the Treasurer of CresaPartners in Washington, according to Hoover's, so with two members of the Tarpley family working in his office, we can see that Mr. Sachs has a significant influence over the income flow for the Tarpley household.


Leah Tarpley works for Gene S. Sachs at the Washington office of CresaPartners LLC.


Gene S. Sachs, Managing Principal of CresaPartners LLC and preferred agent for the British defense giant BAE Systems, is Mrs. Tarpley's boss and paymaster.

If Mr. Tarpley has any solid evidence that Al Qaida in Yemen is, in fact, "a creation wholly of U.S. intelligence agencies" he should bring this information to the attention of the U.S. government and Leon E. Panetta, the Director of the CIA.  Mr. Tarpley should explain who controls Al Qaida in Yemen, which he says is "functioning, as always, as the CIA Arab-Islamic legion."  Pray tell Mr. Tarpley, which part of the CIA is running Al Qaida in Yemen?  Is it under the direction of Mr. Panetta or is it a rogue outfit of the agency?

Mr. Tarpley should be asked if the CIA was running Al Qaida in Yemen when the USS Cole was bombed in 2000, an attack that killed 17 sailors and wounded 39 others.  Perhaps Mr. Tarpley can explain the logic of why the CIA would attack a U.S. Navy ship in Yemen.


The bombed USS Cole looked very much like the USS Liberty after Israel bombed it in 1967.  If "Al Qaida" in Yemen is really "controlled by U.S. intelligence," as Webster Tarpley says, he should explain why they would bomb their own ship.  He should present his evidence to the U.S. government and Director of the CIA, if he has any.

Tarpley mentions that the Christmas bomber Abdul Mutallab flew through Amsterdam but he doesn't mention the conspicuous fact that security for both Schiphol Airport and Delta Airlines is provided by the Mossad-run company, International Consultants on Targeted Security -- the same company that provided passenger screening services at the crucial airports on 9-11.  

So who is Webster Tarpley really serving with his disinformation?



Christopher Bollyn with Italian 9-11 journalist Maurizio Blondet at the Excelsior Hotel in Rome in June 2005 after asking Webster Tarpley why he avoided any discussion of Israeli involvement in 9-11.

[Ognir]

Tarpley is another shite, what did he say recently,  that the Rothschilds come 10 a penny or something to that effect
Total shill, was put in place early with Jones to hack the 911 movement

 

[Whaler]

what did he say recently, that the Rothschilds come 10 a penny or something to that effect
Total shill, was put in place early with Jones to hack the 911 movement

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=8006
RENSE 2009-10-12, HOUR 2, 35:00 WEBSTER TARPLEY SAYS "ROTHSCHILDS ARE RELATIVELY LOW-LEVEL PEOPLE GIVEN DIRTY WORK TO DO"

http://rapidshare.com/files/292457916/2 ... ley_2_.mp3




Here is some Retro Tarpley. He is exposing the ADL and Zionist Jews. What the f*ck happened to him??? He sure doesn't sing this tune anymore.

[youtube:1ued92aq]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDjb7CoibI[/youtube]1ued92aq]

[thirdeyewise]

Here is some Retro Tarpley. He is exposing the ADL and Zionist Jews. What the f*ck happened to him??? He sure doesn't sing this tune anymore.

[youtube:1ydrceqm]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDjb7CoibI[/youtube]1ydrceqm]

Retro Tarpley....Come home baby, we miss you!
(Felt like a was watching 'the twilight zone'; Webster Tarpley talking about Jews)


Mental note to myself and everyone else who watched that video: Add Jeff Steinberg, the Jew from the video, on the list of "those who spoke out"

[Christopher Marlowe]

I saw "The Green Zone" the other night, and it seemed to remind me of WT: the movie does a good job of discussing the political situation in Iraq in the early days of the war, except it COMPLETELY IGNORES iSRAEL.

If "Green Zone" had discussed israel, it would never have been made. If WT talked about israel, we wouldn't be seeing as much of him.

There is a censorship of communication and thought in our society, and it is at all levels of consciousness. We are programmed from our earliest years to think that Jews are the most oppressed/picked on people ever, and so we censor ourselves. We also correct other people when we hear them use the word "Jew" or speak of Jewish people in a negative way, even if the Truth is being stated. Social groups, religious groups, and media representatives feel it is necessary to censor and publicly castigate anyone who speaks negatively of Jews, even if they are stating the Truth. The Jewish controlled media censors any movies, shows or news items that speak negatively of Jews or israel. And laws in certain countries make it a CRIME to speak ill of Jews or to question the hoax.

If a witness is going to testify, the stated oath usually includes "the WHOLE Truth", implying that the court can be misguided by the purposeful omission of facts. e.g. implicating some while ignoring others can lead listeners to infer that those persons not mentioned had nothing to do with the crime.

Warning: Plot Spoilage
When I watched "Green Zone", the Pentagon was the cause of the war. DC wanted to start the war and was willing to use evidence it knew was false. There is a Journalist amalgam character (Amy Ryan) that is trying to find out the Truth about WMDs because, as we discover, she promoted that fiction in many articles leading up to the war.  

Now if the movie were real, the journalist would be Judith Miller, and she would have known that here sources were crap. The movie would show that she was part of a criminal Jewish cabal working out of the Feith's Pentagon Office of Special Plans, where israeli generals met and fixed false evidence intended to excite the goyim to a fever pitch.  

If the movie were real, it would show the israeli military contractors torturing Iraqi prisoners, and blowing up Iraqi and US targets with the intent of prolonging the conflict, inciting civil war and causing a break up of any civil order in Iraq.  

But the Green Zone satisfies itself with showing that the evidence of evidence fixing started with "the Pentagon".  The main Pentagon character's name is Poundstone, which suggests that he is Jewish, but that is as close to "the whole Truth" as "Green Zone" gets.  

It is interesting to get a different perspective on this movie.  Here is a review from The Jewish Chronicle:

By Jonathan Foreman, March 11, 2010

I had a sense of what to expect from Green Zone because I had seen director Paul Greengrass's 2002 Bloody Sunday as well as his Bourne films. In Greengrass's version of the 1972 incident in Ulster, he implies that the killings were a deliberate massacre by the British Army - even inventing a sinister posh-voiced general who tells the Paras it is time to teach the Fenians a lesson.

His latest is a thriller "inspired" by the bestselling but smug and dishonest book Imperial Life in the Emerald City by Rajiv Chandrasekaran, a Washington Post journalist with a soft spot for Arab nationalism. Scripted by Brian Helgeland, Green Zone is set in the first months after the arrival of Coalition troops in Baghdad in 2003 and is essentially attempt to shoehorn a crude but popular conspiracy theory about the Iraq war into a compelling action drama. It stars Matt Damon as Weaver, the leader of a small team of specialist soldiers assigned to look for WMDs in the newly conquered country. When no WMDs are found, Weaver gets suspicious and starts questioning the intelligence on which his mission is based.

In no time he cuts free of the chain of command and connects with a top journalist (Amy Ryan) who was fed false information by a Bush administration official, a skeptical CIA agent (Brendan Gleeson, sounding very Irish), the malevolent Bush appointee, Poundstone (Greg Kinnear), who has masterminded the entire conspiracy and is now running Iraq, as well as a pair of Iraqis who have knowledge of the alleged secret source of WMD intelligence.

Kinnear's evil, lying neocon has his own Praetorian Guard of brutal special forces soldiers led by Jason Isaacs whom he sends out to frustrate Weaver's investigation and to kill off his sources.

Besides Damon's supersoldier, the good guys are the CIA who understand that the right thing in Iraq is to give power to a top Baathist general. Without the strong arm of the general and the Republican Guard, the country will collapse into insurgency and civil war.

Unfortunately the evil, lying neocon has foolish and naïve notions of bringing in democracy - or installing an Ahmed Chalabi-like politician - it is not clear which. Moreover he is willing to have Bourne's character hunted down and killed by his henchmen.

As someone who was actually reporting from Iraq at the time the film was set I can vouch for Green Zone's visual accuracy. Greengrass somehow combines computer-generated images of Baghdad with footage shot in Spain and Morocco to create settings that are almost all exactly, extraordinarily right. Almost every small detail - uniforms, weapons even military language - is spot on. It is the big picture that is ignorant and wrong, and spectacularly so.

Greengrass is a terrific action director and the film crackles with energy notwithstanding the insulting stupidities of the plot. Green Zone is a well-crafted and fast moving vehicle for a big lie.

It is perhaps a mercy that Poundstone is not made explicitly Jewish, though the film is so steeped in conspiratorial nonsense of a certain stripe that you can easily imagine the next project of the team behind it to be an exposé of Zionists aiding the Holocaust to bring about the state of Israel.

Did you notice that this review gets almost everything backward? It is a "crude but popular conspiracy theory" that that the Pentagon fixed the evidence of WMDs in order to start the war in Iraq. Interesting. The f*cking Downing Street Memo is a crude but popular Conspiracy theory? Lt. Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski's eyewitness testimony about israeli generals meeting in the OSP with vampire Feith is a conspiracy theory?

To Jonathan Foreman it is a mercy that Poundstone is not explicitly Jewish because that prevents the audience from figuring out what the f*ck actually went on.  

And did you notice he managed to squeeze in the Hoax? I can imagine a writer at a Jewish newspaper having his copy returned from the editor.
"What's wrong with it?"
"You didn't mention the Holocaust."
"But its just the review of a Disney movie!"

(Am I WAY off topic?)  

Webster Tarpley is not immune from this Jewish disease: this endless censorship of any mention of Jewish involvement in anything bad; the non-stop promotion of Jewish suffering, e.g. the Hoax.

At the heart of this is Anti-Christ. What began as the denial of Jesus Christ, has now evolved into the zionist need to promote the Jewish people as the Messiah.  The Jews are the source of light in the world, and thus cannot do wrong. Any evidence of Jewish wrongdoing must therefore be purged.

Jewish suffering is the source of redemption for the world, so the term "Holocaust", once seen to refer to the suffering of Christ on the Cross, has now been replaced by the LIES of "Nazi extermination camps".  

Bollyn showed that WT shills for israel. The earliest videos show that WT is not probably not an agent.

Negentropic got it right, I think:

I don't think he's a Mossad agent, just a shill, a useful idiot disinfo shill. The smarter you are, and no one will argue that Tarpley isn't a smart guy, the easier it can often be to become a self-made shill.

I did find WT's comments on the ME situation to be very informative. Perhaps when listening to WT, there should be a warning sign, akin to those of side-view mirrors, flashed at the bottom of the screen:

WARNING: iraeli/Jewish crimes as depicted in the Jewish Media may appear to be MUCH SMALLER than they actually are.

[kolnidre]

Damn, Marlowe, that is one tremendous post. A showcase for the level-headed, factual thinking that often shines here. Our newest member should study it hard.

I don't know why I bother, but I tuned in to Alex Jones last night and had to shut him off after "John from Ohio" (really Steve from Chicago) called in and took Rand Paul to task for his support of the Zionist Imperium's endless wars after AJ had been going on and on about how persecuted poor Rand had been lately. Steve noted Paul's position paper on Israel, which appeared like it could have easily been taken whole cloth from an AIPAC press release, and cautioned against getting blindly behind Paul when Israel was trying to start World War Three. Naturally, this set AJ off on a long rant, associating opponents of Israel with agents like Hal Turner and going on personal attacks against Steve for his socialist leanings. The tone of his hysteria was in fact quite similar to the now infamous Jason Bermas "jump in the tub with a toaster" attack on a caller who questioned Jewish involvement in high crimes.

I'm not a video editor, but it would make great material for a factual video that uses pieces from Paul's warmongering position paper blindly supporting Israel, points out the personal attacks on Steve, AJ's lying that he'll give Steve the last word (of course he doesn't shut up to allow a word in edgewise), and a flashback to the Bermas outburst.

Infowars and Tarpley are now completely exposed as Israel Deniers, which makes AJ's assertions that Wikileaks "is probably legit" fit right in. After all, Wikileaks never mentions Israeli false flags, deception, war lobbying and war crimes.